|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
Friday June 17 00:05:52 2005 Re: Double-posting of VCR alerts |
Brian R wrote:
> The reason for "very short notice" ones has to > do with the fact that it takes time sometimes to read through > Discussion. Most people read it first. So by the time > they get to one that's on right then, they may miss it. Would it be possible to summarize information from the VCR alerts page at the top of the main discussion forum or even the page where you select which forum you want to view? Something really basic like... VCR Alerts for today, June 16 2005 Missing - Episode "blah blah" on FOX, DB Entry #345 Charmed - Episode "this that" on CBS, DB Entry #8145 It might require a slight modification to the entry form for the VCR page to obtain the tidbits of information but I think it would be helpful. If one wants more info they can either look it up in the scene database or VCR alerts. |
Kerhop |
Friday June 17 01:09:28 2005 Re: Left Coast Alert for |
Tapemaster wrote:
> I was not "pestering." You are incorrect. |
The Moderator |
Friday June 17 01:10:39 2005 Re: Double-posting of VCR alerts |
Kerhop wrote:
> possible to summarize information from the > VCR alerts page > Something really basic As recall, part of the reason request for full description of VCR Alerts was differentiate between gag and no gag scenes. Likely arise on something like this as well? |
Jay L |
Friday June 17 01:11:13 2005 Re: Double-posting of VCR alerts |
Kerhop wrote:
> Would it be possible to summarize information from the > VCR alerts page at the top of the main discussion forum > or even the page where you select which forum you want to > view? It would be possible. I have so many other things that I would rate as higher importance that it isn't likely. |
The Engineer |
Friday June 17 01:41:58 2005 Re: Double-posting of VCR alerts |
Kerhop wrote:
> require a slight modification > for the VCR page Suggested perhaps handy if date/time to current running page only thing that changed? Imagine based on checking by changed time, then learning from posts actually fired a week into the future, or whathaveya? Recall seeing a problem around the Midnight mark huh? That, and not aware how slight a modification for Brian Have to look up what that about again |
Jay L |
Friday June 17 07:37:21 2005 Batman Begins |
Was there anything of interest in Batman Begins? |
Friday June 17 09:12:24 2005 Women Removing Gags |
This is a slightly unusual request - can anybody recall any scenes in which either the bound woman removes her own gag (either with her freed hands or with something else) or removes the gag of a bound person (man or woman, it doesn't matter)?? |
Tightgag |
Friday June 17 09:14:46 2005 Tiffani Thiessen |
Has anybody seen the Tiffani Thiessen scene from Fastlane (tied to chair, no gag) and is it worth me hunting down? |
Tightgag |
Friday June 17 09:26:19 2005 Re: Women Removing Gags |
Tightgag wrote:
> This is a slightly unusual request - can anybody recall > any scenes in which either the bound woman removes her > own gag (either with her freed hands or with something > else) or removes the gag of a bound person (man or woman, > it doesn't matter)?? Loni Anderson removing her own gag on Partners in Crime and then removing Lynda Carters gag, and more importantaly talks to Lynda as she does it, and Lynda mmmmphing back at her. |
Friday June 17 09:39:51 2005 Re: Double-posting of VCR alerts |
I'm as guilty of this practice as anyone, but I do it only under "special circumstances". Granted, one person's "wow-that's-cool" can be another's "yawn", but you have to use your own judgement. I only double-post when...
(1) Time is short. Something just came to light & it airs within a few hours. (2) An interesting *detail* comes to light, not covered in the existing alert (...like the fact that tomorrow's SciFi movie HAMMERHEAD: SHARK FRENZY will have a DiD-scene for *HUNTER TYLO*!!). I don't know about the rest of you, but most of my visits are to the "Discussion" forum. Sometimes I don't visit "VCR Alerts" for days. (Let's face it, most "Alerts" are for the umpteenth repeat of some very marginal scene.) Anyhoo, I honestly don't see this as a problem. Are there *really* that many double-alerts? Do they *really* clutter the Discussion page? Will Amanda Tapping ever have a *really* good DiD-scene? (Sorry, my mind drifted. I suffer from ADD (Adbucted Damsels Disorder).) :-) |
Van |
vvvan@earthlink.net |
http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
Friday June 17 10:24:38 2005 Re: Batman Begins |
(unsigned poster) wrote:
> Was there anything of interest in Batman Begins? nope. it's a bust. whoever claimed they had seen pictures was faking us. Great movie though. And Katie holmes is hot, tied or not tied. |
j |
Friday June 17 10:27:30 2005 Re: Double-posting of VCR alerts |
> Suggested perhaps handy if date/time to current running
> page only thing that changed? > Imagine based on checking by changed time, then learning > from posts actually fired a week into the future, or > whathaveya? > > Have to look up what that about again =============== Oh, it wasn't. More related to no longer a reply feature on VCR Alerts. Recall reason for that too At time, felt solution was to work through DB splitting parted entries as came across them. So in case of these "Marathons" in the United States, you could post the specific part to the day as came across. Then same system: ==== Re: Crown vs Florissant Katie "Correction" Nothing in part 1. Action should be in part 2 @9pm KPLR {Insert split entry} ------- Which trip the: VCR Alerts Last new message posted: "Blahblahblah" same a reply feature ========= Problem saw, as related before: Though you would stop the "Last new message" from being tripped for those "useless ones week in future you won't see till date comes up" You'll also have the fellas right around 11:30pm to Midnight of say the 1st, posting for Midnight to 1am the 2nd, neither tripping the message. Perhaps more a pain in the arse for Brian than a solution? |
Jay L |
Friday June 17 12:36:35 2005 Re: Double-posting of VCR alerts |
Van wrote:
> I'm as guilty of this practice as anyone, but I do it > only under "special circumstances". > Time is short. Something just came to light & it > airs within a few hours. Relax Air in afew hours aka "Flash Alerts" not the problem It a perception issue: Why Brian headhunting on the foreign posters for asking US posters about caps of scenes they raving about? No Flash alerts brought up. It was day away alerts, and in one case where day or two away alerts posted before the VCR Alerts checked, as they already posted. Among other usual, etc =========== Whilst on this, "In General" One thing like fellas outside US to realise. I'm pretty sure Kinkynapper is in the United States. He been consistent about both caps & alerts. Figure he, Anubis, and even that major goon Brian would understand if someone like myself asked. Appears they more getting on their fellow US posters to read alerts and tape the shows themselves That, well as have the Trade Page for asking |
Jay L |
Friday June 17 15:33:26 2005 High Tension |
Looks interesting... |
Dave |
Friday June 17 15:45:02 2005 Re: Double-posting of VCR alerts |
Van wrote:
> I'm as guilty of this practice as anyone, but I do it > only under "special circumstances". Granted, > one person's "wow-that's-cool" can be another's > "yawn", but you have to use your own judgement. > I only double-post when... > > (1) Time is short. Something just came to light & it > airs within a few hours. > > (2) An interesting *detail* comes to light, not covered > in the existing alert (...like the fact that tomorrow's > SciFi movie HAMMERHEAD: SHARK FRENZY will have a > DiD-scene for *HUNTER TYLO*!!). > > I don't know about the rest of you, but most of my visits > are to the "Discussion" forum. Sometimes I > don't visit "VCR Alerts" for days. (Let's face > it, most "Alerts" are for the umpteenth repeat > of some very marginal scene.) > > Anyhoo, I honestly don't see this as a problem. Are > there *really* that many double-alerts? Do they *really* > clutter the Discussion page? Will Amanda Tapping ever > have a *really* good DiD-scene? (Sorry, my mind drifted. > I suffer from ADD (Adbucted Damsels Disorder).) :-) > http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ I know I'm weighing in on this topic late, but I agree. I honestly don't know why this has become such a hotly debated subject since we've been doing it like this for years. It's true the VCR alerts shows the last day/time updated, but it doesn't show which day the update was for. I used to be one of those who mainly checked VCR alerts and avoided Discussion, but now it's become the opposite. Like Van pointed out, most of the stuff in alerts is just repeats, but if a scene is really good there will be multiple posts discussing it. Anytime I see **West Coast Alert** in Discussion, it automatically catches my attention. I hope we leave things as they are now. |
MadFish |
Friday June 17 17:04:24 2005 Re: Women Removing Gags |
Tightgag wrote:
> This is a slightly unusual request - can anybody recall > any scenes in which either the bound woman removes her > own gag (either with her freed hands or with something > else) or removes the gag of a bound person (man or woman, > it doesn't matter)?? A "Halloween" episode of Walker, Texas Ranger- Alex is in a black cleave, about to be sacrificed, Walker interrupts and the head cult guy unties her to drag her off and complete the ritual, but she elbows him off and takes off her gag. Big Trouble in Little China had a good one with Kim Catrall, who is untied and everyone makes a dashing escape- she runs off with the gag intact, and unties it in the next scene. A late season episode of the series FAME had two of the kids (girl & guy) captured by industrial spies to retrieve a tape they had. They "mmmph" to each other, and work close enough to rub off their tape gags, to free their mouths for working on the knots. |
valkyrie |
http://valthesub.net |
Friday June 17 17:52:51 2005 Re: Double-posting of VCR alerts |
MadFish wrote:
> this has become such a hotly > debated subject It has? appears to me a step away from sorted quite peaceful > It's true the VCR alerts shows the last day/time > updated, but it doesn't show which day the update was > for. Again, possible problem between 11:30pm & 1am, in a running day only time trip. > Anytime I see **West Coast > Alert** in Discussion, Again, west coast alerts are what? 3hrs apart. Same as "Flash Alerts". They not the ones brought up. It alerts for the next day, or day after, and a case where the poster didn't check VCR Alerts before posting, as they already posted there |
Jay L |
Friday June 17 20:47:52 2005 Re:Brown Nosing |
This post was deleted. Poster: Massive Reason: Abusive. Say what you want about me, but Jay L. has earned so much respect for his massive amount of work on the database and the free tapes he's sent you that I won't tolerate AT ALL. Slagging him is going to be a good way to end up banned. |
The Moderator |
Friday June 17 21:13:22 2005 Re: Women Removing Gags |
Tightgag wrote:
> This is a slightly unusual request - can anybody recall > any scenes in which either the bound woman removes her > own gag (either with her freed hands or with something > else) or removes the gag of a bound person (man or woman, > it doesn't matter)?? In the final episode of Melrose Place (I believe it was titled "Asses to Ashes"), Jaime Luner is bound and gagged in a bathtub in just her bra and panties. It's one of my favorite scenes. Later on there's a second scene, only this time there's a guy with her, unfortuantly. She gets herself untied and removes her own gag, then unties the guy. One other small perk to this scene: In the second scene after she takes her gag and the putz's gag off, he asks her something. I forget what he asks her, but she responds while saying "while I was bound and gagged in here." I always get a kick out of hearing the damsel "talk about it." :) |
McBain |
Friday June 17 21:55:34 2005 Re: bit gag scene from "The Inside" |
I missed the beginning of "The Inside" show and hence missed the bit gag scenes. I was wondering ... how was the gag secured? Was it one of those single-strap jobs or was a head harness of some kind involved? I did an article on head harnesses in mainstream scenes (see homepage link) and may have to update.
Also, a lot of the dialogue seemed to indicate to me that the policewoman on the show had submissive tendencies and her fellow cops knew about it. WTF? Is this an accurate impression? A openly kinky and submissive female cop as the lead on a TV series? Not something I'd expect ... |
Pat Powers |
http://www.bondagerotica.com/articles/headharnesses/headharness.html |
Friday June 17 23:00:48 2005 Update |
Both Major John's & Jay L's are updated courtesy of Bindher,
including an answer to the previous post. |
Major John |
silent_night_022003@yahoo.com |
http://www.bindher.com/silentnight |
Friday June 17 23:55:13 2005 Re: bit gag scene from "The Inside" |
Pat Powers wrote:
> Also, a lot of the dialogue seemed to indicate to me that > the policewoman on the show had submissive tendencies and > her fellow cops knew about it. WTF? Is this an accurate > impression? A openly kinky and submissive female cop as > the lead on a TV series? Not something I'd expect ... Not submissive, empathetic and curious maybe, and perhaps searching for something cathartic to exorcize past demons. I thought the show was interesting in it's balanced treatment of kink, but when the smooth talker got tied down and f_ _ _ked in the a_ _ at the end (no pun intended) they sort of lost me. Unless of course, they were making the (subtle and brilliant) statement that male viewers (voyeurs) can have a love/hate thirst for artistic depictions of female rape, but not male rape. If they were punishing him for handcuffing her earlier in the mutual sex exploration scene (he did let her go) then I think I don't get it at all, and, it's a cop out (again, no pun). TV is pushing it lately, that's for sure. |
|