|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Tuesday November 06 01:28:34 2007 Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| There was no bondage on "Chuck" tonight. The preview for next week shows Rachel Bilson making a guest appearance as a woman (not a secret agent) who is romantically interested in Chuck and perhaps jealous of "Sarah" (Yvonne Strahovski). This leads to a number of possibilities: 1. Enemy agents kidnap, bind and gag Rachel Bilson as bait for Chuck. 2. Chuck or Sarah bind and gag Rachel Bilson because she is interfering with their mission. 3. Rachel Bilson turns out to be a stalker and she binds and gags Sarah to get rid of her competition. 4. Both Rachel Bilson and Sarah get captured by enemy agents, bound and gagged, and they have to cooperate in order to free themselves (or Chuck rescues them). Let's all hope that we get some bound-and-gagged action next week. This show has so many possibilities. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Tuesday November 06 01:38:30 2007 Sweeps |
| When does the November "sweeps" period begin and end? |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Tuesday November 06 02:00:11 2007 Re: Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| Tapemaster wrote: > 4. Both Rachel Bilson and Sarah get captured by enemy > agents, bound and gagged.. I like this option best. Surprised so far that "Journeyman" hasn't produced anything. If anyone hasn't seen it, the lovely Moon Bloodgood (bound and gagged in "Day Break" last season) is the female lead. |
| Tuesday November 06 02:05:12 2007 Re: Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Moon Bloodgood (bound and gagged in "Day Break" > last season) is the female lead. New scenes always welcome. |
 |
 |
 |
| Tuesday November 06 07:28:25 2007 Re: Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| Tapemaster wrote: > 4. Both Rachel Bilson and Sarah get captured by enemy > agents, bou and gagged, and they have to cooperate in > order to free themselves (or Chuck rescues them). > Let's all hope that we get some bound-and-gagged action > next week. This show has so many possibilities. The other possibility is that Rachel Bilson is in fact the enemy agent, and that she captures Sarah. In any case, its good that the preview was focusing on women characters for next week. |
| ss |
| Tuesday November 06 08:09:26 2007 Re: The Girl Next Door |
Thank You....somehow I missed the previous discussions, thanks again for the info |
| WolfmanJK |
| eyejdr@aol.com |
| Tuesday November 06 09:51:50 2007 mickie james |
| is there any chance that she will ever be gagged. |
| ghost |
| Tuesday November 06 10:00:05 2007 Re: mickie james |
| ghost wrote: > is there any chance that she will ever be gagged. She has been in TNA |
 |
| steve waitt |
| steve@boundunderduress.com |
| http://www.boundunderduress.com |
| Tuesday November 06 10:04:10 2007 Re: mickie james |
| > ghost wrote: > > is there any chance that she will ever be gagged. > She has been in TNA > http://www.boundunderduress.com oh thanks, but what about with tape? |
| ghost |
| Tuesday November 06 11:36:58 2007 Re: Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| ss wrote: > The other possibility is that Rachel Bilson is in fact > the enemy agent, and that she captures Sarah. You're right! That is a very strong possibility. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Tuesday November 06 12:08:18 2007 AMC - Greenlee |
| Monday Greenlee was shown in a few short scenes with her arms handcuffed behind her. Best view was in a police station about halfway through when one wrist could be seen with a handcuff link around it with acceptable firmness. Not a real special scene, and lessened a bit by the fact that her purse was hanging by her fingers. I'm no authority on police procedures but I doubt a handcuffed suspect is allowed to keep her purse, even if it's been searched. By the 3/4 or so portion of the show the cuffs were off and she was in a cell. |
| Cinch |
| Tuesday November 06 13:04:20 2007 Ein Starkes Team |
| Pics 10 and 11 are quite nice. Maja Maranow caught snooping |
 |
| http://www.zdf.de/ZDFmediathek/content/262954?inPopup=true |
| Tuesday November 06 13:11:11 2007 Re: Ein Starkes Team |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Pics 10 and 11 are quite nice. Maja Maranow caught > snooping Nice white tape gag. When does this air? |
| Tuesday November 06 13:13:33 2007 Re: Ein Starkes Team |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > > snooping > Nice white tape gag. When does this air? Looks like this aired already. Record number: 13065 Title: Ein starkes Team Medium: Other Actress: Maja Maranow Description: Episode: Unter Wölfen (2007) Verena is snooping around on a camping ground. Of course she gets caught after a while. a few minutes later she is found by her collaegues. She is lying on the floor with her hands bound behind her back with cable ties. Her legs are tied together with the same material and she is tapegagged. Short mmphing before she gets free. |
| Tuesday November 06 13:41:54 2007 Re: Ein Starkes Team |
| Pic #11 at the referenced site suggests there's a pretty nice gagging scene that the db doesn't reference. Anyone know if that scene made it to the actual program? |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.jebsadventurebound.net |
| Tuesday November 06 14:12:19 2007 Re: Ein Starkes Team |
| > Pic #11 at the referenced site suggests there's a pretty > nice gagging scene that the db doesn't reference. Anyone > know if that scene made it to the actual program? She's being ungagged by partner in pic |
| Tuesday November 06 14:28:58 2007 Re: Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| It's just too good to be true. Probably none of them will happen...:(. |
| Tuesday November 06 15:20:31 2007 Re: Sweeps |
| Tapemaster wrote: > When does the November "sweeps" period begin > and end? Did you try using Google? GOOGLE is Van's friend! |
| Nov1 to Nov28 |
| Tuesday November 06 16:03:00 2007 Rachel Hunter |
| Think this pic was posted a while ago. |
 |
| Tuesday November 06 16:03:21 2007 Re: On Consignemnt |
| Does this really count as "mainstream" as far as I can see these are essentially soft core porn movies with a heavy B&D leaning. How do they differ from story driven HoM vids from the mid 80's |
| Tom Quin |
| Tuesday November 06 16:06:48 2007 Re: Wonder Woman Bondage Panel |
| AgentOrange wrote: > The following is a bondage panel from Wonder Woman, > occuring circa 2000, or late 90's. Anyone know which > issue?? > http://www.wondertrash.com Does anybody know where you could find the rest of the pictures in this comic? |
| Tuesday November 06 17:32:01 2007 Re: Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| Tapemaster wrote: > You're right! That is a very strong possibility. Except for 2 little words: Writers Strike. With all the writers on strike, how many episodes does Chuck have left in the pipeline? |
| Bob Nielsen |
| robertwnielsen@q.com |
| Tuesday November 06 17:41:27 2007 Re: Wonder Woman Bondage Panel |
| > Does anybody know where you could find the rest of the > pictures in this comic? My recollection is that's the only one in the book; certainly when I scanned it, that's the only picture I scanned. |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.jebsadventurebound.net |
| Tuesday November 06 17:43:25 2007 Re: On Consignemnt |
| Tom Quin wrote: > Does this really count as "mainstream" Probably not, but until the Mod deep-sixes it, I'm happy to keep seeing that domme's pic whenever I pop in here-- she's far and away the hottest of the bunch. |
| Jeb |
| Tuesday November 06 17:45:46 2007 Re: Chuck -- nothing tonight, possible next week |
| Bob Nielsen wrote: Writers Strike.With all the writers on strike, how many episodes does Chuck have left in the pipeline? Aint it Cool website has an article on the strike. They claim that most hourlong shows have 'at least' 5 scripts ready to go, which would go through the Nov. sweeps period. |
| anon22 |
| Tuesday November 06 18:18:59 2007 Re: Ein Starkes Team |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Title: Ein starkes Team > Medium: Other > Actress: Maja Maranow > Description: Episode: Unter Wölfen (2007) Yes. This of course is a *TV Series* I'm on it I've sent the poster a message about doing his own thing and buggering the search feature. Hopefully we won't see *Other* ? or dates in the Description Box? again |
| Jay L |
| Tuesday November 06 19:26:46 2007 Re: On Consignemnt |
| Jeb wrote: > Tom Quin wrote: > > Does this really count as "mainstream" > Probably not, but until the Mod deep-sixes it, .. I agree the production values are excellent (for these type of vids anyway) but the multiple bandwidth-eating pics are a bit much: Not enough bondage for the buck for this board IMO. I'd be happier if the poster just posted one pic with some background about the vid (location, stars, shooting days, etc). |
| Captureher |
| Tuesday November 06 19:32:03 2007 Re: Maroon Five Video |
> So when exactly are videos even SHOWN if one wanted to > say set his recorder for a 6-8 hour stratch in hopes of > catching that video? > And Fuse's schedule didn't look much different. If you get the digital channel MTV Hits, it plays on that station periodically. Record whenever they air the mtv hits playlist, and you will eventually get it. That's how I got it. |
| ID4J |
| id4j@aol.com |
| Tuesday November 06 19:46:12 2007 Outer Space Damsels: other than Star Trek |
| Other than Star Trek, know of any good examples in outer space (TV, movie, or DVD) ? |
| Tuesday November 06 19:55:47 2007 Re: Maroon Five Video |
| ss wrote: > JP wrote: > > So when exactly are videos even SHOWN if one wanted > to > > say set his recorder for a 6-8 hour stratch in hopes > of > > catching that video? > Why not just buy it on Itunes or watch it on youtube? Well that's a possibility I suppose....but I was more wondering if someone knew when videos play on the music channels...MTV, FUSE, etc. so a person could get a nice first generation copy for his video/DVD collection. Not everyone (myself included) prefers the grainy, tiny screens of youtube for watching their bondage scenes. I myself much prefer watching them on a nice 52" crystal clear screen from the comfort of my easy chair! :-) |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Tuesday November 06 20:01:16 2007 Re: Maroon Five Video |
| ID4J wrote: > If you get the digital channel MTV Hits, it plays on that > station periodically. Thanks bro! I'll be keeping an eye on MTV hits! |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Tuesday November 06 21:32:38 2007 Re: Heroes |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Hoping they show some promos of upcoming episodes so we > can tell when Bell and Pantiere will be tied up with duct > tape. Only Bell will be duct taped. Unfortunately, Hayden Panitterie's wrists will be zip tied behind her back instead of being taped. Probably eliminates her shot at a tape gag or having her legs tied in that little cheerleader skirt. |
| Tuesday November 06 22:05:30 2007 On Consignemnt |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: mobius Reason: I'm just not feeling this as mainstream, especially the images shown. |
| The Moderator |
| Tuesday November 06 22:06:22 2007 Re: VCR Alert: Besos Robados |
| Just wondering: was there any further action on this show this past weekend? I haven't seen anything here about it, but earlier posts implied that it may have been ongoing. My TiVo was set, but the reception was once again Comcastic enough to be completely unwatchable. (For some reason, the Spanish-language channels seem to be particularly susceptible to this at the House of Raffish...sigh.) I'd love to post this publicly as I did with the first part, if the show did in fact come through with more damselly goodness and someone could fix me up with a recording in some format or another. As always, site credit can be arranged. |
| Raffish |
| raffish@bondageparade.com |
| http://www.bondageparade.com/ |
| Tuesday November 06 22:07:03 2007 Re: On Consignemnt |
| Tom Quin wrote: > Does this really count as "mainstream" as far I think I'm with you on this. |
| The Moderator |
| Tuesday November 06 22:07:56 2007 Re: On Consignemnt |
| Jeb wrote: > Tom Quin wrote: > > Does this really count as "mainstream" > Probably not, but until the Mod deep-sixes it Sorry to ruin your day. |
| The Moderator |
| Tuesday November 06 22:29:37 2007 Re: Ein Starkes Team |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Pics 10 and 11 are quite nice. Maja Maranow caught > snooping I can't see the whole picture, particularly the part that shows her face at the bottom. Also, how do you stop the "slideshow" on that particular picture? |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Tuesday November 06 22:30:25 2007 Rules and enforcement |
| It's time for a wee discussion about the rules on the site. 1. If there aren't rules, then this would pretty quickly be spam heaven. Take a google around for message boards that aren't being monitored and you'll see what I mean. 2. Whenever there's a set of rules, there will arise occasions when some individual disagrees with a rule or lack of a rule. That's the case regardless of whether the rules are chosen by one person, a committee, or general democracy. Point one I had in mind from the get-go. Point two I probably would have realized intellectually had I thought about it. However, it was brought home fairly early one when we got in a situation where someone was going to be unhappy whichever way I ruled on a topic. After that, I realized that I had to not concern myself with whether anyone would be dissatisfied with the rules. That way, I could focus solely on what I felt was best for the forum at large. I have no doubt that there are some rules that would be overturned by a popular vote. However, this isn't a democracy, so it doesn't matter. I have the ultimate vote. As the person who's been posting here the longest (even if only by minutes) I have the most perspective. I use what I recall of past discussions (there really are very few new topics) to forbid or cut short certain avenues of discussion that I feel to be unproductive. "Unproductive" generally means that the posts tend to become argumentative and repetitious, even sometimes abusive, or they lead to where off-topic political discussions await with nasty sharp pointy teeth. The upshot of all this is that this is the system. The system won't change, short of my deciding to step down or untimely passing or some such. You're free to dislike the system. You're free to dislike some aspects of the system. But it is what is. I'll always listen to reasoned rebuttal, and perhaps take into account the points. Histrionics and hissy-fits will almost certainly be totally discounted. That's all for now, back to your cheerleader dreams. |
| Brian R |
| Tuesday November 06 23:24:20 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Brian R wrote: > I use > what I recall of past discussions (there really are very > few new topics) to forbid or cut short certain avenues of > discussion that I feel to be unproductive. Then instead of ruling certain threads as being "off-topic", why don't you just rule them as being "unproductive"? > "Unproductive" generally means that the posts > tend to become argumentative and repetitious, even > sometimes abusive, or they lead to where off-topic > political discussions await with nasty sharp pointy > teeth. Abusive messages should be deleted for being abusive. Political messages should be deleted for being off-topic. There is no reason to get rid of an entire thread just because someone posts an abusive or political message within a thread. The thread as a whole can still be very "productive". I don't see anything "off-topic" OR "unproductive" about discussing the topic of whether or not people in the TV and movie industry are aware of the the erotic appeal of women in bondage and whether or not they make decisions based on that. The topic does have to do with the issue of bondage scenes in the mainstream media, even if we are not talking about any specific scene. Other topics that do not discuss any actual scenes are considered on topic (such as our "wishlists" for which actresses we would like to see bound and gagged), so why should this be any different? Any topic that deals with the issue of women in bondage in the mainstream media should be allowed, even if we are not talking about any specific scenes. That is a very broad area. It includes not only topics dealing with specific scenes, but also our theories about the presence or absence of such scenes in the TV & movie industry, the psychological motivations behind our interests in such scenes, our behavioral habits in seeking out and recording such scenes, and our desires as to what actresses we would like to see in bondage. Any topic that does NOT deal with that issue (even popular ones such as politics, sports, quality of TV & movies in general, attractiveness of certain women in general, and bondage scenes not in the mainstream media) should be ruled "off-topic" and deleted. Any abusive posts (where one poster says something nasty to another poster) should be ruled "abusive" and deleted, even if the abusive post is on-topic. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Tuesday November 06 23:35:17 2007 Re: AMC - Greenlee |
| You just make me think here: how long can the soaps run with new episodes everyday before the writers' strike can really affect them? |
| ACC |
| accasino@hotmail.com |
| Tuesday November 06 23:38:10 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| Tapemaster wrote: > discussing the topic of > whether or not people in the TV and movie industry are > aware of the the erotic appeal of women in bondage and > whether or not they make decisions based on that. AGAIN, you were given a forum where they discuss those types of topics.. Check it out |
| http://www.bedroombondage.com/bondage/guestbook/index.html |
| Tuesday November 06 23:45:44 2007 Who else knows? |
| What other people have you told about your interest in mainstream bondage? Have you told your wives, girlfriends, pals, or family members? If so, what have they had to say about it? For years only a few friends and my two brothers knew of my interest in bound and gagged women. However, a few months ago I told my parents. They don't have a problem with it. They think it's perfectly normal. In fact, my mother told me that she already knew about my interest in it! My mother records a lot of primetime TV shows and watches them later on. These are shows that I have no interest in watching, yet I realize the potential for bondage scenes (such as "Desperate Housewives"). Now she lets me know if a certain show has a scene and she holds on to the tape to give me the next time I see her. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Tuesday November 06 23:49:06 2007 Re: Rules and enforcement |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > AGAIN, you were given a forum where they discuss those > types of topics.. > Check it out Thanks for the link. I will go there. However, the issue at hand is not whether we can discuss such issues on other forums. The issue is whether we can discuss such issues on "Brian's Page". |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
|
|