Home         Message Forums         E-Zine          Scene Database          FAQs          Friends Page          Contact


Discussion Page

Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.

Post a Message


July
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
August
SMTWTFS
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
          

Saturday July 21 00:09:22 2007
Re: Painkiller Jane
(unsigned poster) wrote:

> Nothing. She only wore her outfit in front of a target
> and got shot. No bounds what so ever.

Yeah, no bondage, but a fun little episode. I'm glad I watched. The show's writing has definitely improved since the pilot, which was dull, as were the next couple of eps I watched. I might check other eps out now.

Sadly, they are still using that muted color that completely wastes Lokken's beauty. It's even more evident in this episode -- when they shot Lokken during more normal light during her magician's assistant stint, she looking SMOKIN' hot. It's really freakin' stupid to waste her beauty like that. X-Files, for example, always took full advantage of Gillian Anderson's beauty, and she wasn't nearly as beautiful as Lokken, but she looked MORE beautiful than Lokken, thanks to good cinematography.
Pat Powers
Saturday July 21 00:30:22 2007
I need to Understand
I need to understand. About the slew of messages that have been removed recently as being "off topic". Is it not appropriate to warn people that if they visit sites with Java enabled that there may be what appears to be an image that is really an applet that reports their real ip and other information that is available to Java.

To me this is potentially not quite on topic but the visitors here should know. Am I wrong? I think everyone should turn off java except at times that they need it on for some reason.

Visiting this page is not a good reason. Not implying that the page is bad, just that there is nothing here that needs Java.
Anna
Saturday July 21 01:15:09 2007
Re: I need to Understand
Anna wrote:

> I need to understand. About the slew of messages that
> have been removed recently as being "off
> topic". Is it not appropriate to warn people that
> if they visit sites with Java enabled that there may be
> what appears to be an image that is really an applet that
> reports their real ip and other information that is
> available to Java.

I removed a thread of posts regarding whether or not
a recent and past person are really dead.

Totally off-topic. I didn't read the posts that
carefully, if people put other information in then
too bad.

Also, other sites are off-topic. Period.




The Moderator
Saturday July 21 02:07:34 2007
Re: I need to Understand
The Moderator wrote:

> Anna wrote:
>
> > Is it not appropriate to warn people that
> > if they visit sites with Java enabled

Additionally, if someone feels there's a problem with
images linked here, TELL ME.


The Engineer
Saturday July 21 14:41:14 2007
Re: I need to Understand
The Moderator wrote:

>> I removed a thread of posts regarding whether or not
> a recent and past person are really dead.
>
> Totally off-topic. I didn't read the posts that
> carefully, if people put other information in then
> too bad.
>
> Also, other sites are off-topic. Period.
>

Thank you for that clarification. When I saw Captivepenny/RE removed for being off topic I was curious about it. When I intially reported about her demise I wasn't sure if that was technically off topic or not. I knew all lot of our regs knew and or cared about her.

As much as we like to tease you about "old hitler" and "jackboots" leaving all the nice things said about her up really touched some of her friends and showed a big heart on your part.

Now lets start making fun of Raffish again...
;)


Snowcat
Saturday July 21 14:49:34 2007
Re: I need to Understand
The Engineer wrote:


> Additionally, if someone feels there's a problem with
> images linked here, TELL ME.
>
>

OK - I will tell you. There is a problem with images linked here.

The problem is that we rely on the browser to deal with the link and it blindly calls the url that is posted. There are sites out there, I will not name them, since this is off topic that have copies of this site and lists of the ip addresses of the visitors. I personally have tested and they do it by inserting links here to what appear to be images but are actually Java applets. The Java applet then reports back.

I know of no method of stopping this other than stopping Java for any non-trusted site. Personally, I run with Java disabled for these and other security reasons.
anengineer@enotz.com
Saturday July 21 15:55:29 2007
Re: Man Who Turned to Stone
Mike D wrote:

> I see from the VCR alerts that The Man Who Turned to
> Stone is on TCM tonight in the early morning hours...
> but this is the first time I've heard of it being on a
> national station. Highly recommended.

For us horror movie collectors as well as collectors of bondage scenes (I happen to be both). This is one RARE movie, regardless of the fact that it isn't really all that great (as a horror film). Been waiting for an airing if it for years.

On a side note, I saw a DVD rental called "The Perfect Marriage" that I got the other day. I vaguely remember a discussion about it some time ago, with Jamie Luner in it, and that there was no bondage in it at all. However, the cover showed a woman with her wrists bound in front of her with duct tape (the pic takes up the entire cover practically), and I grabbed it without even reading who starred in it. It wasn't till I turned it on that I realized that it was the one with Ms. Luner in it and that there was nothing of interest to us in it.

Another case of a bondage-themed cover having nothing to do with the movie. So if you run across it (sorry I can't scan the pic for you, but you can see it on Amazon and the NetFlix site), pass it up if you're looking for a bondage scene.

JP
japfeif@aol.com
Saturday July 21 16:26:58 2007
video game scenes
heard there was a scene in def jam: fight for NY video game a while back, is is any good? anyone know of any others?
Saturday July 21 18:18:39 2007
No reservations
Lite scene in the CZJ flick - she is blindfolded with a silk/satin scarf
Liz
Saturday July 21 19:32:45 2007
Hairspray
There was a picture in my newspaper today from this movie, same image posted on here before, of girl being tied to bed by her mother. Well, I'm sure as hell not going to see this movie, so if anyone has any information on the details of this scene, let it out!
SLJ
Saturday July 21 20:18:38 2007
Re: Spider Cocoons
Jordan wrote:

> Can anyone tell me live action movies with a spider
> cocooning a woman?

Eight Legged Freaks
Saturday July 21 21:41:03 2007
Re: Man Who Turned to Stone
JP wrote:

> For us horror movie collectors as well as collectors of
> bondage scenes (I happen to be both). This is one RARE
> movie, regardless of the fact that it isn't really all
> that great (as a horror film). Been waiting for an
> airing if it for years.

Not a great horror film, but a really fun horror film. I was laughing my ass off ... immortal zombie mad scientists running a reform school ... reform school girls in their 20s, 30s, hell there was one who was in her 40s at least and maybe even her 50s ... cheesy pulp immortality formulas ... "the subject must be immersed in a solution of copper sulfate ..." What a hoot! And bondage scenes to boot! Many thanks to whomever put up the alert.
Saturday July 21 21:42:20 2007
Re: Man Who Turned to Stone

> Not a great horror film, but a really fun horror film. I
> was laughing my ass off ...

I'm Pat Powers and I approve this message ... 'cause I'm the one who wrote it.
Pat Powers

Post a Message

Home         Message Forums         E-Zine          Scene Database          FAQs          Friends Page          Contact