|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Wednesday July 04 00:09:35 2007 Least likely damsels |
| Okay - I've asked this question before, but I'm always interested in everyone's answers: What female celebrity would you love to see get the full treatment, but probably never will? I have two: Judge Marilyn Millian from The People's Court and Meredith Vieria from the The View. Any other comments? |
| Gnort |
| Wednesday July 04 00:40:38 2007 Re: Least likely damsels |
| Gnort wrote:
> Okay - I've asked this question before, but I'm always > interested in everyone's answers: What female celebrity > would you love to see get the full treatment, but > probably never will? Rachel Ray. Tied naked and kneeling on a platter lined with watercress and festive radish flowers. Maybe a few sprigs of fresh oregano. With an apple gag in her mouth. And a come hither look in her eyes ... |
| Pat Powers |
| Wednesday July 04 00:54:16 2007 Gefangene |
| Much bigger photo of interest at the link. |
| Eric |
| http://www.ln-online.de/images/meldungen/200727_186177_6_024.jpg |
| Wednesday July 04 00:55:16 2007 Re: This and that and nothing in particular... |
| Fettershackle wrote:
> How about whether a couple of good > scenes from movies based on books set in MHFs were the > creation of the authors of the original story, or were > spawned by Hollywood license? I suspect that there aren't THAT many books that have been based on novels, that involve MHFs, that members of Brianspage have both read and seen, and have an opinion about. That said, Pamela Gidley's writhing scene in "Disturbed" definitely transcended the power of mere words to describe. |
| Pat Powers |
| Wednesday July 04 01:33:12 2007 Re: Least likely damsels |
| Gnort wrote:
> Okay - I've asked this question before, but I'm always > interested in everyone's answers: What female celebrity > would you love to see get the full treatment, but > probably never will? I have two: Judge Marilyn Millian > from The People's Court and Meredith Vieria from the The > View. Any other comments? Kristina Abernathy, Alexandra Steele and Jennifer Lopez of the Weather Channel (really, they have a lady who does the weather named Jennifer Lopez, and I personally think she's prettier than the other J-Lo). Daryn Kagan, Paula Zahn, Suzanne Malveaux of CNN Katie Couric of CBS News. One I'm pretty sure won't end up in a bind, but you never know is Stephanie from the "Late Show with David Letterman". She's pretty cute and he has her do all sorts of silly things, so one day, who knows he may volunteer her for a magic trick or something... |
| Moraxian |
| http://www.moraxian.us |
| Wednesday July 04 02:57:21 2007 Re: Least likely damsels |
| Gnort wrote:
> Okay - I've asked this question before, but I'm always > interested in everyone's answers: What female celebrity > would you love to see get the full treatment, but > probably never will? Well, considering that Sarah Purcell was a TV show hostess who went on to star in one of my alltime favorite scenes (The Terror Among Us), I don't know that I rule anyone out! I suppose I'd go with Pat... the delectable Ms. Ray is unlikely to ever taste cloth (with or without EVOO). Second choice would probably be CBS Sports' Jill Arrington. |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.jebsadventurebound.net |
| Wednesday July 04 05:54:22 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| I was wondering whether you keep a count of the number of Database Entries composed by an individual contributor. I have submitted numerous Entries to the voluminous Scene Database, and have lost count of exactly how many Entries I have composed. Who are the most prolific contributors to the Scene Database? |
| Hadji |
| Wednesday July 04 07:03:32 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| Jay L wrote:
> > I tried alerting to what? "Das Schwurgericht" I can clear this up to some extent, will reply on DB corrections. |
| Peter de K |
| Wednesday July 04 08:07:00 2007 Re: Least likely damsels |
| Gnort wrote:
> Okay - I've asked this question before, but I'm always > interested in everyone's answers: What female celebrity > would you love to see get the full treatment, but > probably never will? Lacey Chabert. Sure, she's an actress, so there's always the chance she'll get the "right" part, but my pessimism knows no bounds. |
| Wednesday July 04 08:24:15 2007 Drive tonight |
| This is on the VCR alerts page for tonight:
Drive: The final two episodes will be aired from 8 to 10. Likely something with Amy Acker bound and gagged. What actual information exists to support such a prediction? Two hours is a long time to sit through, or even record, on a wild guess. |
| Eric |
| Wednesday July 04 09:20:04 2007 Re: Least likely damsels |
| Gnort wrote:
> Okay - I've asked this question before, but I'm > always > interested in everyone's answers: What female > celebrity > would you love to see get the full treatment, but > probably never will? Oprah Winfrey. Go ahead. Groan. Moan. Sigh. Roll your eyes. Say "Ewwww!" I don't care. I wanna see "Girlfriend" get it! There's already been a near miss with her, of course. When "Beloved" came out, there was a story-later debunked-that she had spent time bound and gagged in preparation for her role in that film as an ex-slave. (Turns out she HAD been blindfolded, but neither gagged nor tied, as I recall.) Heck, I'd even settle for her in bondage without the gag. I've even got a plausible scenario in case anyone from Harpo Productions just happens to lurk around here. How about Oprah perhaps doing shows from inside prison a la Joan Lunden a few years back? Let's see...she could do an issue show on the death penalty, maybe visiting Texas' assembly-line death row to give her viewers a first-hand account of life there. The episode could culminate in a real-time walkthrough of the execution procedure, ending with Winfrey strapped to the gurney, being asked if she has any last words... |
| Fettershackle |
| Wednesday July 04 09:35:44 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| Hadji wrote:
> I was wondering whether you keep a count of the number of > Database Entries composed by an individual contributor. I doubt you can go back and get a count from entries already in the DB. But there is a simple way to do it for future entries. Just put your name at the end of each entry you submit. Then you can do a search for your name and all your listings will come up. |
| Wednesday July 04 09:43:50 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| A possible solution for getting items of interest into each entry would be to have check boxes of a list of items (like "Cleave gag", "tape gag", "high heels", "barefoot", "skirt", etc.) on the submission page so that the person who is making the submission could just check off appropriate boxes after they write their entry.
That way, along with the scene description there would be a list of keywords (like on Raffish's site) that come up with each entry. |
| Wednesday July 04 10:01:36 2007 F.B.I Files |
| Void the alerts for today, they were yesterday and I screwed that royally. |
| civil |
| Wednesday July 04 10:07:10 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Hadji wrote: > > > I was wondering whether you keep a count of the > number of > > Database Entries composed by an individual > contributor. In my opinion, it doesn't concern me that someone posts more than the other or to blame someone for incorrect entries. The next thing someone will want is the count of how many corrections they made. |
| Wednesday July 04 10:56:25 2007 Re: Least likely damsels |
| Gnort wrote:
> Okay - I've asked this question before, but I'm always > interested in everyone's answers: What female celebrity > would you love to see get the full treatment, but > probably never will? I have two: Judge Marilyn Millian > from The People's Court and Meredith Vieria from the The > View. Any other comments? Now, now, Mr. Moderator frowns on this sort of thing... otherwise I'd tell you how much I'd *really* *like* to see KELLY O'DONNELL (NBC News) get the Lois Lane treatment. ;-) |
 |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
| Wednesday July 04 11:09:02 2007 Re: Drive tonight |
| Eric wrote: Drive: The final two episodes will be aired from 8 to 10. Likely something with Amy Acker bound and gagged.
Don't know if there is anything for us, but my listing in the New York area does not have it showing tonite, but does have two shows listing on 7/13 at 8-10pm. |
| RON |
| Wednesday July 04 11:42:27 2007 Re: Drive tonight |
| Eric wrote:
> Drive: The final two episodes will be aired from 8 to > 10. Likely something with Amy Acker bound and gagged. > > What actual information exists to support such a > prediction? Fox switched the final two episodes to Friday, July 13, from 8 to 10. TV Guide has the episodes airing tonight, but that is wrong. Acker was being held hostage B&G in one of the earlier episodes, so her rescue will come at some point. Whether she's still B&G is anyone's guess, but record the 2 hours since it'll never air again. |
| Wednesday July 04 11:51:45 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| Hadji wrote:
> I was wondering whether you keep a count of the number of > Database Entries composed by an individual contributor. Yes, I can tell whom posted. That is normally used to make an individual aware to line up his titles for the search feature. Or to tell them to keep away from mentioning ages. |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday July 04 11:53:55 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Just put your name at the end of each > entry you submit. Then you can do a search for your name > and all your listings will come up. No need. As mentioned, we already know whom posted |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday July 04 12:37:36 2007 Little help? |
| Was hoping someone could identify this
http://ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/bgscenes/photos/view/79f5?b=8 email is thegagman@hotmail.com Was also hoping to talk to someone that could put some youtube files onto a DVD for me |
| Wednesday July 04 12:39:10 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> In my opinion, it doesn't concern me that someone posts > more than the other or to blame someone for incorrect > entries. Correct. Other than English is the poster's second language (a normal requiring contact situation), we'll get new to the board posters unaware that the Oldtimers are still here and trying to upgrade their scenes and that the Database is more connected with VHS machine Alerts than Discussion page. So the DB is stricter than Discussion Contacting posters is all about making aware of mentioned. I try and keep contacts polite as possible. I certainly hope it wasn't misunderstood as being acid towards them either. |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday July 04 12:47:00 2007 Re: Whats the series/movie that best set up bondage opportunities, and missed them most egregiously? |
| Police Academy-What a waste of Leslie Easterbrook.
|
| togolane |
| Wednesday July 04 13:20:01 2007 Re: Drive tonight |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Acker was being held hostage B&G in one of the > earlier episodes, so her rescue will come at some point. > Whether she's still B&G is anyone's guess, but record > the 2 hours since it'll never air again. But remember, these last two episodes were only episodes 5 and 6 out of a scheduled 13, so there is no guarantee that Amy is even in these two episodes. A rescue scene seems extremely unlikely, since that surely would have come much later in the run of 13 episodes, if at all. |
| Wednesday July 04 13:21:45 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> A possible solution for getting items of interest into > each entry would be to have check boxes of a list of > items (like "Cleave gag", "tape gag", > "high heels", "barefoot", > "skirt", etc.) on the submission page Yes, this similar to the "Rapid read Alerts" requests from awhile back, correct? Problems at time. Guys that wanted the Rapid Elements read didn't care about barefeet and such. Gagged or not? the priority. Perhaps requests from others to check off would help? Other problem (kind of humourous), I did take out "plot you could read in IMDB/ TV Guide", so it was rapid elements read, and ended up on some of Brian R's. (I can probably find the post exact) But basically Brian R preferred the "essay" style as the plot was what assisted him in recalling the scene Putting the keyword in the Description Box will bring it up, though you'll have to do some reading, still seems fairest all around at the moment |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday July 04 14:13:24 2007 Happy 4th of July |
| At the link |
 |
| Stephanie |
| http://www.majorjohns.com |
| Wednesday July 04 15:22:04 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| Hadji wrote:
> I was wondering whether you keep a count of the number of > Database Entries composed by an individual contributor. Yes and no. The system knows who put in what entry. However, it doesn't tabulate numbers or anything, plus it would have to cross-check to see how many of those entries are still valid and not deleted by our crack staff of editors. |
| The Engineer |
| Wednesday July 04 15:24:51 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Just put your name at the end of each entry you submit. Anything like that would probably be cleaned up by the editors, followed by an email saying to stop doing it. |
| The Engineer |
| Wednesday July 04 15:26:18 2007 Re: Least likely damsels |
| Van wrote:
> Now, now, Mr. Moderator frowns on this sort of thing... Bleah, so far gone now I'll just let you guys have today to get it out of your system. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday July 04 15:28:02 2007 Re: Database Entries |
| Jay L wrote:
> No need. > > As mentioned, we already know whom posted Yeah, we do. They don't. But trying to game the system that way is not what "the Boss" wants. If "he" wanted a name field he'd have put one. |
| The Engineer |
| Wednesday July 04 15:28:40 2007 Re: Little help? |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Was also hoping to talk to someone that could put some > youtube files onto a DVD for me This should be discussed on Trade. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday July 04 17:10:39 2007 Re: Wonder Woman bondage-o-rama issue |
| Pat Powers wrote:
... In one 1948 story, there were no fewer than 75 panels depicting bondage ... Does anybody know which issue has the 75 panels? I recently downloaded the 70's reprint. If you would like me to upload if for you, PM me at my YouTube page. |
 |
| Sylvie |
| http://youtube.com/profile?user=21Sylvieca |
| Wednesday July 04 17:43:21 2007 Help Identify |
| In the early 80s there was a cheap horror movie that I can't remember the name of (which is what I need help for) a hot chick in a skirt is tied up in a wheelchair with a crazy dude ( I think a priest) who turns out to be the killer, dancing around her in a little birthday party hat and his priest gear. Does this ring a bell for the title. She was not gagged but the binding was quite good from what I remember. This had to have come out in 80 or 81. |
| Big J |
| Wednesday July 04 22:54:05 2007 Amber Heard |
| She looked so hot in the bikini on Hidde Palms.
Would love to see her B and G and since she is a young actress, it could very well happen. We still need Kristen Bell who's show was gagged by the CW. Natalie Morales would be a good celebrity though. |
| joe |
| ilovewordbond@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday July 04 23:02:33 2007 Re: Drive tonight |
| Eric wrote:
> This is on the VCR alerts page for tonight: > > Drive: The final two episodes will be aired from 8 to > 10. I tried posting an alert that this got switched to the 13th but I put in the wrong date and it shows up on the page for Friday July 13th instead of today the 4th. Being a VCR Alerts first timer...and all. |
| MT |
| Wednesday July 04 23:41:11 2007 Transformer |
| It's not much, but it's worth a mention. The hot Megan Fox gets arrested twice in the film. Her hands are behind her back, but there's no shot of seeing the handcuffs.
As for the film, nothing but dumb explosions, another stupid product of Michael Bay. |
| Wednesday July 04 23:43:01 2007 Re: Transforrmer |
| Check that, during her second arrest there's a blink and you'll miss scene where the cops throws her to the floor and applies the cuffs. You can barely see it though. |
|
|
