|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Thursday October 25 00:54:36 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| Tapemaster wrote: > So, does anyone know of any websites that are still > posting the full Nielsen ratings list? http://www.zap2it.com has ratings every day from the nigh before by the early afternoon. Click on TV, then ratings in the menu bars. They don't run a complete list, but you can tell how your favs are doing on the nightly recap. They keep about two weeks worth up. Use the link into your favorites. |
| http://www.zap2it.com/tv/ratings/ |
| Thursday October 25 00:55:56 2007 "Bones" on Tuesday |
| Promo during baseball tonight didn't show bondage, but Emily Deschanel running around as Wonder Woman in the entire promo. Must be a Halloween episode. That would be a nice score for her to get B&G in the outfit. |
| Thursday October 25 01:02:04 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Girl found in last 10 minutes bound and gagged in a > storage room. NOTE: This girl wouldn't get served in a pub |
| Jay L |
| Thursday October 25 01:59:27 2007 General Hospital scene coming up |
| I was flipping channels this afternoon when I saw a preview of what's coming up in the next few weeks and there's definitely a scene coming up on GH. I saw a handgag but I couldn't see exactly who was it (it looked like Lulu or Emily) and possibly a tied up girl but it was shown so quickly I couldn't see exactly. It seems to happen during a ball and since they start to talk about the ball today on GH, I assume the scene(s) will happen maybe next week. |
| ACC |
| accasino@hotmail.com |
| Thursday October 25 02:01:15 2007 Upon further review... |
| ...of the Cheryl Ladd "did she or didn't she refer to 'Bound to Please?' " issue, I think Snorkle Puppy and Kinky-napper may be right after all. Now that you mention it, Kinky, it seems that your version of the quote may be more accurate. We'll never know for sure, of course, unless someone saved a copy of the TV Guide issue for that week. I THINK I've got the promo ad that showed her lying bound next to Sam Elliott around here somewhere; why couldn't I just have tossed the whole dadgum TV Guide into the stash, making it worth digging through two-plus decades of detritus to find it now? Guess I never imagined there'd be such a place as this where it'd come in handy. Anyway, Snorkle is absolutely right that this is one of history's most disappointing scenes. All that buildup for essentially nothing. And from CHERYL LADD, of all people! Isn't it funny when you look back on it? Of the original "Charlie's Angels," Kate Jackson was the girl next door, Farrah Fawcett the girl most likely to and Ladd the girl who might if no one else was looking. So which one would you have guessed would go on to make the Hall of Fame with scenes in four different decades? |
| Fettershackle |
| Thursday October 25 02:08:00 2007 RE: Emily in WW costume |
| YES indeed , if she gets bound and gagged in this get-up, it will be the greatest scene of all time!!! |
| Zoey DeChannel |
| Thursday October 25 02:51:49 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| Tapemaster wrote: > Brian, that post was NOT off-topic and you KNOW it! Don't be an idiot. I make all topicality decisions. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday October 25 03:27:52 2007 Found On Flickr |
| here's what a search on Flickr came up with |
 |
 |
 |
| AgentOrange |
| weirdeastcoastkid@yahoo.ca |
| http://www.wondertrash.com |
| Thursday October 25 05:22:40 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| The Moderator wrote: > Tapemaster wrote: > > Brian, that post was NOT off-topic and you KNOW it! > Don't be an idiot. I make all topicality decisions. Of course it is your decision. You can delete any message you want even without a reason if you choose. That is not the point. I am simply stating that the post was perfectly ON-topic and that I think you deleted it for OTHER reasons. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Thursday October 25 05:38:09 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| Historian wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > > "Heroes" ratings are also dropping fast, > but > > that show will survive. The other two won't. > Dare I say it? > Gag the cheerleader, save the ratings. Truer words were never spoken. "Gag the cheerleader, save the ratings" should be made into one of those needlework dealies and hung in every scriptwriter's conference room in Hollywood. |
| Pat Powers |
| Thursday October 25 05:39:10 2007 digimon |
| is there a site with digimon DID screencaps |
| Thursday October 25 05:43:18 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| The Moderator wrote: > Tapemaster wrote: > > Brian, that post was NOT off-topic and you KNOW it! > Don't be an idiot. I make all topicality decisions. Would that include which ointments are topical and which are for internal use? Eh? Eh? Eh? |
| Pat Powers |
| Thursday October 25 05:44:43 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| Jay L wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > > Girl found in last 10 minutes bound and gagged in a > > storage room. > NOTE: > This girl wouldn't get served in a pub All right, that is a little infra-dig for me. You'll have to explain. Also, what kind of bondage we talkin' here? |
| Pat Powers |
| Thursday October 25 05:46:24 2007 Re: Found On Flickr |
| AgentOrange wrote: > here's what a search on Flickr came up with > http://www.wondertrash.com So, what was it you were looking for? It's easy to find generic bondage imagery on the Web, on Flickr and elsewhere. |
| Pat Powers |
| Thursday October 25 07:35:24 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| Jay L wrote: > NOTE: > This girl wouldn't get served in a pub NICE! Talk about your Veteran moves. |
| Snowcat |
| Thursday October 25 08:41:36 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| Pat Powers wrote: > Jay L wrote: > > (unsigned poster) wrote: > > > Girl found in last 10 minutes bound and gagged > in a > > > storage room. > > NOTE: > > This girl wouldn't get served in a pub > All right, that is a little infra-dig for me. You'll have > to explain. It's a chronological reference. Relates to the number of years someone's been on the planet. |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.jebsadventurebound.net |
| Thursday October 25 09:13:11 2007 Re: Upon further review... |
| Fettershackle wrote: > ...of the Cheryl Ladd "did she or didn't she refer > to 'Bound to Please?' " issue, I think Snorkle Puppy > and Kinky-napper may be right after all. I seldom post in this place anymore, but yes she did make a reference to "bound to please" in TV guide. The article claimed she showed wrist bruises or marks of some kind to the interviewer and I naturally watched the movie. I suspect a publicist told her to say something like that knowing it would get more people to watch it. Maybe it will turn up on eBay. |
| Malasfan |
| Thursday October 25 09:41:02 2007 Re: "Bones" on Tuesday |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Promo during baseball tonight didn't show bondage, but > Emily Deschanel running around as Wonder Woman in the > entire promo. Must be a Halloween episode. That would be > a nice score for her to get B&G in the outfit. 'Specially since on that horse fetish episode a couple of weeks ago, during the tittillating/moralizing dialogue all tv shows have about fetishes, 'Bones' says she has done some role playing. |
| ss |
| Thursday October 25 12:07:40 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: (unsigned poster) Reason: Don't mention ages |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday October 25 12:47:36 2007 Re: "Bones" on Tuesday |
> Promo during baseball tonight didn't show bondage, but > Emily Deschanel running around as Wonder Woman in the > entire promo. Must be a Halloween episode. That would be > a nice score for her to get B&G in the outfit. That would be triple word score in Scrabble having used the Z and X!! Holy crap! |
| perilousgirl |
| Thursday October 25 13:14:49 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| Pat Powers wrote: > Jay L wrote: > This girl wouldn't get served in a pub > > All right, that is a little infra-dig for me. You'll have > to explain. Ha! Okay, do it US Channel FOX way. Just for you Pat. ;) Bound girl found wrists front & tape gagged - Trying to alert to age without making searchable age ref been asked not to do So say "Moderator up, 3 and 2, the speedy runner at first and be running." If I make an outright age ref, the Moderator cranks it into the Green Monster, FOX does a closeup of my face in "Arrgghh BUGGER!" mode, the guy comes out from the bench and rest of game the colour-coms on about "giving up runs". I don't want to be like those guys (like the one poor fella last night) doing it way I did alerts the boys without the Moderator being able to touch it. So say {after looong pause} my "split-finger breaking ball with the high heat". The Moderator starts for the bag, but turns around when the Ref yells "Harrrgghhh!". Colour-coms say "Got him!" I shut the Moderator down! All in FOX HD! How that for an explanation for you and everyone else in the United States will understand Pat? ;) |
| Jay L |
| Thursday October 25 13:30:53 2007 Re: "Bones" on Tuesday |
| perilousgirl wrote: > > > That would be triple word score in Scrabble having used > the Z and X!! Holy crap! Actually it would be the equivalent of a triple word score in Klingon and Latin combined.... The chances of a full treatment scene in this esp of this show with Emily in the WW are about the same as Manchester United winning the Superbowl in 2009... |
| steve a |
| Thursday October 25 13:37:02 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| Jay L wrote: > Pat Powers wrote: > {Snip} > How that for an explanation for you and everyone else in > the United States will understand Pat? ;) Uh... baseball... That's the one where the guy hits the ball with a stick, right? ;-) |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
| Thursday October 25 14:29:21 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| Can we agree on some term that can be used to indicate an age related problem so that folks can be alerted to potentially disturbing content? We already use "Putz" to indicate male interference and "MILF" for older actresses. My I suggest "NAA" for "Not Age Appropriate" to signify DiD's of a tender age? It's not a easily determined acronym and it would let folk flag scenes that many of us dont want to see. |
| Tom Quin |
| Thursday October 25 15:19:58 2007 Re: Found On Flickr |
| AgentOrange wrote: > here's what a search on Flickr came up with > http://www.wondertrash.com Picture 2 is from Hostel 2, which by the way came out this week. |
| civil |
| Thursday October 25 15:51:17 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| Tom Quin wrote: > Can we agree on some term that can be used to indicate an > age related problem so that folks can be alerted to > potentially disturbing content? We already use > "Putz" to indicate male interference and > "MILF" for older actresses. > My I suggest "NAA" for "Not Age > Appropriate" to signify DiD's of a tender age? It's > not a easily determined acronym and it would let folk > flag scenes that many of us dont want to see. "Temporally challenged" might be an alternate choice of euphemism. ...and I'm really sorry Mr. Mod put wish-lists back in the time vault, 'cause I never got a chance to mention JULIANNE MOORE, CAREY LOWELL, and TÉA LEONI, all of whom have had DiD-scenes ranging from the technical to the highly marginal, but none of whom have had the FULL-BLOWN (so to speak), FULL-FEATURE DiD-SCENEs their pulcritudes so richly deserve!! ;-) |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
| Thursday October 25 16:22:39 2007 The Ride: The Key to Survival |
| As was noted the other day, this one-shot comic came out today, and many here will find it a real winner. The heroine is first seen being removed bound and cleave-gagged from a car trunk, then carried OTS into her captor's trailer where she is chained AOH for a couple of pages. Then, in a development that I know will please a lot of folks, she makes her escape, and spends the rest of the book (another dozen or so pages) running from the bad guy, with the gag still in her mouth. She fights him, she runs, she falls down a well... unbound, but gagged the whole time. The book being in black and white mutes much of the blood/dirt that might otherwise be expected in this kind of story-- she looks pretty good the whole time. And I still have Madame Mirage #3 to pick up! Been a good few weeks for comics recently. |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.jebsadventurebound.net |
| Thursday October 25 17:17:05 2007 An unlikely source |
| Just going through the info of tonight's shows on NBC and on My Name Is Earl, the info says that Joy and Catalina get "entangled in a knotty situation". This may be huge, but it could very well be crap. |
| R-dub |
| Thursday October 25 17:34:34 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| Van wrote: > Uh... baseball... That's the one where the guy hits the > ball with a stick, right? ;-) We have something similar, but it lasts all week, and they hire West Indian guys to blow horns and bang cans together in an attempt to keep at least some of the spectators awake. Zzzzzzz.... |
| Thursday October 25 17:37:18 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: Sorry - forgot to sign the above. |
| Mad Dan |
| http://www.dansdidnts.com |
| Thursday October 25 18:13:43 2007 Re: Criminal Minds |
| Van wrote: > Jay L wrote: > > Pat Powers How that for an explanation > > Uh... baseball... That's the one where the guy hits the > ball with a stick, right? ;-) Yep, googled on what sports Pat would've played up on Karg, but got nothing |
| Jay L |
| Thursday October 25 18:22:18 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
> I discovered a new show on CW called "Reaper". > The premise and feel of the show could lend itself to > potential great scene. ...Has anyone else seen this series or is keeping tabs on it with DVR? Seen it twice but wasn't impressed with the show or expectant of any scenes in the future. I'll reserve opinion about the show itself but suffice to say it is a Kevin Smith production ("Clerks") featuring his usual dopey characters with the plainly dressed and acting 'girl next door' type. I doubt the girl will ever be a DID and even if she becomes one at some point I'll bet she'll be plainly dressed (with her 'home depotesque' uniform) with comical-looking bonds (loosies) and no gag to match the mood of the show. You don't have to take my word for it but I took it off my dvr rotation and replaced it with "Heroes" in anticipation of K.Bell's and H.Pannieri's(sp?) upcoming scene. After which I can take that off too... |
| Captureher |
| Thursday October 25 19:55:54 2007 Re: Found On Flickr |
| AgentOrange wrote: > here's what a search on Flickr came up with One of those images is from commercial sources. Please be careful in the future. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday October 25 19:58:43 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| Tapemaster wrote: > The Moderator wrote: > > Don't be an idiot. I make all topicality decisions. > Of course it is your decision. Thanks. > You can delete any message > you want even without a reason if you choose. But I don't. I ALWAYS have a reason. > I am simply stating that the post was > perfectly ON-topic No, idiot, it's not. I. Make. The. Decisions. On. What. Is. Topical. You. Do. Not. Get it? > and that I think you deleted it for > OTHER reasons. I don't know what you think the reasons are, but you're incorrect. I don't want that thread, so it's off-topic. Simple as that. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday October 25 20:00:37 2007 Re: asian sexy sex asian lesbian sex picture |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: Van Reason: Do not respond to spam messages. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday October 25 20:03:25 2007 Interesting Front Page Item |
|
This post was moved to The Bulletin Board. Poster: (unsigned poster) Reason: Been a while since something got BBed. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday October 25 21:08:40 2007 Smallville |
| Lana gets tazered and after the commercial, her hands are bound in front with a black strap and thrown of a building. Next week, supergirl gets cuffed with special cuffs and finds her self strapped down as she is examined. |
| civil |
| Thursday October 25 21:16:09 2007 Re: Smallville |
| civil wrote: > Lana gets tazered and after the commercial, her hands are > bound in front with a black strap and thrown of a > building. > Next week, supergirl gets cuffed with special cuffs and > finds her self strapped down as she is examined. Oh, Lana's quick scene occurs around the 45'mark on the CW for the West Coast folks. |
| civil |
| Thursday October 25 21:52:05 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| The Moderator wrote: > Tapemaster wrote: > > I am simply stating that the post was > > perfectly ON-topic > No, idiot, it's not. I. Make. The. Decisions. On. > What. Is. Topical. You. Do. Not. Get it? Of course I "get it". It is YOUR decision that the post was "off-topic" and therefore you deleted it. I am NOT disputing who makes the rulings. You do and that is all that matters in the end. It is simply that it is my OPINION that the post was NOT "off-topic" and that is what I was stating. > > and that I think you deleted it for > > OTHER reasons. > I don't know what you think the reasons are, but > you're incorrect. I think you deleted it because you don't want us talking about organizing letter writing campaigns to the networks about wanting to see actresses bound and gagged because you think that it might draw negative publicity to this website. I understand your concern, but I do not think that "Brian's Page" would be in any danger if we started letter writing campaigns. > I don't want that thread, so it's > off-topic. Simple as that. That is all this comes down to: You don't want that thread so you ruled it "off-topic". It doesn't make any difference what the topic of a certain thread is. If you don't want it, you will delete it. You don't need any more of a reason. If you would like to discuss this further in private, feel free to send me an e-mail. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Thursday October 25 22:16:28 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| Tapemaster wrote: > I understand your concern, but I do not think > that "Brian's Page" would be in any danger if > we started letter writing campaigns. No, but all of the sites linked from here that provide free caps and vids WOULD be in danger. |
| Nipsy Russell |
| Thursday October 25 22:24:27 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| Nipsy Russell wrote: > Tapemaster wrote: > > I understand your concern, but I do not think > > that "Brian's Page" would be in any danger > if > > we started letter writing campaigns. > No, but all of the sites linked from here that provide > free caps and vids WOULD be in danger. No, they wouldn't. Those websites are not doing anything illegal. Footage that is recorded off television is "fair game". Anybody has a right to post them to a website. Besides, even if we started letter writing campaigns, nobody has to say anything about "Brian's Page". We would just all send the letters and e-mails individually. |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Thursday October 25 22:28:11 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| Tapemaster wrote: > that "Brian's Page" would be in any danger if > we started letter writing campaigns. You type "we" when you mean "you." Only "you." |
| The House of Le Bastard |
| Thursday October 25 22:42:26 2007 The Lucy Show |
| Didn't The Lucy Show (the one with Vivian and Mr. Mooney) have a scene where Lucille Ball and Vivian are tied back to back? If so does anyone have a description, caps or clip? I posted a link to a clip on the Video page that shows a one second glimpse of the scene I think. |
| John |
| Thursday October 25 23:37:28 2007 Re: Fall season a bust so far |
| Tapemaster wrote: > Nipsy Russell wrote: > > Tapemaster wrote: > > > I understand your concern, but I do not think > > > that "Brian's Page" would be in any > danger > > if > > > we started letter writing campaigns. > > No, but all of the sites linked from here that > provide > > free caps and vids WOULD be in danger. > No, they wouldn't. Those websites are not doing anything > illegal. Footage that is recorded off television is > "fair game". Anybody has a right to post them > to a website. You are at least a decade behind with respect to the legal status of "fair use." For your information, it is almost dead, and letter-writing campaigns to the perpetrators -- whom I will consider in this case to be any members of the RIAA or MPAA, or the owners of any major television network -- will merely bring attention to us that almost certainly *will* shut down those of us who have dedicated our efforts to "repurposing" DiD content. (Picture what the producers of "Twisted Sisters" did to majorjohns a while back, times at least fifty.) You know Google, (owners of YouTube), right? You also know Viacom? And you're familiar with the fact that the latter have already forced the former to take down at least a hundred thousand clips submitted by third parties, on threat of a billion-dollar lawsuit? If Google knew the shaky legal ground on which they stood, then how do you think we individual players might feel? I'd try to catch you up on these developments and others, but this is not the place. You know and I know that posting this stuff does not hurt revenues (and possibly quite the opposite in some cases), but the law at the moment does not know this, and it's remarkably ill-informed for you to state otherwise. If you're pissed off about the situation: well, join the club, instead of threatening to help destroy it. (Might I suggest giving generously to the Electronic Frontier Foundation?) > Besides, even if we started letter writing campaigns, > nobody has to say anything about "Brian's > Page". We would just all send the letters and e-mails individually. I see that the House of Le Bastard has already answered this canard perfectly well. |
| Raffish |
| Thursday October 25 23:42:19 2007 Raffish DiDClips updated |
| (Complete with Historian's recent quote on the front page...thanks, man. Funny stuff.) |
 |
| Raffish |
| raffish@bondageparade.com |
| http://www.bondageparade.com/ |
|
|