|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Sunday December 28 00:05:16 2003 Re: Does anyone know the title of this scene. |
| hallbird wrote:
> Rich, above, is right. The two women wore white tape > gags and were tied back to back while standing up. > I believe the sequence began with them seated on the floor, then working themselves to their feet and finding a pair of scissors on a shelf, which they used to effect their escape. Ring a bell with anyone? |
| Biff |
| http://community.webtv.net/unlikelysource/TheCaseFilesofBiff |
| Sunday December 28 00:17:13 2003 Re: Greenlee tied up |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Just saw the preview clip for "AMC" on Monday. > Greenlee is defintely tied to a chair with rope across > her chest. Her hands appear to be tied behind her back. > More good news. The clip shows Greenlee mouthing off to > "kidnapper" Ryan saying "I hate > you...blah....blah." We can't get a better setup > than this. Since they're playing this for laughs, we may > finally get her gagged. Being probably the only person here who actually watches this daily (hey, you never know when something will pop up unexpectedly), I think this is actually the perfect scene. Allow me to speculate some. Greenlee obviously has a mouth on her, something the character Ryan doesn't particuarly like. Ryan will either be holding her in a hotel or, one of the other female characters, Kendall's apartment. The way I'm "fantasizing" about this scene is Ryan will make up an excuse to leave, gag Greenlee and leave her bound and gagged. Kendall will come in a bit later and find Greenlee that way and make some sort of kinky comment. Or, Ryan will just let her go...I'm hoping for the former though (Hey, I was dead-on with that Eva LaRue handgag scene last week so I'm hoping I can go two-for-two). |
| Goten |
| Sunday December 28 01:12:26 2003 Re: Women as captors |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: doug Reason: "I know I'm violating the rules but . . ." is a good way to get banished. CONTACT THE SITE OWNER DIRECTLY! |
| The Moderator |
| Sunday December 28 01:13:30 2003 Re: New York Times reviews: "Monster" and a book |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Noted. I avoided the realism issue to avoid > crossing our Moderator's line. What *are* you talking about? |
| The Moderator |
| Sunday December 28 03:37:27 2003 Biff's query |
| Biff, the description sounds like an old Klaus Kinsky(sp?) movie called Schizoid. |
| Thrillhouse |
| Sunday December 28 03:40:58 2003 Oops |
| Sorry, I posted that before I had a chance to read yesterday's posts. Seems like you guys already had this one covered. |
| Thrillhouse |
| Sunday December 28 03:41:30 2003 Re: New York Times reviews: "Monster" and a book |
| The Moderator wrote:
> (unsigned poster) wrote: > > > Noted. I avoided the realism issue to avoid > > crossing our Moderator's line. > > What *are* you talking about? I think he means comparing the film's reenactment to the actual events would mean describing what really occured would mean going into the off topic area of "real life" bondage. Comparing the real events to the filmed version is is a subject I'm interested in, and would like to continue it in AG. |
| Anubis |
| Sunday December 28 10:59:34 2003 Debut |
| Major John's debuts at the above URL with a bandwidth busting double update - Enjoy ! |
| Major John |
| silent_night_022003@yahoo.com |
| http://www.bindher.com/silentnight |
| Sunday December 28 12:19:55 2003 Re: New York Times reviews: "Monster" and a book |
| Anubis wrote:
> I think he means comparing the film's reenactment to the > actual events would mean describing what really occured > would mean going into the off topic area of "real > life" bondage. Ah, I see. I didn't pick up on that. It is a complex interface there, and with such things I'll generally issure warnings before anything gets moved. |
| The Moderator |
| Sunday December 28 14:43:57 2003 Thnaks, Arubis |
| Three of my favorite scenes posted in the same week |
 |
 |
 |
| http://www.bindher.com/vidsdids/home.html |
| Sunday December 28 15:09:03 2003 Always want more? |
| > > Are we all perpetually unsatisfied?
> > > I agree that we always want more and better scenes, but as for being not satisfied? No way. Just think about all the super hot actresses that have been bound and gagged in the last 10 years alone. The list is endless. I actually can't believe we've gotten as many as we have. ---- And while some continually complain about "the ones who got away" (aka, "Missed opportunities"), it's interesting to look at some of the actresses w/ the most Gag scenes of the past decades: Stefanie Powers, Diana Rigg, Lynda Carter, Kristian Alfonso, Heather Locklear, Stepfanie Kramer, Teri Hatcher, Gillian Anderson, Sheree J. Wilson, and Elisha Cuthbert. These are certainly some of the most attractive actresses of their eras. :-) |
| Kinky-napper |
| Sunday December 28 15:19:43 2003 Days of Our Lives |
| Acroding to a local newspaper, two of the actresses will be rescued this week from the Salem Stalker.
Also, on Monday, "Sami fantasizes about lopping off all Kate's hair." As we've seen a few times before, fantasy scenes in soaps often involve the full treatment. |
| http://www.soapsite.com/spoilers/dool.htm |
| Sunday December 28 15:26:28 2003 "Sue Thomas" Question |
| Has anyone been following this PAX series "Sue Thomas: F.B. Eye"? There's a kidnapping storyline in the listings for tonight but it's not a new episode. Has there been any scenes, near misses, etc.? The listings always have a good storyline but with other shows on Sundays, I've never recorded until tonight. |
| Sunday December 28 16:59:06 2003 Firefly |
| You ever notice that sometimes database descriptions, while techinically accurate, can really miss the flavor of a scene? A scene from the departed series Firefly is a case in point. I thought it was quite interesting for its psychological aspects, even though the actual tieup wasn't all that great.
Here's the original entry: Jewel Staite gets a brief scene in this Fox series. Hands tied behind and feet tied while laying down. No gag. My attempt at update: A strange and ruthless bounty hunter has invaded the ship looking for River, escaped experiment subject. He comes across Kayley (Straite). He talks to her a bit, rambling on about the frailty of life, then suddenly asks if she's ever been raped. There is a closeup of her terrified face during this. He gets the information he needs from her, then informs her that she will be tied up. He has her turn around and put her hands behind her back, then produces a very thin cord. A bit later, there is a pan shot as she lies on her side on the catwalk, beginning at her feet (tied with the thin cord) and running to her face. There are a few shots from overhead as well, where you can just see her tied hands. She is not gagged. |
| Brian R |
| Sunday December 28 21:16:32 2003 Re: Does anyone know the title of this scene. |
| hallbird wrote:
Rich, above, is right. The two women wore white tape gags and were tied back to back while standing up. Biff wrote: I believe the sequence began with them seated on the floor, then working themselves to their feet and finding a pair of scissors on a shelf, which they used to effect their escape. Ring a bell with anyone? __________________________ It is the exact description of the Schizoid scene. |
| Rich |
| bindherupx@yahoo.com |
| http://bindherupx.net |
| Sunday December 28 21:34:09 2003 Re: Firefly |
| Brian R wrote:
> You ever notice that sometimes database descriptions, > while techinically accurate, can really miss the flavor > of a scene? I most certainly did! I never posted suggestions on DB corrections just because of that, if the original entry was technically correct. I thought the editors had enough to do. I DID think, many times, "this entry, what a shame, for THAT nice scene". So, you suggest?????? |
| Per |
| Sunday December 28 21:38:54 2003 Re: Firefly |
| Brian R wrote:
> You ever notice that sometimes database descriptions, > while techinically accurate, can really miss the flavor > of a scene? Absolutely. Another case in point would be "Seven Days to Live," which I rented today on the basis of a fairly sparse DB entry, and decided was worth updating with a lot more detail. I figure that's just how it works sometimes. With any luck, original submitters will include as much detail as possible the first time around -- but surely the most important thing is that they get at least *something* in there that will encourage those of us with a bit more time on our hands to follow up. :) (And on the flip side, it falls upon subsequent editors to respect the flavor of the original entry.) |
| Raffish |
| Sunday December 28 22:47:05 2003 Re: Firefly |
| Raffish wrote:
> Brian R wrote: > > > You ever notice that sometimes database > descriptions, > > while techinically accurate, can really miss the > flavor > > of a scene? > > I figure that's just how it works sometimes. With any > luck, original submitters will include as much detail as > possible the first time around -- but surely the most > important thing is that they get at least *something* in > there that will encourage those of us with a bit more > time on our hands to follow up. :) (And on the flip > side, it falls upon subsequent editors to respect the flavor of the original entry.) I also think it's important, when writing up a scene description, to include all aspects of the scene that might be of interest to visitors to readers. Frex, I did a rewrote on Tarzan and the Slave Girl which included some nice scenes of foot bondage. I don't care a thing about it, but I know a lot of people do, so I included it. Same with handgags -- they don't do much for me, but I know some people like 'em so I include them. If there is any dramatic point that contributes to the bondage scene, I think it should be mentioned as a matter of course. |
| Pat Powers |
| Sunday December 28 23:50:25 2003 Re: Database Entry Editing |
| Raffish wrote:
> it falls upon subsequent editors to respect the flavor of the original entry.) I don't see where this a problem, Wget more complaints about scant descriptions. "Bound hand and foot" ones get complained about the most. |
| Jay |
| Sunday December 28 23:56:16 2003 Re: Database Entry Editing |
| > Raffish wrote:
> > We get more complaints about scant descriptions. > "Bound hand and foot" ones get complained about > the most. Or even simply "bound and gagged"....the most un-descriptive description in the world (next to "tied up", I guess!) :-) |
| JP |
| JAPfeif@aol.com |
|
|