|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Sunday March 04 00:05:26 2007 Re: Paula Peril Movie Available for Download |
| The Moderator wrote:
> > Boy, I'm having a hard time seeing how this is even > > mainstream. Seven minutes? Download? > > With all due respect, Mr. M, the future now! The > deadline for mandatory digital TV approaches and > "mainstream" becomes more and more... > internetish. True..but the very definition of "mainstream" won't change no matter how far modern tech takes us. Just because you're getting digital signals instead of analog does not change things. What is changing, however, are the tools that "us people" have at our disposal to anticipate scenes. 30 years ago it was TV Guide..leafing through it to identify the good Gilligan's Island scenes. It sounds silly now..but at that time that was what we had. Now it seems you can go to any network or cable web site and enter "bondage" as a key word...well perhaps it still isn't quite that simple but it is getting close. But it does not diminish Brian's page in terms of the impact it has had and its value as a tool and a great discussion page. Sometimes, in fact, I think its actually helped to open some of those doors by bringing female bondage into the mainstream. So at the risk of sounding as if I'm kissing up..kudos to The Moderator and The Engineer and everyone else who puts so much time in to keep this the high quality page its continued to be. |
| Mark O |
| Sunday March 04 00:37:05 2007 Re: Paula Peril Movie Available for Download |
| Mark O wrote:
> The Moderator wrote: > > > Boy, I'm having a hard time seeing how this is > even > > > mainstream. Seven minutes? Download? > > > > With all due respect, Mr. M, the future now! The > > deadline for mandatory digital TV approaches and > > "mainstream" becomes more and more... > > internetish. > > True..but the very definition of "mainstream" > won't change no matter how far modern tech takes us. > > Just because you're getting digital signals instead of > analog does not change things. What is changing, however, > are the tools that "us people" have at our > disposal to anticipate scenes. 30 years ago it was TV > Guide..leafing through it to identify the good Gilligan's > Island scenes. It sounds silly now..but at that time that > was what we had. > > Now it seems you can go to any network or cable web site > and enter "bondage" as a key word...well > perhaps it still isn't quite that simple but it is > getting close. > > But it does not diminish Brian's page in terms of the > impact it has had and its value as a tool and a great > discussion page. Sometimes, in fact, I think its actually > helped to open some of those doors by bringing female > bondage into the mainstream. > > So at the risk of sounding as if I'm kissing up..kudos to > The Moderator and The Engineer and everyone else who puts > so much time in to keep this the high quality page its continued to be. Okay, so what's "wrong" with the "Paula Peril" movie? Why is it *possibly* off-topic? Why is it not "mainstream"? It's too short? Not well enough made? There are no commercials? Somebody on the production staff was thinking sinful thoughts? My point is that the traditional mainstream boundry is blurring. "Mainstream" material used to mean it had either been projected on a movie theater screen or broadcast on commercial TV. Stage plays, comics, and prose (and poetry and dance) are considered "semi-" or "2nd-class mainstream", for purposes of this forum. You can post about such stuff, but don't get carried away. The News (real life) is *off* topic. Webcasting is already here. Eventually, someone is going to make something with GOOD production values, like a cgi video featuring Saudelli's Blonde, or a live-action Batgirl-captured-by-Catwoman webcast, and we'll want to discuss it! Jim Weathers' long-awaited "O-Girl" movie looks like it's gonna be pretty darn good... but it won't be "mainstream". Joon's "Pirate" movie *is* mainstream... or is it "mainstream-porno"? ANYhoo... enough ranting. Mr. Moderator needs to be thinking about this stuff, and he *is*. So... MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! :-) |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
| Sunday March 04 00:39:38 2007 Re: YouTube |
| Speaking of Youtube AND Vanessa Marcil, I went there to look and see if someone had uploaded the promo for this Fridays episode. There was nothing about that, but I did find something that some of you might like: |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| http://youtube.com/watch?v=hrYFQ0kTumo |
| Sunday March 04 00:43:21 2007 Re: YouTube |
| Tapemaster wrote:
> I went there to > look and see if someone had uploaded the promo for this > Fridays episode. That should be "this Friday's episode of LAS VEGAS". |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Sunday March 04 00:50:16 2007 Re: Kidnapped in 10 Easy Steps |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> (unsigned poster) wrote: > > > Thursday at 8 pm eastern. Lifetime Movie, 5 > housewives > > kidnapped; Evidently, this is an episode of the series "Inspector Mom" starring a grown-up Danica McKellar of "The Wonder Years" fame. The end of the description says: "It's up to Maddie to close this case before she becomes the next mom to go missing". Let's hope that is EXACTLY what happens! |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Sunday March 04 00:53:57 2007 Re: Kidnapped in 10 Easy Steps |
| Tapemaster wrote:
> "It's up to Maddie to close > this case before she becomes the next mom to go > missing". Let's hope that is EXACTLY what happens! What I mean is: let's hope she goes missing (and bound and gagged as well) BEFORE she closes the case! |
| Tapemaster |
| km574@yahoo.com |
| Sunday March 04 00:56:44 2007 Re: Paula Peril Movie Available for Download |
| Mark O wrote:
> The Moderator wrote: > > > Boy, I'm having a hard time seeing how this is > even > > > mainstream. Seven minutes? Download? > > > > With all due respect, Mr. M, the future now! The > > deadline for mandatory digital TV approaches and > > "mainstream" becomes more and more... > > internetish. > > True..but the very definition of "mainstream" > won't change no matter how far modern tech takes us. I disagree. The definition definitely changes over time. A lot of fetishy behavior and imagery slides quite easily into mainstream, more so over time. Frex, this week Spice Channel is having a special "Fetish Week" for its CSI programming. Two days ago, we had a scene of a woman suspended upside down in a straightjacket and chains, tape-gagged. Last week, we had a scene in Smallville int very restrictive bondage wearing a dental gag. And what's more, I think the medium does matter. Right now, it's a matter of distribution channels. As distribution channels lbecome more numerous, and open to more people, we see not just more programs, but a wider VARIETY of programs. Thus we have cable channels showing stuff that would never air on network channels, if only because it wouldn't attract sufficient viewers, but also because it's more risque. (Don't expect CBS to start airing a "Fetish Week" lineup of CSI programs.) The Internet broadens things even more. People are no longer bound by the traditional bifurcations between porn and nonporn. Writers right now have the freedom to create work that is as sexually-oriented or non sexually-oriented as they like. There's a full continuum out there that encompasses Jeb's Adventure Bound stories, the Knotty Tales, Damsels Under Glass and my stuff. It runs the gamut from stuff you could easily imagine appearing on network TV at prime time in the 60s to stuff that the hardcore porn channels wouldn't touch because it's just too dirty. The same thing will happen with video. Just a matter of time. And I don't see what benefit is to be had by characterizing all stories, written or videoed, as either porn or not porn. The really important things to my mind are, does it have a good story, are the characters interesting? If it's comedy, is it funny, or at the very least, fun? Whether the characters have sex or not and how often they do so are considerably less interesting questions to me. Though I tend to regard sex and so forth as positives rather than negatives, all other things being equal. Which they mostly aren't. In Japan they have hentai that have very strong plots and characters, such as the Wordsworth Saga and Swallowtail Inn, and they have funny hentai like Dragon Pink, and they have works that are not considered hentai that have explicit, and I mean XXX explicit, sexual bondage scenes, like Kite and Mezzoforte. I'd say something like Paula Peril, which may be in a gray area (haven't seen it so I can't say for sure)by American standards, are good things generally. Breaking the boundaries is generally a sign of someone who's trying to create art rather than crank our hackwork. |
| Pat Powers |
| http://www.bondagerotica.com/mainstream.html |
| Sunday March 04 01:40:20 2007 LAS VEGAS |
| Sometimes when there's all this hullabaloo over an anticipated scene, I feel like yelling "Why don't you just wait until the episode airs" it's only a week away!!! |
| hallbird |
| Sunday March 04 01:55:16 2007 What is mainstream... |
| > My point is that the traditional mainstream boundry is
> blurring. "Mainstream" material used to mean > it had either been projected on a movie theater screen or > broadcast on commercial TV. I think it still means that, theater screen, TV and I would add most direct to DVD that a distributer buys and Blockbuster or Netflix would carry (not a video/film you make yourself for the internet only*). This almost always means "professional" level production and/or quality (quality of story, intent etc.) and (gulp), the absence of "prurient interest" (duck). Mainstream (I think) means "professional production" that's distributed professionally, that is, for sale to the public through mainstream channels. If you say that the internet is part of that you're right, but only when it's a sales or exposition tool for a production that originates from a mainstream production source, not just internet to internet only. There may be a change in the air, though there are perceptions that do not change, perceptions like what "most" people just "feel" is mainstream and what they "feel" is commercial (or unprofessional and therefore not mainstream). Although some internet films of professional quality are showing up on Ifilm or Atom Films and others*, the concept of being mainstream is still mostly about perception and "prurient interest". If you think you understand the legal definition of "prurient interest" it doesn't mean that it's clear cut for everyone, not in my mind anyway. If you "feel" the author of the work is creating the work without prurient interest and intention towards (mostly) "bondage fantasy" then you probably think it's mainstream. If you feel that the work is made primarily for "erotic" purposes, or mostly erotic, and it's not a "professional level production" to boot, then it's (probably) not mainstream. I'm not judging anyone here, I'm discussing the idea "in general" and ultimately it's the owner of the page who decides what he thinks is mainstream and what isn't. Who said "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it"? That, and "if it looks like it, acts like it, smells like it, then..." you know. It's important, because sticking tight on "mainstream" is what's good about this site, imho. |
| Sunday March 04 02:09:13 2007 Re: Paula Peril Movie Available for Download |
| Van wrote:
> Okay, so what's "wrong" with the "Paula > Peril" movie? Why is it *possibly* off-topic? Why > is it not "mainstream"? It's too short? Not > well enough made? There are no commercials? Somebody on > the production staff was thinking sinful thoughts? > > My point is that the traditional mainstream boundry is > blurring. "Mainstream" material used to mean > it had either been projected on a movie theater screen or > broadcast on commercial TV. Stage plays, comics, and > prose (and poetry and dance) are considered > "semi-" or "2nd-class mainstream", > for purposes of this forum. You can post about such > stuff, but don't get carried away. The News (real life) > is *off* topic. > > Webcasting is already here. Eventually, someone is going > to make something with GOOD production values, like a cgi > video featuring Saudelli's Blonde, or a live-action > Batgirl-captured-by-Catwoman webcast, and we'll want to > discuss it! Jim Weathers' long-awaited > "O-Girl" movie looks like it's gonna be pretty > darn good... but it won't be "mainstream". > Joon's "Pirate" movie *is* mainstream... or is > it "mainstream-porno"? > > ANYhoo... enough ranting. Mr. Moderator needs to be thinking about this stuff, and he *is*. So... MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! :-) http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ Van my man I know nothing about the "Paula Peril" movie so I was in no way suggesting that it wasn't mainstream or "on topic" as defined here. I do agree that the lines are getting blurry. The point I was trying to make is that the tools we have now to anticipate good scenes are so much better than they were even 10-15 years ago that its almost too easy. Sometimes I miss those old days of leafing through TV Guide to find "...Mrs. Howell devises a plan to make Gilligan a hero..." and then planning your day around it lol. Today you can find the scene on YouTube with a few clicks of the mouse. That's all. I didn't mean to put anyone on the defensive..I just thought that some of us older guys could relate. |
| Mark O |
| Sunday March 04 02:23:47 2007 Re: Anybody seen Black Snake Moan? |
| Pat Powers wrote:
> Anything good in it besides the stuff the waist chain > with the half-naked Ricci? Saw it last night. Nothing too much of interest apart from what you know already. At one point she wraps the chain around her waist several times and loops it around one of her legs while asleep. On a side note, I thought it was an enjoyable movie, despite its mixed reviews. |
| Jimmy Death |
| jimmy_deth@yahoo.com |
| Sunday March 04 02:27:09 2007 Re: Paula Peril Movie Available for Download |
| Mark O wrote:
> Van wrote: > > Van my man I know nothing about the "Paula > Peril" movie so I was in no way suggesting that it > wasn't mainstream or "on topic" as defined > here. That was the beginning of the discussion thread. Mr. M was wondering if a seven minute, purportedly *bad* webcast "movie" was mainstream. |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.restrainedtastes.com/van/ |
| Sunday March 04 05:49:35 2007 Re: Paula Peril Movie Available for Download |
| Van wrote:
> That was the beginning of the discussion thread. Mr. M > was wondering if a seven minute, purportedly *bad* > webcast "movie" was mainstream. The comic book, as I've stated in a recent post, is atrociously bad as well, featuring formulaic plots, semiliterate writing, cliched dialogue, and adequate art. The comic book's only redeeming feature is that each of the first two issues features one of the two main female characters bound and gagged. |
| Hadji |
| Sunday March 04 06:03:40 2007 Re: Paula Peril Movie Available for Download |
| Mark O wrote:
> I do agree that the lines are getting blurry. The point I > was trying to make is that the tools we have now to > anticipate good scenes are so much better than they were > even 10-15 years ago that its almost too easy. Sometimes > I miss those old days of leafing through TV Guide to find > "...Mrs. Howell devises a plan to make Gilligan a > hero..." and then planning your day around it lol. > Today you can find the scene on YouTube with a few clicks > of the mouse. > That's all. I didn't mean to put anyone on the defensive..I just thought that some of us older guys could relate. I, too, vividly recall the days before anyone had ever heard of the Internet, when "TV Guide" was the sole resource for people such as ourselves. We became quite adroit at reading the synopsis of the plot of a television program or movie and assessing the probability that it would contain a bound and gagged actress. Later, with the proliferation of videos, we became adroit at assessing the probability that the plot of a movie contained a bound and gagged actress by reading the plot synopsis on the VHS box. Some video producers thoughtfully and considerately provided a picture of a bound and gagged actress on the box to help us in our quest, but by and large, we had to make the assessment utilizing our experience and reading skills. I occasionally experience a twinge of nostalgia for those days, but I extremely glad for the considerable resources currently at our disposal for locating movies and television programs featuring bound and gagged actresses. I would never regress to the old days, when people such as ourselves had to spend money on and suffer through numerous atrociously bad movies with the hope that our sufferance and patience would be rewarded with just one bound and gagged actress. |
| Hadji |
| Sunday March 04 06:11:32 2007 Re: Paula Peril Movie Available for Download |
| Hadji wrote:
> I, too, vividly recall the days before anyone had ever > heard of the Internet, when "TV Guide" was the > sole resource for people such as ourselves. I forgot to mention that we had two other resources at our disposal, movie trailers and episode previews. Movie trailers rarely, if ever, disclosed whether a movie featured a bound and gagged actress. Episode previews were much better, as they usually indicated whether the following week's episode would contain a bound and gagged actress. I vividly recall the previews for the "Marathon Angels" episode of "Charlie's Angels" and the episode of "Supertrain" that featured Mary Louise Weller bound and gagged for a nearly the entire episode. When the preview for "Marathon Angels" showed a quick glimpse of two women bound and gagged in short running shorts, I fancied that one of them was Cheryl Ladd. The preview for the "Supertrain" episode showed a quick glimpse of the guest actress bound and gagged, and it looked to me as though she was cleave-gagged, though she was actually gagged with a cloth tied over her mouth. |
| Hadji |
| Sunday March 04 07:06:43 2007 real player link: Las Vegas promo |
|
|
| http://www.bondageparade.com/dl/LasVegasPromo.rm |
| Sunday March 04 07:10:06 2007 Re: More Unknowns - C |
| H wrote:
> These are toughies. > > > http://www.diddvd.com I know for a fact that the last (tape gag) and second to last pics (the one with the girl hogtied) are from the exact same movie...or "pelicula", rather. I had a tape that had that movie on it, and another Spanish film that had as many b&g scenes, one with the same girl. Unfortunately, that tape was eaten or else I would dig it out and get the name for you right now. However, I can narrow your search by confirming it to be the same movie. |
| Billy |
| Sunday March 04 07:42:45 2007 Nice Long scene from Thailand |
| From about 2:50 to 5:20 |
| Dr. Gag |
| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwhB9M-6Fvk |
| Sunday March 04 08:48:19 2007 Re: LAS VEGAS |
| hallbird wrote:
> Sometimes when there's all this hullabaloo over an > anticipated scene, I feel like yelling "Why don't > you just wait until the episode airs" it's only a week away!!! Well, I think most of the concern was simply due to the fact that there's no guarantee that the footage on the "exclusive" promo will turn up in the actual episode. By the time we know for sure, the promo won't be there. I'm a bit too far behind on some other stuff I want to do with my site to have bothered hooking one laptop to another with a capture box, if it hadn't been for that little consideration... |
| Raffish |
| Sunday March 04 09:20:24 2007 New Update and New DVD #16 |
| Ciao! |
 |
 |
 |
| PantyDiDCap |
| info@PantyDiDCap.com |
| http://www.PantyDiDCap.com |
| Sunday March 04 10:14:10 2007 Scene last night on Law & order criminal intent |
| it happened about half way through the 10 o clock episode
hot lil blond tape gagged (I think she was the daughter from George Lopez) I was over someone's house so I just saw it quickly in passing the episode was "blasters" I haven't checked the BD yet to see if its a repeat and therefore already in (I do recall talk several weeks ago about a scene with that actress) be gentle... I haven't had me coffe yet |
| Snowcat |
| Sunday March 04 11:30:04 2007 New scenes in the DB |
| Three scenes added to the database today. Zodiak (hogtie), El Laberinto del Fauno and Sweet Jane (Samantha Mathis which is a new lovely addition to the DB). Check them out. |
| Mr.Q |
| Sunday March 04 12:04:22 2007 Re: Paula Peril Movie Available for Download |
|
> I, too, vividly recall the days before anyone had ever > heard of the Internet, when "TV Guide" was the > sole resource for people such as ourselves. We became > quite adroit at reading the synopsis of the plot of a > television program or movie and assessing the probability > that it would contain a bound and gagged actress. > Later, with the proliferation of videos, we became adroit > at assessing the probability that the plot of a movie > contained a bound and gagged actress by reading the plot > synopsis on the VHS box. Ah, the old days. If you didn't read 'Soap Opera Digest' very closely, you probably missed most scenes on the Soaps (and lets not forget many of us can remember a time before VCRs, when we would pretty much miss anything we weren't home to watch--not to mention having only one tv in the house, and having to scheme around parents and siblings to watch Dukes of Hazzard or whatever vs. what they might want to see). You couldn't easily find a list of episodes of a show, and know when a rerun in syndication was likely to pop--you would just keep watching, day after day. You might think you'd seen all the relevant episodes of Wonder Woman or TJ Hooker, but, if you were wrong, there was no scene database to check. Sometimes you might not even notice a relevant show was on the air before it was cancelled (and you may never have heard about it until reading about it here, years later--I grew up in the seventies, and have no memories of 'American Girl', for example). Out of the blue scenes in places you didn't expect would go unnoticed unless you just happened to be in the right place at the right time. It was even quite recent that you might read here about a scene like the classic one on Mission Impossible, but there weren't any websites that permanently had it on archive. But, on the other hand, back in the day, something like Dangerous Curves could pop big time, and you had absolutely no warning--which could be more fun than you'll have now. |
| ss |
| Sunday March 04 12:50:44 2007 Re: Paula Peril Movie Available for Download |
| ss wrote:
> You couldn't easily find a list > of episodes of a show, and know when a rerun in > syndication was likely to pop--you would just keep > watching, day after day. Rerun in syndication? I figured once the episode was shown, my only chance of seeing it again was if the show lasted long enough for a summer rerun. Then gone for good. Many never even got that rerun showing. |
| LV |
| Sunday March 04 13:30:10 2007 Re: LAS VEGAS |
| Raffish wrote:
> Well, I think most of the concern was simply due to the > fact that there's no guarantee that the footage on the > "exclusive" promo will turn up in the actual > episode. I think the footage will appear for sure, but greatly appreciate Raffish's saving that clip and making it available. You never know. Also, Raffish said no sound in the first 30 seconds. There is no sound on the NBC site either, but it's because Marcil does not make a sound in the first part. You can hear background noise a bit. |
| Sunday March 04 14:34:09 2007 scene find |
| Hi can anyone help me find the name of a scene (i don't have a clip i'm afraid) i think it was on panty didcaps about 6-12 months ago.
It looked like it was a 1960/70's scene It has a blonde woman(i think in green dress) with roaps wraped around pinning her arms to her side and a small white tape gag. Apparently there are a couple of putzes on a bed where she is also placed. Does this ring bells with anyone? Any ideas appreciated |
| Sunday March 04 14:44:07 2007 Re: More Unknowns - C |
| Billy wrote:
> > http://www.diddvd.com > > I know for a fact that the last (tape gag) and second to > last pics (the one with the girl hogtied) are from the > exact same movie...or "pelicula", rather. I had > a tape that had that movie on it, and another Spanish > film that had as many b&g scenes, one with the same > girl. The name of the movie is called "La Perversion" (title says it all). The last 2 pictures are from that. |
| Caesar |
| Sunday March 04 14:54:30 2007 Re: Wiseguy |
| CM wrote:
> the US version of TV Land and TV Land Canada are > seperate networks, both owned by Viacom but run > independent of each other. I see. Thanks At moment it appearing favoured Wiseguy, ep: "The Gift" airing on/around March 18th I'll give it abit, then check both mine & Brian R's TVLand-channel for appropriate VHS machine alert |
| Jay L |
| Sunday March 04 17:42:22 2007 Re: More Unknowns - C |
|
> > The name of the movie is called "La Perversion" > (title says it all). The last 2 pictures are from that. That has to be the hottest DVD cover I've seen in my life! |
 |
| Carver_Bloodchew_D.D.S. |
| http://groups.yahoo.com/group/penciledladiesinropes/ |
| Sunday March 04 18:13:19 2007 Re: Anybody seen Black Snake Moan? |
| Jimmy Death wrote:
> Saw it last night. Nothing too much of interest apart > from what you know already. At one point she wraps the > chain around her waist several times and loops it around > one of her legs while asleep. On a side note, I thought > it was an enjoyable movie, despite its mixed reviews. Thanks for the update. Half naked Christina Ricci on a chain by itself is just fine. I'll prolly catch it when it comes out on DVD as no one else in my family is interested. We'll probably end up seeing The 300, which is awesome-looking, but doesn't look too promising DID-wise. |
| Pat Powers |
| Sunday March 04 18:19:01 2007 Re: More Unknowns - C |
| Carver_Bloodchew_D.D.S. wrote:
> > > > > The name of the movie is called "La > Perversion" > > (title says it all). The last 2 pictures are from > that. that scene looks amazing.... strange to see an onscreen tape gagging on the front cover of the film! Dould anyone have a clip for this scene? Also does anyone know the actress? Amazing, just amazing.... |
| dwa |
| Sunday March 04 18:49:16 2007 New German series GSG 9 |
| For those interested, pilot epsode "Feuertaufe" of this new German show has been postponed a day to Thursday March 8th (8.15 pm local time). Has an American swim team bound and gagged (a female team, lucky us).
I'm keeping an eye on it. |
| Peter de K |
| Sunday March 04 19:50:50 2007 Re: LAS VEGAS |
| Raffish wrote:
By the time we know for sure, the promo won't > be there. I'm a bit too far behind on some other stuff I > want to do with my site to have bothered hooking one > laptop to another with a capture box, if it hadn't been > for that little consideration... And thank you for your consideration of "that little consideration". People may not be so concerned right now because, indeed, we have every reason to believe that the scene in question will air on Friday. But imagine if it doesn't! How many years would we be hearing people rant over the "Sam scene" from Las Vegas that was available on the web and was missed by everyone? Let's not forget the massive (and justified) complaints lodged against Smallville a couple months ago for a similar infraction. We don't know for a fact that the scene will appear (knock on wood), we only know that it would be huge misjustice to people of our persuasion if it didn't. In short, I say, if you see what is potentially a holy grail… grab it! Again, Raffish, thank you for your continued efforts. |
| dg |
| Sunday March 04 21:15:14 2007 Re: More Unknowns - C |
| dwa wrote:
that scene looks amazing.... strange to see an onscreen tape gagging on the front cover of the film! Dould anyone have a clip for this scene? At the link |
 |
| Stephanie |
| http://www.majorjohns.com |
| Sunday March 04 21:54:52 2007 Rome |
| There was an interesting scene on tonight's episode. Titus Pullo has a very rough sexual encounter with a full-lipped, busty, hot as hell slave girl. During the act, he wraps his whip around her mouth as a super tight cleave. The great thing about the scene is they show her drooling like crazy!!!!. It was hot.... very hot. |
| doug |
| doug5759@yahoo.com |
| Sunday March 04 21:58:22 2007 Without a Trace |
| In the first 10min, female tourist is laying on the floor and being chloroformed by an intruder. She is wearing a white nightgown. See ends up missing and the FBI needs to find her. Still on at this moment |
| civil |
| Sunday March 04 22:11:14 2007 Re: Without a Trace |
| civil wrote:
> In the first 10min, female tourist is laying on the floor > and being chloroformed by an intruder. She is wearing a > white nightgown. See ends up missing and the FBI needs to > find her. Still on at this moment another reenactment at the 20min mark, but they find her dead in the bed. On female FBI's daughter is taking out of the house in the at the 15min mark while an intruder holds his hand over her mouth. Babysitter was locked in a closet and only see the door rattling and none of her bonds. |
| civil |
| Sunday March 04 22:21:33 2007 Re: Rome ("Death Mask," Episode 2.7) |
| doug wrote:
> There was an interesting scene on tonight's episode. > Titus Pullo has a very rough sexual encounter with a > full-lipped, busty, hot as hell slave girl. During the > act, he wraps his whip around her mouth as a super tight > cleave. The great thing about the scene is they show her > drooling like crazy!!!!. It was hot.... very hot. Yup, she's played by database damsel Zuleikha Robinson, of "The Lone Gunmen" fame. Starts about 20 minutes in. You lucky West Coasters and those of you who get feeds from both coasts will get another chance tonight at 9 p. m Pacific.; the rest of you check your HBO listings for the rest of the week. Details in the database if you're not sure about it. That's the good news; the bad news is that the Servilia/Atia storyline won't result in Lindsay Duncan becoming a Give-and-Getter at Polly Walker's expense. Servilia committed suicide after swearing a curse on Atia. She still managed to obtain a measure of poetic justice, though. Atia is forced to enter an arranged marriage for her son Octavian's political advantage; when her new husband demands consummation at the end of the episode, he-how shall we say this delicately?-proceeds in the same manner as Atia's torturer did with Servilia a few weeks back, as Servilia's curse echoes from the grave. Wicked, totally wicked! |
| An Old Friend |
| Sunday March 04 22:49:31 2007 Easier Ones |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: H Reason: I asked you a question that you failed to answer. I'm deleting all these. |
| The Moderator |
| Sunday March 04 22:50:04 2007 Easier Ones |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: H Reason: I asked you a question that you failed to answer. I'm deleting all these. |
| The Moderator |
| Sunday March 04 22:53:39 2007 brief scene on rome (hbo) |
| one of the lead characters goes down to discipline his friend's slave girl who disrepected his wife.......he has a whip and tells her why he is there and she comes on to him, he seems determinded to not fall for her coming on to him, well that fails they fight they hit ,they bite , they have sex and then as an aferthought he flips her over cleave gags her with the long whip tightly and takes her from behind ........hbo replays rome weveral times a week if anyone is interested.......the slave girl is busty, dark haired and very sultry and hot looking ...might be worth a look .......bubba |
| bubba |
| Sunday March 04 22:55:43 2007 True Crime Magazines at Ebay |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: Pofoz Reason: Sorry, those URLs are too long, they're warping the page. You'll need to figure out something else, maybe instructions on how people can search ebay. |
| The Moderator |
| Sunday March 04 23:09:57 2007 Note to 'An Old Friend' re: "Rome" |
| Not to put too fine of a point on things, but if you're going to post what amounts to a complete Spoiler for Left Coast folks regarding the plot of tonight's "Rome" episode, then some kind of warning high rpt HIGH up in your posting would be much appreciated. I'm a bit testy on this because after "Battlestar Galactica," there isn't much on TV that I avidly anticipate each week other than "Rome." You weren't planning on 'spoiling' tonight's "Battlestar Galactica" as well, were you?
|
| Overlooker |
| Sunday March 04 23:40:29 2007 Re Rome |
| That scene with the slavegirl sounds hot. I no longer have HBO, and that scene almost makes me regret it. Almost. |
| Pat Powers |
| http://www.bondagerotica.com/mainstream.html |
| Sunday March 04 23:46:17 2007 Site update |
| My site is updated today with an essay entitled "How Not To Use A Sexy Robobabe" about the link between Samantha's Darren in "Bewitched," Jeannie's Major Tony in "I Dream of Jeannie" and a guy from some Skinamax flick who's so low that he's unworthy of his sex toy.
|
| Pat Powers |
| http://www.bondagerotica.com/mainstream.html |
|
|