|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Sunday June 27 01:26:49 2004 Re: Db entries |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> I added a whole bunch of law and order ones about a week > or so ago and I don't see them. These, I imagine: Record #10501 Title: Law and Order - 2x09 - Renunciation Medium: TV Series Actress: Ashley Crow Description: Episode: 2x09 Gets escorted out of a courtroom and arrested by 2 cops. Short scene, begins at about 45" w/o commercials. Record #10502 Title: Law and Order - 2x16 - Vengance aka Law & Order Medium: TV Series Actress: unknown Description: Episode: 2x16 - Vengance "12 min in, perp walk, like 5 seconds long. Record #10503 Title: Law and Order - 2x11 - His Hour Upon the Stage aka Law & Order Medium: TV Series Actress: Finn Carter Description: Episode: 2x11 - His Hour Upon the Stage Getting arrested, good cuffing scene. "33" > Any reason why they wouldn't be there? Deleted by one of the editors. I'm not sure exactly what the objection was to the entries, other than the terrible formating. The editor that removed them will be happy to explain exactly why. I do note you completely ignored the standard way entries are in the DB, any reason for that? |
| Brian R |
| Sunday June 27 02:13:12 2004 Re: Db entries |
| > I do note you completely ignored the standard way
> entries are in the DB, any reason for that? Well, other than the fact that there isn't anything on the submission page to suggest a proper format, I don't think so. I'm not arguing, just saying there could be some more pointers. I'm assuming "Episode" (#x##) is the proper format for the episode field "and" should be "&" |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Sunday June 27 03:46:31 2004 Re: Db entries |
| Brian R wrote:
Title: Law and Order - 2x09 - Renunciation Title: Law and Order - 2x16 - Vengance aka Law & Order Title: Law and Order - 2x11 - His Hour Upon the Stage aka Law & Order "I'm not sure exactly what the objection was to the entries, other than the terrible formating. The editor that removed them will be happy to explain exactly why." __________________________________ Yes, recall these. They weren't deleted, just pulled to be looked into. Along with one involving Leslie Hope. Entries posted different from existing entry, in this case: "Title: Law & Order (1990) aka Law and Order" Concern with fellas being, this what deliberatly done by certain individuals to throw off the search, and times post a fella scene, {or Putz scene as some of you fellas refer it} to bait others into arguments. Just recent, a poor fella wasted $37 on one of these joke entries. He took it in stride, most don't. This why editors pull and look into anything that looks odd. Now that I know they legitimate, I'll get around to re-posting them properly. |
| Jay L |
| Sunday June 27 04:16:42 2004 Re: Db entries |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> there isn't anything on > the submission page to suggest a proper format What we're trying to do is have every entry similar for the search feature. There was problems with even spaces causing entries not to be brought up in the search. Which caused some fellas to miss scenes at times, then we editors hear about it. I hate that. What we've done, and still doing, have Title from IMDB and copy same for all entries so they all come up in the search. For episode, we put "" around the episode titles. "" recall easier for show like Pacific Blue, which has an episode titled "Kidnapped" Allows to search exact. We normally have to edit one or two every other day for these reasons. We only pull entries when they're mentioned, or complained about. That's pretty much it. |
| Jay L |
| Sunday June 27 05:06:25 2004 Re: Db entries |
| Jay L wrote:
> Yes, recall these. > They weren't deleted, just pulled to be looked into. No BS, if you want caps or whatever, I'll send them. Ditto with the Leslie Hope one (Line of Fire) and the "Enterprise" one (I think I posted it about the same time) I'll try to throw in an approximate length of the scene in the future. Sorta going off on a tangent, the new "big ass email boxes" are nice for distributing caps - if anyone wants caps, I just have to upload them to the mail server once and x recipients can get them at blazing speeds from yahoo or whoever. |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Sunday June 27 06:42:31 2004 Scene Database entries |
| > They weren't deleted, just pulled to be looked into.
> This why editors pull and look into anything that looks odd. ----- Perhaps that's what happened to one of my entries that seems to have been deleted: one of Erin Gray's better scenes in Buck Rogers in the 25th Century -- which was in an episode entitled "The Fighting 69th". That was the episode w/ guest star Peter Graves, where Colonel Deering's ankles are chained onscreen. |
| Kinky-napper |
| Sunday June 27 07:29:20 2004 Mathilda May - gagged??? |
| Hi everyone, I would like to ask if someone of you has ever seen an issue of the French magazine "Paris-Match" from 1990, where super-beautiful actress Mathilda May was referred to as being "baillonnee" (= gagged) on a photo-series concerning her image as a dumb sex-goddess (in realitiy, she isn't!); might be well worth to watch, I think... |
| Curt |
| Sunday June 27 09:54:18 2004 Re: boots |
| Deanna Lund in several episodes of 'Land of the Giants'. |
| Sunday June 27 11:20:49 2004 Re: Db entries |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> No BS, if you want caps or whatever, I'll send them. > Ditto with the Leslie Hope Don't need caps, I believe you. What would like you to do is go over to Database Corrections page {Homepage Link} See if can ID one of the Unknowns, and like a better description for the Leslie Hope one. Thanx |
| Jay L |
| http://brianspage.com/showday.php?fname=dbcorrect%2Fhtml%2F178-2004 |
| Sunday June 27 11:25:19 2004 Clip |
| does anyone have a clip of charlotte rampling in caravan to vaccares? it is a rare scene... |
| Graham |
| Sunday June 27 12:20:42 2004 Re: Mathilda May - gagged??? |
| Curt wrote:
> Hi everyone, I would like to ask if someone of you has > ever seen an issue of the French magazine > "Paris-Match" from 1990, That reminds me that around the time "Viva Maria!" came out c.1966, Paris Match had a nice full-colour pic of Mlles Bardot and Moreau sitting b&g on a bench on a railway truck (flat car to you Colonials.) They were wearing the same black OTM gags as in the film's Inquisition scene, but tighter, IIRC. No such scene appears in the film, so it must have been an impromptu press set-up. |
| Mad Dan |
| Sunday June 27 13:31:03 2004 Re: Db entries |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> Well, other than the fact that there isn't anything on > the submission page to suggest a proper format, I don't > think so. Well, that's true, but there's a database full of other entries. None of which have episode information in the title. It only takes a second to look at a few existing entries and see what the usual strategy is. Too often people decide that their method is better, and don't care what everyone else does. > I'm not arguing, just saying there could be some more > pointers. That's something that's on the agenda to occupy my copious free time. |
| Brian R |
| Sunday June 27 13:40:15 2004 Re: Db entries |
| Jay L wrote:
> They weren't deleted, just pulled to be looked into. I'd say that entries shouldn't be removed unless there's something immediatedly objectionable. Otherwise, we get reentries, posts here, email to me, etc. wanting to know what happened to them. It tends to cause a lot of confusion, because I don't know what happened, but always me they come to to ask. |
| Brian R |
| Sunday June 27 15:37:26 2004 Re: boots |
| ripley wrote:
> does anyone have a lst of damsels on t.v. series or dvds > wearing knee high boots like marina black in the jake 2.0 > scene? Years ago, I wanted to build a site based on this concept, but never had the time. I started a list and didn't get very far, but here are a few: Anderson, Loni Partners in Crime Anderson, Pam V.I.P. Park, Susie G vs. E Sinatra, Nancy The Man from U.N.C.L.E. Take Tylo, Hunter ? The Huntsman Thorson, Linda The Avengers Look (Stop Me If You've Heard This One) But There Were These Two Kendall, Suzy Bird With the Crystal Plumamge (M) Blackman, Honor The Man from U.N.C.L.E. The Medicine Men Perils of Gwendiline (M) The Charge at Feather River (?) Baxter, Lynsey Young Indiana Jones Lund, Deanna Land of the Giants Miniskirt Mob Habermann, Eva Tales From a Parallel Universe Eating Pattern (1996) Branigan, Laura Automan Murder MTV The G Vs. E. one is quite good (I have the video clip it if you'd like). Loni's is a classic 80's boot over the pants. Miniskirt Mob (although it was a movie) was a great one, but no gag. Sorry some of these are incomplete and some are movies, not TV. The Avengers were always good and Land of the Giants as someone mentioned was also great. Can someone show me where I can see the Jake 2.0 scene with marina Black? Thanks. |
| Malcolm |
| malcolm_bond@excite.com |
| Sunday June 27 17:42:05 2004 Re: boots |
| Malcolm wrote:
> ripley wrote: > > > does anyone have a lst of damsels on t.v. series or > dvds > > wearing knee high boots like marina black in the > jake 2.0 > > scene? Also Linda Evans and Barbara Stanwyck, The Big Valley "Court Martial". The boots play a very prominent role in that one. |
| ss |
| Sunday June 27 18:15:11 2004 Re: Db entries |
| Brian R wrote:
> I'd say that entries shouldn't be removed unless there's > something immediatedly objectionable. So no longer coaching the fellas to email editors off the page? What your term? Having instigators posts "quietly dealt, without a ripple in the pond", or however you put it? Okay. Off-hand, could suggest switching to a system where alert everyone with a warning in the suspect entry |
| Jay L |
| Sunday June 27 18:35:48 2004 Update |
| Been a long time, but I finally got around to positng new caps:
Kirsten Dunst in Small Soldiers |
| Gratefuldead Roger |
| boundandgagged2003@hotmail.com |
| http://www.geocities.com/gratefuldead1212 |
| Sunday June 27 19:30:59 2004 Re: Db entries |
| Jay L wrote:
> Brian R wrote: > > > I'd say that entries shouldn't be removed unless > there's > > something immediatedly objectionable. > > So no longer coaching the fellas to email editors off the > page? I have no problem if you want to do that. I understand there are going to be "problem" entries. As always, feel free to refer those to me for skull-cracking > What your term? Having instigators posts "quietly > dealt, without a ripple in the pond", or however you > put it? It depends on how serious a problem you think you have. Clearly bogus entries go away immediately, of course. It's never my intention to get in the way of any of the editors. I've always got your back and I don't want to second guess you. I guess part of the problem is that you do such a good job with things that I only get brought in when there's a problem, and then I'm not always up to speed on what's going on. > Off-hand, could suggest switching to a system where alert > everyone with a warning in the suspect entry I suggest that rather than pulling suspect entries, add: "This entry under investigation by the Editing Team, be advised that this may be erroneous and subject to future deletion." That keeps people from wasting time on ones that turn out to be phony and alerts the person who entered it that there's a perceived problem. What do you think? |
| Brian R |
| Sunday June 27 20:08:25 2004 Re: Db entries |
| > That keeps people from wasting time on ones that turn
> out to be phony and alerts the person who entered it > that there's a perceived problem. What do you think? PGP Signing ;) /yes, I know it's overkill and would be a pain in the ass for the editors to deal with. |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Sunday June 27 21:00:17 2004 Re: Db entries |
| > I suggest that rather than pulling suspect entries, add:
> "This entry under investigation by the Editing Team, I like this idea. |
| Kerhop |
| kerhop@oz.net |
|
|