|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
Monday May 26 00:55:21 2008 Re: A couple of problems |
Kathy wrote: > It won't take real posts from me: I get "malformed > string" error and instructed to contact the operator No, it said "Contact the Moderator". Did you? Use the feedback link at the top and bottom of the page. Include a copy of the text you are trying to post. |
The Engineer |
Monday May 26 01:08:47 2008 Re: The FLock |
H wrote: > It is indeed Kadee Strickland. I don't know who has the > girl being whipped, or the girl Nadine who is > photographed in some stringent bondage including a > joyrope. So (I missed the first few posys on this movie), is the girl tied & gagged in the movie Kadee Strickland and NOT Kristina Sisco as previously announced? |
Monday May 26 01:26:17 2008 Re: Old Sites |
Magickrat wrote: > Nowadays, it's as easy as your local YouTube to find half > the stuff you are looking for, althought there are still > some "holy grails" out there waiting to be > re-discovered. But you can't save stuff you find on YouTube for a collection....or CAN you? I've never been able to....I can bookmark the page I find the video on but it never seems to last very long (I guess some clips get pulled eventually). Is there a way to actually save a particular video you find on YouTube? |
rex |
Monday May 26 01:46:16 2008 Re: Question For The Experts? The Inside- ep: "Old Wounds"? |
Indeed, "Dans la tête des tueurs" is the french-dubbed version of "The Inside. Although, I thought the scene you're talking about with Rachel Nichols came later during the series but I missed a couple so you might be right. |
ACC |
accasino@hotmail.com |
Monday May 26 02:43:16 2008 Re: Rex's Post |
rex wrote: Rex, I'll talk to you about Youtube vids over on the Video Page, as this is straying OT here on Discussion. See you there --> |
Jay L |
Monday May 26 03:04:50 2008 Re: Question For The Experts? The Inside- ep: "Old Wounds"? |
ACC wrote: > Indeed, "Dans la tête des tueurs" is the > french-dubbed version of "The Inside. AH, figured so. Thank you ***** Although, I thought the scene you're talking about with Rachel Nichols came later during the series but I missed a couple so you might be right. ***** The preview looked promising. But is just Rachel cut hand/pass out/dragged into room. No binds or gags in it...But here hoping |
Jay L |
Monday May 26 03:23:20 2008 British 60's Adventure Shows |
I'm sure everyone is familiar with the classic scenes from 'The Avengers' tv series - just wondered if anyone has come across some other outstanding bondage set-ups from other British series from the time.Im thinking particulrly of the 'Department S' episode ,A Cellar Full of Silence' where the two female leads, Rosemary Nichols and Denise Buckley, get the full treatment in spectacular fashion - one in a chair, one on a bed, with gorgeous thick OTM gags. From the same period, Sue Lloyd in the 'BARON'[ similar series to 'The Saint' ]story, 'The Killing'. This beauteous actress spends the last 15 mins. of the story gagged with bandage and held captive in the back of an ambulance. To add to the fun she ends up having a tussle, still in her restraints, with a female villain, who is dressed as a Nurse! The other outstanding example from this time is Shirley Eaton in the episode of 'The Saint', Invitation to Danger. Has anyone else on this site seen these fantastic scenes? |
Monday May 26 09:04:02 2008 Re: The FLock |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > So (I missed the first few posys on this movie), is the > girl tied & gagged in the movie Kadee Strickland and > NOT Kristina Sisco as previously announced? It's Sisco. Check the database for more info |
H |
diddvd@yahoo.com |
http://diddvd.com |
Monday May 26 09:11:58 2008 Re: British 60's Adventure Shows |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > Has anyone else on this site seen these fantastic scenes? Not those, but I have seen the writhe-y hogtie in "Secret Agent." |
Pat Powers |
Monday May 26 10:59:09 2008 Re: British 60's Adventure Shows |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > I'm sure everyone is familiar with the classic scenes > from 'The Avengers' tv series - just wondered if anyone > has come across some other outstanding bondage set-ups > from other British series from the time.Im thinking > particulrly of the 'Department S' episode ,A Cellar Full > of Silence' Ah yes. {Time for some Brianspage humour ;)} The boy here first overseas deal. Learned the hard way about the differing VHS machines/PAL machines. Paid to get converted and then met the Major whom lived in UK and had the Brit machine. Too late, money spent! ;) Along with most of the converted ended up airing here with better quality tapings *except* than that one! The favoured of the lot! arrgghhh! Like: ***** From the same period, Sue Lloyd in the 'BARON' [ similar series to 'The Saint' ]story, 'The Killing'. This beauteous actress spends the last 15 mins. of the story gagged with bandage and held captive in the back of an ambulance. ***** Larry {RIP}, did manage to get this one in better quality. Happy boys when that happened. Whomever gets "Department S" on DVD will be the new "1st Star" of the game! Early Brianspage trading, hilarious huh? |
Jay L |
Monday May 26 11:03:53 2008 Re: Old Sites |
rex wrote: > Is there a way to actually save a particular video you find on YouTube? Actually, if you download RealPlayer 11 to your machine, you can download YouTube Vids. RealPlayer 11 is free. Once you've downloaded RealPlayer, just move the mouse over the vid you are watching & a small flag will pop up asking you if you want to save the video. Word of Caution though, let the entire vid upload on YouTube first before you save it or you might only get a short clip of the video you're saving. Happened to me a few times before I finally figured it out... Hope this helps you out. |
Magickrat |
magickrat@live.com |
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/didclips/ |
Monday May 26 11:53:01 2008 Re: British 60's Adventure Shows |
> From the same period, Sue Lloyd in the 'BARON'[ > similar series to 'The Saint' ]story, 'The Killing'. 'Baron' also had a great scene with Judith Arthy. See clip at the Video Page |
Monday May 26 11:55:45 2008 Daybreak-Ch. 90 New York |
Looks like the whole series is showing right now on channel tv one, which is channel 90 in New York Time Warner. I believe that they is supposed to be something for us in one of the latter episodes. I don't know which one but I will be recording whatever they are showing. |
RON |
Monday May 26 12:12:15 2008 Re: British 60's Adventure Shows |
(unsigned poster) wrote: I'm sure everyone is familiar with the classic scenes ... British series ... ________________________________ Jay L wrote: ... Larry {RIP}, did manage to get this one in better quality... ________________________________ (Larry) FuzzWeb is listed on my In Memoriam webpage : http://bindherupx.net/memoriam.htm The link is a listing for his video tapes with the numbers and what is on them. Some people still have these tapes if you are looking for something that is not on a video clip. Fuzz and I were working on details for me cataloging his collection before he passed. This is why I have kept this documentation. |
Rich |
bindherupx@yahoo.com |
http://bindherupx.net/fuzzweb.htm |
Monday May 26 12:19:16 2008 Re: Daybreak-Ch. 90 New York |
RON wrote: > Looks like the whole series is showing right now on > channel tv one, which is channel 90 in New York Time > Warner. I believe that they is supposed to be something > for us in one of the latter episodes. I don't know which > one but I will be recording whatever they are showing. I checked TVone's schedule last week on zap2it and it will not show episodes 12 or 13. Episode 12 is the one that had his sister tied in the chair. Unfortunately, they are only showing episodes 1 thru 11 today. Nothing on #12 in the next two weeks either. Moon Bloodgood scene is on now and will repeat later on TVone at 11pm. Her scene starts about 10mins in. |
civil |
Monday May 26 13:22:39 2008 Funny Games pics |
Guys, I remember someone posted the pics of Naomi Watts in Funny Games awhile back... ages ago, it seems... Is it possible someone could possibly post them again? I'd sure appreciate it... I'm DYING to take a look at it when the DVD is released... Thanks!! |
Chip |
tex_vols@yahoo.com |
Monday May 26 15:28:26 2008 Re: A couple of problems |
The Engineer wrote: .> Kathy wrote: .> > It won't take real posts from me: I get .> "malformed .> > string" error and instructed to contact the .> operator .> No, it said "Contact the Moderator". Did you? .> Use the .> feedback link at the top and bottom of the page. Include .> a copy of the text you are trying to post. Yep. I contacted you. As is evidenced by this response from you. And pardon me for using the wrong description of you, your highness. Anyway, it seems that you have fixed the problem since I am now able to post. So, thanks. Also, I did get what I needed, so thank you. And thanks to all of the many people that eMailed me with the info that I needed. This is indeed a great resource. |
Monday May 26 15:31:25 2008 Re: British 60's Adventure Shows |
> 'Baron' also had a great scene with Judith Arthy. See > clip at the Video Page Gags make a nice difference |
Monday May 26 15:39:24 2008 the new UK Law |
In view of the huge scope and consequences of the new law in the UK all users in that domain should be using Tor (or equivalent) and TrueCrypt or equivalent when visiting this site. |
Kathy |
Monday May 26 15:45:38 2008 TOR |
Tor stands for The Onion Router. It is an open source product available for both Windows and Linux and allows all your transmissions to be encrypted before leaving your computer. From there they go to a randomly selected TOR machine, from there to a second randomly selected machine, then to a third. It is only at the third that it is decrypted and then sent to the site that you are requesting the page from. The page is the returned using the same process in reverse. None of the intermediate machines keep logs and none of the intermediate machines know the identity of anything other than the machines to which they must communicate. The TOR machines are scattered throughout the world and the ones used change every few minutes. As such pages that you visit and their content are unknown to all others. So, no one will know where you are going or what you are seeing, except you. Not even the government. Even law enforcement will be be stymied since no one has logs and way too many of the servers are overseas and outside their reach anyway. TOR is open source and so seems to be safe |
Kathy |
Monday May 26 15:52:58 2008 TrueCrypt |
The final part of the puzzle to keep ourselves safe in the UK is TrueCrypt. This product is again open source, and like TOR, it is free. It will allow you to keep sections or the entire drive encrypted with no known decryption without the passphrase. The product even includes the ability to set up a sacrificial area that appears correct but is different so that you could even give law enforcement a passphrase when they arrive at your door. They will then see all the stuff that is on the "safe" drive. There is NO KNOWN way that anyone can even detect that you have the second hidden area there. I would suggest, as I do, using TrueCrypt, create a visible but encrypted drive that you use for your day to day operation. On that drive create a "hidden" stealth volume which is only visible, or even discoverable to someone who enters your correct passphrase, which is different to the one used for the containing volume. Mount this second one before visiting this and related pages and make sure that even your cache is kept there so that the authorities can not even look at what you have accidentally kept in the cache. The penalties for you, and probably Brian are horrible so I suggest that all of us that are in the UK or may visit with laptops observe these steps/precautions. Brian, I think you should be promoting this. I would hate to hear that you had been arrested when you next step into the UK or some country that cooperates with them. |
Kathy |
Monday May 26 17:05:17 2008 'Paris Hilton Gagged' |
Article headline |
http://www.metro.co.uk/fame/article.html?in_article_id=128935&in_page_id=7 |
Monday May 26 17:11:38 2008 Re: 'Paris Hilton Gagged' |
Speaking of B&G sisters, Paris and Nicky would look great tied back-to-back and gagged |
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1135120896/nm1933447 |
Monday May 26 17:46:02 2008 Czech Didclips site has updates |
Hey bondage-lovers, Just wanted to let yall know that Czech dude that has high-quality didclips has been updating his site the last week or so since he hasnt let us know by posting as he did in the past. |
MAV |
http://didclipsarea.ic.cz/ |
Monday May 26 17:49:18 2008 Re: British 60's Adventure Shows |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > I'm sure everyone is familiar with the classic scenes > from 'The Avengers' tv series - just wondered if anyone > has come across some other outstanding bondage set-ups > from other British series from the time. That would seem to be a question for a Brit probably, as most here have seen just about everything that aired in America. Next year will mark 40 years since the last episode of the original Avengers aired in America, that really makes it an oldie, doesn't? It's funny, when I think of all those great scenes from the 60's it occurs to me that: the DID's were almost always pretty, and dressed sexy, the camera usually lingered on the bondage which was usually sexy and secure but never painful looking, there was never any blood and the DID was almost always rescued unharmed; I'm speaking about TV specifically, as film was a little different (ie, The Collector). Dragnet 69 was an exception in storyline but didn't show anything except Klaw/Willie type DID. Don't know if any new show could ever get back to that 60's DID action adventure style without be considered a parody and/or nostolgia, or worse, copying the style but leaving out the bondage. Even shows like She Spies or V.I.P. were nothing like The Avengers, The Saint or Man From Uncle. Shows like Viper or 7 Days seem to have permanently faded away, and shows like Smallville have none of the DID bent of the original Superman series. Hollywood is just not interested in cliffhangers and innocent/fun DID anymore, which I find sad because I just feel in my gut that the audience still is. Sometimes it feels like the Soaps are the last great holdout for this style of fun. |
Monday May 26 17:59:36 2008 Re: TrueCrypt |
Kathy wrote: > Brian, I think you should be promoting this. I would > hate to hear that you had been arrested when you next step into the UK or some country that cooperates with them. I seem to have missed an important thread. brianspage.com... No nudity, no depiction of sex or lewd acts, zero-tolerance of underage anything, discussion of "Damsel-in-Distress" material from MAINSTREAM sources... Get back to us when the entire staff of the BBC is arrested. |
Van |
vvvan@earthlink.net |
http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
Monday May 26 18:30:13 2008 Re: TrueCrypt |
.Van wrote: . . .> Kathy wrote: .> > Brian, I think you should be promoting this. I .> would .> > hate to hear that you had been arrested when you .> next step into the UK or some country that cooperates .> with them. .> I seem to have missed an important thread. .> brianspage.com... No nudity, no depiction of sex or lewd .> acts, zero-tolerance of underage anything, discussion of .> "Damsel-in-Distress" material from MAINSTREAM .> sources... .> Get back to us when the entire staff of the BBC is .> arrested. .> http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/. Clearly you have neither read the act nor the explanation of it, Van. |
Monday May 26 18:40:41 2008 The Act |
I can not officially provide legal advice here for a number of reasons and as I understand it Brian, our host is not at risk. However, as a Barrister (that's a type of lawyer here in the UK) I have no doubt that the current law would define this page as governed by the act and as such put anyone possessing copies of it in the UK at risk. I can not give legal advice on this here but I can say that if I was asked by a client resident or traveling to the UK that he/she should not have copies of this page on his/her computer. The fact that a TV show or film was not made for the purposes governed by the act does not influence whether specific compilations and extracts made from those shows or films made for the purposes clearly defined here are governed. It does seem that Kathy has provided a good solution although again I can not speak to its legality. As a member of the English Bar I must say that I find the law to be chilling and inappropriate. It was clearly created to provide a means by which selective enforcement can be used to "catch" those that would otherwise be protected. |
Monday May 26 18:55:24 2008 Re: A couple of problems |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > "Contact the Moderator". > And pardon me for using the wrong description > of you, your highness. You've misunderstood his tone. It is requested that any bugs get reported to the Moderator so he aware and can sort them. Actually, there is an oddity with your post that I'll be contacting the Moderator about myself. |
Jay L |
Monday May 26 19:24:11 2008 Re: The Act |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > I can not officially provide legal advice here for a > number of reasons and as I understand it Brian, our host > is not at risk. > However, as a Barrister (that's a type of lawyer here in > the UK) I have no doubt that the current law would define > this page as governed by the act and as such put anyone > possessing copies of it in the UK at risk. > The fact that a TV show or film was not made for the > purposes governed by the act does not influence whether > specific compilations and extracts made from those shows > or films made for the purposes clearly defined here are > governed. The text of the new Act, which becomes effective next January, is available at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmbills/130/07130.43-46.html#j400 It will be a criminal offence, punishable by up to 3 years' imprisonment, to possess what are termed "extreme pornographic images". The aim is to catch people downloading realistic snuff and torture movies and the like, but the wording of the Act is so vague and general that no one yet knows what the operating criteria might be. Complete certified movies and TV programmes are okay, but if you keep single violent frames or clips out of context for what a jury might consider to be your own sexual arousal, you can be prosecuted for creating "extreme pornography". Many clips currently displayed on YouTube would clearly be eligible. The law will not apply in Scotland, which has its own legislature, but England, Wales and Northern Ireland will be covered by it. How websites and Yahoo groups, etc, that deal with the traditional, mild damsel in distress or peril genre, or bondage fakes, will fare is a matter of some anxiety. So far it seems to be down to what the police and prosecutors think will constitute a case. A fake based on a sexually violent bodyshot will presumably be included, but other kinds may not be. Until the prosecutions start, we just don't know! |
Mad Dan |
http://www.dansdidnts.com |
Monday May 26 19:30:25 2008 Re: A couple of problems |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > Yep. I contacted you. As is evidenced by this response > from you. And pardon me for using the wrong description > of you, your highness. No, you posted a general message. That's not the same thing. > Anyway, it seems that you have fixed the problem since I > am now able to post. So, thanks. I changed nothing. |
The Engineer |
Monday May 26 19:48:33 2008 Re: A couple of problems |
The Engineer wrote: .> (unsigned poster) wrote: .> > Yep. I contacted you. As is evidenced by this .> response .> > from you. And pardon me for using the wrong .> description .> > of you, your highness. .> No, you posted a general message. That's not the same .> thing. Why not? The message got to you and also I was able to share with others that there seemed to be a problem. .> > Anyway, it seems that you have fixed the problem .> since I .> > am now able to post. So, thanks. .>I changed nothing. Weird then since it now works. As I say, thanks! Anyway, as I said previously, thanks. And also, thanks for the site. It is great, even with those little bugs it is great! |
Kathy |
Monday May 26 22:30:24 2008 Re: TrueCrypt |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > .Van wrote: > Clearly you have neither read the act nor the explanation of it, Van. Clearly someone is having fun at the expense of the facts. This legislation would have no effect whatsoever for 'mainstream material' which has already been vetted by the censors - otherwise they'd be prosecuting the BBC, ITV, and any other media which broadcast a so-called 'questionable' scene. |
Monday May 26 23:26:30 2008 Re: TrueCrypt |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > Clearly someone is having fun at the expense of the > facts. This legislation would have no effect whatsoever > for 'mainstream material' which has already been vetted > by the censors - otherwise they'd be prosecuting the BBC, > ITV, and any other media which broadcast a so-called 'questionable' scene. I don't know about that. It may be different in Britain, but here in America we have a looooooong history of using anti-pornography laws to go after legitimate works of art. Cases in point: "Catcher in the Rye" and "Ulysses." What do you think about people who have a copy of Nastassia Kinski's scene from "Cat People" on their computers or CDs? Or whatsername from Lexx's scene from "Knocking on Heaven's Door"? Both are mainstream films. |
Pat Powers |
Monday May 26 23:33:23 2008 Re: The Act |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > I can not give legal advice on this here but I can say > that if I was asked by a client resident or traveling to > the UK that he/she should not have copies of this page on > his/her computer. > The fact that a TV show or film was not made for the > purposes governed by the act does not influence whether > specific compilations and extracts made from those shows > or films made for the purposes clearly defined here are > governed. Exactly what is probibited by the UK statute? Copyright compliations, or this type of material? It isn't make clear in these posts. I find it very hard to believe there will be prosecutions over this, especially among American tourists to the UK who happen to have this site on their computers. Who would know what's on my hard drive, and how? And more importantly, even if they knew, what's the cost benefit component to prosecuting me over it? |
Ali Lohan |
Monday May 26 23:51:49 2008 Re: TrueCrypt |
(unsigned poster) wrote: >> Clearly you have neither read the act nor the explanation of it, Van. You're absolutely right. I haven't read the act nor the explanations, but I know bullsh*t when I smell it. I confess that I have what the average nun would probably call "unclean thoughts" when I look at pictures of Courteney Cox &/or Jennifer Aniston. This means, of course, that any and all celebrity picture and "FRIENDS" fan sites are now porno in the UK, and the police, somehow knowing all this, will arrest me if I ever visit Britain. God only knows what they'll do to Courteney or Jennifer. |
Van |
vvvan@earthlink.net |
http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
|