|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Thursday November 06 00:08:34 2003 "World of Tomorrow" |
| > Has anyone heard *anything* new about "World of
> Tomorrow?" No official web site, no leaked photos, > *nothin'*! They must have hired one of those > "publicity" experts who think the public is the enemy. It's due for release next May, and Paramount is evidently so high on it they've already ordered a sequel. |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.homestead.com/jebsadventurebound |
| Thursday November 06 00:46:26 2003 Thanks to you Scene Database contributors |
| Just a quick thanks to the people who add to the Scene Database. And especially thanks (as a skirt and dress fan) to those who mention what the girl is wearing when tied.
I'm in Australia so we are usually way behind the US and Europe with most stuff, so it's great to be forewarned of upcoming scenes, especially when it involves the damsel wearing a skirt/dress. Big thumbs up from Melbourne! |
| jds |
| Thursday November 06 01:05:25 2003 Nothing on Jake 2.0 |
| Jake 2.0 was a bust tonight. They were attempting to kidnap the cute tech girl, but the bad guy used the old wine and dine and pretend to be the boyfriend ploy. So, he lured her onto the kidnap boat with the promise of a cruise, no bondage at all. And then Jake interfered before any bondage could take place.
|
| Mmmalph |
| Thursday November 06 01:57:42 2003 Question |
| Hi all. I dunno if this post is relevant for this page or not, but I do feel the need to ask the question. I've noticed that many of us who like love the sight of bound & gagged women also have a foot fetish (me included). Can someone please explain to me this link because I seriously don't understand it?
Thanks .. |
| S |
| Thursday November 06 06:36:09 2003 bound in a boat |
| In the 'sea devils' sequence the damsel was wraped in a blanket. There was also a scene in 'the baron' series. Sue Lyons tied, hands in front, ankles bound and OTM. She was locked in a small cabin and released when the boat left the dock.
Also the fearure film 'sail a crooked ship' Robert Wagner was the star Showing his girlfriend around his old boat when the bad guys knock him out and haul her away. She is carried into the cabin and sat down. Hands tied behind and OTM. Wagner pulls the gag down and she starts bad mouthing so he pulls it back up again. Lucky man! Alan |
| alan |
| gail425@iprimus.com.au |
| Thursday November 06 10:13:13 2003 Re: Alyssa Milano |
| zinger wrote:
> That picture is a still from the 1995 movie "Deadly > Sins", which stars Alyssa Milano. I stand corrected, and happy about it. My apologies for ever doubting you. I can't wait to see it! |
| doug |
| doug5759 |
| Thursday November 06 10:49:21 2003 Dumb Luck |
| Just caught this elusive flick in The Movie Channel. Decidedly a mixed bag. Tracy is sitting in a folding chair, hands cuffed behind, with a nice cleave gag (yellow bandana).
The good points were: 1)it was Tracy Nelson finally getting a decent Full Treatment scene (not counting that lame 2-second scene on "Father Dowling") 2)there was some pretty nice mmmphhhing 3)some good face close-ups 4)the gag looked fairly tight (possibly with even a little bit of dampness where it crossed her mouth) 5) some closeups of her cuffed wrists However, points were deducted for: 1)feet were not tied 2)rather unflattering business-suit outfit 3)the closeups of her wrists show the handcuffs were of the "five-or-six-links" variety rather than the more secure type having far less links 4)the gag, while it LOOKED tight, was simply pulled off by the hero (well, Scott Biao!) after the rescue, without even haning to untie the (presummed) knot, so in essence, Miss Nelson was basically just holding the gag with her teeth & the ends just tossed behind her head (although admittedly you couldn't tell it till the ungagging) A bit of nit-picking here I know, but as we all are a bunch of "nit-pickers" anyway when it comes to these things, I just wanted to give the full skinny for any interested parties. I'm not sure if & when it will air again. The Yahoo Online TV Guide didn't show it airing again for at least the next 2 weeks. The scene starts about 1 hour & 10 minutes in (give-or-take) and lasts about 3 minutes or so total. |
| JP |
| JAPfeif@aol.com |
| Thursday November 06 12:24:07 2003 Re: Matrix Revolutions |
| How long has this streak been of no major mainstream movies having a B&G scene? 'Wrong Turn' deosn't really count as a major release.
Lots of disappointment with films like Charlie's Angels, Hulk, Texas Chainsaw, etc. |
| Keano |
| Thursday November 06 15:27:50 2003 Major mainstream movies with a b&g scene |
| Keano wrote:
> How long has this streak been of no major mainstream movies having a B&G scene? 'Wrong Turn' deosn't really count as a major release. Lots of disappointment with films like Charlie's Angels, Hulk, Texas Chainsaw, etc. ----- I dunno if one can really speak of a B&g "drought" in major movies -- the law of averages simply operates against it. What's the % of a B&g scene occurring on a random TV show (if one excludes sports, game shows, and talk shows)? Maybe 1% - 2%? OK, now multiply that 1.5% by the number of major releases in a year, and one can only expect a low probability of occurrence in any one year (especially if a "Wrong Turn" doesn't meet your definition of a "major release"). "The Life of David Gale" was a 2003 release, so we can consider this as an "Average" year. And in the genre of major action films, I wouldn't think there'll be a b&g scene in the upcoming "Master and Commander", "The Return of the King", or "The Last Samurai"... |
| Kinky-napper |
| Thursday November 06 15:47:10 2003 one life to live |
| Anything today on "One Life?" |
| anon22 |
| Thursday November 06 15:50:43 2003 Re: one life to live |
| anon22 wrote:
> Anything today on "One Life?" Nope Nada & nothing was shown on the previews for tomorrow but Flynn Does have Blair at gunpoint... & The plot does call for some ropework & a gag but we'll see if they accomodate us |
| Snowcat |
| Thursday November 06 15:59:06 2003 OLTL |
| Thanx for the update. |
| anon22 |
| Thursday November 06 16:18:15 2003 Re: Matrix Revolutions |
|
yes there is indeed a scene. saw it yesterday |
| shamhain |
| Thursday November 06 16:42:57 2003 Apologies lads |
| Not sure if this is appropriate on discussion - Brian is of course free to delete as required.
Had a little incident on SUN - heart palpitations !! Anyway, unable to update on Monday and apologies all round. Will try to do it this weekend - currently resting comfortably at home with a case of beer and send regards to all. |
| Major John |
| silent_night022003@yahoo.com |
| http://www.fuzzweb.org |
| Thursday November 06 16:47:18 2003 Any New DVD Must Haves? |
| Anything out of DVD involving a cleave that is worth purchasing/renting? Aside from Raiders Of The Lost Ark of course. |
| Thursday November 06 17:17:52 2003 Re: Matrix Revolutions |
| shamhain wrote:
> > > > > yes there is indeed a scene. saw it yesterday more details please. what scene, who, what, where? carrie anne moss? cleave, tape, otm. handgagged? what was it exactly? details my man details. |
| terry caulfield |
| ghostdog1uk@yahoo.com |
| http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Grab_Her/ |
| Thursday November 06 17:26:03 2003 Re: Matrix Revolutions |
| Check the DB, mate |
| Thursday November 06 18:09:34 2003 Upon watching/clipping "Zero Woman: Final Mission" |
| Word to the wise: refusing to engage in bondage sex with a Japanese hottie just *might* result in her hopping naked into the driver's seat of her car and running you over, with fatal results. Consider it one of those Darwinian things.
Thanks again, Netflix... |
| Raffish |
| Thursday November 06 18:21:00 2003 Re: Any New DVD Must Haves? |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Anything out of DVD involving a cleave that is worth > purchasing/renting? Aside from Raiders Of The Lost Ark of > course. ELIZA DUSHKU: Wrmmmng Trnnnnn! (I think she meant to say "Wrong Turn.") Of course, the better answer to your question is: search the database with the word "cleave" and medium "movie," with "match all fields" checked, and cross-reference the results with dvdpricesearch or netflix. |
 |
| Raffish |
| Thursday November 06 19:27:48 2003 Re: Apologies lads |
| Hey, things like that are only supposed to happen to us dinosaurs, not a young buck like you :-)
You take it easy and get all recuperated, dont want to lose ya !!!!!!! |
| Jacot |
| Thursday November 06 19:29:06 2003 Re: Apologies lads |
| Major John wrote:
> > Had a little incident on SUN - heart palpitations !! > Anyway, unable to update on Monday and apologies all > round. Get well soon, Major John. |
| Mr. S |
| Thursday November 06 21:05:59 2003 Re: Question |
| S wrote:
> Hi all. I dunno if this post is relevant for this page or > not, but I do feel the need to ask the question. I've > noticed that many of us who like love the sight of bound > & gagged women also have a foot fetish (me included). > Can someone please explain to me this link because I > seriously don't understand it? > > Thanks .. I don't know how many fans of bound and gagged damsels are also fans of barefoot damsels. I certainly am, and I have noticed that plenty of others are as well, but I have no idea what the percentage actually is. I do have a theory: A woman is completely vulnerable when she is bound and gagged. She can not resist a sexual advance. Therefore, it is stimulating. A woman who is barefoot is more vulnerable than when she has shoes on. She could step on glass, sharp rocks, hot sand, etc. Also, she can't kick as powerfully as she could if she was wearing shoes. She is much more vulnerable (and therefore sexually available) without shoes. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Thursday November 06 21:08:02 2003 Re: Apologies lads |
| Major John wrote:
> Had a little incident on SUN - heart palpitations !! > Anyway, unable to update on Monday and apologies all > round. Sorry to hear that, John. Have a beer and get well soon! |
| Jazz411 |
| jazz411@ptd.net |
| Thursday November 06 23:26:23 2003 Re: Question |
| > I don't know how many fans of bound and gagged damsels
> are also fans of barefoot damsels. I certainly am, and I > have noticed that plenty of others are as well, but I > have no idea what the percentage actually is. I do have a > theory: A woman is completely vulnerable when she is > bound and gagged. She can not resist a sexual advance. > Therefore, it is stimulating. A woman who is barefoot is > more vulnerable than when she has shoes on. I, for one have to chime in on the side of the non-barefoot lovers. Women's bare feet are completely neutral to me, but I have a thing for high heels. And I would argue that a damsel is more vulnerable in high heels that she can't kick off. If she tries to hop around, it's much harder in the heels than barefoot. So that's my 2 cents. High heels- YES!, barefoot- disappointing. |
| Tom |
| Thursday November 06 23:38:49 2003 Re: heels |
| I'm with you Tom! |
| Thursday November 06 23:41:28 2003 Re: Question |
| Tom wrote:
> So that's my 2 cents. High heels- YES!, barefoot- disappointing. All I can say at this point is that there aren't nearly enough damsels TIED UP IN BUNNY SLIPPERS. |
| Raffish |
|
|