|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Thursday August 19 01:19:58 2004 Blockbuster |
| I didn't realize so many other Blockbuster employees like myself visit this site regularly. It really is helpful to be able to watch just about any mainstream DID scene I want for free. By the way, this $24.99 deal the others have mentioned is called the Movie Pass and everyone should buy one. That way when people rent these direct-to-video movies to see if they have a scene in it, they won't waste their money if there isn't one. |
| Another Blockbuster Guy |
| Thursday August 19 03:26:14 2004 Re: Blockbuster |
| Another Blockbuster Guy wrote:
> I didn't realize so many other Blockbuster employees like > myself visit this site regularly. It really is helpful > to be able to watch just about any mainstream DID scene I Sorry Moderator i know this might be against the rules but i just want a quick survey......How many people here work at blockbuster? Just wondering how many insiders we have here. We are a good source for screening movies to see if they are any good.....we might even be able to ask each other to check out certain movies to distribute the load. Thanks |
| The Origonal Blockbuster Dude |
| Thursday August 19 05:50:15 2004 Re: Ghoulies 3 |
| >>>>>>>>>
>>>The Moderator wrote: I'll accept that you didn't intend any mean-spiritedness, so we'll chalk it up to miscommunication.<<<< That's ok with me. >>>>>However, you need to accept that both I and the person directed in your message took it badly. That means that, in spite of your intentions, you didn't express yourself well.<<<<<<< I'll concede that I didn't flower things up and I'll also concede that someone could have taken my post as negative or hostile, but I'll also say that's not how the post was written and therefore it's a tad unfair to me that you would assume I meant it that way. Especially you, moderator, since I've posted on this board almost since it's inception and you KNOW I've never been one for mean-spirited attack posts, even on the old AG page. It's just not my style. >>>>>Your post was not helpful and not particularly accurate. The subject was discussed in a few posts six months back,<<<<<< My point was, the scene is from a widely-distributed, old (1991) video that's also been on cable a million times. Moreover, most video boxes I've seen have a cap of Eva BG on the back, so this could hardly be called a hidden treasure. Since this forum has been around for years, it's inconceiveable that the scene hasn't been discussed on multiple occasions. Now, the way I read your ruling is that it's ok to bring up scenes that have been discussed ad nauseum, as long as they haven't been discussed recently. Unless you step in and say otherwise. Do I have it right? |
| Vince Grey |
| Thursday August 19 05:58:45 2004 Re: Blockbuster |
| Let's not heap TOO much praise on Blockbuster and the other big chain video stores. They've basically killed off local mom and pop video operations, and that's meant a lot of B thru Z videos with possible DiD scenes never see the light of day.
It's also meant that there's no real price competition. Unlike Walmart, who generally does have the best prices, Blockbuster- this recent special notwithstanding-has always been higher priced than most and has rarely run any good specials on new releases. |
| Vince Grey |
| Thursday August 19 06:01:31 2004 Re: Ghoulies 3 |
| Let me add this about Eva LaRue: To me, considering body and face, she looks better now than she did back in 1991.
|
| Vince Grey |
| Thursday August 19 07:10:17 2004 Re: Ghoulies 3 |
| > My point was, the scene is from a widely-distributed, old
> (1991) video that's also been on cable a million times. Finally we get to the essential kernel of information, which is what this site is all about, or so it seems to me. A couple of years ago, the Moderator (or was it Brian) said the site got over 30,000 hits a day. It could be more now. New readers come here most days, and they are NOT, repeat NOT, just from North America. A very large number, including myself, do not have cable or satellite television, and are not in a position to spend lots of money or time renting every video that may contain a bondage scene, however mediocre. >Since this forum has been around for years, > it's inconceiveable that the scene hasn't been discussed > on multiple occasions. That is sadly of no help to somebody hitting the site for the first time today. Imagine the waste of time, and, if on a metered account, money, required to search the archives for every scene that comes to the individual's mind. Also, the true value of this site is that we citizens of the world at large get to hear of scenes in films we might otherwise have missed, the most esoteric case I can think of being the excellent Polish scenes that recently turned up. One person's old hat is another's exciting revelation. Some posters here appear to speak only to their own compatriots, age group and cultural sympathisers. Is that reasonable or polite on a forum that is literally worldwide, multicultural and of both genders? The only thing we all have in common is an interest, whether general or focused, in mainstream scenes of bound ladies. What I like to see in a post here is, first and foremost, information. If a scene has been discussed in depth in the last couple of months or so, a polite reference to the search coordinates is helpful. A sneering rebuttal based on national and cultural assumptions is not. By all means opine, but please, not before you have politely informed. Thank you. |
| Phimophilus |
| Thursday August 19 08:15:09 2004 Re: Ghoulies 3 |
| Phimophilus wrote:
> New readers come here most days, and they are NOT, repeat > NOT, just from North America. > ............ > By all means opine, but please, not before you have > politely informed. Thank you. Pas mieux. |
| Filou |
| Thursday August 19 11:37:07 2004 Re: ATWT |
| Snowcat wrote:
> Twould' be very cool if someone got a real clean cap of her in the chair ;) Twould' be a miracle, her legs are in the shadows. I brightened the color some but all I can make out is a discoloration that may be rope. But here is the cap at the link. |
| G-MaN |
| http://www.geocities.com/anothermoviesite/2004SummerVaction.html |
| Thursday August 19 11:37:09 2004 Any one from Latin America |
| I wonder if there is some one living in south of the border that shares our passion and can alert which Spanish soaps have something for us. thanks to my Italian I'm able to pick up some of the plot I can recall 4 scenes in the last two weeks on Univision, I know these soaps were shown in Mexico 2 yrs ago or so. It would be nice to know the ones to follow. |
| Magno |
| Thursday August 19 11:46:26 2004 Re: BÉSAME TONTO |
| Biff wrote:
> Do you know the name of the actor? The woman is Blanca who is played by Anita Sarvia. The guy is Gonzalo (Paul Martin). Philly, feel free to jump in and correct me if I'm wrong. |
| G-MaN |
| Thursday August 19 12:30:48 2004 Re: Ghoulies 3 |
| > Now, the way I read your ruling is that it's ok to bring
> up scenes that have been discussed ad nauseum, as long as > they haven't been discussed recently. Unless you step in and say otherwise. Do I have it right? Just to add my 2 cents on this (hope this isn't off-topic or unwelcome), Phimophilus (hope I spelled that right!) hit on pretty much what I myself has thought, about new people visiting. I've seen several posts from folks that blast other folks for posting about shows, scenes, etc. that have been discussed at length in the recent (or not-so-recent) past. I have to say that everytime I read one of those I usually say to myself two things: 1) "gee, what if that poor poster who asked the original question never posted here before & had no idea Terror Among Us (to use an example) had been discussed in depth before?" and 2) "so what if it has been discussed at length in the past? It's a discussion board isn't it? Are we such snobs that once a show or topic has been discussed it becomes a dead topic & needs to not be mentioned again & if you missed it the first time 'too bad so sad'"?? Are we supposed to every time we post something scroll back 3 months to "make sure it hasn't come up before"? I"ll say right now I never do that. I hang out here enough on a daily basis I keep up on what's been discussed recently & what hasn't. But what of the new posters, or those who haven't visited in several months? They can't POSSIBLY know what topic has been discussed to death & what hasn't. I know if I were a first-time visitor & I asked something about Terror Among Us or Ghoulies III or whatever & was immediately barraged with several "that topic has been discussed to death...dolt" replies (and yes I know no one actually called anyone a "dolt", but I know you know what I mean!), I'd probably not be back. Why exactly do people get so irritated when a well-discussed topic is mentioned again? I can see Brian maybe having some issues about taking up bandwidth or something (I have no idea how that works or anything, by the way), but for us visitors, isn't it easier & better to just scroll past a post that discussed a topic we may be sick or hearing & reading about rather that getting on to the poster for bringing up a "done-to-death" subject? Just because someone may not want to read about Terror Among Us for the umpteenth time, maybe some of us do (and I'm sure the original posted who asked the question would probably like to read about it!) Sorry if long-winded and/or off-topic (or infringing on the Moderator's territory) but just wanted to say that. |
| JP |
| Thursday August 19 12:41:31 2004 Re: Ghoulies 3 |
| JP wrote:
Sorry if long-winded and/or off-topic (or infringing on the Moderator's territory) but just wanted to say that. I so hate to add something this topic... but P.E.T.A. just called and they are going to picket the BB for "Continued abuse of a deceased Equine animal"... ;) |
| Snowcat |
| Thursday August 19 12:45:50 2004 Re: ATWT |
| G-MaN wrote:
> Twould' be a miracle, her legs are in the shadows. I > brightened the color some but all I can make out is a > discoloration that may be rope. But here is the cap at the link. you Rock FEROCIOUSLY as usual G thanks to the miraculous job you did wiff the cap I can actually make out the ropes on her ankles... too bad HD-TV isn't here yet a little rope around her torso an nice cleave gag and GOOD LIGHTING (and lots more footage of her ) and this one could have been a "Contendah" |
| Snowcat |
| Thursday August 19 13:30:53 2004 Re: Ghoulies 3 |
| Vince Grey wrote:
> Let me add this about Eva LaRue: To me, considering body > and face, she looks better now than she did back in 1991. > I agree 100 percent. Another takeoff on my the-older-they-get in Hollywood sometimes. Cady McClain from "ATWT" was my example. Another soap goddess, Nancy Frangione from "Another World" looked 100 times hotter in her last B&G scene in 1986 (likely mid-30s) than she did five years earlier in 2 other scenes (late 20s). |
| Thursday August 19 13:34:36 2004 Re: ATWT |
| G-MaN wrote:
> > Twould' be a miracle, her legs are in the shadows. I > brightened the color some but all I can make out is a > discoloration that may be rope. But here is the cap at the link. To add insult to injury, that bed behind could have been put to good use. Damn that James Stenbeck. He's over the hill after this debacle, time for some new blood. Maybe the guy with the accent who had Martha Bryne tied up and gagged for like a week in the late 1990s. Bring him back! |
| Thursday August 19 13:55:32 2004 Re: Foreign Posters- One Favour?- "Go Slow, Getting Wrong Impression" |
| Phimophilus wrote:
> what this site is all about > NOT, just from North America. > we citizens of > the world at large get to hear of scenes in films we > might otherwise have missed, > Some posters here appear to speak only to their own > compatriots, age group and cultural sympathisers. So take it you from Europe, Phimophilus? Favour I ask of you, and other foreign posters, is to realise there's alot going on that not posted about as much as say US scenes. So, Re: "what this site is all about" Is still Brian R's "bulk of the effort" organising for collecting of Mainstream scenes, which includes those "NOT, just from North America" ones. Brian R may correct me on this? But believe one of the first scenes he related interest to me about getting were UK TV show Heartbeat, and the Italian TV movie with Carol Alt? In other words, foreign ones. Re: "we citizens of the world at large get to hear of scenes in films we might otherwise have missed" Correct. But due to language translation difficulties, trying to alert Europeans to their shows normally end up on the Database Corrections Page. With my buddy from Europe Peter de K having to put his efforts into. Heck, a cheeky bugger dubbed DB Corrections "German 101", and it appears caught on. ;) Other thing to realise, after what? 6 years now? The collectors have become familiar with each other to point emailing more common than posting. Trust me, one Foreign scene alert post may get say 2 replies, but we get say 10 emails about getting ahold of it. Same other way, the "Frauline pilot B&G'd in the trash compactor scene". Not much on here other than ID'ing, but interested fellas sure lit up my email asking about it. ;) Also, after a conversation with the Major about how much mailing. Worked out a rough 1600 plus tapes mailed to the US in last 5 or 6 years. With German, French, Italian, UK & Chinese shows, well as our local ones, leading. That just foreign to US, not counting all sent to Europe & Australia. So there *is* interest in what outside US posters have to say. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Thursday August 19 13:59:52 2004 Amazing Scene on FUSETV show Uranium |
| Check out this episode "Juliya Gets Kidnapped".
Juliya is a VJ interviewing Killswitch Engage who decide to tie her to a chair and cleave gag her. The scene lasts a long time with lots of great mmmphing. This is one of the year's best scenes. |
 |
| PervoMan |
| http://fuse.tv/content/uranium/launcher.php |
| Thursday August 19 14:12:37 2004 Re: Amazing Scene on FUSETV show Uranium |
| PervoMan wrote:
> Check out this episode "Juliya Gets > Kidnapped". when was this episode on? and how can we see it? |
| Bowers |
| Thursday August 19 14:35:41 2004 Re: Amazing Scene on FUSETV show Uranium |
| The show aired last night at 8pm EST on FUSE but can't find out when or if it will be replayed. Certainly it will be, not could not find anything through searching.
Seeing Juliya get the treatment would be cool, although it's not hard to imagine her being a girl who hasn't been tied down before if ya know what I mean. |
| Chris |
| Thursday August 19 14:37:26 2004 Re: Foreign Posters- One Favour?- "Go Slow, Getting Wrong Impression" |
| Jay L wrote:
the "Frauline pilot B&G'd in the trash compactor scene" .... Just a note Jay L ......I checked out the above in my building on QQ, and it seems to have enough room for TWO Frauleins..... |
| Major John |
| Thursday August 19 14:39:36 2004 Re: Foreign Posters- One Favour?- "Go Slow, Getting Wrong Impression" |
| > So take it you from Europe, Phimophilus?
Yes, the UK. > > Favour I ask of you, and other foreign posters, is to > realise there's alot going on that not posted about as > much as say US scenes. No question about it. If I get information that's not already posted here, I try to share it, and so do many other Europeans. >what this site is all about > Is still Brian R's "bulk of the effort" > organising for collecting of Mainstream scenes, which > includes those "NOT, just from North America" > ones. Absolutely. > So there *is* interest in what outside US posters have to say. Again, absolutely agreed. My point was about the style of certain posters, who expect everyone to share their experience and cultural assumptions. These people make no allowances, and seem uninterested in the greater picture. There are Europeans, especially Brits, who seem equally unaware of what is or isn't available abroad, and describe local scenes as if everyone were familiar with the shows in question. All I ask is that posters broaching a subject give enough information to make it clear what they're talking about, and realise that not everyone has heard of, or can get to see, even the best-known scenes. If that means going over well-trodden ground, so be it. Most of us, if we really want to see something known to exist, can track it down given enough info. Being greeted with rudeness may make potentially useful posters think, "Well, if that's your attitude, I'll go and spend my time and money elsewhere." |
| Phimophilus |
| Thursday August 19 14:40:29 2004 Wishful thinking |
| This VCR alert for Spike TV on Sunday is an error. I wish it wasn't. Been waiting for "Fall Guy" reruns to turn up again somewhere.
The 3-hour block is a movie starring Timothy Dalton, not the "Fall Guy" episodes with Erin Gray. Day: Sunday August 22 2004 Time: 8:00 PM EST Channel: Spike Record number: 58 Title: Fall Guy, The Medium: TV Series Actress: Erin Gray Description: Episode: "License to Kill" (1.10 & 1.11) Wearing a white naval officers' uniform, Gray is tied to a chair and cleave gagged with a blue bandanna. Medium length scene, but nice. ALERT: This is being shown as a 3 hour movie called "License To Kill". |
| Thursday August 19 14:57:51 2004 Hercules (Lou Ferrigno version) |
| Anyone seen it? |
| http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=60307&item=3833108449&rd=1#ebayphotohosting |
| Thursday August 19 15:07:23 2004 La Bonne |
| Another nice lobby card |
| http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=4948&item=2261227316&tc=photo |
| Thursday August 19 15:47:11 2004 GH |
| If the idea of Emily Quartermain in a striaght jacket does any thing for you then be sure to catch the last 15 min of GH today. |
| Mark C |
| Thursday August 19 18:35:48 2004 Re: La Bonne |
| here's an even better shot of it
http://film.spettacolo.virgilio.it/cinema/gallery.php?persona=947&p=7 giddyup.... |
| kramer |
| Thursday August 19 18:38:43 2004 The Pre-VCR era |
| > back in the "olden days" before VCR's we were just so lucky to catch a scene (I actually remember using an instant camera to try to catch Linda Carter's bound hands on my TV screen)
---- As a matter of fact, one can tell that a number of Movie Star News' 8"x10" black-and-white glossy photos of DiD scenes were photographed off a TV set -- the square TV set is part of the picture. That was pretty much the only way to accomplish a "screen capture" before the VCR. |
| Kinky-napper |
| Thursday August 19 18:41:12 2004 For Jay L. (re VCR alert) |
| Tonight movie " Batman et Robin 40 plus tard" is the french version of " return to the batcave".
So don't waste tape for recording! |
| Dr Ruth |
| Thursday August 19 19:01:44 2004 Re: Amazing Scene on FUSETV show Uranium |
| > PervoMan wrote:
> > Check out this episode "Juliya Gets > > Kidnapped". Has anyone made a cap of the scene or a video? |
| Ted |
| Thursday August 19 19:30:51 2004 Re: Wishful thinking |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> This VCR alert for Spike TV on Sunday is an error. I wish > it wasn't. Been waiting for "Fall Guy" reruns > to turn up again somewhere. > > The 3-hour block is a movie starring Timothy Dalton, not > the "Fall Guy" episodes with Erin Gray. > I posted the alert. My source was next week's TV Guide. Its description states "this film derived from the TV series". It lists Monte Markham, Erin Gray & William Smith as co-stars. They were the main guest stars in that episode. What was your source that it's the Dalton movie (presume you're referring to the James Bond flick)? |
| LV |
| Thursday August 19 19:35:32 2004 Re: The Pre-VCR era |
| I tried to capture an image off of TV several times, got some real nice pics of a TV set with a blank screen, but did get some TV pics [non-DID, just what happened to be on at the time] purely by accident while taking some pics of the wife :-) |
| Jacot |
| Thursday August 19 19:41:29 2004 New members |
| Since we have a lot of new readers, I'll ask this again.
What is most important in a DID scene: 1. Who is tied 2. Quality of the bindings and gag 3. Fulfilment of a 'Holy Grail' ? For me it is a tossup between 2 and 3, a 'NAME' star in a hokey loosie is very disappointing and very annoying. Anybody ??? |
| Jacot |
| Thursday August 19 19:44:44 2004 New Members |
| This is for all the other old timers and the couple of other dinosaurs, remember, we were all newbies once.
It might be 5-6 years since we first started coming here and 40+ years since we started chasing DIDs, but we were all newbies once :-) |
| Jacot |
| Thursday August 19 20:13:08 2004 Re: Ghoulies 3 |
| Vince Grey wrote:
> Now, the way I read your ruling is that it's ok to bring > up scenes that have been discussed ad nauseum, as long as > they haven't been discussed recently. Sounds pretty good to me. To my knowledge, I haven't in the past ruled against discussing any particular movie or show. I have ruled against broad classifications of topics, notably, "news women I'd like to see get it", "recasting Terror Among Us", "them dang feminists are keeping us from seeing scenes", and not least of all "what kind of gag is best". |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday August 19 20:37:27 2004 Re: The Pre-VCR era |
| Jacot wrote:
> I tried to capture an image off of TV several times, got > some real nice pics of a TV set with a blank screen, but > did get some TV pics [non-DID, just what happened to be > on at the time] purely by accident while taking some pics > of the wife :-) Ah, the joys of scan rate versus exposure time. :-) The longer the expo you can give it without camera shake, the better. I've got a few scenes on tape I might yet have to cap that way, borrowing my bro's digital camera. Just have to make sure I erase them from his card after putting them into this 'ere idiot box.... |
| Mad Dan |
| Thursday August 19 20:51:45 2004 Re: Amazing Scene on FUSETV show Uranium |
| Chris wrote:
> The show aired last night at 8pm EST on FUSE but can't > find out when or if it will be replayed. Name of the episode is Killswitch Engage: "Killswitch Engage kidnaps Juliya at the New England Metal & Harcore Music Festival in Worcester, Mass." The on-line TV listings don't show a repeat but there are a couple of airings shown with no episode title. |
| Brian R |
| Thursday August 19 20:58:30 2004 Re: Hercules (Lou Ferrigno version) |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Anyone seen it? > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=603 > 07&item=3833108449&rd=1#ebayphotohosting as a matter of fact..yes there were a FEW REALLY good scenes... I don't know if it is in the DB I saw it a really lo-o-o-o-o-ng time ago |
| Snowcat |
| Thursday August 19 21:34:17 2004 Re: Amazing Scene on FUSETV show Uranium |
| the show replays the thurs night episode at 3 am est. say she interviews machine head |
| doug |
| Thursday August 19 21:57:19 2004 Re: For Jay L. (re VCR alert) |
| Dr Ruth wrote:
Get back to me Dr Ruth prior to this wkend - in TMR this weekend for 'Life Channel' |
| Major John |
| silent_night_022003@yahoo.com |
| Thursday August 19 22:04:55 2004 Re: Ghoulies 3 |
| JP wrote:
> Are we > such snobs that once a show or topic has been discussed > it becomes a dead topic & needs to not be mentioned > again & if you missed it the first time 'too bad so > sad'"?? > You've just accurately described GameFAQs - another message board I hang around. If something is news from literally TWO days ago, people jump on anyone who points it out, even if that person brought it up simply to comment on it and add their opinion or start a discussion. Fortunately that doesn't happen here much at all. Hey, I've seen tons of topics that interest me not, but scrolling them by (even on days when they make up the bulk of the conversation, which can happen with popular scenes) is no trouble. Vince Grey wrote: > I'll concede that I didn't flower things up Being polite and being excessively polite are two very different things. The typed word does not convey tone of speech, so intended humor can sometimes pass people by or even come off as rude. I've managed to accidentally offend people in the past via things I've typed, so I know the problem. But changing how you word things isn't "flowering things up". It's being polite. Phimophilus wrote: > There are Europeans, especially Brits, who seem equally unaware of what is or isn't available abroad, and > describe local scenes as if everyone were familiar with the shows in question I've seen the same behavior from people who watch a lot of Japanese cartoons. I am familiar with very FEW of them, and yet having a conversation about DiD scenes in cartoons inevitably tends to lean in that direction ("Lupin the 3rd had a great scene involving 3 kidnapped models" "What's Lupin the 3rd?" "How can you not know?!"). It's frustrating, not just because I don't know the cartoons, and that my tastes are more Western in general, but their sheer assumptions. |
| Jazz411 |
| jazz411@ptd.net |
| Thursday August 19 22:27:37 2004 Clearing the air |
| While we wait for the next rumor to surface about which damsel will be getting "the treatment" on what soap (& the resulting week's worth of hysterical posts), let's pause & reflect on the wonder that is Brian's Forum.
Oldsters, newbies, Americans, Canadians, Mexicanos, Euros, Jaffa-fresh-through-the-Stargåte, lurkers, (but *not* trolls)... WELCOME ONE AND ALL! Brian has rules (& they're the ones that count), but here's *MY* two cents worth on what makes this site purr like a kitten: Remember your audience. They're interested in details, so DON'T LEAVE THINGS UNSAID. No need to be long-winded, but scene details are the logical next question. They're World Villagers, so don't say "next Wednesday", say "next Wednesday *in the US*", "on Sky TV *in the UK*", etc, Also... The IMDb is your friend. Use it to verify names, titles, etc. Be diligent. Take a couple of minutes at the IMDb &/or Google & do a little research before posting. ALSO check the above &/or Brian's DB *especially* before posting a *question*. ...& most important of all: If you have info about a *NEW* DiD-SCENE for a FRECKLED REDHEAD---*POST IMMEDIATELY*!!! Use the code phrase: *CELTIC CUTIE ALERT*!!! :-) |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.lovetied.com/dug/ |
| Thursday August 19 23:06:07 2004 Inquiry |
| anyone familiar with this movie:?
Title: New Crime City (1994) Medium: Movie Actress: Sherrie Rose Description: Cute blonde actress Sherrie Rose gets the treatment thrice in this action movie: 1. Right at the beginning she's gagged over the mouth and tied to some kind of throne. 2. She's got her hands tied behind her back while being interrogated. 3. Hands tied behind her back, tightly cleave-gaggged and used as bait for an exchange. I had a tape with about 10-15 minutes left on it so I recorded the first 15 minutes of this movie the other nite, hoping to get the first scene (I already have the last 2 scenes from a previous airing). After scanning thru what I recorded, there was no tie-and-gag scene for Sherrie Rose in the first 15 minutes. Obviously the database entry, which says the first scene occurs "right at the beginning" is a bit off (or else I scanned right past the scene). Does anyone know more exactly when the first scene show so I can catch it when the movie airs again? thanks. |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Thursday August 19 23:40:56 2004 Re: Amazing Scene on FUSETV show Uranium |
| doug wrote:
> the show replays the thurs night episode at 3 am est. say > she interviews machine head The one we're looking for was Wednesday's. |
| Brian R |
| Thursday August 19 23:57:54 2004 Re: Amazing Scene on FUSETV show Uranium |
| Hate to tell you, but Wednesday night's showing was already a rerun. The Yahoo listing says it originally ran July 2.
|
| Paul |
|
|