|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Monday May 10 00:53:44 2004 Re: Input |
| Not Brian. Couldn't Be. wrote:
> Also, I kinda miss the occasional short jokey posts, > thrown out recently along with the longer attempts at > humor, less likely to be worth the time. Agreed. Especially when there's a serious response to one of the short, jokey posts. |
| gasface |
| Monday May 10 01:23:25 2004 Re: Input |
| Not Brian. Couldn't Be. wrote:
> Also, I kinda miss the occasional short jokey posts, Well, that was the result of a previous vote. It was decided by a majority that off-topic jokes weren't desired. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday May 10 01:46:09 2004 CASE FILE added |
| Elizabeth Hurley from MY FAVORITE MARTIAN |
| Biff |
| http://community.webtv.net/unlikelysource/TheCaseFilesofBiff |
| Monday May 10 05:29:34 2004 Re: Stretching the Envelope |
| Van wrote:
> Surely *some* discussion of WHY > & HOW TV & movies do a good or bad job is > interesting & relevant to our "hobby." I > understand that anything can be taken to extremes, but I > think a little more leeway is appropriate. If someone > posts something that is "esoteric" but > otherwise "legal," I suggest Mr. Moderator let > it run for a while. See if a thread develops. See if > others are interested. If it starts getting waaaay off > track, *that's* the time to rein things in. AFAIC, I do agree. |
| Filou |
| Monday May 10 06:34:44 2004 Bondage at Stake |
| Does anyone like me perfer seeing an actress tied to a stake as opposed to a chair. I like it because you get to see more of her. Two of my favorites are:
Ginger and Mary Ann in Gilligan's Island's "How to Be a Hero". Jane Russell in "Paleface". Can anyone think of any more. Also, I understand that my favorite actress, Mariette Hartley was tied to the stake in an episode of Bonaza. I can't find that episode on VHS or DVD nor on any of the Vid Cap sites. Does anyone have vidcaps of this episode or is it a "HOLY GRAIL"? Hope not. |
| tyler |
| Monday May 10 06:38:57 2004 Re: Bondage at Stake |
| tyler wrote:
> Does anyone like me perfer seeing an actress tied to a > stake as opposed to a chair. I like it because you get to > see more of her. Two of my favorites are: > > Ginger and Mary Ann in Gilligan's Island's "How to > Be a Hero". > > Jane Russell in "Paleface". > > Can anyone think of any more. > > Also, I understand that my favorite actress, Mariette > Hartley was tied to the stake in an episode of Bonaza. I > can't find that episode on VHS or DVD nor on any of the > Vid Cap sites. Does anyone have vidcaps of this episode > or is it a "HOLY GRAIL"? Hope not. There was a scene in a defunct late-night series entitled "Forever Knight", about a vampire who works as a police detective in Seattle. In the episode in question, a deranged man kidnaps the gorgeous brunette guest actress and tied her to a stake outside a church, and cleave-gags her with a thin black cloth. He believes her to be Joan of Arc. |
| Hadji |
| Monday May 10 06:47:35 2004 Re: Input |
| I'm pretty much ok with things as is, but wouldn't be oppposed to most of the proposed changes I've seen posted.
The only two points of contention I have, and their minor, is one, I hate to see any posts deleted. I realize there are situations where it must be done, but overall, I would like to see deleted posts moved to AG. One man's poison is another man's pudding. Second, my biggest pet peeve is when a scene or subject has been discussed at length, beat to death and put to bed, and then a short time later someone brings it up again like it's a totally new topic. Perhaps we, or the moderator, could create some sort of "been there, done that" post to let these posters know that subject has already been discussed at length. Just a suggestion. |
| The Greyman |
| Monday May 10 07:15:40 2004 Bondage at Stake |
| > Does anyone like me perfer seeing an actress tied to a stake as opposed to a chair.
Can anyone think of any more? ---- Have you tried using the "Search" functionality on the Scene Database on the keyword "stake"? I got 144 hits on it -- just eliminate its matches for "stakeout", etc. You can also try searching on the keyword "post". It should include such memorable scenes such as Buffy the Vampire Slayer ("Gingerbread"); Dr. Doolittle (1967); and Dracula's Castle (1969), etc. |
| Kinky-napper |
| Monday May 10 08:30:29 2004 Input |
| It's very gracious of you to allow these opinions to be aired Brian, for that I thank you. I've never had a problem with the rules. At the same time I've not posted things very often because I find a lot of the stuff discussed is either not worth commenting on or has already been thorougly dealt with. That doesn't mean I don't enjoy the forum because I do. As well as a place of common interest, there are no social class barriers, no politics or egos,(most of the time). These are the things I believe to be important. I'm sure there are similar places, where things deemed to be off topic here, are fully accepted. I'd just like Brian to come across a little less stressed in his own posts if he can. You'll live longer mate. |
| marzman |
| Monday May 10 09:07:41 2004 On vs. Off Topic |
| You asked my opinion her it is:
On topic: "Reviews" of scenes, lists of favorites, Alerts, enquiries into secnes which the title escapes you or certain situations (such as the current in-flight bondage thread), and debates as to what makes a good scene. Off topic: "Casting calls" (i.e., "I want to see Sandra Bullock in the new Wonder Woman movie") Wish lists, and newsbabes. (Especially local ones!) |
| Historian |
| historian64@hotmail.com |
| Monday May 10 10:41:52 2004 Amanda Plummer B&G |
| According to new movie review at link |
| Jack London\'s Call of the Wild : Survival (Drama) John and Buck rescue a girl held hostage. |
| Monday May 10 10:42:45 2004 Re: Amanda Plummer B&G |
| This link |
| http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=reviewsNews&storyID=5082740 |
| Monday May 10 10:44:57 2004 Re: Amanda Plummer B&G |
| "There's no shortage of blood and gore on display, so horror fans will be reasonably satiated, while more discerning audiences will find certain amusement in the social satire on display, most notably in a lengthy Halloween party sequence in which the killer, toting a bound-and-gagged Plummer, wreaks murderous havoc on the guests."
The "Jack London: Call of the Wild" passage refers to an episode airing tomorrow in Canada on the New VR. Does anyone know if there was anything in that episode? |
| Monday May 10 11:11:00 2004 Re: Shut her up! |
| > Of course! -- this is one of my favorite types of
> On-screen gaggings. Another example was Madeleine Stowe > in The Amazing Spider-man ("Escort to Danger"). A very nice scene but could have losed the putz |
 |
 |
| Monday May 10 11:28:50 2004 Re: Amanda Plummer B&G |
| > This link
> http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=reviewsNews& > storyID=5082740 Well ok, but I really want to see her: http://www.cvkproductions.com/Katheryn.html Katheryn Winnock, the "comely" sister mentioned in the article. |
| Monday May 10 11:37:18 2004 Re: Stretching the Envelope |
| > I've had some posts deleted with the reason given
> something like: "This is not a media criticism > forum." I'm with Van on this, but the Mod usually does a good job of reigning this stuff in. I think it's ok, and sometimes funny, to vent or rant about dumb shows that sometimes have good scenes (it's kind of like giving your opinion about whether a show is worth the look in the future). For instance, have you seen Charmed lately, I hope you like babies and pregnency stories because I bet there's more coming soon! > If someone > posts something that is "esoteric" but > otherwise "legal," I suggest Mr. Moderator let > it run for a while. See if a thread develops. See if > others are interested. If it starts getting waaaay off > track, *that's* the time to rein things in. I think Van is asking to let this stuff go a little longer than usual and I think I agree. Thanks Mod. |
| Monday May 10 11:41:21 2004 Re: Input |
| "Dear Abby" articles should be included on this page |
| Monday May 10 12:53:53 2004 Input |
| > my biggest pet peeve is when a scene or subject has been discussed at length, beat to death and put to bed, and then a short time later someone brings it up
again like it's a totally new topic. Perhaps we, or the moderator, could create some sort of "been there, done that" post to let these posters know that subject has already been discussed at length. Just a suggestion. ---- These type of posts often seem to start with the phrase "I don't know if this has been brought up before..." At another moderated website, the owner has included in his Posting Rules/FAQ language to the effect of "Before posting, did you use the Search functionality to check for previous posts on the topic?" |
| Kinky-napper |
| Monday May 10 14:04:19 2004 Re: Input |
| Kinky-napper wrote:
> At another moderated website, the owner has included in > his Posting Rules/FAQ language to the effect of > "Before posting, did you use the Search > functionality to check for previous posts on the topic?" Other sites have a "tree," where you can see the responses for each topic. I'm not saying that is better. I like this the way it is. But maybe there's some way of blending the two, no? |
| gasface |
| Monday May 10 17:33:09 2004 Input |
| > Other sites have a "tree," where you can see the responses for each topic.
I'm not saying that is better... ---- I'm no techie, but doesn't that approach work best when persons post intelligent information in the Subject (or "Title" field), so that one can tell at a glance what the Thread is about? E.g., "Best Nurse in Uniform b&g scene?" Instead, on Brian's Page we often see entries such as "Question" or "Aargh" in the Title field. At least this isn't as much of an issue here as in my previous job, where I might receive an average of 75 e-mails a day, and I'd beg senders to take 10 seconds to type something relevant in the "Subject" field, so that I could organize/prioritize my work. |
| Kinky-napper |
| Monday May 10 17:49:12 2004 Re: Input |
| I think I'd be happy to keep things pretty much as they are. The further we stray from the basic topic, the more "grey area" stuff we get, which is not only more work for The Mod, but will lead to way too many "hey, you left his post up-- what's wrong with mine?" exchanges.
And I say this as someone who routinely has to stick my hands in my pockets to keep from typing snarky one-liner jokes. I mean, I'd love to do it, but I just think it would too quickly get out of hand. |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.homestead.com/jebsadventurebound |
| Monday May 10 18:33:15 2004 PHONE COMMERCIAL |
| WHEN IS THE BEST TIME TO CATCH THE METRO PHONE COMMERCIAL I BEEN HEARING ABOUT? |
| CHARLES |
| Monday May 10 19:14:08 2004 Re: Input |
|
> I'll point out that this site has a search feature. As > my "move message" has the title of the post(s) > deemed > off-topic, it's pretty easy to extract only those, it > that is what you desire. No wading required. > After reading all these posts I'm interesting in seeing sJenni's article, but I can't find it. I tried searching back 60 days in both Anything Goes and Discussion for 'sJenni', 'newspaper', 'article' and I can't find it. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks in advance. |
| Max |
| Monday May 10 19:26:06 2004 Article |
|
> After reading all these posts I'm interesting in seeing > sJenni's article, but I can't find it. There's a link to it on the "What's New" page of my site. |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.homestead.com/jebsadventurebound/files/New.html |
| Monday May 10 19:28:07 2004 Dark Shadows and Lost in Space |
| Bad news for those who looking forward to these series' DiD potential.
From today's "Dark Horizons" site: ... it's likely the [WB] will dump both its high profile remakes of classic 60's shows - the gothic vampire drama "Dark Shadows" and the sci-fi update "The Robinsons: Lost in Space". |
| Jeb |
| Monday May 10 19:49:11 2004 Re: Input |
| > After reading all these posts I'm interesting in seeing
> sJenni's article, but I can't find it. I tried searching > back 60 days in both Anything Goes and Discussion for > 'sJenni', 'newspaper', 'article' and I can't find it. Am > I doing something wrong? > Thanks in advance. My name is sjJenni, I suspect that you missed a j, also, the search feature requires that you hit a checkbox if you want to search the body, which is where the words are. Hope this does not count as too far off topic. And, btw, click the link. |
| sjJenni |
| sjJenni@missHoudini.com |
| http://www.portlandmercury.com/2004-04-22/feature.html |
| Monday May 10 20:08:49 2004 Re: Input |
| One time I posted a pic of Julianne Moore and asked who she was so that I could x-ref her in the DB and it was moved to AG for being OT. Never could figure that out, but needless to say, my vote would be for that to not be OT. :) |
| CollectorX |
| http://gagsnroses.tripod.com |
| Monday May 10 20:10:21 2004 Re: Input |
| The Greyman wrote:
> The only two points of contention I have, and their > minor, is one, I hate to see any posts deleted. I realize > there are situations where it must be done, but overall, > I would like to see deleted posts moved to AG. One man's > poison is another man's pudding. I don't see much need for abusive posts or spam to be moved to AG. > Second, my biggest pet peeve is when a scene or subject > has been discussed at length, beat to death and put to > bed, and then a short time later someone brings it up > again like it's a totally new topic. Perhaps we, or the > moderator, could create some sort of "been there, > done that" post to let these posters know that > subject has already been discussed at length. That's not something I'd be interested in doing. If you are going to do so, it'd be best have the title of the previous thread so the person can search for the past messages. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday May 10 20:17:19 2004 Re: Shut her up! |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> A very nice scene but could have losed the putz You are not using the term "putz" as it is used on this site correctly. It doesn't refer to a male captor, but to a male captive. Male captors are prefered by many here. |
| Brian R |
| Monday May 10 20:25:03 2004 Re: PHONE COMMERCIAL |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: Turn it down, sonny Reason: Stop moderating my page. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday May 10 20:27:52 2004 Rule changes |
| Mod, I'd advise you change as little as possible. But if you are seriously considering a change, I'd consider allowing (within reason) current events/media that deal with bondage, such as the aforementioned Sara Kozer, the Portland newspaper article, etc.
As for keeping stuff off-topic, please keep off-topic the "dream lists", such as "who would you like to see re-cast in a Terror Among Us remake"? Those posts never go away. Also, keep hentai off-topic. It's not "mainstream bondage," it's cartoon porn, and way too esoteric to be relevant to a mass audience. |
| Lord Zoltar |
| Monday May 10 20:30:46 2004 Re: Input |
| Max wrote:
> After reading all these posts I'm interesting in seeing > sJenni's article, but I can't find it. Make sure you select the Search Body box, otherwise it only searches the Title. |
| The Engineer |
| Monday May 10 20:42:10 2004 Re: Stretching the Envelope |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> I'm with Van on this, but the Mod usually does a good job > of reigning this stuff in. I think it's ok, and sometimes > funny, to vent or rant about dumb shows that sometimes > have good scenes (it's kind of like giving your opinion > about whether a show is worth the look in the future). But I don't feel like I discriminate against those sorts of posts. I don't mind, in general, if you discussion cinematic elements of episodes or movies that have scenes. My objection is to Van's tendency to go off on tangents. Recent example. He wrote a long post about how a potential new Tarzan series was set in NY again, and not in the jungle. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I just read a blurb at the Dark Horizons website. It's one of those *very*-early-in-the-process things & may be just an agent's trial baloon or idle talk, but apparently HUGH JACKMAN of the soon to be released Van (no relation) Helsing, is interested in a future project being the next TARZAN... & it'll be set in MODERN DAY NYC!!! What's with Hollywood??? Is everyone oxygen starved by the damn smog??? I can think of nothing the Apeman could do in New York that's a *tenth* as good as what would happen in 19th Century Darkest Africa. The Crocodilemen? The Lost City of Opar? Imagine a Kiera Knightly/Kate Winslet/Gwyneth Paltrow-type Jane Porter, a jungle full of peril (*&* magnificent waterfalls, vine-covered forest giants, the treehouse, etc.), realistic apes & other fauna, skinny-dipping in jungle pools, ripped Victorian bush costumes & chamois bikinis, Jane captured by native warriors, impending sacrifice by some slow &/or cruel method, Tarzan to the rescue... (sigh) Is an entire generation destined to grow to maturity thinking Tarzan is *supposed* to be in New York??? My hope is that after Peter Jackson's *King Kong* comes out (assuming the Sacrifice-of-the-Bride-of-Kong scene is everything we expect), the studios will see the light. Also, Paramount is *still* supposedly developing *Princess of Mars* as a tentpole project. That might help too. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday May 10 20:44:10 2004 Re: Input |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> "Dear Abby" articles should be included on this > page My belief is that those are, without exception, fakes. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday May 10 20:45:40 2004 Re: Input |
| gasface wrote:
> Other sites have a "tree," where you can see > the responses for each topic. That requires a threading model. One of the planned improvements will be that as an option. |
| The Engineer |
| Monday May 10 20:47:41 2004 Re: Input |
| Kinky-napper wrote:
> I'm no techie, but doesn't that approach work best when > persons post intelligent information in the Subject (or > "Title" field), so that one can tell at a > glance what the Thread is about? E.g., "Best Nurse > in Uniform b&g scene?" > > Instead, on Brian's Page we often see entries such as > "Question" or "Aargh" in the Title > field. That's often a problem in message forums. A big It would be best if people searched the message BODIES for a relevant keyword, but sometimes it's hard to get the right one. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday May 10 20:48:56 2004 Re: PHONE COMMERCIAL |
| CHARLES wrote:
> WHEN IS THE BEST TIME TO CATCH THE METRO PHONE COMMERCIAL > I BEEN HEARING ABOUT? I really would prefer that you not post in all caps. That, in the cyber-world, is considered to be shouting. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday May 10 21:19:10 2004 WEST COAST ALERT: Johnny Stacatto On Trio |
| A few weeks ago, someone posted a possible alert for a DID on Johnny Staccato, one of the "Brilliant but Cancelled" series on the cable channel Trio. Well, tonight it paid off.
Set in a vaguely film noir New York City, Johnny Staccato is a late 50s/early 60s series starring John Cassevettes. In the final five minutes of this episode, aspiring singer Susan Oliver - who also happens to be the daughter of a crime boss - is in a hotel room, tied to a chair with her hands behind her and over the mouth gagged with a white cloth. The good news: She is extremely attractive. The bad news: It's just one shot, with her from behind, so we never actually get to see her face. Also, she's getting smacked around, which isn't pleasant to watch. What's odd is that the bad guy insists on interrogating her while she's gagged. The show aired at 8:30 PM EST. I don't know if Trio delays its programming by time zones or not, so I don't know if this will pan out for you West Coasters. If you miss it, it's not the end of the world. Like I said, she's very pretty, but it's a disappointing scene. (And yes, I've added it to the database.) |
| Derek Smalls |
| Monday May 10 21:43:21 2004 Re: Rule changes |
| Lord Zoltar wrote:
> > > As for keeping stuff off-topic, please keep off-topic the > "dream lists", such as "who would you like > to see re-cast in a Terror Among Us remake"? Those > posts never go away. > Amen, brother. And let's keep the surveys of "What female anchor-woman would you most like to see tape gagged" off-topic too. Borrring. |
| H |
| h_tribe@yahoo.com |
| www.geocities.com/h_tribe |
| Monday May 10 21:57:18 2004 Re: Input |
| The Moderator wrote:
> My belief is that ["Dear Abby" articles] are, without exception, fakes. But that makes them entertaining. If they're "real", then they're off-topic for sure. In effect, someone has taken the trouble to write a little bit of DiD fiction and get newspapers all over the country to publish it. If there are those who'd like to read it, a little heads up here would be appreciated for sure. Perhaps treating this sort of thing like updates to friend's sites--post the link, but no discussion--would work. Amen to all those giving respect to our host. Brian: Thanks for the site, asking for input and all your hard work. |
| Rich McGill |
| Monday May 10 22:33:39 2004 Stretching the Envelope-II |
| Note: The following is friendly but terse. I'm *not* pissed, but I don't have time to use flowerly 19th Century style prose to soften things. We're all friends here (I think.) :-)
Okay, so every now & then I rant about Tarzan in NY or some other "off-topic" thing that's caught my eye. 1. I'm posting it *here* 'cause there's *some* relevance. (For example, "Tarzan" is a traditional source of DiD-scenes. If "Princess of Mars" ever gets made it could me a real dream-come-true for DiD-fans like us.) 2. Ergo, discussion of Tarzan is (however tenuously) "on-topic"... sort of. Tarzan, or Princess of Mars, or King Kong---we're all a little better informed. What a tragedy. 3. It's not like this forum gets dozens of solidly ON-TOPIC posts every day. Days go by with NOTHING interesting. 4. And finally... What's the big deal with "wish lists?" What's the cost? Who does it inconvenience? What Breaking News has ever been pushed off this forum by someone giving voice to a minor fantasy? Bored? ...then don't read it! 5. Talk about boring... Heather Locklear was hogtied on an episode of "T.J.Hooker." ...years ago. ...& every time you replay the video it will be exactly the same. Get over it! |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
| Monday May 10 22:48:35 2004 phone commercial |
| sorry im am new to this. |
| CHARLES |
| Monday May 10 22:57:40 2004 Re: phone commercial |
| CHARLES wrote:
> sorry im am new to this. It looks to me like this is a phone service in a particular locale. I've taped for a while all shows where this commercial was sited and have come up dry, which leads me to suspect that it's not in service in my area. |
| hallbird |
| Monday May 10 23:20:24 2004 Re: phone commercial |
| hallbird wrote:
> > It looks to me like this is a phone service in a > particular locale. I've taped for a while all shows > where this commercial was sited and have come up dry, > which leads me to suspect that it's not in service in my area. > I imagine metroPCS has a website that would list its areas of availability. I taped the ad I used for the cap set on my site during a SF Giants game ... and initially ran across it in the same venue. |
| Biff |
| http://community.webtv.net/unlikelysource/TheCaseFilesofBiff |
| Monday May 10 23:40:18 2004 Touching Evil |
| The preview for next week's Touching Evil showed the female lead Vera Fermiga being bound with tape hands and feet while unconcious in a field. USA Network Monday at 10:00 P.M. EST with possible rebroadcasts. |
| Gordian Knot |
|
|