|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
Sunday March 02 00:30:48 2008 Re: On-topic or Off-topic? |
This post was deleted. Poster: Tapemaster Reason: Off-topic. And, that's it. Warned, repeatedly. Chose to ignore. |
The Moderator |
Sunday March 02 01:22:12 2008 Wednesday's GH |
I would bet that from a production standpoint that Kelly Monaco is not bound and gagged in the car trunk itself but on something that simulates the car trunk. For that reason I think it's highly unlikely that we'll see any bound and gagged stuff with her. We'll probably see her after she's freed herself and is trying to get out of the car. |
hallbird |
Sunday March 02 01:41:59 2008 Re: Wednesday's GH |
hallbird wrote: > I would bet that from a production standpoint that Kelly > Monaco is not bound and gagged in the car trunk GH marathon under way right now on SoapNet. Action in the Monday episode starts around 1:45 a.m. |
Sunday March 02 02:51:41 2008 Re: On-topic or Off-topic? |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > You're just wasting your time and embarrassing yourself even more. Well no, he's wasting all our time too. Having to scroll through all his long winded ranting posts. Personally I think it detracts from the stated purpose of the forum. Thank you Mr. Mod for pulling the plug on this guy. |
MT |
Sunday March 02 03:43:04 2008 Re: Wednesday's GH |
hallbird wrote: > but on something that simulates the car trunk. For that > reason I think it's highly unlikely that we'll see any > bound and gagged stuff with her. I wouldn't be so sure of that, a behind the scenes video of the ATWT railroad track scene with Jennifer Landon from last summer showed them tying her up to the train tracks and had some commentary from her about it. I bet we'll see something, since she's a main character involved in this story. |
MT |
Sunday March 02 03:57:07 2008 Tapemaster's GONE ? |
Cheers to that. |
C |
Sunday March 02 04:21:37 2008 Re: On-topic or Off-topic? |
Binde Meister wrote: > If you haven't figured it out yet, speculation is where > everything veers off topic. That's when the countless > renditions of no-gag clauses, et. al., pop up and the > topic is ruled off-topic. Amen. I know there are some actresses with obvious opportunities who've never been gagged, but I've always hates how it translates into a conspiracy theory about Hollywood in general annoys me. Oh, and "the conversation evolved" is passive. "I evolved the conversation into..." is more descriptive of what actually occured. |
Stressed |
Sunday March 02 04:25:12 2008 Re: Tapemaster's GONE ? |
C wrote: > Cheers to that. And long overdue. I was truly tired of having to scroll and scroll in order to find the conversations that interested me and fearing that I'd miss stuff. |
Stressed |
Sunday March 02 04:45:32 2008 Re: Britney Spears |
The Instant classic wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > i just saw the flickr pic > Britney gagged with red bandana. It looks real. If its > not then its the realistic looking fake pic i ever saw. The headshot is a press photo, taken at some public function. There's a guy looking off to the side behind her, and the background is dark. From the sharp focus, catchlights and small highlights, it's a flash shot. The scarf is in much softer focus (you should see the weave quite clearly at this resolution), the damp patch is off-centre in her mouth, and you'd expect the loose fold at the front to cast a dense shadow at the angle of the jaw. There is nothing to suggest compression of the cheeks or stretching of the corners of the mouth. Finally, if Britney ever appeared gagged in public the media would have such a field day that we'd never hear the last of it! Gotta be a fake, folks. |
Mad Dan |
http://www.dansdidnts.com |
Sunday March 02 06:03:49 2008 Re: Tapemaster's GONE ? |
Stressed wrote: > > Cheers to that. I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, Brian and the Mod had every reason to banish this guy. Alas, poor TM just couldn't let go of his Hollywood conspiracy theories, which obviously consume him. On the other hand, as someone previously pointed out, TM did provide a good amount of valuable info. More importantly, he provided non-stop entertainment. I mean what could be more fun to watch than an OCD train wreck who can't control his lust for "The perfect gag?" In the absence of Biff, TM was the best show on Brian's for shear guilty pleasure viewing. But wait, there's more! If you are interested in "The New Adventures of Tapemaster", by all means visit Brian's "Friends" page and scroll to the bottom, where you will find the Profoz web site link. Profoz set up an Anything Goes page. Low and behold, our old friend Tapemaster has already set up shop there, desperately looking for takers to his banished thread about Monaco, etc. If you couldn't get enough of TM, as I certainly never can, head on over and bid him hello. Let's see how long before Profoz kicks poor TM out the door. I mean ultimately it's inevitable, right? |
Dr. Jan Itor |
Sunday March 02 06:06:02 2008 Re: Wednesday's GH |
hallbird wrote: > I would bet that from a production standpoint that Kelly > Monaco is not bound and gagged in the car trunk itself > but on something that simulates the car trunk. I just watched a rerun of Tuesday's episode, and in most of the scenes in which Ms. Monaco is bound and gagged, the duct tape over her mouth seems to be securely applied. It seems to adhere quite securely to her mouth; it does not look loosely applied at all, except in the final scene, in which she is bound to a chair. The dastardly villain pulls it off her mouth, and this may be why it was loosely applied; this facilitated his removing the tape from her mouth, and also minimized her discomfort. |
Hadji |
Sunday March 02 06:07:23 2008 Re: Britney Spears |
Mad Dan wrote: > > (unsigned poster) wrote: > i just saw the flickr > pic Britney gagged with red bandana. Could someone please post the Web address for this picture? |
Hadji |
Sunday March 02 08:12:11 2008 Re: Tapemaster's GONE ? |
>>>>Alas, poor TM just couldn't let go of his Hollywood conspiracy theories, which obviously consume him.<<<< I'm the one, many years ago, who started the "no-gag clause" thing for actresses. Of course, I never took it seriously. To me, it was just a tongue-in-cheek way for this admitted gag-snob to point out/complain about how certain actresses manage to avoid being gagged their entire careers, which, if you look at Hollywood overall, is a pretty difficult thing to do, thank goodness. Anyway, after a while the Moderator decdied this subject needed, for various reasons, to be labeled off-topic. If I recall, I didn't particularly agree with this ruling, but in the end I had to respect the "his site, his rules" aspect and anyway, I had my own site to post anything I wanted. So, even though I kind of feel a bit bad if my original posts might have influenced someone's posts to the point of being banned, I guess in the end he's an adult and therefore responsible for his own actions. |
An Old Grey Friend |
Sunday March 02 08:44:10 2008 Diana Rigg |
This Legs website is getting better all the time. The pic is from : http://imdb.com/title/tt0054518 The Avengers (1961) "The Danger Makers" (4.20) Mrs. Emma Peel |
Rich |
bindherupx@yahoo.com |
http://www.celeblegs.net/ms/riggdiana02.jpg |
Sunday March 02 09:30:55 2008 Re: Wednesday's GH |
Hadji wrote: > I just watched a rerun of Tuesday's episode, and in most > of the scenes in which Ms. Monaco is bound and gagged, > the duct tape over her mouth seems to be securely > applied. I agree. I don't see anything wrong with it all. The removal part was loose, similar to Kathy Ireland in "Gridlock" where she faked irritation on a loose gag. Even then, Kathy Ireland and Kelly Monacco tape-gagged in enough for me. |
Sunday March 02 10:02:57 2008 Re: Britney Spears |
Hadji wrote: > Could someone please post the Web address for this picture? Yer tiz. http://www.flickr.com/photos/23969435@N05/2293097511/sizes/o/ Originally posted on Friday. |
Mad Dan |
http://www.dansdidnts.com |
Sunday March 02 11:26:48 2008 Re: Britney Spears |
Hadji wrote: > Could someone please post the Web address for this picture? Please use the Search feature to find old posts. |
The Moderator |
Sunday March 02 12:27:27 2008 The Cottage |
This looks interesting!!Release date 3/14 (UK) 4/29 (US) http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article3438930.ece Jennifer Ellison is back. And this time she's acting for her life. Really. Look at her there, in the first-act climax of the smart new Britflick comedy-horror The Cottage. She's doped up and lifeless, trussed up in ropes and gags, a helpless kidnap victim in low-slung tracky bottoms and tight microtop. But wait! No! She's waking up, and she's loud and aggressive! And what's this? She's kneeing the hapless kidnapper Peter (Reece Shearsmith) in the groin! She's dropping him to the ground and, still bound and gagged, butting his nose into a bloody pulp. “I just broke your f***ing nose with my hands tied behind my back,” she growls in guttural Scouse, gag yanked down, lips curled in disgust. “So what does that make you?” Welcome, boys, to the new Jennifer Ellison. Ogle at your own risk. |
Boots and ropes |
Sunday March 02 14:08:13 2008 GH Behind-the-Scenes Special |
Saw the ad for this during the Soapnet marathon, but when exactly is it on? Here we get the new General Hospital on ABC from 3:00 to 4:00 p.m. and the Soapnet same-day rebroadcast from 10:00-11:00 p.m. Is my local affiliate actually going to preempt the 4:00 showing of Oprah to air the behind-the-scenes special? Is Soapnet going to preempt the 11:00 showing of Days of Our Lives? Or is the Wednesday episode going to be shortened somehow? |
Eric |
Sunday March 02 14:23:13 2008 Jennifer Ellison, the Cottage |
Hello All, I just read a review for a new flick called "the Cottage" staring Jennifer Ellison. The article below shows that this dark comedy should deliver for us. It opens this month, thought I'm not quite sure where. http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article3438930.ece |
PW |
Sunday March 02 14:39:17 2008 Re: Britney Spears |
The Instant classic wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > i just saw the flickr pic > Britney gagged with red bandana. It looks real. Alas, tis but a clever fake... |
steve a |
Sunday March 02 14:42:33 2008 Re: Wednesday's GH |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > GH marathon under way right now on SoapNet. If you don't wanna wait around several hours for SoapNet or can't stand all the non relevant bs, I posted a site update featuring all Kelly Monaco's action from the week that was posted on Youtube. I'll be on top of next week's action as well including the "behind the scenes" stuff. Enjoy! |
MT |
http://www.bigmtdid.blogspot.com |
Sunday March 02 14:46:26 2008 Re: Jennifer Ellison, the Cottage |
PW wrote: > opens this month, thought I'm not quite sure where. imdb.com is the best site for this kind of info, generally, but not always, correct. Their boards always have people that talk about release dates, this one is March 14 in the UK where it has already premiered, and April 29th direct to DVD in the US. |
http://imdb.com/title/tt0465430/ |
Sunday March 02 16:52:27 2008 Japanese movie ID |
Need help: Just saw a couple of clips on majorjohn's "Japan 01" and "Japan 02" under "Requests"; very extensive scenes, anyone know the titles? By the way, also as part of the update the much heralded "Home & Away" scene with one of the best tape gag and struggling scenes ever. |
Sunday March 02 16:55:20 2008 Re: Britney Spears |
steve a wrote: > The Instant classic wrote: > > (unsigned poster) wrote: > i just saw the flickr > pic > Britney gagged with red bandana. It looks real. > Alas, tis but a clever fake... I guess its a fake. Give credit though i think its a pretty good looking fake. Compare to some of these others you can its fake a mile away. |
The instant classic |
Sunday March 02 17:00:10 2008 General Hospital |
The bondage on General Hospital may not be over yet. The spoiler boards have this item posted for this week: "Diego binds Nadine up and keeps her in the shadows. Nikolas locates and rescues Nadine from the elevator shaft." Nadine is played by the lovely Claire Coffee. |
Another old friend |
Sunday March 02 17:13:32 2008 Dexter 2nite |
Just a reminder there will be a scene at the end of tonights episode on CBS. I posted an alert. |
The Instant Classic |
Sunday March 02 18:19:51 2008 Re: Wednesday's GH |
MT wrote: > I'll be on top of next week's action as well including > the "behind the scenes" stuff. Enjoy! It's hard to be "on top of" the behind the scenes stuff when we don't know when it is. SoapNet doesn't appear to have provided for a special time slot after the Wednesday rebroadcast -- Days of Our Lives comes on right after GH. So what's going to happen Wednesday? Will GH be cut to half an hour followed by a half-hour special? That sounds odd. |
Eric |
Sunday March 02 18:47:32 2008 Witless protection |
Did anyone go to see this film which we know for a fact has at least one scene, maybe more? |
ss |
Sunday March 02 19:02:37 2008 Re: Tapemaster's GONE ? |
Stressed wrote: I was truly tired of having to scroll > and scroll << But really now. How long does it take to scroll past individual posts on this forum? One tenth of a second? Is this really a serious problem in anyone's life? |
Sheesh. |
Sunday March 02 19:17:23 2008 Wmen in the Forum |
Please forgive me if this is an off-topic post. I will certainly understand if the moderator wants to delete this. Its in response to an earlier comment by an apparently now banished member. I am also an actual woman who enjoys bondage. I have been known to visit this forum and to lurk about. I did post just once about a movie with some bondage in it. The picture was huge and it was deleted. Anyway, I wanted to assure some of the posters here that there are probably a few women, interested in bondage, who do read the messages and comments on this forum. Its not a big deal, and I don't really want to start a discussion about it because its not really the point of the forum. I just thought that some people might appreciate the knowledge. Thanks! |
Prefer to be Anonymous |
Sunday March 02 20:07:14 2008 Re: Tapemaster's GONE ? |
Dr. Jan Itor wrote: > TM did provide a good > amount of valuable info. Really? Well then here's the link to the Chiller channel so you can see what he's watching "right now"! ;) |
Jay L |
http://www.chillertv.com/ |
Sunday March 02 20:22:57 2008 Question |
Okay, during Tapemaster's second-to-last post he listed a whole bunch of things he "clearly" believed were off topic. This list included comic books. Question: Are comic book scenes - provided they're mainstream, available-in-your-local-comic-shop books and not Franco Saudelli/Alazar/Eros Comix - fair game here? I've posted a few times about some comics recently and just want a clarification on the site policy. Thanks. BTW, at the risk of sounding like a suck up, I really appreciate the work you put into this site. I've had it bookmarked since the tripod and dreambook days. Thank you for everything. |
Brett |
bretttcarr@yahoo.com |
Sunday March 02 20:35:10 2008 Re: Question |
Brett wrote: > Okay, during Tapemaster's second-to-last post he listed a > whole bunch of things he "clearly" believed were off topic. This list included comic books. Question: Are comic book scenes Are you having trouble with the search feature? Try = Empowered |
Jay L |
Sunday March 02 20:39:34 2008 Re: Brittney Spear |
paolo wrote: > Brittney gagged > http://www.flickr.com/photos/23969435@N05/2293097511/sizes/o/ If that's a fake it's one of the most realistic ones I've ever seen. There even looks to be a saliva splotch in the center of the bandana. Paolo, where did you find this pic? |
JP |
japfeif@aol.com |
Sunday March 02 20:45:57 2008 Re: Brett's Question |
> Are you having trouble with the search feature? > Try = Empowered Don't try "Empowered" as realised that the one you previously mentioned posting about. ;) Try = Wonder Woman =========================================== Thursday January 10 17:47:00 2008 JLA: Classified In this week's issue of JLA: Classified, #50, Wonder Woman gets caught in her lasso by a hulking monster. She gets tied up and knocked out, and there's a couple of good panels. Fair warning, though: in the end, she winds up tied back to back with Supes, as the cover image shows (and the bondage is better). But there are a few panels with no super-interference. If by chance that cover image appeals to you, there's a massive version at: http://www.emeraldcitycomics.com/uploaded_images/JLAclassified50-785562.jpg Jeb jebdel@yahoo.com http://www.jebsadventurebound.net ================================================ Monday February 04 00:14:04 2008 Site Update Tiffany Fallon appears kinda/sorta nude on the cover of Playboy and millions riot. Well, it seems that way, as MSNBC online covers the controversy. Normally this kinda stuff wouldn't make a ripple outside the blogoverse, but with the big newsies going online I guess they're kinda desperate for material at times. Anyway, we cover the story, since it's the same anti-sex feminists who have been all over bondage imagery for so long. Does this article contain a gratuitous bondage image involving Wonder Woman? Oh, why did you even have to ask? http://www.bondagerotica.com/extras/playboyarticletease.jpg Pat Powers http://www.bondagerotica.com/mainstream.html ========================================================= Monday February 04 00:52:22 2008 Re: Site Update Pat Powers wrote: > Tiffany Fallon appears kinda/sorta nude on the cover of > Playboy and millions riot... > ...Does this > article contain a gratuitous bondage image involving > Wonder Woman? Oh, why did you even have to ask? Thanks for the info, but here's a correction: This image... http://www.bondagerotica.com/articles/wonderwoman/wwimages/wwnakedchainedcu1986.jpg ...is from the 90's restart of the WW title, but it's of WW's mommy, Queen Hippolyta, *not* WW. Diana hadn't been "born" yet when Heracles and his pals went all *Gorean* on the Amazons. http://www.bondagerotica.com/articles/wonderwoman/wwimages/wwnakedchainedcu1986.jpg Van vvvan@earthlink.net http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ ============================================= If having any problems? Let me know |
Jay L |
Sunday March 02 20:54:39 2008 Re: Brett's Question |
Jay L wrote: > Don't try "Empowered" as realised that the one > you previously mentioned posting about. ;) Jeb also has one from "Black Widow" |
Brad Boyes |
Sunday March 02 20:57:18 2008 Re: Question |
Brett wrote: > Okay, during Tapemaster's second-to-last post he listed a > whole bunch of things he "clearly" believed > were off topic. This list included comic books. He was incorrect. Comic books are mainstream media, and have been discussed with some regularity over the years. I should have clarified at the time. |
The Moderator |
Sunday March 02 21:02:20 2008 Re: Brett's Question |
Brad Boyes wrote: > Jeb also has one from "Black Widow" Hey, if comics are "off-topic", then let's see the Moderator deal with this guy! =========================== Sunday January 07 23:20:11 2007 9 Chickweed Lane Superlative Girl in a bind again. Brian R http://comics.com/comics/chickweed/archive/images/chickweed20070101047217.jpg ============================================ |
Jay L |
Sunday March 02 21:15:22 2008 TM's banishment |
I whole heartedly disagree with his banishment as I saw him as a very valuable contributor in terms of thought provovking threads and cool bondage info. However, if you want the quality of discussion on this page diminshed to the point whre this is nothing more than a trades/vcr alerts page, then by all means, ban him and keep him banned. His absence is your loss! That's all I have to say about the matter. |
Chris |
Sunday March 02 21:32:09 2008 Re: Brittney Spear |
JP wrote: There even looks to be a saliva splotch in > the center of the bandana. The faker copied the gag from a commercial bondage image, as is usual in composite photomanipulations. The saliva splotch is therefore to be expected. If he or she had actually centred it between Britney's teeth rather than off to her right, it would have been more convincing. Being wet, it would also have a highlight if were in the same narrow flash beam as Britney's face. The lighting on the scarf is softer and more even, like studio lighting - which it probably is. The scarf seems to be very loose, as if sitting on her lower teeth and lip, but there is no shadow below it. Look at the shadow outlining Britney's chin; there is nothing like it under the scarf, apart from one angular black spot. The artist has, however, darkened a small area of hair to suggest shadow. If the scarf were tight around her head, the shadows at the sides of her face would curve in to follow the top of it, and the scarf would have shading of its own at the sides. Neither is the case. The scarf has softer edges in some places than in others, though it is much better trimmed out than most I've seen. Also, the thickness of the scarf appears to be forced up between two pairs of teeth, the visible ones of which are of different shapes! Poor girl would need to see a dentist after that. Yes, it's a good fake, but the telltale signs are easy enough to spot if you look closely. And if it's real, where was it taken, why is it unique, and how come it's not all over the media? Imagine the headlines! |
Mad Dan |
Sunday March 02 21:41:22 2008 Torchwood & Being John Malkovich |
Those two alert for tomorrow are wrong. I started to paste the schedule from zap2it to the description to limit the errors, but alas I still am still not found a more reliable way. |
civil |
Sunday March 02 22:01:23 2008 Are there scenes in these movies ? |
In the older versions of these movies, these movies have scenes: "The Hound of the Baskervilles" and "The Sign of Four". ION TV on 3/7 is showing the newer versions of these movies, do these have any scenes ? Also on 3/8 Sci-Fi Channel is showing "Snake King" with Jayne Heitmeyer, doesn't she get her hands tied behind her back ? |
Sunday March 02 22:06:30 2008 Stargate Atlantis |
Anything important happen on Friday. It should replay at 9pm this friday. Must not have been, since Van has been quiet. |
civil |
Sunday March 02 22:23:06 2008 Re: TM's banishment |
Chris wrote: > I whole heartedly disagree with his banishment as I saw > him as a very valuable contributor in terms of thought > provovking threads and cool bondage info. I agree. An idiot, but a valuable one. Both informational and comedic value. |
Sunday March 02 23:29:19 2008 Re: TM's banishment |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > Chris wrote: > > I whole heartedly disagree with his banishment as I > saw > > him as a very valuable contributor in terms of > thought > > provovking threads and cool bondage info. > I agree. An idiot, but a valuable one. Both > informational and comedic value. This isn't really bondage-related or anything, so probably off-topic, but...so how does that work exactly...banishment? Does that mean someone banished like TM cannot post here anymore, but could still access the page, like a regular web site, and read discussions & see alerts & such, or now if he were to say type in the URL would he get an "access denied" messgae or something like that? I've often wondered how severe a banishment from the page actually is. I mean, not being able to post would suck but a person could still see upcoming alerts & catch up on scenes. But if you couldn't even access the page at all, just to read it...that might really suck. Just wondered about this, that's all. |
JP |
japfeif@aol.com |
|