|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Thursday May 13 00:23:37 2004 THE DIVISION |
| While checking the above website via the above post I noticed that a number of the upcoming episodes have possible bondage scenarios, including one in which one of the characters named Raina is abducted. |
| hallbird |
| Thursday May 13 00:25:32 2004 Re: The Division |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Tape gag scene this weekend. Click the Video at the home > page for trailer > http://lifetimetv.com/shows/division/ Thanks for the link. It is hard to see (even when pausing it) but the damsel looks quite attractive. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Thursday May 13 00:34:22 2004 Re: Court TV alert |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Just saw the preview for "Masterminds" on the > Pierre Hotel robbery mentioned on Wednesday. Preview did > show a tape-gagged female. Show starts in a few minutes > at midnight eastern. Not much more shown in the episode than in the preview. Would like to see the original episode mentioned yesterday. Several of the females were hotties. |
| Thursday May 13 00:36:05 2004 Re: THE DIVISION |
| hallbird wrote:
> While checking the above website via the above post I > noticed that a number of the upcoming episodes have > possible bondage scenarios, including one in which one of > the characters named Raina is abducted. She's gorgeous! Click the link to see her character's picture and info. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| http://lifetimetv.com/shows/division/bios/char_raina.html |
| Thursday May 13 00:40:46 2004 Smallville... |
| ...did rack up another scene for Lana tonight. (No gag, of course.) I wasn't expecting anything since the previews showed her locked in a room, but after breaking out the friend ties her to the bed. |
| G-MaN |
| http://www.geocities.com/anothermoviesite/200304Season.html |
| Thursday May 13 02:22:33 2004 Re: Charisma Indeed! |
| Van wrote:
> By remarkable coincidence I read in a Dark Horizons > article that CHARISMA CARPENTER has *NOT* been ruled out > for the lead role in the upcoming Wonder Woman movie to > be filmed in Australia. > > ...AND... > > Charisma has a photo spread (so to speak) in the new > issue of PLAYBOY (June 2004)... & she looks > WONDERFUL! > > I for one hopes she gets the part AND they do a good job > with the script & movie AND Diana/WW runs afowl of > her own Magic Lasso! Yes, hear, hear! I second the motion. I really hope this silences those negative nellies who've complained "that she's aged," or "she's not as hot as she used to be," and all those others not recognizing her obvious charms. She IS hot, and Playboy wouldn't publish her, as the COVER GIRL no less, if she wasn't appealing to a large group of gentlemen. But lest those of you who disagree with me continue to . . . Hmmm, let me think, should I agree with Van, Playboy, and my own visceral reaction when looking at her, or those anonymous souls in bondageland who don't like Charisma Carpenter for whatever idiosyncratic personal reason, hmmmmm . . . |
| Clarifier |
| Thursday May 13 04:59:08 2004 Morir Dos Veces |
| I've been Tivoing this daily on Univision since the alert appeared, but nothing yet. I assume the sequence of interest hasn't started yet? |
| Eric |
| Thursday May 13 07:13:13 2004 Does anyone know the title of this movie? |
| I once saw a preview for a movie starring Kenneth Branagh, with a scene in which he is frolicking in bed with an attractive woman. What was intriguin about this scene was that she was bound and gagged; I don;t recall how her hands were secured, but she had a thick cleave-gag in her mouth, through which she exhibited a gleeful expression. Someone had just discovered them in bed together.
Does anyone know the title of this movie? |
| Hadji |
| Thursday May 13 09:09:22 2004 Re: Charisma Indeed! |
| >>>>>She IS hot, and Playboy wouldn't publish her, as the
COVER GIRL no less, if she wasn't appealing to a large group of gentlemen.<<<<<< I love CC, but you can't use the Playboy thing as any indicator of whether she's still an uber-babe or not. With their makeup artists, lighting experts, and air-brushing, they could make anyone this side of Janet Reno a hottie. Personally, I think she's the closest thing I've seen to a natural WW body type among the actresses and and models I've seen in the last few years. However, that doesn't mean there's not some gorgeous 5' 10" or taller, busty, 20-year-old brunette out there with the acting chops to pull it off. |
| The Greyman |
| Thursday May 13 09:15:00 2004 Re: Charisma Indeed! |
| The Greyman wrote:
> >>>>>She IS hot, and Playboy wouldn't > publish her, as the > COVER GIRL no less, if she wasn't appealing to a large > group of gentlemen.<<<<<< > > I love CC, but you can't use the Playboy thing as any > indicator of whether she's still an uber-babe or not. > With their makeup artists, lighting experts, and > air-brushing, they could make anyone this side of Janet > Reno a hottie. > > Personally, I think she's the closest thing I've seen to > a natural WW body type among the actresses and and models > I've seen in the last few years. However, that doesn't > mean there's not some gorgeous 5' 10" or taller, > busty, 20-year-old brunette out there with the acting chops to pull it off. Charisma is hot and she has given us two great cleave gag scenes on Angel. I think she would look great with one of a black cloth cleave gag similar to the ones that Lynda Carter wore. Another woman that would be great for this role and has been missing from a full treatment scene for a while is Jessica Alba! |
| Mike |
| Thursday May 13 09:48:20 2004 Re: Charisma Indeed! |
| Clarifier wrote:
> Yes, hear, hear! I second the motion. > > I really hope this silences those negative nellies who've > complained "that she's aged," or "she's > not as hot as she used to be," and all those others > not recognizing her obvious charms. > > She IS hot, and Playboy wouldn't publish her, as the > COVER GIRL no less, if she wasn't appealing to a large > group of gentlemen. > > But lest those of you who disagree with me continue to . > . . Hmmm, let me think, should I agree with Van, Playboy, > and my own visceral reaction when looking at her, or > those anonymous souls in bondageland who don't like > Charisma Carpenter for whatever idiosyncratic personal reason, hmmmmm . . . To be fair, there was a period on *Angel*, towards the end of Cordy's role, when Charisma looked... (how to put this delicately) ...plumpish? Her cheeks were full (*overly* full) & they dressed her in tent-like outfits. At the same time, there were rumors flying that CC was a notorious party girl: up all night, dancing, drinking, not going to church, etc. Whatever the truth of things, & whatever it had to do with the demise of Cordey... CHARISMA'S BACK!!! Lay your hands on a copy of Playboy if you're a doubter. And unless the airbrush is full of Magic Pixie Dust, it's *not* special effects! According to everything I've read, the new WW movie is going to be "light" (as opposed to the X-Men films, which were "heavy.") One more reason why Charisma would be perfect for the role, and (in my mind) more reason to expect *fun* DiD-ishness (I hope.) Fingers crossed!!! :-) |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
| Thursday May 13 10:02:46 2004 Re: Charisma Indeed! |
| Van wrote:
> when Charisma looked... (how to put > this delicately) ...plumpish? Her cheeks were full > (*overly* full) & they dressed her in tent-like > outfits. At the same time, there were rumors flying that > CC was a notorious party girl: up all night, dancing, > drinking, not going to church, etc. Was her weight in the last series of Angel not because she was pregnant in real life? Anyway, I think she'd be a great Wonder Woman but I have my doubts as to whether the movie will provide a lot - if anything. I know that Lynda Carter was bound and gagged a few times but the difference of her being in a television series where often the type of peril results from a lack of budget. The fact that in the past WW's Kryptonite was her magic lasoo and her inability to escape if bound by man (I don't know if that's still the case) might fall victim to revisionist script writing is also worth considering. It's a damned shame but I have my doubts as to whether many of the comic book adaptations will provide much for the superheroines. I'd love to see Charlize Theron in tight blue spandex struggling against some futuristic bonds as Sue Storm. I'd have loved to have seen Michelle in bondage in Batman Returns but I doubt it will happen. As someone who doesn't read too many comic books these days I'm not sure how often superheroines actually get put into bondage in print these days. However - we can dream. |
| Eh??? |
| Thursday May 13 12:34:41 2004 Re: Charisma Indeed! |
| Eh??? wrote:
> Van wrote: > > > when Charisma looked... (how to put > > this delicately) ...plumpish? {Snip} > Was her weight in the last series of Angel not because > she was pregnant in real life? Ooops! My bad! (Sorry Charisma!) :-} > Anyway, I think she'd be a great Wonder Woman but I have > my doubts as to whether the movie will provide a lot - if > anything. I know that Lynda Carter was bound and gagged > a few times but the difference of her being in a > television series where often the type of peril results > from a lack of budget. The fact that in the past WW's > Kryptonite was her magic lasoo and her inability to > escape if bound by man (I don't know if that's still the > case) might fall victim to revisionist script writing is > also worth considering. > {Snip} > > As someone who doesn't read too many comic books these > days I'm not sure how often superheroines actually get > put into bondage in print these days. > However - we can dream. "Comics" are getting new respect in Hollywood, for the only reason that counts: Comic-based movies are making money. Those of us who read comics/graphic novels know there is no one "theme" or "way" or "attitude" attached to the medium. There's no reason a production team has to do anything comic-based in any way other than whatever their collective muse tells them to do. The ideal WW movie would go back to the roots of the legend. I can easily see a feminist/empowered WW character who *still* runs into problems with her lasso & winds up in classic DiD situations. The lasso is WW's kryptonite. The hero always has a journey to make (if I might wax Joseph W. Campbell-ish for a moment), and overcoming adversity is the point of the exercise. Walker-Texas-Ranger always get the crap beat out of him before he summon his inner-Hero & opens a can of whoop-ass. So, can WW be bound & gagged, placed in a death trap, gloated over by a villain or villainess, abandoned to a horrible fate... *then* escape & open a can of whoop-ass? OF COURSE SHE CAN!!! The Bride did it in "Kill Bill" (which was spectacularly ironic since rumor has it Uma Thurman's bone-head attitude about DiD's was what torpedoed key scenes in the "Avengers" movie.) Anyhoo... I like Charisma, I like WW, & I hope the production team hires her for the role & doesn't screw things up. I'm done! :-) |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.restrainedtastes.com/ |
| Thursday May 13 13:12:29 2004 Re: Finding posts |
| The Engineer wrote:
"If you are looking for posts that have been moved from here to AG, note that the title always has added to it: (moved from Discussion). If you search that phrase in the title field, you'll get all posts and any replies generated over there." _____________________________________ Okay, that probably easier than date/time: Will test it. |
| Jay L |
| Thursday May 13 19:51:34 2004 Re: Nancy Drew News Item |
|
This post was moved to Anything Goes. Poster: Hadji Reason: Off-topic political. |
| The Moderator |
|
|