|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Friday April 09 00:43:53 2004 Re: Rachel Hunter Gagged |
| JP wrote:
> A thought: Mr. Moderator, could pics like that one be > posted over on the AG page as opposed to here? No, that's a restriction from the hosting company. |
| The Moderator |
| Friday April 09 00:57:24 2004 Re: Spidey 2 |
| BamaHunt wrote:
> Malasfan wrote: > > > What channel(s) is this showing on? > > It premiered towords the end of "The > Apprentice", about 45 minutes in, on NBC. Although > it was one of those 'extra-long' TV trailers, I'd guess > it will pop again at some point. It'll most likely show up tomorrow on either the main website. However, try the following site tomorrow. It should be up. |
| Anonymous |
| http://www.apple.com/trailers/ |
| Friday April 09 01:21:36 2004 Spidey trailer |
| The Spider Man 2 trailer is up at the official website. Kirsten Dunst has her hands tied above her head, and is later shown falling with the ropes still attached to her hands. Both are blink and you miss them in the trailer, and no gag in site, but I am not complaining.
http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/spider-man_2/trailer/ |
| tripper |
| Friday April 09 01:30:16 2004 Yes or no? |
| did the BAJO LA MIAMA PIEL scene happen? and if it did, is it continuing? |
| Bowers |
| Friday April 09 02:30:21 2004 Rachel Hunter |
| Guess I'm the only one here old enough to actually be a Playboy subscriber of many years. Guys, I have that Rachel Hunter issue, and those pics are not in it.
Gee, suppose they can actually fake gags with a computer now??? who'd a thunk it?? They did look great, but I don't think they really exsisted. Playboy actually managed to do picture articles on both Bettie Page and bondage model Deta Von Teese without ever showing, nor mentioning the word bondage. |
| David Knight |
| http://www.DavidKnightBondage.com |
| Friday April 09 06:27:03 2004 Re: Rachel Hunter |
| David Knight wrote:
> Guess I'm the only one here old enough to actually be a > Playboy subscriber of many years. Guys, I have that > Rachel Hunter issue, and those pics are not in it. 'Fraid they do. They're unpublished photos on the Playboy Cyber Club site. I had initially posted about them a few weeks ago. The Mod warned that the subject matter was debatable for this page so no further mention wss made. |
| DAK |
| d_kinnier@hotmail.com |
| Friday April 09 08:05:59 2004 Re: Freaky Friday |
| > Lindsay Lohan wasn't tapegagged??
> I was hoping for something......anything (even a handgag).....from her latest, Mean Girls. |
 |
| Friday April 09 09:45:00 2004 Van's First Law of DiD Scenes |
| > VAN'S FIRST LAW OF DiD-SCENES IN MAINSTREAM MOVIES & TV: It's never about the BONDAGE; It's always about the STORY.
...& another thing: Over the years, almost every series I've ever watched (Charlie's Angels, Wonder Woman, X-files, Buffy, Charmed) has been an exercise in FRUSTRATION. DiD-scenes are ALWAYS few & far between, & series become hotbeds of bondage *only* in fond, flawed, & highly selective memory. ---- To compare apples with apples, my biggest disappointment was "Charlie's Angels". Twenty years later, "Angeles" produced more full-treatment scenes for its three series regulars in its brief one season than "Charlie's Angels" did in its six seasons run. |
| Kinky-napper |
| Friday April 09 11:02:15 2004 Re: Yes or no? |
| Bowers wrote:
> did the BAJO LA MIAMA PIEL scene happen? and if it did, > is it continuing? The scene consisted of a handgagging where the lady in question was stuffed in a car around the 7-minute mark. She was shown being forced to sit down with her hands tied in front briefly at around the 20-minute mark. At that time, the guy informed her that this was NOT a kidnapping and that she should simply follow instructions and she wouldn't get hurt. Then she's flown in a helicopter, unbound, to a remote island location where her lover has planned a romantic dinner and beach walk. So, yeah, I'm not really expecting this to go any further. |
| KEVIN |
| Friday April 09 11:05:44 2004 Rachel |
| Apology for the confusion, guys...I was told they were from Playboy, and I assume that meant the magazine. Turns out they are indeed additional content for their site. But they are real, and turn up pretty frequently when you search "Rachel Hunter Playboy" in Google.
The ends of the stocking (?) used to gag her are visible down her neckline and mixed in with her hair. That would be one detail-oriented, labor-intensive PhotoShop. I also think I'm pretty good at spotting a fake: they don't do it for me at all. Too much actual content out there to even bother with. Since my last message came at the tail-end of a message day, I provided the link again here. Just change the "1" to a "2" at the end to see the other pic. |
| Royler |
| Royler20@aol.com |
| http://img21.photobucket.com/albums/v64/Royler/rachelgagged1.jpg |
| Friday April 09 11:09:06 2004 Bondage in Adult Movies |
| I also wanted to give a quick plug to my list of bondage scenes in adult feature films. This is NOT a compilation of fetish movies: scenes mentioned here are from "mainstream" adult flicks. Producers are getting a little more complacent when it comes to bondage and sex, though I'm not sure how long that may last in the current political climate. Anyway, follow the link to check it out. Feedback appreciated.
|
| Royler |
| royler20@aol.com |
| http://img21.photobucket.com/albums/v64/Royler/rachelgagged1.jpg |
| Friday April 09 11:11:44 2004 Bondage flicks |
| Whoops...adult scene list is above. |
| Royler |
| Royler20@aol.com |
| http://www.jollyroper.com/fflist/roylergeneral/roylerslistgeneral.html |
| Friday April 09 11:26:10 2004 Spidey 2 Trailer |
| DiDcaps please!
Could someone with a broadband connection & capture (so to speak) capability help us out here? I'd *dearly* like to see Kirsten Dunst tied AOH (even if she *isn't* a real redhead.) Also... how 'bout a coffee refill (French Roast) & a muffin? :-) |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/spider-man_2/trailer/ |
| Friday April 09 11:28:03 2004 Re: Spidey 2 Trailer |
| Van wrote:
> DiDcaps please! > > Could someone with a broadband connection & capture > (so to speak) capability help us out here? I'd *dearly* > like to see Kirsten Dunst tied AOH (even if she *isn't* a > real redhead.) Also... how 'bout a coffee refill (French > Roast) & a muffin? :-) > http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/spider-man_2/t > railer/ Hey Van-i only have a 56K but I downloaded the mid-size trailer and made 4 caps. I just need somewhere to post em. Anyone have the space? I could email it to ya. |
| MAV |
| Friday April 09 12:28:22 2004 Re: Rachel |
| > The ends of the stocking (?) used to gag her are visible
> down her neckline and mixed in with her hair. That would > be one detail-oriented, labor-intensive PhotoShop. The other thing that occurred to me is that most fakers would have made the gag more effective-looking. |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.homestead.com/jebsadventurebound |
| Friday April 09 12:30:38 2004 Playboy |
| Around 1979 all the Harmony magazines disappeared from my local adult bookstores.
I just assumed that they went belly up. Then in the spring/early summer of 1980 'Playboy' ran a very flattering short review of the latest 'Bondage Life'[somewhere around # 6 I think]. The review was very positive in all respects, basically saying that 'Bondage Life' was a 'Coffee Table' quality publication. So, at one time 'Playboy' was not adverse to mentioning bondage. Not sure if the strident 'pornography degrades women' campaign started before or after this. Also, somewhere, years ago, I saw an interview with one of Hefner's longtime top editors who flat out said that 'we really missed the boat by ignoring bondage'. Any other oldtimers remember that? |
| Jacot |
| Friday April 09 13:06:24 2004 Re: Adult Films & US Media- Under Review? |
| Okay, "on the phone" with the "War Room" in St Louis right at the moment about the ones that aired on Canadian TV.
Remember, has to be "conclusive" mainstream. ;) For now, because I've made reference posts on Database Corrections Page, I'll repost all of them together over there. Help Brian in his review too. Any additional questions will be answered on the Anything Goes Page. |
| Jay L |
| Friday April 09 13:21:24 2004 Re: Van's First Law of DiD Scenes |
| Kinky-napper wrote:
> To compare apples with apples, my biggest disappointment > was "Charlie's Angels". Twenty years later, > "Angeles" produced more full-treatment scenes > for its three series regulars in its brief one season > than "Charlie's Angels" did in its six seasons run. A rare, rare, classic TV fact slipup from Kinky-napper. "Charlie's Angels" ran 5 seasons. (It just felt like six from the wasted chances in the final season). |
| Friday April 09 13:39:38 2004 Charlie's Angels |
| > > To compare apples with apples, my biggest disappointment was "Charlie's Angels". Twenty years later, "Angeles" produced more full-treatment scenes for its three series regulars in its brief one season than "Charlie's Angels" did in its six seasons run.
> > > > A rare, rare, classic TV fact slipup from Kinky-napper. "Charlie's Angels" ran 5 seasons. (It just felt like six from the wasted chances in the final season). ---- OK, OK, 5 TV seasons = 6 calendar years. Either way, one would've thought its last season with the newest Angel (Julie Rodgers), an ex-model -- not having the Police background of the other Angels, would've landed herself and/or the others repeatedly into B&g situations. Instead, viewers were supposed to believe that modelling is excellent preparation for undercover work. Well, at least Cybill Shepherd's ex-model Maddie Hayes wound up B&g'd several times in "Moonlighting". |
| Kinky-napper |
| Friday April 09 14:09:55 2004 "Days" |
| Not much on Friday in the new Deidre Hall scene. They kept the ID of the female secret. They showed the lower part of her face tape-gagged while riding in the backseat of the car, and many shots of her wrists taped in front.
More interesting was the preview for next week. Some psycho female is stalking the petitte blond in an attempt to steal her boyfriend. Might be Kirsten Storms? |
| Friday April 09 15:53:29 2004 Kill Bill DVD |
| I work at blockbuster and I just pre-released the kill bill volume 1 DVD, and there are no scenes in any of the special features. There is an awesome making of video with tonnes of footage from volume 2 for those who are interested. I live in Canada, so the US version may be different. |
| Nad |
| Friday April 09 16:30:19 2004 Re: Playboy |
| > Also, somewhere, years ago, I saw an interview with one
> of Hefner's longtime top editors who flat out said that > 'we really missed the boat by ignoring bondage'. > > Any other oldtimers remember that? I don't remember it, but I'd really like to know where you saw the interview. |
| Pat Powers |
| Friday April 09 16:32:30 2004 Re: Bondage flicks |
| Royler wrote:
> Whoops...adult scene list is above. An excellent list it is. ;> |
| Pat Powers |
| Friday April 09 18:27:49 2004 Re: "Days" |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Not much on Friday in the new Deidre Hall scene. They > kept the ID of the female secret. They showed the lower > part of her face tape-gagged while riding in the backseat > of the car, and many shots of her wrists taped in front. > I'll be curious to see if, in fact, that was Deidre Hall bound and gagged. That one close-up looked like the tape gag was on there pretty tightly. The 4 or 5 times I've seen her gagged, it's always been a loosie detective-style gag. |
| MadFish |
| Friday April 09 18:37:12 2004 Re: "Days" |
| MadFish wrote:
> I'll be curious to see if, in fact, that was Deidre Hall > bound and gagged. There was a frame or two where it looked like is was she. |
| Friday April 09 18:39:18 2004 This week's update |
| Presenting Diana Rigg and Irene Bradshaw in The Avengers "Murdersville," Diana Ivarson in Batman "Flop Goes The Joker," Heather Thomas and Suzanne Barnes in The Fall Guy "Seavers, Dead Or Alive," Gayle Hunnicutt in Target, Nina Blackwood in Vice Squad, and Diane Nadeau in Voodoo. |
 |
| Raffish |
| raffish@abductor.com |
| http://www.abductor.com/raffish/ |
| Friday April 09 18:39:51 2004 Re: Playboy |
| >Pat Powers wrote:
> I don't remember it, but I'd really like to know where > you saw the interview. I have a vague recollection of it being in a print article [definitely not on the Internet] contrasting the types of reader letters printed in 'Playboy' and 'Penthouse', other than that ??? |
| Jacot |
| Friday April 09 18:42:10 2004 Screaming Dead just added to the DB |
|
Record number: 10183 Title: Screaming Dead (2003) Medium: Movie Actress: Misty Mundae, Rachel Robbins, CJ DiMarsico, Heidi Kristoffer, AJ Kahn Description: At the opening of this Shock-O-Rama flick, we see Kahn, playing a model, having her feet strapped down to a horizontal altar. She's wearing a very skimpy sleeveless belly-revealing sash and matching torn dress bottom. She's commanded to hold on to a chain above her head, which, after the push of a switch, acts as a rack-like device which will drop a spike on her lovely belly if she doesn't hold on. She writhes around for a bit while pictures are taken, until she lets go of the chain and the device is exposed to be fake. Next, Misty Mundae is commanded by the same guy to get strapped to an x-rack nude. She does so and he takes pictures. After a while, some lightining and evil eyes come out of nowhere and Misty is bloodily slashed by unseen forces. Next, the remaining 3 actresses are captured by another villain (there may be some handgags, i forget). We see Robbins (wearing a jogging suit), DiMarsico (wearing a nightie over a teddy) and Kristoffer (wearing a tank top and panty shorts) chained arms overhead. Kristoffer is then strapped down spreadeagle to a horizontal altar with her head in a wooden frame to facilitate chinese water torture. After gloating over the still AOH-chained Robbins and DiMarsico, a sweaty Robbins, now in a tank top and panties, is then placed on a very advanced horizontal spreadeagle rack device. She is stretched a little and also given 1 electrical shock. At this point some guy spoils the fun, and while he fights the villain, we get shots of Mundae on the xrack, DiMarsico still chained AOH, Kristoffer still in the spreadeagle chinese water torture device, and Robbins in the spreadeagle device that now has a drill heading for the middle of her spread legs. Soon after, the spoiler guy defeats the villain and ends the bondage trifecta. |
| MAV |
| Friday April 09 18:53:19 2004 Re: Screaming Dead just added to the DB |
| > Soon after, the spoiler guy defeats the villain and ends the bondage trifecta.
Wow, that sounds REALLY TASTY. And I'm REALLY SURPRISED, because I've come to associate the name Misty Mundae with films that tease but deliver very little ("Satan's School for Girls"), or if they do have it's so feeble as to be totally uninteresting ("Playmates of the Apes") and films that are bad even for Skinamax, and THAT'S saying something ("Lord of the G-Strings"). Every single film I've ever seen her in has sucked so badly that seeing her name on a film is a definite turn-off for me. Maybe this one was done in association with someone other than the crew that turned out the other stinkers I've seen her in. Mundae herself seems nice enough though with no more acting skills than you'd expect, but god her movies stink. |
| Pat Powers |
| Friday April 09 18:58:26 2004 Re: Playboy |
| > I have a vague recollection of it being in a print
> article [definitely not on the Internet] contrasting the > types of reader letters printed in 'Playboy' and > 'Penthouse', other than that ??? Thanks I'll dig around at some point and see what I can come up with. |
| Pat Powers |
| Friday April 09 19:37:47 2004 Re: Rachel Hunter |
| DAK wrote:
> The Mod warned that the subject matter was > debatable for this page so no further mention wss made. That's still the case. I don't really consider Playboy to be mainstream media. Let's transfer anything further to AG, where it belongs. |
| The Moderator |
| Friday April 09 19:42:35 2004 Re: Bondage in Adult Movies |
| Royler wrote:
> I also wanted to give a quick plug to my list of bondage > scenes in adult feature films. This is NOT a compilation > of fetish movies: scenes mentioned here are from > "mainstream" adult flicks. That's NOT considered mainstream as far as this site is concerned. Magazines or movies that exist largely for sexual purposes don't qualify. Yes, there are lots of gray area movies, but I'm going direct anything further to AG. |
| The Moderator |
| Friday April 09 19:44:28 2004 Re: Rachel Hunter |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: Pat Powers Reason: You know better than to start that anti-feminist crap again. We've been over this. |
| The Moderator |
| Friday April 09 19:46:12 2004 Re: Rachel Hunter |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: David Knight Reason: Off-topic. |
| The Moderator |
| Friday April 09 19:46:26 2004 Playboy |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: Royler Reason: Off-topic. |
| The Moderator |
| Friday April 09 19:46:50 2004 Re: Playboy |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: Van Reason: Off-topic. |
| The Moderator |
| Friday April 09 19:48:01 2004 Re: Playboy |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: Pat Powers Reason: Off-topic. |
| The Moderator |
| Friday April 09 19:49:35 2004 Re: "Days" |
| MadFish wrote:
> I'll be curious to see if, in fact, that was Deidre Hall > bound and gagged. That one close-up looked like the tape > gag was on there pretty tightly. The 4 or 5 times I've > seen her gagged, it's always been a loosie detective-style gag. Oh, there's a MUCH better scene out there with her from about 15 years ago. The guy playing John was holding her captive on some island or something and Bo, Hope and the British guy were looking for them. John was leading her around with her hands tied behind her and she was very tightly cleave-gagged. The gag was removed and then forcibly replaced when she screamed for help. Good long scene, great close-ups. An all-time top ten scene as far as I'm concerned, daytime-wise. |
| DAK |
| d_kinnier@hotmail.com |
| Friday April 09 20:33:45 2004 Re: Bad news, I fear |
| P wrote:
> There's a new trailer out for Kill Bill Volume 2, and > there looks like a few shots from the scene with the full > treatment in the script. No gag, and from what I saw, no > bondage. So I think we lost out in this one.. Not necessarily. In the latest issue of Fangoria, there are pics, and while uma is not gagged in the pics, she is tied hand and foot with rope. This is a buried alive scene. It is possible she is gagged before she is buried. Keep hope. |
| ID4J |
| id4j@aol.com |
| Friday April 09 20:58:43 2004 Kill Bill |
| > > There's a new trailer out for Kill Bill Volume 2, and there looks like a few shots from the scene with the full
treatment in the script. No gag, and from what I saw, no bondage. > > > Not necessarily. In the latest issue of Fangoria, there are pics, and while Uma is not gagged in the pics, she is tied hand and foot with rope. Keep hope. ---- And one news article posted today (I didn't read more than the headline) was that a "Kill Bill, Volume 3" is being considered. |
| Kinky-napper |
| Friday April 09 21:26:32 2004 Re: Bad news, I fear |
| ID4J wrote:
> Not necessarily. In the latest issue of Fangoria, there > are pics, and while uma is not gagged in the pics, she is > tied hand and foot with rope. This is a buried alive > scene. It is possible she is gagged before she is > buried. I'm still keeping my fingers crossed. According to the draft script, she's gagged before and as she's being put in the box. Hopefully, QT wasn't forced to compromise his vision. |
| MadFish |
| Friday April 09 23:54:06 2004 Re: Screaming Dead just added to the DB |
| MAV wrote:
> Record number: 10183 > Title: Screaming Dead (2003) I've capped it. Xvid and jpegs. email me if you want the caps. I need webspace ;) |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
|
|
