|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Friday June 24 01:06:45 2005 Re: One Life to Live |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> well, the babe and her boyfriend were capture by the > goons... Melissa Gallo plays the part of Adriana. |
| anon22 |
| Friday June 24 01:07:51 2005 Malevolence |
| I just rented it. One of the best duct tape scenes ever. Samantha Dark is an incredible damsel. I want to add it to the database, because I don't see it in there. Is the entry spelled wrong or what? Any help? GO, NOW and rent it you will not be disappointed!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Rob T |
| Friday June 24 01:22:34 2005 Please |
| >>You are incorrect. People want that information.
>>The Moderator You can't be serious, can you? I'm talking about scenes that DO NOT feature women bound in any way (i.e. what was established here long ago as a "candyass" scene, vs. a "ruined by a putz" scene). Are you seriously saying that flagging of, and esp. detailed descriptions of these types of men-only scenes are welcome here, and on-topic? What's wrong with a guideline of simply "Nothing of interest" for these scenes? You've got me REALLY confused now. I've been with this site practially since day one, and all this time I thought it was all about letting each other know about females bound in popular entertainment. If you're saying people on this board want the information of "there's no female bound in this film/episode...", then great. If you're going further and saying they desire the additional information that there's a guy instead tied - and details of such - then I respectfully disagree. |
| Longtimer |
| Friday June 24 01:36:19 2005 Re: Malevolence |
| Rob T wrote:
> I want to add it > to the database, because I don't see it in there. Is the > entry spelled wrong or what? ===== Title should be: Malevolence (2004/II) Not getting anything on search, so feel free to enter it |
| Jay L |
| http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0388230/ |
| Friday June 24 01:45:54 2005 The Dead Zone - "The Collector" |
| The fourth season of The Dead Zone was recently kicked off on the USA Network and the second eppy was titled "The Collector". Based on the detailed recap and photos on the USA Network site, there doesn't appear to be much bondage in the show other than flashbacks or visions by the lead character. Since the episode first aired last Sunday and no discussion took place, perhaps there's not much for us to see, but I'll be taping one of the repeats on Friday. With a setup like this, you would hope there would be a decent scene somewhere. Still cute Dedee Pfeiffer plays one of the guest stars.
------------------------- Johnny's (Anthony Michael Hall) visions of a young girl's abduction lead him on a life-and-death race to find "the collector" (Brian Markinson), a disturbed man who kidnaps and indoctrinates young women. |
| Zuma |
| http://www.usanetwork.com/series/thedeadzone/show/episodes/s4_thecollector/index.html |
| Friday June 24 01:54:59 2005 Re: Please |
| Longtimer wrote:
> >>You are incorrect. People want that information. > You can't be serious, can you? I'm talking about scenes I think he was saying that people want to know about putz alerts, although I think you are both in agreement about not wanting a couple paragraphs devoted to how the putz was tied. |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@gmail.com |
| http://groups.yahoo.com/group/asbestosfilterscaps |
| Friday June 24 01:57:53 2005 New fall series pops a scene |
| I first caught a promo for this one about a week ago, and I was going to post it here, but I was just walking in from the other room when I saw it, I was about half toasted, and it was so quick I wasn't sure I saw what I thought I saw. Now the other half is toasted, LOL, and I saw a slightly different promo tonight and I'm sure.
I was sitting here daydreaming about my Mariners beating the ball team that Frank's state doesn't even have yet in the world series when.. (inside joke guys.. thanks for the grins Frank..except for the part where I spit half my drink all over my puter screen laughing over what you wrote, heh heh. FYI Brians pagers, Frank and I have known each other before either of us did what we now do, which is tie up pretty girls and hopefully make you guys go yowza!)when darned if CBS didn't advertise one of its new fall series called, I believe, "Criminal Minds". Wednesdays, after summer, LOL! The promo mentioned Seattle a couple times, which caught my attention..start taping if you hear that.. and at the end of the promo is a shot of a computer monitor going from black to feature a black and white shot of a gal inside what looks like a large dog carrier solid metal cage. I had to do a freeze frame on it, but she has dark hair, appears to be dressed in what might be pajamas, arms are in front, bound I think though you can't see her wrists, and she is both blindfolded and cleaved gagged, rather tightly I thought. It's very quick in the promo but hopefully won't be in the actual show. Looks like another CSI type series, and they are looking over all kinds of dead type stuff when somebody proclaims "He hasn't killed her yet" and you get the shot. So it is off to the rescue of the damsel, which is good, fun stuff. Something to look forward to in the fall besides raking leaves guys! |
| David Knight |
| DavidKnight@DavidKnightBondage.com |
| http://www.DavidKnightBondage.com |
| Friday June 24 02:30:13 2005 CASE FILE added |
| Saskia Garel from NIGHTMAN "Keyes to the Kingdom of Hell" |
| Biff |
| http://community.webtv.net/unlikelysource/TheCaseFilesofBiff |
| Friday June 24 03:51:32 2005 Re: Petra Kagchelland gagged |
| Petra Kagchelland wrote:
> A very nice surprise at the very end of tonights Onderweg > Naar Morgen (on Yorin) episode... finally the ever so hot > Petra Kagchelland (in her role as Iris) bound and tape > gagged by her stalker. ...this promises a lot for the > next days/weeks... The really interesting thing about this is the way she's gagged. The criss-cross style is more akin to commerical video bondage as opposed to just the typical tv show/movie gag which is just one strip across...care was taken to make sure it looked effective. Nice touch indeed. |
| Friday June 24 06:33:27 2005 Re: Please |
| Longtimer wrote:
> You can't be serious, can you? I'm talking about scenes > that DO NOT feature women bound in any way (i.e. what was > established here long ago as a "candyass" > scene, vs. a "ruined by a putz" scene). If I may, Mr. Moderator: if you are truly a longtimer then you should know that the Moderator does not appreciate anyone telling him what the rules are. He rules; you do not. I think that's what he's really saying. |
| Mark O |
| Friday June 24 07:20:07 2005 Re: Malevolence |
| Jay L wrote:
> Rob T wrote: > > > I want to add it > > to the database, because I don't see it in there. > Is the > > entry spelled wrong or what? > ===== > > Title should be: Malevolence (2004/II) > > Not getting anything on search, > so feel free to enter it Nice interview with Samantha Dark about halfway down the page with a good , if a little dark, image |
| http://www.iconsoffright.com/IV_Sam.htm |
| Friday June 24 07:21:16 2005 Re: Malevolence |
|
can anyone elaborate on scene details please? |
| Friday June 24 08:35:47 2005 Australian Pantene Ad |
| For anyone interested there is an ad I just saw airing here in Australia for Pantene Frizz Defence shampoo which shows a number of female hairdressers (and unfortunately possibly one male) with tape gags over their mouths. I'm not sure why this is the case though - I'll have to watch it again more closely!!!! |
| Ham_Roll |
| Friday June 24 09:53:11 2005 Re: Australian Pantene Ad |
| Ham_Roll wrote:
> For anyone interested there is an ad I just saw airing > here in Australia for Pantene Frizz Defence shampoo which > shows a number of female hairdressers (and unfortunately > possibly one male) with tape gags over their mouths. I'm > not sure why this is the case though - I'll have to watch > it again more closely!!!! I saw this one too - it's an amazing advert! I assume it's an Australian advert only, and not being screened in the U.S. If it were, someone would SURELY have mentioned it in here! There are about ten gorgeous female models walking around in this commercial for Pantene "Anti-Frizz" products, all gagged with silver duct tape. They're not all hairdressers - some are just pedestrians who stare back at the equally gorgeous female protagonist as she walks along the street staring curiously at all the tape-gagged people who are walking past her. Puzzled, she continues on her way until she leans on the glass of her hairdresser's frnt window, only to see all three of the hairdressers inside, gagged with duct tape, going about their regular task of doing people's hair. Two of the hairdressers (thankflly the two who are in the fore and middleground of the scene), are gorgeous as well! On all of the tapegagged people, you can see the impression of their lips through the silver duct tape. At last one of the female models lans forward to look at the protagonist while she's still in her car (or taxi), and so there's a really nice momentary close up of her beautiful face. This really is one of the best commercials I've seen on Australian television featuring any kind of bondage (let alone my fave kind - silver duct tape), but it's not on very often at all. I waited for over a week to see it a second time. Glad to hear it was on again tonight! SOMEONE PLEASE SET YOUR VIDEO! I HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO MAKE CAPS! |
| Friday June 24 10:39:20 2005 Dead Zone |
| I caught "The Collector" episode of DZ when it aired Sunday, and there is little of interest. Deedee and another woman are held captive in the prototypical abandoned industrial building, locked away. No restraints except for a VERY brief "drop off" scene with Deedee blindfolded and her wrists tied in front of her. Johnny also "sees" the numerous other women dropped off at the same spot, and they may have tied wrists, as well. Really not worth it.
|
| Royler |
| Friday June 24 10:49:58 2005 Re: Australian Pantene Ad |
| Ham_Roll wrote:
> Pantene Frizz Defence shampoo which > shows a number of female hairdressers > with tape gags over their mouths. I'm > not sure why this is the case though Believe Pantene Frizz Defence gives her hair the look like she just stepped out of the salon? Or whathaveya? A best kept secret, or something? the running theme. Gagged stylists would play into that abit. |
| Jay L |
| Friday June 24 11:22:48 2005 Re: Australian Pantene Ad |
| Jay L wrote:
Ham_Roll wrote: Pantene Frizz Defence shampoo which shows a number of female hairdressers with tape gags over their mouths. I'm not sure why this is the case though Feel free to send off a copy to me - as noted in the update coming tomorrow - 'deputzilation' is my specialty. My friend Mai also prefers Pantene for washing her pleated skirts - doesn't take the crease out, I'm told ....... |
| Major John |
| silent_night_022003@yahoo.com |
| http://www.bindher.com |
| Friday June 24 11:29:18 2005 Re: Petra Kagchelland gagged |
|
> > The really interesting thing about this is the way she's > gagged. The criss-cross style is more akin to commerical > video bondage as opposed to just the typical tv > show/movie gag which is just one strip across. It's quite common in political ads, protests or comedy skits where the gag is symbolic, and usually done with narrow strips of medical tape, just like the traditional plastering of a cut. I saw a great example of the style, with wider white tape, on the cover of a John Creasey paperback around 1972. Wish I'd bought the book, or could even remember the title, one of hundreds he wrote and, I think, under one of his pseudonyms. In the story, burglars in a department store surprise a worker who has stayed behind, and leave her wrapped up in a carpet overnight. The gag is two tight wraps of plaster, and her struggles for breath as her face turns red are quite lovingly described. On the cover, however, the lovely blonde wore two pieces of 2-inch(?)white tape in an 'x', and was carpeted to the shoulders. Fabulous expression, wide-eyed and puff-cheeked, IIRC. >care was taken to make sure it looked effective. Nice touch indeed. Very pretty, but I can imagine sealing problems as the thick, rather stiff tape fails to follow the compound cuves around the jawline. You can see it standing proud of the skin at the bottom, and the straight highlight lines show it's not supple. Thinner gaffer or duct tape with a more open weave would have conformed and adhered better, and revealed the shape of her lips as a bonus. Not that I'm complaining, mind. A face like Ms K's gagged with any kind of tape is a treat in my book.:-) |
| Mad Dan |
| Friday June 24 11:31:15 2005 Re: Malevolence |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> can anyone elaborate on scene details please? An annoying bank robber fleeing the scene is poised to kidnap a mother and her daughter who are stopped at a gas station. He takes them out to an old abandoned house, where he uses duct tape to bind their hands behind their backs, ankles, and the obligatory gag. Daughter gets loose, runs off, mom stays tied up for a while. Later, she is discovered by two of the robbers' accomplices, who remove her gag, but then reapply it. Lots of good struggling, especially when the bound mother sees the killer and starts flipping out. There's a scene where she is dragged along the floor by a female criminal. A very good scene, I'd say, and the movie itself isn't too bad either. It pays homage to the old Friday the 13th movies, though it's a shame we didn't see any bondage back when Mr. Voorhees ruled the horror scene. |
| X |
| Friday June 24 11:32:45 2005 Re: Please |
| Longtimer wrote:
> > > You can't be serious, can you? I'm talking about > scenes > > that DO NOT feature women bound in any way (i.e. > what was > > established here long ago as a "candyass" > > > scene, vs. a "ruined by a putz" scene). I think the original poster was letting us know not to bother with the scene since the guy was the only one tied up. It was one sentence, guy...get over it. |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Friday June 24 12:25:27 2005 Re: Australian Pantene Ad |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> SOMEONE PLEASE SET YOUR VIDEO! I HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO MAKE CAPS! Tough. Shouting demands at us right after we had a whole discussion about this kind of problem isn't going to help your situation. |
| Anubis |
| Friday June 24 13:33:31 2005 Re: Malevolence |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Nice interview with Samantha Dark about halfway down the > page with a good , if a little dark, image > > http://www.iconsoffright.com/IV_Sam.htm And check out "Clip #3" at the bottom of the page for a short clip. |
| PassDaTape |
| Friday June 24 15:42:34 2005 Please |
| Mark O. - I was not "telling the Moderator his own rules". I presented a reaonable suggestion for a new guideline, or even something for us all to follow (self-police) - and I presented it in a constructive, pragmatic, mature way. Why don't YOU stop trying to speak for the Moderator yourself, pal?
JP - No, you are incorrect; I was not referring to the post you are talking about, but another with much greater detail (but there have been several over the years that have bothered me). Crikey! Is there ANYTHING wrong with what I'm suggesting: No discussion of men-only scenes (MEN-ONLY, get it!? NOT ruined-by-a-putz scenes - which I've now made clear multiple times), and esp. the details of these off-topic scenes? Can we not just agree among ourselves to keep it to "Nothing of interest for us" for these scenes? I'm making a SUGGESTION - hoping for the Moderator to back me up, and say "I agree; posting or discussion of men-only scenes where no female is tied at all is off-topic". I'm not telling him what to do. I'm making a suggestion (and asking for a "sub-regulation" that I as a long time supporter and user of the board would like) - something that I suspect he would be in agreement with or support as a clarification. Sheesh. |
| Longtimer |
| Friday June 24 15:50:06 2005 Re: Australian Pantene Ad |
| Major John wrote:
> Jay L wrote: > Pantene Frizz Defence shampoo which > shows a number of female hairdressers > with tape gags over their mouths. **** Mai also prefers Pantene for washing her pleated skirts - doesn't take the crease out, I'm told ....... ****** Humourous Major, but serious Ads been running firewagon. Girls get whistled at without going to the salon, Grandma washed the grey out, without affecting the crimping, etc etc This tape gagged one due to air anytime |
| Jay L |
| Friday June 24 15:58:18 2005 Re: Greatest Movie Quotes |
|
Let me list 3 of my all-time favorites. I may have mentioned these before, but they're classics. The Three Stooges detective scene ("Dopey Dicks," I think is the one). Upon finding the b&g damsel, Shemp asks, "Do you have a toothache?" "The Black Swan" after tying and gagging Maureen O'Hara, her captor says, "You make courtship a little more strenuous than I like it!" The all-time classic. From the Fleisher "Superman" cartoon "Mechanical Monsters." The villain says to a bound and gagged Lois Lane: "So, you won't tell me!" |
| PRW |
| Friday June 24 15:58:31 2005 Re: Malevolence |
| Good description of the scene...but......what's the AOH pics at the site all about? When do they come inot play? |
| Friday June 24 16:16:45 2005 Re: Please |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> people want to know about putz > alerts > not wanting a couple paragraphs devoted to how the putz > was tied. Hey Filter, thought you got that from "Unsigned Poster's" DB Corrections antics, and on backcheck realised hadn't fully sorted it. Got it now. Thanks |
| Jay L |
| Friday June 24 17:07:06 2005 Re: Please |
| Longtimer wrote:
> I'm making a SUGGESTION Which he already rejected, so why are there two more followups giving an attitude to people who were just trying to help you? |
| Friday June 24 17:21:01 2005 Please |
| He didn't "reject it"; it was quite obvious to me he didn't understand what I was suggesting (he clearly thought I meant "girl + putz" scenes vs. guy-only scenes; I can't seriously see him supporting the notion that detailed discussion of these are considered on-topic).
Also, the posts you refer to were in no way trying to "help". Nor were they constructively adding to the discussion, which I consider important to clarify. Why don't you just let the Moderator answer - rather than answer for him? |
| Longtimer |
| Friday June 24 17:36:05 2005 Re: Please |
| Longtimer wrote:
> Nor were they constructively adding to > the discussion And this is? |
| Friday June 24 17:58:04 2005 John Creasy paperback |
| Mad Dan wrote:
> > I saw a great example of the style, with wider white > tape, on the cover of a John Creasey paperback around > 1972. Wish I'd bought the book, or could even remember > the title, one of hundreds he wrote and, I think, under > one of his pseudonyms. > >. > > On the cover, however, the lovely blonde wore two pieces > of 2-inch(?)white tape in an 'x', and was carpeted to the > shoulders. Fabulous expression, wide-eyed and > puff-cheeked, IIRC. > > >care was taken to make sure it looked effective. Nice > touch indeed. > I have this paperback somewhere, can't recall the title off the top of my head but I'm sure I can find it out if you are interested. Quite a few of Creasy's novels had tied an gagged damsels and at least one other had a photo cover that I can recall. that time it was a brunette hanging out of a sports locker OTM gagged and wrists tied in front. My alltime favourite photo cover though is Chinaman's Chance, can't recall the authors name but a quality pic of a sext redhead tightly tape gagged, there were two strips of tape wrapped right around her head and you could see the red welts on her cheeks from the pressure - suggesting the photographer kept her gagged for a little while waiting for that perfect shot |
| moxx of balhoom |
| mike@timelord.wanadoo.co.uk |
| Friday June 24 18:09:48 2005 Re: Petra Kagchelland gagged |
|
> > Petra Kagchelland (in her role as Iris) bound and tape > gagged by her stalker. ...this promises a lot for the > next days/weeks... I want this scene. Can anybody send it to me. Tks |
| Nauticus |
| nauticusbondage@yahoo.com.br |
| Friday June 24 18:15:53 2005 Hey, Longtimer. |
| Here's an old saying:
In life, you can either be right, or you can be happy. We GET it. Yes, this site is about women tied, so men have no place here. Go to Boundit's if you're into men. So what if someone slips up every now and then and makes a mistake or misunderstands the context of Brian's Page? Shit happens. Ignore it. I'm sure many of us are just itchin to go "up in arms" the second the moderator takes an authoritative crap on one of our posts/comments, but it IS his site, HIS rules, and it's best just to drop it or take it to e-mail. Yeah, so maybe his use of power isn't right all the time - Get a load of Bush. You've just got to roll with the punches. |
| X |
| Friday June 24 19:02:44 2005 Re: Please |
| Longtimer wrote:
> You've got me REALLY confused now. I've been with this > site practially since day one, and all this time I > thought it was all about letting each other know about > females bound in popular entertainment. You have ME confused. What the hell are you talking about? I thought you meant the one from The Inside. If not, then be specific, I'm not a mind reader. |
| The Moderator |
| Friday June 24 19:08:48 2005 Re: Please |
| Mark O wrote:
> If I may, Mr. Moderator: if you are truly a longtimer > then you should know that the Moderator does not > appreciate anyone telling him what the rules are. He > rules; you do not. I think that's what he's really saying. Anyone is free to raise a Point of Order about a particular post. I just don't know what he's talking about. If he has something in mind, then I'll be happy to review it. |
| The Moderator |
| Friday June 24 19:16:55 2005 Re: Petra Kagchelland gagged |
| Nauticus wrote:
> I want this scene. Got this post up over on Trades Page {Homepage Link} Where you a better chance of getting ahold of |
| Jay L |
| http://brianspage.com/showday.php?fname=trade%2Fhtml%2F174-2005 |
| Friday June 24 19:35:07 2005 Re: Malevolence |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Good description of the scene...but......what's the AOH > pics at the site all about? When do they come inot play? Ah, good point. Count on a gag snob to ignore the rest of the DiD in the movie .. Ok, so in the beginning, in a flash back, a killer has kidnapped some random blonde woman, and a boy. He chains the blonde's hands to the ceiling, and forces the k1d to watch as he knifes her. Nothing gory, though. This is definitely not a Joe Spinell movie. Secondly, the blonde later in the film who is taped up with her k1d, also gets this tethered to the ceiling treatment. Her predicament is exactly the same as the one seen in the flashback, except this time we get more coverage, and it's a different dame. Hope that sums it up nicely for you. |
| X |
| Friday June 24 21:37:11 2005 Re: Please |
| I was sure there was some confusion; I'm sorry if I caused it.
To clarify, I was talking about the soap opera posting from the other day - not THE INSIDE. My main point is this: If we're hoping for a scene on a particular program or film - and it turns out to be a bust - then we should just say "Nothing of interest / Nothing yet" etc. What I (personally) don't like, and (personally) thought was off topic was when people say "No female bondage at all - but this particular guy got it real good.." and then (worst of all) go into a detailed description of how the guy was tied. I don't like when this happens (and it does occasionally) - and think it's at least as much off topic as talking about commercial vids, etc. A "ruined-by-a-putz" description (with a female also involved) is one thing... (and something that has always been on-topic). A detailed description of a scene that ONLY involved a guy (in lieu of a female) would seem to be irrelevent and - to me - to be off topic. |
| Longtimer |
| Friday June 24 21:40:26 2005 Possible East Coast alert, CBS 10p EDT |
| Never seen the series before, but just happened to click on Yahoo! TV's listings for "NUMB3RS", and the episode description is:
NUMB3RS CBS 2 Jun 24 10:00pm Add to My Calendar Series/Drama, 60 Mins. "Prime Suspect" When a mathematician (Neil Patrick Harris) gets close to solving the Riemann hypothesis, a difficult math problem whose solution is worth millions, his daughter is kidnapped. Cast: Rob Morrow, David Krumholtz, Peter MacNicol, Judd Hirsch, Sabrina Lloyd, Alimi Ballard, Navi Rawat, Neil Patrick Harris, Susan Egan, Egan Prescott, Greg Zola, Ian Barford, Tom Irwin, Jamie McShane, Fay Wolf, Murphy Cross, Michael J. Cutt, Yang King, Susan Beaubian, Mauricio Mendoza. Director(s): Lesli Linka Glatter. Producer(s): Ridley Scott, Tony Scott, Alex Gansa, Brooke Kennedy. Writer(s): Liz Friedman. Original Airdate: February 18, 2005. Not in the database, but two other episodes are, so I guess its somewhat promising... |
| Friday June 24 21:43:46 2005 King Kong |
| I was just watching Sling Blade on the Bravo Channel, and they showed a commercial for the King Kong trailer that NBC is showing Monday. Anyway, there was a blink-and-you-miss-it shot of Naomi Watts tied with her arms stretched apart between what looked like two trees. There might be more in the actual trailer but it looks like this version will pay off just like the older ones. |
| Blockbuster Guy |
| Friday June 24 21:45:20 2005 Putzes |
| Jeez TM, get over it already! Nobody cares. |
| Friday June 24 22:39:24 2005 Re: King Kong |
| Blockbuster Guy wrote:
> I was just watching Sling Blade on the Bravo Channel, and > they showed a commercial for the King Kong trailer that > NBC is showing Monday. Anyway, there was a > blink-and-you-miss-it shot of Naomi Watts tied with her > arms stretched apart between what looked like two trees. > There might be more in the actual trailer but it looks > like this version will pay off just like the older ones. Sweet. Now, hopefully the bondage will be realistic like the first King Kong and not the 70's remake. And, hopefully, it won't be a blink and you miss it type of scene. |
| Friendly Fire |
| Friday June 24 22:43:31 2005 King Kong pic found!!! |
| Well, it looks like I just found the answer to my question.
Bondage looks realistic. Too bad she's not sleeveless. Click link for a montage...about 1 mb |
| Friendly Fire |
| http://boards.kongisking.net/perl/gforum.cgi?post=55497 |
| Friday June 24 22:45:37 2005 Re: King Kong |
| Friendly Fire wrote:
> > Sweet. Now, hopefully the bondage will be realistic like > the first King Kong and not the 70's remake. And, > hopefully, it won't be a blink and you miss it type of scene. There is a pic of it at the following link. I'm not impressed at all. http://boards.kongisking.net/perl/gforum.cgi?post=55497;sb=post_time;so=DESC;forum_view=forum_view_expanded;guest=442886 |
| Malasfan |
| Friday June 24 22:55:35 2005 Re: Possible East Coast alert, CBS 10p EDT |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Never seen the series before, but just happened to click > on Yahoo! TV's listings for "NUMB3RS", and the Nothing. Don't want to mention anything about age either, but lets just leave it at "Nothing" |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@gmail.com |
| http://groups.yahoo.com/group/asbestosfilterscaps |
| Friday June 24 22:57:09 2005 Re: John Creasy paperback |
|
> Mad Dan wrote: > > I saw a great example of the style, with wider white > > tape, on the cover of a John Creasey paperback > around 1972. Found these on Ebay. None were very expensive. |
 |
| Pofoz |
| Friday June 24 23:05:09 2005 Re: Australian Pantene Ad |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> There are about ten gorgeous female models walking around > in this commercial for Pantene "Anti-Frizz" > products, all gagged with silver duct tape. name a couple. |
| zorak |
|
|