|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Thursday May 19 01:19:35 2005 Re: The Watcher |
|
The Best ever, Lynda Carter, was Ms. Arizona, and a finalist in Miss America. |
| Rob T |
| Thursday May 19 02:41:04 2005 Alias |
| Short scene with Lena Olin tied hands in front on "Alias" on Wednesday. No gag, not well lit, and Lena was a dirty mess. Jennifer Garner did get strung up in the jungle, but was quickly freed before the captors arrived. |
| Thursday May 19 03:44:04 2005 Star Wars Anti-Alert |
| Just to let you know, there's nothing for Natalie Portman (or anyone else) in Revenge of the Sith. Wonderful movie, though. |
| Thursday May 19 07:52:31 2005 Re: Actresses into Bondage |
| > On the last version of the show The Surreal Life, Go-Gos
> guitarist Jane Weidlen (sp?) 'came out' as an active > member of the fetish community. I kept hoping for a > scene in which she would demonstrate -- she was quite > proud of her lifestyle -- but alas, she only wore the > clothing in one of the final episodes, and I think > brandished a riding crop, but never got the treatment. There was once a photo shoot in Vanity Fair supposedly based on star's fantasy ideas. Gwyneth Paltrow appeared as 'Betty Page', although the look she had was nothing like Page's, there was no bondage, just Gwyneth in black leather underwear (I recall it was all the more infuriating because it was described on the page before the photo--so I read 'Gwyneth Paltrow appears as fifties dominatrix (sic!) Betty Page', then turned the page in anticipation, and, d'oh!). But still, you wonder... And recall that dumb 'goth' outfit she wore to the Oscars a few years back with racoon eye makeup. She's got some kind of dark side thing going on. |
| ss |
| Thursday May 19 09:13:10 2005 Re: Actresses/celebs who are into bondage? |
| McBain wrote:
> Blockbuster Dude wrote: > > > I cant remember where i heard this but didnt cameron > diaz > > say that she had an affinity for bondage. No..as far as I can remember the only Diaz "DID Myth" I remember was the rumour about an article in which she's talking about a movie she was in and said something like, "well, at least I don;t get tied up in this movie"..implying that she had in most of her other movies. But after a long series of poeple trying to recover the article, I think we decided it was a fake. |
| Thursday May 19 10:04:56 2005 Re: Actresses/celebs who are into bondage? |
| Did I miss something? None have said Angelina Jolie. Has openly
claimed that being tied up "calms her down". |
| Thursday May 19 11:25:17 2005 Re: Actresses/celebs who are into bondage? |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Did I miss something? None have said Angelina Jolie. Has > openly > claimed that being tied up "calms her down". From IMDB: Jolie's Quest for S&M Lover 19 October 2004 (WENN) Oscar-winner Angelina Jolie believes the man who understands her sadomasochistic needs and ties her up will be "the one". The Tomb Raider star tried to engender trust in her marriages to actors Jonny Lee Miller and Billy Bob Thornton by introducing violence into their sex lives, and she wants to push the boundaries even further with her next lover. Jolie explains, "A lot of my relationships just weren't honest enough. So I took them down different paths toward violence or wildness... to try to find somebody to hold me down and make me feel. S&M sex can be misinterpreted as violence. It's really about trust. I like to push boundaries, both emotional and sexual, with another person. That's when I've felt the sexiest. I've been in both submissive and dominant roles because I want more. I've never been tied up. I have a feeling the person that does it will be the one. I think that's what I'd like." No wonder Brad left Jen |
| el tinko |
| Thursday May 19 11:50:26 2005 Jennifer Garner |
| I heard Jennifer Garner is pregnant ? I sure hope not or this is really going to screw everything up. Kind of selfish , but I want to see her looking good not pregnant. LOL |
| Roach |
| Thursday May 19 12:31:47 2005 Re: Jennifer Garner |
| Roach wrote:
> I heard Jennifer Garner is pregnant ? I sure hope not > or this is really going to screw everything up. Kind of > selfish , but I want to see her looking good not > pregnant. LOL "Alias" is moving to Thursdays at 8 in the fall and will start with all the other shows, as opposed to this season when it didn't start until January. If she just got pregnant, it wouldn't interfere right away but by the end of the season it would cause problems. Also, the time slot switch will kill this show next year anyway, going up against NBC comedies (even bad ones) and Survivor. This will give ABC reason to ax the show, which never delivered any good ratings despite media praise. Plus, they don't need Garner anymore, with "Lost" and "Desperate Housewives" being their best shows. TNT reruns start in the fall. |
| Thursday May 19 12:32:36 2005 Re: Jennifer Garner |
| Roach wrote:
> I heard Jennifer Garner is pregnant ? I sure hope not > or this is really going to screw everything up. How is that going to "screw everything up"? Kind of an overly pessimistic attitude, no? > Kind of > selfish , but I want to see her looking good not > pregnant. LOL You know, pregnancy DOES end after childbirth. She won't look pregnant for the rest of her life. I'm sure there will still be a chance of a Did scene in the next 20-30 years of her career after she has the kid. No matter what, theres always a bunch of unrealistic negative comments for every minor thing predicting how our hobby is being ruined somehow. This is the kind of thing that makes people so impossible to satisfy on here. If you expect to be let down, youre going to be let down no matter what happens. C'mon, lighten up guys. |
| Anubis |
| Thursday May 19 16:03:54 2005 Re: Jennifer Garner |
| > Roach wrote:
> > > I heard Jennifer Garner is pregnant ? I sure hope > not > > or this is really going to screw everything up. > > How is that going to "screw everything up"? > Kind of an overly pessimistic attitude, no? > > > Kind of > > selfish , but I want to see her looking good not > > pregnant. LOL > Anyway, pregnant Garner means more room for Mia Maestro. I've never liked JG much, but I give her credit for not being a diva and nixing Maestro, whose obviously much hotter. |
| ss |
| Thursday May 19 16:17:15 2005 SOAP CAP-Florencia Lozano |
| Does anyone have a pic of this from OLTL? I had only read about it. Anything you could post would be so appreciated. Thanks. |
| eddie |
| Thursday May 19 18:52:03 2005 Re: Alias |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
Short scene with Lena Olin tied hands in front on "Alias" ... Jennifer Garner did get strung up in the jungle, but was quickly freed ... ________________________________________ No tmuch bondage wise but what really knocked me out was the scene in the shop. Jennifer's lovely legs & feet were very much on display as she was wearing high heel sandals as she was trying on some jewelry on her ankle. Wow! |
| Rich |
| bindherupx@yahoo.com |
| http://bindherupx.net |
| Thursday May 19 19:40:57 2005 "Young Billy Young": On-Topic or No?? |
| I had some spare time this afternoon, so I took in an Old Western on Showtime Extreme. It's called "Old Billy Young" (1969), and stars Robert Mitchum & Angie Dickinson. It's entertaining, but largely forgettable EXCEPT for the last scene that pops up about 86 minutes in. Mitchum struts into the saloon where scantily attired dancehall girl Angie is on stage, grabs her, flips her over his right shoulder, and carries her kicking self out into the street. She certainly doth not protest much, and he proposes marriage en route to a waiting stage coach. The scene's a gem, even though there's no bondage. And need I mention that though Angie was no ingenue at the time, she had a pair of stems that one would be hard pressed to improve upon?
So, to Mr. Moderator I ask, is this On-Topic for purposes of making an entry in the DB? I will be glad to do so if you give the OK. But, hey y'all, if Mr. M. says NoNo, interested parties may still look upon this as a form of alert. Showtime Extreme repeats stuff all too frequently, so I'm sure it will pop up again before the end of the month. |
| Overlooker |
| Thursday May 19 19:44:31 2005 Re: Jennifer Garner |
| ss wrote:
> Anyway, pregnant Garner means more room for Mia Maestro. That's a good thing, IMHO. I repeat, this is only an opinion, but I don't get all the shucking and jiving over Garner. I personally don't find her very attractive, and she loses major points in my books for headlining the theatrical blasphemy that is Elektra. Ms. Maestro is lightyears ahead of her in the looks department, and I'll even stir up the shit-pit a little more by saying I find her to be the better actress. Her one scene is not enough though! She's got to have more, and she's bound to. :) |
| X |
| Thursday May 19 19:51:08 2005 "Young Billy Young" , Part Deux |
| I suppose I should point out that the correct title is "Young Billy Young", not "Old". Must have been my subconscious playing because the hard-living Robert M. was definitely starting to look "old" in 1969.
|
| Overlooker |
| Thursday May 19 20:08:10 2005 Re: "Young Billy Young": On-Topic or No?? |
| Overlooker wrote:
> flips her > over his right shoulder, and carries her > though there's no bondage. > is this On-Topic for purposes > of making an entry in the DB? No Entries with no bondage get deleted However, if you want to make a friend? there a fella in the UK (believe Mark?) whom be interested in this for his "Over the Shoulder Carry" Database with caps. |
| Jay L |
| Thursday May 19 21:55:33 2005 Re: "Young Billy Young": On-Topic or No?? |
| >
> No > Entries with no bondage get deleted > Okay, do scenes with only handgags count as "bondage" scenes? I have seen plenty of them in the database in the past few months. I, personally, don't consider just a handgag as a scene, nor do I think cops handcuffing a damsel count, either. Does a guy blindfolding a girl count, like leading her into a surprise party or something like that? If it where up to me, which it is not (thankfully!), I would not include cartoon scenes either. But that's just my opinion. |
| Legend of the Wolf |
| legendofthewolf@yahoo.com |
| Thursday May 19 22:10:25 2005 West Coast Alert |
| Tonight's 'CSI' has a brief but very nice glimpse of two blondes gagged back to back with duct tape wrapped around their heads. It's well-lit and shot (for a change) and there's some nice emoting. Happens within the first 15-20 minutes. (Has nothing to do with the main plot) |
| Magellan |
| Thursday May 19 22:49:50 2005 Re: Database- On-Topic or No?? |
| Legend of the Wolf wrote:
***** Okay, do scenes with only handgags count as "bondage" scenes? ****** Yes **** cops handcuffing a damsel count ***** Yes ***** blindfolding a girl count ***** Not on it's own, no **** cartoon scenes ***** They should all be marked "Animated" in the actress slot, so's to avoid confusion with real actress |
| Jay L |
| Thursday May 19 23:31:28 2005 Re: West Coast Alert |
| Magellan wrote:
> Tonight's 'CSI' has a brief but very nice glimpse of two > blondes gagged back to back... Thanks for the alert. Managed to grab this one just in time. I don't suppose anybody caught the names of the cute twins, did they? I checked IMDB but the guest stars section for this episode does not have a complete listing yet. |
| Wavy |
| verywavy@yahoo.com |
|
|