|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Saturday March 01 00:15:05 2008 Straightjacket Halloween costume |
| Here's a Halloween costume I haven't seen before. I imagine it doesn't really restrain or they would be afraid of legal issues. It does hold with velcro, so the girl might have a little bit of a struggle. All it needs is a shock therapy bit gag. |
| Tom |
| frink49@bellsouth.net |
| http://www.buycostumes.com/Category/126/45/Product/20928/ProductDetail.aspx |
| Saturday March 01 01:12:18 2008 Re: Clean up |
| Tapemaster wrote: However, you have made this website so terribly > confining with your arbitrary and ridiculous decisions as > to what is "off-topic" that we can not talk > about anything anymore. Brian doesn't have the last word because he's always right... he's right because he has the last word. This is HIS website, not yours. He pays for it, not you, he built it, not you, he maintains it, not you. You do nothing. You are entitled to nothing from him here. Whining isn't going to change anything. Now, today, go start a KM/Tapemaster website and talk about anything you want. That's the only way you'll ever be happy. |
| Skank |
| Saturday March 01 02:36:17 2008 Re: Tapemaster |
| The Moderator wrote: > The House of Le Bastard wrote: > > We vote for him not getting banned. > This is not a democracy. Yeah, his posts are deleted, he's ridiculed even when he posts what's happening in the show, and people bait him and imitate him. But he hasn't been punished enough. Yes, ban him. That will certainly work better than ignoring him and ridiculing him. |
| The House of Le Bastard |
| Saturday March 01 04:55:44 2008 Re: Straightjacket Halloween costume |
| Tom wrote: > Here's a Halloween costume I haven't seen before. Great one! Thanks for the find, man. |
| Saturday March 01 05:38:20 2008 late alert -- Melrose Place "Escape from L.A." |
| I just noticed that Melrose Place "Escape from L.A." (Josie Bissett bound and gagged) will be on Soapnet from 6:00 AM - 7:00 AM eastern time Saturday March 1. The scene is at the beginning of the episode. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Saturday March 01 06:45:08 2008 Pecados Ajenos |
| Thanks for identifying the actress so quickly, "hallbird"; well done! |
| Guest |
| Saturday March 01 08:49:38 2008 Re: Brittney Spear |
| I think it's a FAKE. |
| Saturday March 01 09:42:48 2008 Re: Pecados Ajenos-ALERT!!!!! |
| hallbird wrote: > Oz wrote: > > Right now, on Telemundo, SMOKIN hot lady in a baby > doll > > nightie, wrists tied over head to posts, cleave > gagged, > > bare feet tied together. Looks like she may be in > her > > 40's but HOT!!!!!!! > 40's!! She's the mother of what has to be a 40 year old > man in the show. She's at best in her late 50's and her > name is Lupita Ferrer for anyone who wants to check her bio. Many thanks for this alert. Just wondering - is it still ongoing? Anyone capture it? Has anyone else noticed a trend of older women society-wide starting to look sexier in general? Or am I just getting older? :) I bet it's the gym/health trend... |
| skezemuth |
| Saturday March 01 12:43:05 2008 this week on GH |
| This has been a pretty Cool week for scenes. It was a big plus for me that there was a least a little camera time on Kelly's bound boots. I don't want to say that the crappy tape gags ruin it for me but they do a little. So much of what I like about ~bondage~ has to do with the aesthetic visual quality. If the gag is too big, covering the bottom half of her face, too thin (ala dental floss) or a tape gag that’s not stuck it makes it less of a pretty picture to me. It would be insanely cool if this whole thing contu=inues next week and Elizabeth and Sam are both bound and gagged. |
| Snowcat |
| Saturday March 01 12:52:57 2008 Re: Tapemaster |
| The House of Le Bastard wrote: > The Moderator wrote: > > This is not a democracy. > Yeah, his posts are deleted Because they are off-topic. Not of meaness. Because. They. Are. Off-Topic. >, he's ridiculed even when he > posts what's happening in the show, and people bait him > and imitate him. One of the "features" here of long standing is that you're basically free to bash me. However, I consider that opening the door to getting it back from the other contributors. Whether that's a fair and reasonable policy is something I'm certainly willing to discuss. > But he hasn't been punished enough. Yes, ban him. It not about punishment. It's about the fact that people who will not follow the rules will not be allowed to stay. Simple as that. It's entirely up to him. He knows what he needs to do to stay. If he chooses a different path, then so be it. I will not allow rule-breakers to stay just because they have or may in future post useful stuff. |
| The Moderator |
| Saturday March 01 13:23:36 2008 Re: The Mod - FAQ 2.2 etc? |
| The Moderator wrote: > I have no doubt whatsoever that some people have left > because of me. I do C'mon, Biggest source of "rage on this page" is missed scenes. Most common, a Database ID error. 2nd most a US poster checked Alerts page to set his VHS machine before going to work. Then came home and saw something mentioned on Discussion like a Late Alert that wasn't on Alerts {Why Canadian Alerts moved to majorjohns.com so Civil & Kinkynapper had a clear and easy to read page.} Way more rage than your deleted posts. Not to mention the one guy promising to leave because of you was banned what? 15 times afterward... Ha! You'll be golfing during the "arseholes play-offs" ;) |
| Jay L |
| Saturday March 01 14:07:07 2008 Re: this week on GH |
| Snowcat wrote: > I don't want to say that the crappy tape gags ruin it for > me but they do a little. Kelly Monaco's fake tapegag HAS ruined the scene for me. That's why I have been so upset about it. It could have been a classic. > It would be insanely cool if this whole thing contu=inues > next week and Elizabeth and Sam are both bound and gagged. I wouldn't count on that. Advertisements on Soapnet have shown Elizabeth and Sam (escaped from her bonds) getting out of the car. They will probably be saved and the killer will probably get killed or arrested. The sequence will probably end soon. The advertisement showed a closeup of Kelly Monaco's hands cutting through the tape binding her wrists. I couldn't tell what she was cutting it with. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Saturday March 01 14:11:56 2008 Re: Michelle Marsh |
| Mushroom wrote: the pic e-mailed to me (thanks again MAV) and it is > Michelle Marsh. If you want the pic too I'm sure MAV > would be nice enough to send it your way as well :P ok...I just know Coppin shot something that sounds identical recently |
| james |
| Saturday March 01 16:17:07 2008 On-topic or Off-topic? |
| Brian, it is my belief that I was not posting off-topic material. If I was to post something about commercial bondage videos, TV in general, comic books, attractiveness of certain actresses in general, sports, politics, or what I had for breakfast this morning, those posts would clearly be off-topic. However, I was not talking about things like that. I was talking about Kelly Monaco's bondage scene on General Hospital and the fact that her fake tapegag ruined the scene for me. I was talking about a bondage scene in mainstream media and my opinions about it. You couldn't get any MORE "on-topic" than that. The conversation evolved into speculation as to what circumstances would lead the show to use a fake tapegag. It was my speculation that the actress involved ended up making that decision and I expressed that. Conversations EVOLVE, both face to face and on the internet. As far as I was concerned, I was discussing the same "on-topic" topic. If the evolution of a conversation reaches a point where you feel that it is "off-topic", then you have to let us know EXACTLY where you are drawing the line between "on-topic" and "off-topic", because there is a huge gray area. There are also other ways in which you have not been specific enough in letting us know what is "on-topic". For instance, suppose I was to start a converstaion by saying: "I like white over-the-mouth gags the best." Is that "on-topic" or "off-topic"? I COULD be referring to gags in bondage scenes in the mainstream media, but not necessarily. I could be talking about bondage in general or bondage in commercial videos. If everybody then got into a conversation about their favorite types of gags, without referring specifically to any mainstream media scenes, is that "on-topic" or "off-topic"? OR, what if I was to say: "Jaclyn Smith has been bound, but never bound and GAGGED. You would think that after being a professional actress since the 1970s, being on "Charlie's Angels" for 5 years and all the women-drama TV movies that she has been in, that she would have been gagged at least once at some point along the way. I wonder why that is?" Is that "on-topic" or "off-topic"? I am talking about the ISSUE of an actress being bound and gagged in the mainstream media. However, I am talking about the LACK of a scene, not the presence of one. If this would be ruled "on-topic", then consider the possible continuation of this conversation: Somebody else says: "Maybe she doesn't like to be gagged. Even though she is the actress, not the director, and therefore shouldn't have policy-making power, what if she does? What if there have been times when the script called for her to be gagged and she said "no", and she was allowed to have her way." Do you see how the conversation would naturally evolve in that direction? You could make the argument that ANY post could be ruled "off-topic" unless it discusses a SPECIFIC mainstream media scene and what our opinions are about that scene. ANYTHING ELSE would therefore be "off-topic". Is that what you are limiting us to? |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Saturday March 01 16:27:00 2008 Re: Clean up |
| Cohen wrote: You're a frigging idiot. Or, to be slightly less harsh: As Karl Malden's character told George C. Scott's character in "Patton," "You don't know when to shut up, George!" |
| Cinch |
| Saturday March 01 19:03:32 2008 Re: On-topic or Off-topic? |
| Tapemaster wrote: > You could make the argument that ANY post could be ruled > "off-topic" unless it discusses a SPECIFIC mainstream media scene and what our opinions are about that scene. ANYTHING ELSE would therefore be "off-topic". Okay. Let's say he does rule a whole bunch of stuff like that off-topic. So? It's still his forum, not yours. Moderators in any forum like this do have a lot of power. You therefore don't post in any forum if you don't respect the Moderator.... otherwise, you will never be happy with anything he does. For you to get your way would mean YOU are now the Moderator, and that obviously isn't going to happen. That aside, your fanatic attitude about these things may serve as an illustration of why it's best not to take this particular hobby too far. But I digress. |
| Sigh. |
| Saturday March 01 19:12:37 2008 Re: this week on GH |
| Yeah, I'm betting it's just about over. That car's not going anywhere, and the bad guy wouldn't get far on foot with two hostages, so pretty much the only way for him to pull it off would be to incapacitate the other cop and steal the police car. It's not inconceivable, but it's pretty far-fetched. |
| Raffish |
| Saturday March 01 19:38:20 2008 This and that and nothing in particular... |
| ...or as Sarah Michelle Gellar proclaimed to rescuer Linda Cardellini after divesting herself of the last of her bonds in the 2002 live-action "Scooby-Doo" movie: "I'm SO over this damsel in distress nonsense!" Careful, Sarah-you're not in the Hall of Fame yet. Anyway...on to what I wanted to talk about. I was down at the library earlier today going through some old microfilmed newspapers doing research on another matter, and just happened to come across a number of accounts dating from 1971 or so of young women in Northern Ireland who had the misfortune of their dalliances with British soldiers coming to light among those who, shall we say, didn't hold with that. It seems the usual response involved said young women winding up tied to a post and then relieved of their hair, a la French women a generation earlier who'd been a bit too chummy with the occupying Nazis and then fallen into the clutches of the Resistance after liberation (although I don't recall any bondage being involved there). The Irish captives, however, weren't paraded about sans their locks as were the French; instead, while still tied, their scalps were tarred and THEN they were released. Which got me to thinking-and, of course hitting the database. Seems about the only possibility is Margot Kidder's scene in 1974's "A Quiet Day in Belfast" which is described as involving a post-tying (!) but doesn't mention scissors or tar. Don't tell me Kidder wussed out on us BEFORE The Greatest Wasted Opportunity Of The Twentieth Century-namely her bondageless turn as Lois Lane opposite Christopher Reeve in the "Superman" movies. Well, if not Kidder, then anyone else? I always thought the fraternizing-femme-facing-Resistance-revenge setup should have produced some scenes. Did it? And could the "troubles" in Northern Ireland have provided more than is in the database? Too bad if they didn't. Roma Downey might have more of a solid case for making the Hall of Fame if they had. |
| Fettershackle |
| Saturday March 01 21:22:16 2008 Re: On-topic or Off-topic? |
| I certainly understand where you are coming from... I think it sucks that Jacky Smith never got gagged... I'd LOVE to be the guy deciding how tie up scene on GH go down... its just after you've heard the ~nongag clause ~ antibondageconspiracy~ theirshowswouldruleiftheyjustcateredTOUS~ type posts so many times they all get WAY old and tiresome One of the biggest reasons this page is so awesome is that it is so well moderated. The moderator has very good reasons for everything he rules on, trust him on that. He has certainly cut me slack when I posted something stupid (I'm a jokey type & some stuff would have be cool if Me Raff Brian & Jay were having beers but posted on a page it leaves too much room for neg interpretation) or responed to a troll (I can be a tad firey too lol) I guess we Oldtimers have a bit of a sense about what Old Hitler doesn't like & we respect that. I guess that the bottum line just try to respect the Mod and huis wishes... I assure you he has earned my respect massively. |
| Snowcat |
| Saturday March 01 21:26:00 2008 Re: On-topic or Off-topic? |
| and the mocking of Snowwycats poor typing ~skills~ can commence forthwith... ;) |
| Snowcat |
| Saturday March 01 21:30:57 2008 Re: On-topic or Off-topic? |
| Tapemaster wrote: > Brian, it is my belief that I was not posting off-topic > material. etc. etc. etc. You do realize he's not going to answer you or your posts, because he already made it clear that you are on "Tapemaster status" which means he will just delete your posts and not bother discussing it with you? You're just wasting your time and embarrassing yourself even more. |
| Saturday March 01 21:47:31 2008 Re: This and that and nothing in particular... |
| Fettershackle wrote: > their dalliances with British > soldiers coming to light among those who, shall we say, > didn't hold with that. It seems the usual response involved said young women winding up tied to a post and then relieved of their hair, Seems about the only possibility is Margot Kidder's scene in 1974's "A Quiet Day in Belfast" Correct she got a haircut, had tar poured on her and then they threw feathers on her. She was playing twins, and I think they grabbed the wrong twin |
| Jay L |
| Saturday March 01 22:01:59 2008 Re: This and that and nothing in particular... |
| Fettershackle wrote: > ... Also, but not Irish. (Italian) === Record number: 11084 Title: Tre stelle (1999) Medium: TV Movie Actress: Alba Parietti, Unknown Description: Alba and two other ladies are captured by Taliban types. Three are tied hands behind, have signs referring to them as whores tied around their necks, and have their heads shaved. ======================================= This was an on screen makeover. But no tar, nor feathers like Margot Kidder An out of the blue scene in a soppy romance as she's caught saying goodbye to the German guy by the Italian guy she also romancing and he left a (Puta?) note, she crying.. the end? No Then it all starts going like your descript |
| Jay L |
| Saturday March 01 22:17:28 2008 Re: this week on GH |
| Raffish wrote: > Yeah, I'm betting it's just about over. On Wednesday, Soapnet will be showing a special General Hospital "behind-the-scenes" program showing how they filmed the "car teetering over the bridge" sequence. Although it seems that they will be focusing on the use of the "green screen" background and computer generated effects, it is possible that they will also show footage of how they filmed Kelly Monaco bound and gagged in the car trunk. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Saturday March 01 22:21:35 2008 Re: On-topic or Off-topic? |
| Tapemaster wrote: > The conversation evolved into speculation as to what > circumstances would lead the show to use a fake tapegag. If you haven't figured it out yet, speculation is where everything veers off topic. That's when the countless renditions of no-gag clauses, et. al., pop up and the topic is ruled off-topic. Is that such a tough concept to digest? |
| Binde Meister |
| Saturday March 01 23:16:27 2008 Re: Britney Spears |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > i just saw the flickr pic Britney gagged with red bandana. It looks real. If its not then its the realistic looking fake pic i ever saw. |
| The Instant classic |
|
|