|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Monday February 18 00:11:04 2008 Re: The Tonight Show |
| Eric wrote: > Clyde wrote: > > Kristin Chenoweth is a Broadway actress and singer... > From what I recall of The West Wing, she's also very > short -- or is Allison Janney just tall? Kristin is indeed tiny-hot. According to the imdb, she's 4' 11" (1.50 m). Incidently, Allison Janney *is* "just tall" (6' (1.83 m)). |
 |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
| Monday February 18 01:48:43 2008 Interesting trailer at the video page |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: (unsigned poster) Reason: Do not post about items on Video unless it's in reply to a message. People who are interested in vids will, you know, READ that page. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday February 18 01:49:31 2008 Re: Morning |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: Tapemaster Reason: Off-topic. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday February 18 01:49:44 2008 Complaining (was Re: Morning) |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: Tapemaster Reason: Off-topic. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday February 18 02:10:15 2008 Re: Morning |
| The Moderator wrote: > This post was deleted. > Poster: Tapemaster > Reason: Off-topic. How come that post was deleted for being off-topic but the post that I was replying to was not? |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Monday February 18 02:11:20 2008 Re: Complaining (was Re: Morning) |
| The Moderator wrote: > This post was deleted. > Poster: Tapemaster > Reason: Off-topic. AGAIN, how come that post was deleted for being off-topic but the post that I was replying to was not? |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Monday February 18 02:28:53 2008 Re: What are your opinions of "Torture Porn"? |
| Ralphus wrote: > What do you think about "torture porn"? Is it a > good thing, or do regular bondage films satisfy you more? I don't think the two should even be related. Bondage is, well, bondage. In fact, the term BDSM clearly separates bondage and domination (restraint, implied threat) from sadism and masochism (the torture and pain). Even had that Lindsey Lohan gag scene been the perfect gag/bondage/acting combo I would not have kept it because the explicitness of the torture made it sickening to me, not exciting. |
| Stressed |
| Monday February 18 04:01:17 2008 Arguing with the Mod' +++ ...Not a good idea. |
| Tapemaster, how frustrated will you get if you end up with a permanent ban ? Tone down your posts and show more respect. |
| C |
| Monday February 18 04:52:42 2008 American Dad |
| The attractive female neighbor of the Smith family is bound and gagged in their basement by Francine Smith in this episode. She is bound to a chair with ropes and gagged with a cloth tied tightly between her teeth. She is attractive, but not glamorously beautiful; she looks like an animated version of Amy Irving. Her gag is removed not long afterward, but she spends a lot of time tied to the chair. |
| Hadji |
| Monday February 18 05:07:17 2008 Re: American Dad |
| Hadji wrote: > The attractive female neighbor of the Smith family is > bound and gagged in their basement by Francine Smith in > this episode. I have composed an Entry for this episode for the voluminous Scene Database. I entered "unknown" in the actress name data field, but I'm sure this character was voiced by one of the actresses who voices the regular characters. |
| Hadji |
| Monday February 18 05:14:13 2008 Re: Complaining (was Re: Morning) |
| Tapemaster wrote: > AGAIN, how come that post was deleted for being off-topic > but the post that I was replying to was not? You had me at AGAIN...much better than your first post 75 seconds earlier. I hereby reserve the right to get REALLY PISSED at the moderator if he does not indulge my desire to discuss the STRANGE JAPANESE SEA CREATURES that I just saw on the Discovery Channel, because the fact that I have used the same subject line as you makes it INHERENTLY ON-TOPIC. I mean, these fish had ELBOWS. I think we need to discuss this. |
| Raffish |
| Monday February 18 06:56:53 2008 Re: Complaining (was Re: Morning) |
| Raffish wrote: > I mean, these fish had ELBOWS. I think we need to discuss this. Were their elbows tied? If not, I want to complain. I think we are missing far too many opportunities for bound fish elbows. I think we should all write letters to the Fish & Game Commision demanding that there is more bondage in our ponds, streams, lakes and oceans. BTW, does anybody here remember the term "Tapemaster status" from days past? It just sprung to mind. |
| Dr. Jan Itor |
| Monday February 18 07:44:13 2008 Re: Complaining (was Re: Morning) |
| Dr. Jan Itor wrote: > BTW, does anybody here remember the term "Tapemaster > status" from days past? It just sprung to mind. Yes, and also when AG used to make fun of all his posts like these. Love your name, btw. |
| Bindemeister |
| Monday February 18 10:20:53 2008 Re: Moderator- Michael's "Unhappy End!" |
| Ahoi, I did not intent to bring so much confusion in Brian´s site, I just mentioned the new episodes as I know some people on your site are also interested in UE. Raffish is right: There ARE several UE episodes which do not contain bondage at all but it seems noone cares about those episodes and I got many complaints when we released them because they do NOT contain scenes). The actresses we have in the series are usually REAL actresses who play big parts or even star in German TV series, sometimes we also have models in UE. Michael |
| Michael Huck |
| http://www.gator-group.de |
| Monday February 18 10:37:34 2008 Re: Complaining (was Re: Morning) |
| Dr. Jan Itor wrote: If not, I want to complain. I > think we are missing far too many opportunities for bound > fish elbows. I think we should all write letters to the > Fish & Game Commision demanding that there is more > bondage in our ponds, streams, lakes and oceans. Don't your realize the reason we HAVE fishing is so we can see female fish with hooks in their mouths, which really look like GAGS? I am a consumer, and I won't eat seafood for this reason. That is my RIGHT. |
| Tapeblaster |
| Monday February 18 12:37:43 2008 Re: Moderator- Michael's "Unhappy End!" |
| Michael Huck wrote: ***** Ahoi, I did not intent to bring so much confusion in Brian´s site I just mentioned the new episodes as I know some people on your site are also interested in UE.***** Understood, I'm going through the notes, hopefully clear this up. Btw: I've watched your videos and think they're great. But that a personal opinion of mine. It has no influence on the criteria Brian uses to judge if Mainstream & acceptable for the Database **** Raffish is right: There ARE several UE episodes which do not contain bondage at all The actresses we have in the series are usually REAL actresses who play big parts or even star in German TV series, sometimes we also have models in UE. ***** Okay, the criteria leans more on availability to the posters of this page, than the popularity of leads. "King of the Park Rangers" (Homepage link) is from a similar situation. Popular dog from the Katts & Dog series was involved in that, with the intent of a Mainstream production. Most of the complaints which lead to Brian's ruling and it's deletion from the Database revolved around the availability to the posters. Like, "It's not on the shelf at Tower Records", or "It won't be airing on Television", etc Hope that clears this up? |
| Jay L |
| http://cliffhangerproductions.net/kingoftheparkrangers.html |
| Monday February 18 13:08:15 2008 The Moderator - Re: Complaining |
| Raffish wrote: > I hereby reserve the right to get REALLY PISSED at the > moderator if he does not indulge my desire to discuss Raffi, figure this all a joke gone too far? Whilst going through the notes for Michael, which include other posters, there are afew demands from Tapemaster for Brian to Moderate and really crackdown on posters. Can't see getting pissed with Brian with this lack of consistency? |
| Jay L |
| Monday February 18 16:11:48 2008 Re: Moderator- Michael's "Unhappy End!" |
| Jay L wrote: > "King of the Park Rangers" (Homepage link) is > from a similar situation. Popular dog from the Katts > & Dog series was involved in that, with the intent of > a Mainstream production. > Most of the complaints which lead to Brian's ruling and > it's deletion from the Database revolved around the > availability to the posters. Like, "It's not on the > shelf at Tower Records", or "It won't be airing > on Television", etc Hope that clears this up? Here's a question regarding KOTPR. The serial has finally gotten a slightly more official release and is now available through Amazon.com. It should be listed on the IMDB soon, too. So, would that make it eligible for the database? |
| Todd 3-D |
| todd3d@yahoo.com |
| http://ww.cliffhangerproductions.net |
| Monday February 18 16:13:54 2008 The Cottage website |
| At link has some good stuff with cute blonde white cloth OTM and hands tied behind. It's in flash so click on the door then click the coffee cup to see quick scenes of the action with several good shots of her. If you click the picture cards on the table it shows pics that don't open for me; one of them is her tied and OTM gagged. By the way, way too much talk about protocol here lately and not enough about good scenes; just mho. |
| http://www.thecottagemovie.co.uk/ |
| Monday February 18 16:45:29 2008 Re: The Cottage website |
> By the way, way too much talk about protocol here lately > and not enough about good scenes; just mho. Boy, I couldn't agree with you more... probably the reason I don't usually visit here much these days - and at one time I was very much a "regular" here. Heck, 2 days ago I wrote about seeing previews of two movies with scenes - one got a few responses - (they seemed to be from the same person) - the other got nary one mention from anyone. |
| old man |
| Monday February 18 17:32:19 2008 Re: The Cottage website |
| old man wrote: > Heck, 2 days ago I wrote about seeing previews of two > movies with scenes - one got a few responses - (they > seemed to be from the same person) - the other got nary > one mention from anyone. Are you the one who wrote about the Backwoods scene? I can't believe that didn't get more responses...it's HAYLIE freakin' DUFF tape-gagged!!! |
| Duffman |
| Monday February 18 18:01:17 2008 Medium tonight possiblilty |
| Let me qualify that by saying I'm hoping for a scene for Alison (Arquette), the lead, because she experiences the deafness of the kidnap victim in tonight's episode maybe she will also dream about being the victim herself. I'm not sure but I think Patricia Arquette has never had a scene ever; too bad really. Also tonight, only Prison Break and The Sarah Connor Chron. is new so I'm wondering 1. is Jodi Lynn O'Keefe going to hit one and 2. Is there any hope for the two babes in TSCC because it really seems like not. Maybe the mom but I doubt there will every be a reason to b&g a robot, will there? |
| Monday February 18 18:04:55 2008 Re: Moderator- Michael's "Unhappy End!" |
| Todd 3-D wrote: > Here's a question regarding KOTPR. If you don't mind? Previous two (Guest & Michael) I don't know so I answered them here. But I know you and rather continue this over on Corrections ==> Thanks Bud |
| Jay L |
| Monday February 18 19:07:18 2008 CSI Marathon |
| Spike TV is airing a "CSI" episode marathon, with the episodes selected by viewers. I noted with disappointment that the "Empty Eyes" and "Grave Danger" episodes were not selected. It is unfathomable to me why these episodes, which featured, respectively, six and two actresses bound and gagged, would not intrigue viewers. As a minor consolation, the "What's Eating Gilbert Grissom" episode was selected as one of the favorites. |
| Hadji |
| Monday February 18 19:17:58 2008 Re: The Cottage website |
| Duffman wrote: > Are you the one who wrote about the Backwoods scene? I > can't believe that didn't get more responses...it's > HAYLIE freakin' DUFF tape-gagged!!! Don't know if anyone's mentioned it but haylie-duff.org has caps up. |
 |
| Monday February 18 19:26:13 2008 Re: DB Talk Disrupting Discussion |
| old man wrote: > > By the way, way too much talk about protocol here > lately > > Boy, I couldn't agree with you more... probably the > reason I don't usually visit here much these days - and > at one time I was very much a "regular" here. You are correct that it better on Corrections, but I dealing with two new posters. Have to answer them - Reacting to the circumstances and all that. Over on Corrections now Don't stop posting on account of that |
| Jay L |
| Monday February 18 20:40:11 2008 Re: Moderator- Michael's "Unhappy End!" |
| Michael Huck wrote: > I did not intent to bring so much confusion in > Brian´s site, I just mentioned the new episodes as > I know some people on your site are also interested in > UE. Sure. I have to say that the reason for deciding to remove the post was that I recently reviewed some of the material in question. In my judgment, regardless of the status of the actors involved, the episodes fit into the category of storyline commercial. Now, the rules on the Trade page are looser, and there wouldn't be trouble if you wanted to post there, I suppose. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday February 18 22:44:46 2008 Re: The writers' strike is over |
| I want to see her eyes and the emotions that her eyes reveal. I agree. The eyes are sometimes the sexiest part. I liked Nikki Cox's scene on Unhappily cuz it started at the eyes, stayed there for a few seconds then revealed her situation. I would love to see a scene like that where the damsel waked up to find herself tape-gagged.... |
| Monday February 18 23:18:28 2008 Re: The Cottage website |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > http://www.thecottagemovie.co.uk/ I read today that the movie is scheduled for a direct-to-DVD release in the U.S. on April 29th. IMHO, it looks like it could be a great scene. |
| Not a Guest |
|
|