|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Wednesday March 29 00:21:54 2006 Re: answering LV's question |
| LV wrote:
> I just don't feel update announcements fit the Discussion > Page purpose, which is stated basically as discussions of > scenes in mainstream media. This is a tradition date back to well before most of you ever started coming here. The reason was that it was important for people to know about these alternatives. > Many non-discussion posts are > moved to other forums; most notably of late, cap requests > to the Trade Page. To me site update announcements are of > a similar nature, and it would seem logical for them to > be moved to the Bulletin Board. Everything that is moved is off-topic, and SHOULD NOT have been posted in the first place. Only by my discretion were they saved from deletion. Posts cannot be regulary directed to BB. > (People usually do post > announcements on them, right?) Particularly, right now, > the BB is quite underutilized, and moving such items > there would encourage greater use of it There is no "use" of the BB. Only I can place posts there. > In conclusion, you used the word confusion. I think a lot > of confusion is created by what at times seem to be > rather arbitrary topical rulings by the mod. There is no arbitrariness. If you are confused by a ruling, by all means ask and I will clarify. > What brought > up today's discussion were two such rulings, which while > consistently following Mod's rulings on previous postings > on these topics, still seem inconsistent to the overall > page definition. That very consistency should sooth any seeming inconsistency. The fact that general rules have some exceptions shouldn't be surprising. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday March 29 00:25:21 2006 Re: Mason |
| Jacot wrote:
> > I did not delete what you claim that I did. > > > I never posted a complaint about BIEL, just an honest > description of how the the non-gallerie pics are > presented, so there wouldn't be a bunch of complainants > regarding my post. It was a follow-up to two other posts regarding problems at the site, and went with them. That's the way it goes. I have not deleted any update announcements from BIEL, that I recall. > But at least we now know why Mason is allowed to post > about his self admitted off topic site. While technically off-topic, the stories aspect of TTT is of what I call allied interest to the page, and is of interest to many participants. I have encouraged others to develop such pages, and it's why I maintain the Friends Page. It's part of service to the wider community. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday March 29 00:27:26 2006 Re: on off |
| Lyter wrote:
> I will suggest that the on/off topic issue be settled out > in the school yard with sticks. Move On. These discussions are not only acceptable, I consider them vital where there are questions. I'd rather have people dish it out so I know what they're feeling and what confuses them. Then I can address the situation. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday March 29 07:14:41 2006 Re: answering LV's question |
| The Moderator wrote:
> LV wrote I still think it doesn't make sense, but I know it is your decision. |
| LV |
| Wednesday March 29 08:22:27 2006 TRES MUJERS |
| DOES ANY ONE KNOW HOW LONG IT MAY BE UNTIL KARYAME LAZANOS BIG BONDAGE SEEN WILL OCCUR IN THIS NOVELA? IT IS BEING AIRED AGAIN BY UNIVISION AT 2:00 AM TUESDAY THRU SATURDAY. ANY ONE OUT THERE WITH ANT IDEA? |
| SADDLEBAGS |
| Wednesday March 29 09:23:13 2006 Silent Hill the movie |
| Okay, *here's* something. I posted some time ago that based on numerous publicity stills, Rhada Mitchell would be spending time running around dank catacombs with her wrists cuffed together in front. Well, the new issue of Fangoria has an article on the movie, & it includes a cropped photo of Laurie Holden bound with rope. It's one of those arms-pinned-to-sides-with-big-rope things. You can't tell for sure if she's tied to something, but it's very likely. I'm normally not a fan of thick rope "bondage", but this doesn't look loosie. It's tight & the rope is hitched around her wrists. Her face is bloody, but it might not be her blood. Housekeeping in the catacombs is not very good, & for all we know she tripped in a pool of... something. Best bet is it's her big death scene, & she's about to meet a gruesome demise---but she's tied up, so it's on topic! ;-) |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://imdb.com/title/tt0384537/ |
| Wednesday March 29 09:57:52 2006 Re: Silent Hill the movie |
| Any gagged scene in this movie |
| Mel |
| Wednesday March 29 12:47:31 2006 Re: White Noise |
| Jay L wrote:
Title: White Noise (2005) Medium: Movie Actress: Suzanne Ristic Description: At the very end of this movie, Micheal Keaton finds her bound wrists to chair arms, ankles to chair legs and tape gagged to a chair in an abandon warehouse. scene is dark, short close up of face, a lot of moaning. I had the pleasure of meeting Suzanne at the Toronto Film Festival last year - quite chatty in fact - unfortunately no moaning that night ..... |
| Major John |
| Wednesday March 29 13:53:43 2006 Re: White Noise |
| > I had the pleasure of meeting Suzanne at the Toronto Film
> Festival last year - quite chatty in fact - unfortunately > no moaning that night ..... Did you manage to ask about her scene? |
| Wednesday March 29 14:40:36 2006 WWE Smackdown Possibility |
| The show is pre-taped and a review states:
(3) Booker T w/Sharmell vs. Paul Birchall: Paul Birchall via countout Note: Boogeyman came down very quickly, kidnapping Sharmell, and Booker got counted out. Backstage Segment (a few of them): Booker T searching for Sharmell, and finding tons of worms. _____________________ It doesn't say what happens so it may play out at Wrestlemania. Sharmell was handgagged by Kurt Angle a while ago. |
| Cowboy Bob |
| Wednesday March 29 14:45:54 2006 Re: on off |
| Lyter wrote:
> I will suggest that the on/off topic issue be settled out > in the school yard with sticks. Move On. More importantly, could we please divert our energies to seeing if we can answer my PBS question posted a few days ago instead? :-) :-) This is driving me crazy and I'm sure some knowledgeable person here has some inkling. Thanks. |
| John |
| Wednesday March 29 15:08:30 2006 2001 maniacs |
| dont know if it was discused yet but the new direct to video release of 2001 maniacs has a nice scene with a cute blond getting a white cleave gag and hand tied behind(no bonds shown).she does alot of mmmphing but beware there is a putz in the same scene.Very good movie too. |
| Steve |
| underduressnet@hotmail.com |
| Wednesday March 29 15:25:21 2006 my earliest tv scene |
| I need some help. I remember being six years old and watching a tv series in black and white that had a beautiful
woman tied up in a chair. It was associated with the 1800's gold rush in Alaska. My research leads me to believe that the series was in fact "The Alaskans" and the gorgeous DID was Dorothy Provine. I'm curious because I remember being stimilated even though I was only six. Does anyone recall what episode I'm refering to. It was an OTM gag. Thanks |
| brian |
| Wednesday March 29 16:07:45 2006 Re: my earliest tv scene |
| brian wrote:
My research leads me to > believe that the series was in fact "The > Alaskans" and the gorgeous DID was Dorothy Provine. I recall that scene (or a similar one) from The Alaskans with the beautiful Ms Provine too. I recall that she had a nice wide OTM gag, and as the bad guy was stealing money or something from her, he was explaining to her how he was going to cause an avalanche which would bury her and the cabin she was in. There was a great look of helplessness from Dorothy. The scene has great sentimental value for me, because I was about 7 or 8 at the time, and it was probably the scene that alerted me to the fact that there was something very erotic about DiD scenes. |
| Mike D |
| Wednesday March 29 16:39:50 2006 Re: WWE Smackdown Possibility |
| > Note: Boogeyman came down very quickly, kidnapping
> Sharmell, and Booker got counted out. Nice trend recently with B&G Wrestling Diva's |
 |
| Wednesday March 29 16:48:49 2006 Re: WWE Smackdown Possibility |
| > Nice trend recently with B&G Wrestling Diva's
Unfortunately Ashley didn't say much in her blog entry the day after her B&G scene on Raw: "What's up!! Thanks for all the messages guys! It was awesome to get back to work, unfortunately interfered by that insane skank Mickie! She's crazy! I just had surgery and that little stunt she pulled could have increased my time before I get back in the ring! Thankfully, I'm ok, the leg is feeling ok, was killing me yesterday but much better now" |
| Doink |
| http://www.wwe.com/superstars/raw/ashley1/photos/ |
| Wednesday March 29 17:09:14 2006 DIDs in novels... |
| Right, as promised am putting together a list of all of the books I owe with excellent-good scenes in them...this should be ready in a couple of days, but as Im moving house my internet access might be limited for a week or so..
Anyhow what info would you guys like? Am thinking of something akin to Mr Irony's old site, with details on type of situation and a personal rating system. Could also just list titles here for ease of use... your thoughts? |
| Steve a |
| immortalinblack@hotmail.co.uk |
| Wednesday March 29 17:29:09 2006 Re: my earliest tv scene |
| Mike D wrote:
> brian wrote: > My research leads me to > > believe that the series was in fact "The > > Alaskans" and the gorgeous DID was Dorothy > Provine. > > DP in a chair tie with a wide white OTM? OMG! If pre-TV comic illustrations hadn't started me, THAT sure would have! :-)) Too bad we never had that show over here, IIRC. |
| Mad Dan |
| Wednesday March 29 17:51:06 2006 Re: my earliest tv scene |
| brian wrote:
> I need some help. > watching a tv series in black and white > believe that the series was in fact "The > Alaskans" If you're not sure, run through this one too. Though I recall watching it as "Sgt Preston & Yukon King" Haven't seen it in years, so can't tell you for sure here |
| Jay L |
| http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0182633/ |
| Wednesday March 29 18:00:27 2006 Re: my earliest tv scene |
| Mad Dan wrote:
DP in a chair tie with a wide white OTM? OMG! If pre-TV comic illustrations hadn't started me, THAT sure would have! :-)) Too bad we never had that show over here, IIRC. A search of my hard-drives (there are 14, so not an easy feat) comes up with 3 possibilities for 'Alaskan' - if you repeat your request on Trades, with some more information, perhaps we can nail down and email you the scene. |
| Major John |
| Wednesday March 29 18:36:03 2006 Re: 2001 Maniacs |
| > dont know if it was discused yet but the new direct to video release of 2001 maniacs has a nice scene with a cute blond getting a white cleave gag and hand tied behind (no bonds shown).she does alot of mmmphing but beware there is a putz in the same scene.
---- Will you be adding this movie to the Scene Database? :-) |
| Kinky-napper |
| Wednesday March 29 19:06:49 2006 Re: White Noise |
| Joan wrote:
Is this deborah kara unger ___________________________ She did have a nice scene in Whispers in the Dark 1992 #302 http://imdb.com/title/tt0105811 |
| Rich |
| bindherupx@yahoo.com |
| http://bindherupx.net/bhuxref.htm |
| Wednesday March 29 20:38:18 2006 The BIEL site |
| Speaking of this, it's come to my attention that one of the entries on the Friends Page was ripping off Clem's work. That's been corrected, and my apologies for not paying closer attention.
|
| The Engineer |
| Wednesday March 29 23:36:30 2006 Re: "The Sentinel" |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Not the TV series, but the movie out April 21. Stars > Keifer Sutherland as a Secret Service agent helping > Michael Douglas. Oh yeah, Kiefer's partner? Eva Longoria. > Can't ask for a better setup than this. Speaking of Eva Longoria, someone mentioned here some time ago that she mentioned in an interview somewhere that she likes to be tied up. What did she say and where could I read the interview? |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday March 29 23:45:10 2006 The Notorious Bettie Page |
| >>Royler: Well, we can confirm the upcoming Bettie Page biopic contains bondage...
Sheesh guys, really. We can confirm the upcoming Bettie Page biopic contains bondage, BECAUSE I SAW THE FILM 7 MONTHS AGO, AND HAVE REPORTED ON IT HERE MORE THAN ONCE. To review, there is a great scene with Gretchen Mol bound spreadeagle, standing, and ball-gagged (by John Willie). You know, the famous "jungle bikini" scene. There are a few other quick scenes in re-enactments of both films and photos, both with Bettie as victim and binder (all cloth gags, cleave and OTM, some change mid-stream - just like in the old loops). The film treats our "hobby" with sensitivity, and it's a well-made, cute and makes no judgments, just presents her life in a straightforward way. Mol looks (and acts) absoultely INCREDIBLE as Bettie. Now, can we stop pretending that no one here has yet seen nor reported on the film? |
| Roper |
|
|