|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Wednesday November 07 00:02:10 2007 Re: Who else knows? |
| Tapemaster wrote: Now she lets me know if a certain show > has a scene and she holds on to the tape to give me the next time I see her. Your MOM tapes shows for you so you can use them to...whatever you do with them? I'm speechless. |
| Kerry Madden |
| Wednesday November 07 00:08:03 2007 Re: Outer Space Damsels: other than Star Trek |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Other than Star Trek, know of any good examples in outer > space (TV, movie, or DVD) ? Off the top of my head, Battlestar Galactica, Firefly, Stargate, and especially Lexx have all delivered. On the movie front, "Dead Fire," "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," "Escape Velocity," and "Assault on Dome 4" all deserve a look. See Brian's DB and/or mine for more info. |
| Raffish |
| Wednesday November 07 00:16:05 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Tapemaster wrote: > However, the issue > at hand is not whether we can discuss such issues on > other forums. The issue is whether we can discuss such > issues on "Brian's Page". Dude, what about NO don't you understand? The N or the O? |
| Tapemaster's Page???? |
| Wednesday November 07 00:30:04 2007 Re: Who else knows? |
| Tapemaster wrote: > Housewives"). Now she lets me know if a certain show > has a scene and she holds on to the tape to give me the next time I see her. This can't be true. It just can't be. Long ago, my brother and I used to watch shows we knew a parent had taped. But we didn't ask them to do it. |
| The House of Le Bastard |
| Wednesday November 07 00:40:48 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Tapemaster wrote: > I don't see anything "off-topic" OR > "unproductive" about discussing the topic Did you miss the part where it doesn't matter what any of us see or don't see? It's the mod's call. End of story. |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.jebsadventurebound.net |
| Wednesday November 07 00:44:16 2007 Re: Who else knows? |
| Kerry Madden wrote: > Your MOM tapes shows for you so you can use them > to...whatever you do with them? > I'm speechless. She doesn't tape shows specifically for me. She tapes shows so she can watch them herself. However, if she notices that a show that she has taped has a bound-and-gagged scene, she will tell me and then hold on to the tape to give me the next time I see her. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday November 07 00:47:29 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Jeb wrote: > Did you miss the part where it doesn't matter what any of > us see or don't see? It's the mod's call. End of story. Obviously it is the moderator's call. I have never disputed that. I was just giving my opinion about the topicality of that particular issue. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday November 07 01:14:16 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Tapemaster wrote: > Other topics that do not discuss any > actual scenes are considered on topic (such as our > "wishlists" for which actresses we would like > to see bound and gagged), so why should this be any > different? In General Reminder- "Wish List" isn't "On Topic": ============================ Wednesday October 24 00:59:17 2007 Re: wish list This post was deleted. Poster: esaw Reason: See, this is why I usually disallow "wish lists". Things just get silly. So, this will hold EVERYONE for wish lists for the next year or so. The Moderator ============================== |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday November 07 01:31:18 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Tapemaster wrote: > Brian R wrote: > > discussion that I feel to be unproductive. > Then instead of ruling certain threads as being > "off-topic", why don't you just rule them as > being "unproductive"? Posts are either on-topic or not. "Unproductive", like "abusive" is a reason why they're off-topic. > I don't see anything "off-topic" OR > "unproductive" about discussing the [blah blah] Demonstrating that you missed the point of the either message. It doesn't matter what YOU think. Feel it. Believe it. It only matters what I think. I know, I know. What an arrogant ass! Perhaps. But that's the way it is. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday November 07 01:33:38 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Tapemaster wrote: > The issue is whether we can discuss such > issues on "Brian's Page". There is no issue. The answer is no. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday November 07 01:42:14 2007 Re: Outer Space Damsels: other than Star Trek |
| Raffish wrote: > Off the top of my head, Battlestar Galactica, Firefly, > Stargate, and especially Lexx have all delivered. On the > movie front, "Dead Fire," "The > Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," "Escape > Velocity," and "Assault on Dome 4" all > deserve a look Doctor Who has 31 hits in the DB. Not all are set in outer space though. Elisabeth Sladen with the most. Louise Jameson with the best gagged scene. |
 |
 |
| MT |
| Wednesday November 07 01:44:20 2007 Re: Who else knows? |
| I only told to my ex girlfriend, in fact, we play bd in our first sex date. Nobody more know about this, only you my comrades :) |
| Mandrake |
| Wednesday November 07 02:37:19 2007 Re: mickie james |
| steve waitt wrote: > ghost wrote: > > is there any chance that she will ever be gagged. > She has been in TNA > http://www.boundunderduress.com I've seen this pic several times, and I'm curious as to if anyone has actually seen the scene. I've never seen it, and if anyone knows of it, can they help me find it? I've been searching for it for a while. Thx. |
| Nick |
| letthemeatpie@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday November 07 05:35:29 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| The Moderator wrote: > Tapemaster wrote: > > Brian R wrote: > > > discussion that I feel to be unproductive. > > Then instead of ruling certain threads as being > > "off-topic", why don't you just rule them > as > > being "unproductive"? > Posts are either on-topic or not. Then you might as well not give any reason WHY a message or thread gets deleted. > "Unproductive", > like "abusive" is a reason why they're > off-topic. When a message is ON-topic, but abusive, you rule it as "abusive" and therefore it gets deleted. However, when a message is ON-topic, but "unproductive", you rule it as "off-topic" and therefore it gets deleted. Such a message should be ruled as being "unproductive". A message CAN be ON-topic and yet be "unproductive", just as a message CAN be ON-topic and still be "abusive". > > I don't see anything "off-topic" OR > > "unproductive" about discussing the [blah > blah] > Demonstrating that you missed the point of the either > message. It doesn't matter what YOU think. I completely get the point. Yes, it doesn't matter what I think. I don't make the rules and I don't enforce them. However, I can still voice my OPINION about your rulings. MOST of the time I agree with them, but there are some times when I don't. I think that you delete too many threads and messages for being "off-topic". Some of them ARE "on-topic", but you find them to be "unproductive". I can understand deleting messages for being "unproductive", I just wish that you would label them as such in order to avoid confusion. If you delete an "unproductive" thread as being "off-topic", then we don't know if that topic could have been dealt with in a "productive" manner. In addition, I feel that some of those "unproductive" threads and messages ARE "productive" and they should not be deleted. "Off-topic", "unproductive", and "abusive" are all completely different things. For example: "wish lists" ARE on-topic because they deal with the issue of what actresses we would like to see in bondage. Actresses in bondage is the entire point of this website. However, "wish lists" could be seen as "unproductive" because most of us would like to see EVERY actress in bondage and posting such long lists could clog up the forum. My opinion on the matter is that "wish lists" should be allowed as long as they are kept short. If someone refers to someone else's wish list as being "stupid", then that message is "abusive" and should therefore be deleted. > Feel it. > Believe it. > It only matters what I think. Yes, I am well aware of that. > I know, I know. What an > arrogant ass! No, I don't think of you as being arrogant. It is just that sometimes I disagree with your rulings. > Perhaps. But that's the way it is. Yes, it is. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday November 07 06:57:07 2007 Re: Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| anon22 wrote: > Bob Nielsen wrote: > Writers Strike.With all the writers on strike, how many > episodes does Chuck have left in the pipeline? > Aint it Cool website has an article on the strike. They > claim that most hourlong shows have 'at least' 5 scripts > ready to go, which would go through the Nov. sweeps period. Ive been doing a little research on this myself, even though as a Brit it doesn't directly affect me. Assuming the strike drags on for a while (last one lasted 5 months i believe) then expect the soaps to grind to a halt sometime in December, Most primetime shows following in January 0r February at the latest There will be an 8 episode run of Lost in February - half the proposed season - and 7 episodes of Jericho but that could be the entire new drama output for those 2 months. Status on 24 is unconfirmed but some parties seem optimistic it may still air (could they already have a full season of scripts?) with reference to Chuck apparantly the producers are holding fire on a full season commision until after the strike,(as i imagine will be the case with mostnew shows) likewise the second half of this series of Heroes will be withheld until after the strike. Bionic woman is 're-launching' with a 2 hour special in January, though i'm also told production on that show has already closed down for the duration of the strike. |
| Moxx of Balhoom |
| Wednesday November 07 07:12:18 2007 Re: AMC - Greenlee |
| ACC wrote: > You just make me think here: how long can the soaps run > with new episodes everyday before the writers' strike can > really affect them? I read a story on Yahoo! News that stated that most soaps have scripts ready through January 2008. |
| Greg |
| gb9304@yahoo.com |
| http://greggerbits.tripod.com |
| Wednesday November 07 09:46:34 2007 Devilman UK |
| Devilman UK joins majorjohns.com as our weekly wednesday contributor |
 |
| Mai Li |
| http://www.majorjohns.com |
| Wednesday November 07 10:40:52 2007 Criminal Minds |
| Maybe a scene on tonight's episode on CBS @ 9pm. It's about two serial killers and one dies. THe other is still killing females. Well, there was a preview of a gal in jeans and was lying on her side with the killer behind her. It was shown as if the killer was torturing her with a webcam broadcasting the scene. I show no bonds, but people on the east coast may want to prepare if some are shown. |
| civil |
| Wednesday November 07 11:04:37 2007 Re: Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| Tapemaster wrote: > There was no bondage on "Chuck" tonight. > The preview for next week shows Rachel Bilson making a > guest appearance as a woman (not a secret agent) who is > romantically interested in Chuck . Rachel Bilson will be on Chuck for two episodes starting next week. |
| ss |
| Wednesday November 07 11:56:10 2007 Smallville guest star |
| Since Smallville has given us Supergirl as well as various male DC superheroes I hope they get around to showing a young Wonder Woman at some point, along with some of the other females - preferably with plenty of the scenes we like, of course. I imagine this wish has been voiced before; just haven't seen it since I've been here. |
| Cinch |
| Wednesday November 07 13:04:58 2007 Emmerdale |
| Anyone know who the actress is? |
 |
 |
 |
| Wednesday November 07 13:10:21 2007 Re: Emmerdale |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Anyone know who the actress is? > That is lorraine Chase playing steph something. Like that scene. |
| Pete |
| Wednesday November 07 13:10:39 2007 Re: Emmerdale |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Anyone know who the actress is? I think someone asked this before. The actress is Lorraine Chase |
| Gaz P |
| Wednesday November 07 13:10:56 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Tapemaster wrote: > "wish lists" ARE on-topic > So this not good enough for you huh? ============================ Wednesday October 24 00:59:17 2007 Re: wish list This post was deleted. Poster: esaw Reason: See, this is why I usually disallow "wish lists". Things just get silly. So, this will hold EVERYONE for wish lists for the next year or so. The Moderator ============================== Then how about a "Blast From the Past"? ==================================== Tuesday March 09 20:43:03 2004 FAVORITE BONDAGE ACTRESS This post was moved to Anything Goes. Poster: Christian Reason: Off-topic. We don't do wish lists because every attractive actress has somebody who wants to see her. The Moderator ========================================= |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday November 07 15:08:31 2007 Re: Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| She'll be on for two episodes? I only heard one. Anyways, can somebody find out if she gets the treatment before hand? I'm going crazy here! |
| Wednesday November 07 15:23:06 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Tapemaster wrote: > Brian R wrote: > > posts > > tend to become argumentative and repetitious, even > > sometimes abusive, or they lead to where off-topic > > political discussions await with nasty sharp pointy > > teeth. > I don't see anything "off-topic" OR > "unproductive" about discussing the topic of > whether or not people in the TV and movie industry are > aware of the the erotic appeal of women in bondage Here, (I know, took abit! Got search down for ep ID's, not as quick on non-DB related) This was posted by a writer: ======= "Come on. God forbid a show should make an attempt at advancing a plot or a story (okay, fastlane is a poor example). As a writer, I take serios offense to asking when we will come to our senses. Catering to your bondage interests is not the focus of these shows. There are plenty of videos out there that do just this, so see one of them. Stop blaming the writers! And by the way. who are you to say who watches these shows and why. Remember, your opinion is just that, yours. it does not apply to everyone. Sorry if this is off topic Moderator, but this BS has been going on for far too long." ============================================ The poster took offence. Brian was requested to rule on it and responded fairly. Keep in mind, Brian one of the guys. Here why we here. Say more tapes have been sent to Brian than most here. Even more than Jeff and his 52" Big Screen TV Why not as a bud, do him a favour and hold off posting something that would cause offence and he'd have to deal with? Fair? |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday November 07 17:05:14 2007 mickie james |
| i didnt know mickie james ever got b&g in TNA. when did this happen. I too would like to find a clip of this. and have there been any other bound damsels in TNA |
| Wednesday November 07 17:08:58 2007 ezine |
| they cant get rid of ezine. i know its a lil old, but i still like lookin and reminding. I think they should make more ezines. They only made five, or did they. anyone know if they made more? I would like 2 c them. with all the internet nowadays too, u think they could come up with more ezines. |
| Wednesday November 07 18:25:10 2007 Re: Who else knows? |
| Tapemaster wrote: > Now she lets me know if a certain show > has a scene and she holds on to the tape to give me > the next time I see her. > Your MOM tapes shows for you so you can use them > to...whatever you do with them? > I'm speechless. I'm thinking this was almost in the "too much information" category. I actually feel a little bit...unclean now! |
| rex |
| Wednesday November 07 18:31:15 2007 Re: mickie james |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > i didnt know mickie james ever got b&g in TNA. when > did this happen. I too would like to find a clip of this. > and have there been any other bound damsels in TNA I have the scene on tape (yes, I still record my scenes on ol' VHS tapes!!!). I got it in trade & quality isn't the absolute greatest but not bad. Mickie (back then, Alexis Laree) is tied to a chair & cleave gagged with a mal;e wrestler behind stage. Later, her & the guy are bruoght to the ring and thrown onto the ring apron by the baddies (James Mitchell & company), who proceed to threaten Raven & the other "good guys" (who are not in the ring) with harm to their comrades (Alexis & the guy) if they do not come out to the ring. There are several shots of Alexis wiggling around on the ring apron, still cleave gagged. For me, a REALLY nice touch was that her ankles were crossed while tied. They showed more scenes of the tied up guy, since he was getting roughed up quite alot by the bad guys, but Alexis did receive a pretty good kick to the gut while she was tied up. There were no real close-ups...all were about the same medium shots as in the pic that was posted yesterday here. |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Wednesday November 07 18:40:57 2007 Re: Heroes |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Only Bell will be duct taped. Unfortunately, Hayden > Panitterie's wrists will be zip tied behind her back > instead of being taped. Probably eliminates her shot at > a tape gag or having her legs tied in that little cheerleader skirt. I don't know, this show popped a great scene last year with hands behind and a white tape gag. Anything is possible especially with 2 DID's in the scene. |
| Wednesday November 07 19:20:29 2007 Re: Who else knows? |
| rex wrote: > Tapemaster wrote: > > Now she lets me know if a certain show > > has a scene and she holds on to the tape to give me > > the next time I see her. .... > I'm thinking this was almost in the "too much > information" category. I actually feel a little > bit...unclean now! Word; on one hand, it must be a relief to be 'out' about it. On the other, at least for me, I prefer to keep it to myself and any significant others with open minds as my own little secret to enjoy. |
| Captureher |
| Wednesday November 07 19:35:32 2007 Captivity & This Hollow Sacrament |
| I noticed these latest updates on majorjohns aren't in the database; any reason that someone knows of? I can understand why "Captivity" would've been skipped -- too silly considering she could've stuck her tongue to the bottom of the funnel -- but neither are there and both seem mainstream. |
| Captureher |
| Wednesday November 07 20:12:41 2007 Re: Just a heads up |
| > In the series Nip/Tuck the characters played by Miranda > Richardson and Portia de Rossi will be kidnapped. Does anyone know the source of this claim? |
| PW |
| Wednesday November 07 20:16:07 2007 Marvel heroes..? |
| Almost 'wish-listable': http://www.marvel.com/news/.1749. Marvel_Costume_Contest_Winner Just needed some rope and... |
| Wednesday November 07 20:36:38 2007 late alert -- Bound |
| "Bound" (Gina Gershon and Jennifer Tilly bound and gagged) is on right now on the LOGO channel. The scene hasn't started yet. Details are on the VCR alerts page. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday November 07 20:38:37 2007 Update |
| I added to my site SLEEPER by Woody Allen with Diane Keaton. Recent update is Heller in Pink Tights. Next updates will be Minotaur. |
 |
| paolo |
| http://www.italianmoviefan.it/ |
| Wednesday November 07 20:45:36 2007 Re: Just a heads up |
| PW wrote: > > In the series Nip/Tuck the characters played by > Miranda > > Richardson and Portia de Rossi will be kidnapped. > Does anyone know the source of this claim? Google "Richardson Rossi kidnapped" and you'll find plenty of sources. |
| ss |
| Wednesday November 07 20:55:26 2007 Re: late alert -- Bound |
| Tapemaster wrote: > "Bound" (Gina Gershon and Jennifer Tilly bound > and gagged) is on right now on the LOGO channel. The movie repeats tonight at 12:30 AM eastern time on LOGO. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday November 07 21:06:47 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| civil wrote: > Maybe a scene on tonight's episode on CBS @ 9pm. It's > about two serial killers and one dies. THe other is still > killing females. Well, there was a preview of a gal in > jeans and was lying on her side with the killer behind > her. It was shown as if the killer was torturing her with > a webcam broadcasting the scene. I show no bonds, but people on the east coast may want to prepare if some are shown. About 5 minutes in, we get a woman, hands tied in front, and cleave gagged. Screaming to get free. May be more to come..... |
| H |
| diddvd@yahoo.com |
| http://www.diddvd.com |
| Wednesday November 07 21:12:02 2007 K-ville possible alert |
| Show a quick preview for Monday's episode on Fox. Show a guy running with a girl in his arms and her with her hands close to her chest. Plus a guy holding a gun to another womans's head. Never show any bonds, but it seemed like a hostage situation. |
| civil |
| Wednesday November 07 21:38:57 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Tapemaster wrote: [blah blah blah] Congratulations. After all this time, you have reachieved "Tapemaster Status. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday November 07 21:41:42 2007 Re: ezine |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > > they cant get rid of ezine. They can't? > with all the internet nowadays too, u think they could > come up with more ezines. The problem was that "they" was mostly "me". |
| The Editor |
| Wednesday November 07 21:43:58 2007 Ghost Whisperer |
| Tonight, during Criminal Minds, they showed a preview with JLH handcuffed to the bed. It isn't playful, as she looks distressed. Something about a psychic. |
| Oz |
| Wednesday November 07 21:59:22 2007 Trap |
| Hello All, There is a new movie out (direct to DVD) that has a decent scene. The movie is called "Trap" and was a lower budget feature film shot in Detroit. I saw a private screening of it in the theater. Near the end (after a brief putz scene) he turns the tables on his captor and tapes her hands behind her back and her and feet with duct tape and puts her in an empty bath tub. From there she makes an athletic escape onto the floor where she ultimately escapes her bonds though we don't see it. She's recaptured a short while later and has her hands taped overhead and is back in the tub and a tape gag is applied as well. The gag scene isn't terrible impressive as it's one of those you-can-see-her-mouth-open-as-she's-screaming bits. She's a cute blond but unfortunately her face is a little bloody and scarred from earlier action in the film. It's kind of a cool story too and a great low budget effort that does not scream "low budget crap film." Two stars. |
| PW |
| Wednesday November 07 22:07:37 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| H wrote: > About 5 minutes in, we get a woman, hands tied in front, > and cleave gagged. Screaming to get free. May be more to > come..... > http://www.diddvd.com Poor scenes after the 30' mark with tape of guy tying a girl in a hogtie. Very poor video and video mostly points at the guy. In the last 10 minutes, guy ties a rope from a girl's neck to her hands (behind her) then to her feet on a cliff top. Also places a "u" shaped fork at her neck keep her still. Shes starts out on her side, then siting up and then once again lying down. Won't say more to spoil anything for the folks on the other coast. |
| civil |
| Wednesday November 07 22:13:22 2007 BESOS REBADOS |
| If you're a gag snob like me there was nothing else. The putz and the damsel spent most of the first hour before being freed sitting up in bed and talking. Each had a wrist handcuffed to the side of the bed and there other wrist cuffed to each other. Nothing else. |
| hallbird |
| Wednesday November 07 22:24:49 2007 Chuck |
| I'm a little worried about Chuck surviving this season. It's ratings jump up and down, and the writer's strike definately doesn't help. I don't know how many of us are out there, but if we could start watching it every Monday, maybe the ratings would improve enough for NBC to keep it around once the strike is over. Not only is this show our best bet for continued scenes, it is also one of the best new shows around based on pure entertainment factor. All of you should give it a try. |
| Wednesday November 07 23:08:45 2007 Re: Maroon Five Video |
| JP wrote: > ss wrote: > > JP wrote: > > > So when exactly are videos even SHOWN if one > wanted > > to > > > say set his recorder for a 6-8 hour stratch... As far as a music video channel, I prefer Fuse better than the MTV networks since they play videos more often than MTV. On MTV they air videos mostly overnight while on Fuse you can narrow it down by searching for "No. 1 Countdown", they have various countdowns but I saw it on the Rock countdown (next airing I have is Thurs. 8pm CT). Or you can search for "Loaded" which is a half-hour block of videos by one band or artist, in this case Maroon Five. |
| Wednesday November 07 23:14:36 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
> Congratulations. After all this time, you have reachieved > "Tapemaster Status. Ah, memories. |
| Kerry |
| Wednesday November 07 23:20:28 2007 Re: Smallville guest star |
| Cinch wrote: > Since Smallville has given us Supergirl as well as > various male DC superheroes I hope they get around to > showing a young Wonder Woman at some point, along with > some of the other females - preferably with plenty of the > scenes we like, of course. I imagine this wish has been > voiced before; just haven't seen it since I've been here. Black Canary will be a guest hero on an upcoming episode of Smallville, complete with martial arts fishnet stockings and canary cry. |
| MadFish |
| http://tv.ign.com/articles/831/831980p1.html |
| Wednesday November 07 23:20:39 2007 Re: Ghost Whisperer |
| Oz wrote: > Tonight, during Criminal Minds, they showed a preview > with JLH handcuffed to the bed. It isn't playful, as she > looks distressed. Something about a psychic. If I understood the preview from Friday correctly there was another woman who was in this predicament and JLH had a vision or something where she was the woman ib the predicament.... much like her handcuffs & hanging scene |
| Snowcat |
|
|