|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Saturday September 15 00:55:44 2007 Re: days of our lives |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> preview for next week showed a women with what looked > like a wrap around tapegag being taken off You don't happen to know which character it is? 'Cause there's a lot of them I wish I'd see gagged. Is it shown Monday? |
| ACC |
| accasino@hotmail.com |
| Saturday September 15 01:35:50 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| SLJ wrote:
> Pat Powers wrote: > > > Abu Zalaam wrote: > > > > > Can anyone think of any other film that would > > benefit > > > more from a shot-for-shot remake with Damsel > > Upgrade? > > I'm going to beat all the regulars to the punch and say > Terror Among Us. I find NONE of the women in that movie > particularly attractive, and would love to see a Lifetime > Movie remake of it with more attractive girls. I've often wondered about this old show being such a touchstone for this board. I would not be a bit surprised if the cast, crew and director have all either died, or forgotten about it. The master tape was probably recycled to record Circus of the Daytime Stars a week after the "movie" was shown. But 100 years from now, when Brian's great great great grandson is deleting posts with holograms larger than the strict 50 petabyte limit, the denizens of this board will still be lovingly passing around 2 megabyte, 15 minute clips of "The Terror Among Us" made from 5th generation (beta->VHS->KCS audio cassette->AVI->Quicktime) clips, and trying to figure out which of the blurry blobs are male, and which are female. |
| Abu Zalaam |
| Saturday September 15 01:56:55 2007 Re: Canucks & Northern Yanks- Interesting OMNI Vid |
| Jay L wrote:
> How OMNI sometimes runs untitled vids > Starts off like that Niagara Falls Marineland Sea Park > commercial like you've seen a million times - > "Everyone loves the Belugas", with those funny > looking fish swimming around a park with an Asian lady watching them. Thought it an ad for that park, but it not. As it goes on there's a gal tied up in a car and a guy almost gets blown up === Yeah, took long enough.. but appears we got her. This is from a Korean video "Zia Voice of Heaven" And I also lucked out and found (prt 1) on YOOTOOB that their gestapo hasn't got around to canning yet For now, I'll post that 1st part up on the Video Page |
| Jay L |
| Saturday September 15 02:21:13 2007 Re: days of our lives |
| ACC wrote:
> > You don't happen to know which character it is? 'Cause > there's a lot of them I wish I'd see gagged. > It will be Kate, played by Lauren Koslow. Decent looking but wouldn't be my first pick. Spoilers say she's found tied up on Monday. |
| http://www.nbc.com/Days_of_our_Lives/bios/kate_roberts.shtml |
| Saturday September 15 02:23:53 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| > Brian's great great great grandson is deleting posts
> with > holograms larger than the strict 50 petabyte limit, the > denizens of this board will still be lovingly passing > around 2 megabyte, 15 minute clips of > "The Terror Among Us" made from 5th generation > (beta->VHS->KCS audio > cassette->AVI->Quicktime) clips, and > trying to figure out which of the blurry blobs are male, and which are female. Ha Ha, so true. And you wouldn't think it would have grown to such mythological proportions by its modest entry in the database: "Description: A psycho rapist breaks into their apartment and takes all four women captive. They end up bound hand and foot with rope and gagged with cloth. Lots of struggling and moaning by all four women. This is a very lengthy scene." Whereas scenes of no particular worth or mention sometimes have extremely long detailed descriptions that always leave you dissapointed. But that is all part of the system. Terror Among Us was probably one of the first entries added, back when there was a derth of scenes in the database, not an enormous amount like now, all struggling for signifigance. And of course it has nostalgic appeal to a certain generation. Little bit before my time, I'm afraid, though I can still respect a lengthy scene involving four women and gagged. And having only seen clips I can avoid the whole messy rape scenario. I was never able to enjoy the seens in the Collector after I'd actually watched the movie. I'd just get depressed. |
| SLJ |
| Saturday September 15 02:31:33 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| SLJ wrote:
> Pat Powers wrote: > I'm going to beat all the regulars to the punch and say > Terror Among Us. I find NONE of the women in that movie > particularly attractive, and would love to see a Lifetime > Movie remake of it with more attractive girls. Oh, I thought Sarah had GREAT legs back then. Didn't you? In fact, I remember another castmember of her reality show ("Real People"?) actually commenting on these attributes on the air. It may have been -- and probably was -- the late Skip Stevenson, and he said something like, "Well, we all know that Sarah has beautiful legs." The little blonde with the broken arm was rather fetching, as well, though I didn't care for the way she got knocked around by the bad guy. Leo. |
| Saturday September 15 02:40:25 2007 FUNNY GAMES Remake |
| Well, the B&G in this thing will have to be exemplary to get Leo to watch it. I absolutely HATE the cynical original. I regard it as a faux-intellectual piece of mastabatory fantasy from a singularly untalented writer/director.
I can only hope that the "bad boys" are portrayed a little more convincingly than the pair of donut-stuffed sissies of the first version. As I said at the time of the original release, send those two poseurs down here to the good old South, and your average housewife will have both of them squealing in terror while they search for their detached balls in the local storm drain. Hate that alleged movie. Leo. |
| Leo |
| monkmayfair2000@yahoo.com |
| Saturday September 15 02:46:20 2007 Re: Benifit From Shot-for-sShot Remakes? |
| Pat Powers wrote:
> the upgrade I would rather make is to the > director/writer > I thought about how nice it would be to > replace Dorothy Stratten in "Autumn Born" > wouldn't make up for all the > other missteps made by the director (Lloyd Simandl). Figure you didn't see that Japanese "Perfect Education" film really more, or less borrowed from "Autumn Born"? (Except tamer, younger gal, little D/s & fetish references than Autum Born) I personally preferred Autumn Born over it. As for Simandl, I can't recall Title he got the plot from offhand, but do recall it was deep/understood by ladies. Most guys didn't really follow Considered similar to how you could tell all the non-Catholics in the theatre when "Jacob's Ladder" was playing, with them going "what the heck?". Same |
| Jay L |
| Saturday September 15 02:56:15 2007 Re: Benifit From Shot-for-sShot Remakes? |
| Jay L wrote:
> Pat Powers wrote: > the upgrade I would rather make is to the > director/writer > "Autumn Born" > > Figure you didn't see that Japanese "Perfect > Education" film really more, or less borrowed from > "Autumn Born"? Better clarify, as DB descripts has them all sounding abit like "Autumn Born" ;) This is the particular one I saw from the same principle. (Though she not at - bored of clubbing/looking for serious relationship- as Dorothy's character) = Record number: 11425 Title: Jin shi pei yu, xiang gang qing ye (2002) aka Perfect Education 3 Medium: Movie Actress: Kana Ito Description: This installment from the series of Perfect Education movies was made in Hong Kong, unlike all of the other movies which were made in Japan. During a school field trip Ai (Kana Ito) leaves her hotel to wonder in the city. As night falls she takes a taxi only to be kidnaped by Bo, a lonely Chinese taxi driver. He takes her to the countryside and locks her in a cabin. At minute 9:30 he binds Ai’s wrists behind her back with broad rope. She has been cleaved gagged with a white cloth and throws her in the bed. He gets in the bed next to her and embraces her to keep her next to him so she won’t escape. The following morning he leaves her bound, alone, while he goes to work. We see nice close ups of her gagged lovely face. She easily passes her bound wrists down her unbound feet and brings her arms up front. She removes the gag and gets rid of the ropes that bind her. Although she remains her prisoner for the rest of the movie, she is never again seen tied up and she eventually falls for his kidnaper, the common theme of these movies. |
| Jay L |
| Saturday September 15 08:16:39 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| Stephen wrote:
The Collector would be an obvious choice for a > shot-for-shot remake, perhaps with someone like Anne > Hathaway in the damsel role. Yes, please yes !! Also Quake with Halle Berry. |
| Saturday September 15 08:21:26 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake- Naomi Watts Gagged |
| I played, paused and played the msn trailer. It looks mostl;y a scene-scene remake of the original with one delicioius addition - and you all know who. There are plenty of shots of her in undress and underwear - which was missing in original.
Ok - ok - now coming to the subject - 1.59 min mark in the trailer - the famous scene where the lady is brought back while trying to escape with her mouth stuffed with cloth and taped - there is a flash of Naomi Watts exactly the same way !It is grainy - but see if you can pause and magnify the page. Worked for me ! |
| jamesfromindia |
| Saturday September 15 11:15:59 2007 Looking for ... |
|
This post was moved to The Trading Forum. Poster: John Reason: Off-topic. |
| The Moderator |
| Saturday September 15 13:15:19 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake- Naomi Watts Gagged |
| jamesfromindia wrote:
> I played, paused and played the msn trailer. It looks > mostl;y a scene-scene remake of the original with one > delicioius addition - and you all know who. There are > plenty of shots of her in undress and underwear - which > was missing in original. Yep, it definitely looks from the blinkie at the 1:57 mark as though she's in bra and panties for the infamous hopping-around-the-room scene. Yow. |
| Raffish |
| Saturday September 15 13:27:10 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Stephen wrote: > The Collector would be an obvious choice for a > > shot-for-shot remake, perhaps with someone like Anne > > > Hathaway in the damsel role. > > > Yes, please yes !! Also Quake with Halle Berry. And don't forget The Terror Among us with let's say Elisha Cuthbert, Katherine Heigl, Sarah Chalke, and Jenna Fischer. |
| Raffish |
| Saturday September 15 13:58:43 2007 spine on DVD |
| dont know if it has been mentioned or not but amazon shows spine as being released on DVD on September 25th. |
| Eric |
| Saturday September 15 15:00:49 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| > And don't forget The Terror Among us with let's say
> Elisha Cuthbert, Katherine Heigl, Sarah Chalke, and Jenna > Fischer. Well, the Collector remake is at least possible. That movie was at least arty and semi-famous, not some throwaway made-for-TV-movie from four decades ago. But if they made the Collector again and it wasn't a shot-for-shot remake it would probable be gender reversal. Which would be exactly like Delores Claiborne or something like that so I hope they don't make it. |
| SLJ |
| Saturday September 15 15:03:18 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| >Which would be exactly like Delores Claiborne
> or something like that so I hope they don't make it. Oops, I meant Misery. They're all the same to me. |
| SLJ |
| Saturday September 15 15:35:52 2007 Saving Grace |
| Just posted to the alerts page, there will be a scene with Holly Hunter on "Saving Grace" this Monday (9/17). You can see a fairly lengthy chunk of it on TNT's web site (http://www.tnt.tv) - she is handcuffed spreadeagle to a bed, face down and nude (of course, you can only see her back, head, and arms). She is having a lengthy discussion with the angel "Earl," don't know if he put her in that position because she's so darn naughty or if she was cuffed during consensual sex with her lover "Ham" - those are the two most likely possibilities. |
| Rob |
| Saturday September 15 15:44:54 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| SLJ wrote:
> >Which would be exactly like Delores Claiborne > > or something like that so I hope they don't make > it. > > Oops, I meant Misery. They're all the same to me. Or The Hitcher... Okay, we should really stop talking about remaking movies in which our damsels don't live to see the closing credits. Howzabout a nice update of Thoroughly Modern Millie? |
| Raffish |
| Saturday September 15 16:45:40 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| I've looked, but I still haven't seen a gag. I've seen the parts where she's getting pushed down w/ her arms taped behind her (bra n panties) and where her ankles r getting taped, but the gag snob in me will refuse to see this w/o it! |
| Rocky |
| Saturday September 15 17:13:32 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| Rocky wrote:
> I've looked, but I still haven't seen a gag. I've seen > the parts where she's getting pushed down w/ her arms > taped behind her (bra n panties) and where her ankles r > getting taped, but the gag snob in me will refuse to see > this w/o it! It looks like she's wearing the exact same outfit as the original in the scene where she's being pushed through the door after being recaptured. If they're being as accurate as possible, I bet they include the all-time best gag in mainstream moviedom. |
| Help |
| Saturday September 15 17:47:48 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake |
| Leo wrote:
> Well, the B&G in this thing will have to be exemplary > to get Leo to watch it. I absolutely HATE the cynical > original. I regard it as a faux-intellectual piece of > mastabatory fantasy from a singularly untalented > writer/director. > > I can only hope that the "bad boys" are > portrayed a little more convincingly than the pair of > donut-stuffed sissies of the first version. As I said at > the time of the original release, send those two poseurs > down here to the good old South, and your average > housewife will have both of them squealing in terror > while they search for their detached balls in the local > storm drain. Hate that alleged movie. Leo. Hear, hear! I couldn't agree more! The original - and the remake by the looks of the trailer - is a sick piece of shit, with absolutely no 'art' about it, and no redeeming qualities other than to feed the vicarious desires of the hidden wannabe serial killers in the audience. I hope everyone will boycott this crap for what it is. BY THE WAY, for those who haven't seen the original - THE WHOLE FAMILY GETS KILLED, FOR NO REASON, END OF MOVIE. Wow, that's entertaining? Or as the trailer self-states (they surely won't get critics saying it) "Magnificent" "Brilliant" "Daring" . . . wha??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE EMPEROR (Michael Haneke, the director, who's obviously duped a lot of greedy industry types) HAS NO CLOTHES! |
| Saturday September 15 18:28:40 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake |
| > Hear, hear! I couldn't agree more! The original - and
> the remake by the looks of the trailer - is a sick piece > of shit, with absolutely no 'art' about it, and no > redeeming qualities other than to feed the vicarious > desires of the hidden wannabe serial killers in the > audience. I hope everyone will boycott this crap for > what it is. > BY THE WAY, for those who haven't seen the original - THE > WHOLE FAMILY GETS KILLED, FOR NO REASON, END OF MOVIE. > Wow, that's entertaining? Or as the trailer self-states > (they surely won't get critics saying it) > "Magnificent" "Brilliant" > "Daring" . . . wha??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > THE EMPEROR (Michael Haneke, the director, who's obviously duped a lot of greedy industry types) HAS NO CLOTHES! I hate to dredge up an old argument, but your problems with the movie are exactly the point of the movie. The movie is a commentary on violence in movies and how we've come to accept it as moviegoers. That is why the killers frequently break the fourth wall and make comments like "But we're not even up to feature film length yet." The point is to show how desensitized we've all become to violence in our entertainment and how uncomfortable it becomes when it seems "real." That's why so many people here hate the movie despite the fact that all the real violence happens off-screen. It's way less violent than say "Candyman 3" or Hellraiser 3, but it's bondage scenes are more reviled because the violence (and by extension the bondage) is realistic. |
| Help |
| Saturday September 15 18:34:27 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> SLJ wrote: > > > Pat Powers wrote: I didn't write any of this, however, I agree Sarah Purcell had great legs. |
| Pat Powers |
| Saturday September 15 18:39:44 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake |
| Leo wrote:
> Well, the B&G in this thing will have to be exemplary > to get Leo to watch it. I absolutely HATE the cynical > original. I regard it as a faux-intellectual piece of > mastabatory fantasy from a singularly untalented > writer/director. > Hate that alleged movie. Leo. I'm totally with you on that movie. It was just a European pseudo-intellectual's excuse to show a middle class family being tortured for no particular reason, other than that it got to show how much he didn't like the middle class. You really got the idea that for the director, the psychos were to real heroes of the movie. And the shot-for-shot remake will be no different. There'll jsut be a bondage scene in it and nothing else, for us. Nothing at all for those who don't like bondage. |
| Pat Powers |
| Saturday September 15 18:45:38 2007 Re: Benifit From Shot-for-sShot Remakes? |
| Jay L wrote:
> Pat Powers wrote: > Figure you didn't see that Japanese "Perfect > Education" film really more, or less borrowed from > "Autumn Born"? > (Except tamer, younger gal, little D/s & fetish > references than Autum Born) > I personally preferred Autumn Born over it. I haven't seen "Perfect Education" but there's an (IIRC) film called "Blind Beast" making the rounds on cable right now in which a beautiful young model is kidnapped by a blind artist (and his mom!) and eventually kinda after a fashion falls for him and winds up dead. What made "Autumn Born" different is that Stratton was sent to a special Academy which trained haughty young women to be slavegirls. Call it Gor Academy if you will -- it wasn't just some guy with a crush on the gal, she was actually turned over to this third party group that specialized in slavegirl training. It was more like "Dresden Diaries" than a maledom/femsub romance. |
| Pat Powers |
| Saturday September 15 18:54:29 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake |
| Pat Powers wrote:
Leo wrote: Well, the B&G in this thing will have to be exemplary to get Leo to watch it. I absolutely HATE the cynical original. I regard it as a faux-intellectual piece of mastabatory fantasy from a singularly untalented writer/director. Hate that alleged movie. Leo. Sorry that this movie isn't artsy or sophistacted enough for ya cause I'm certainly going to enjoy it. It's make believe and if Naomi happens to get the full treatment then that'll be an added bonus. I love violence and if anything, enjoy seeing the bad guys provail sometimes. Good wins over evil way too ofetn. It's nice to change it up every now and again |
| Chris |
| Saturday September 15 19:37:20 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake |
| Pat Powers wrote:
> Leo wrote: > > > Well, the B&G in this thing will have to be exemplary > > to get Leo to watch it. I absolutely HATE the cynical > > original. I regard it as a faux-intellectual piece of > > mastabatory fantasy from a singularly untalented > > writer/director. > > > Hate that alleged movie. Leo. > > I'm totally with you on that movie. It was just a > European pseudo-intellectual's excuse to show a middle > class family being tortured for no particular reason, > other than that it got to show how much he didn't like > the middle class. Wow...that's really your final take on it? I'm not saying it's a work of genius or anything, and perhaps it went a bit over the top in the bleakly satirical point it was trying to make, but sometimes you really do have to shout fire in a crowded theatre. There is far more to the original film than class warfare. > There'll jsut be a bondage scene in it and nothing else, > for us. Nothing at all for those who don't like bondage. Be careful for whom you speak. The original is still Guaranteed Fresh on rottentomatoes (if only just barely), and as much as I'd like to believe those 60% of critics are all Some of Us...er, no. Somehow, at least a few of them clearly found something other than the bondage to admire. |
| Raffish |
| Saturday September 15 19:45:46 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake |
| I'm just curious how they got somebody as name recognizable as Naomi Watts to star in it.
|
| Jacot |
| Saturday September 15 19:54:49 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake |
| Jacot wrote:
> I'm just curious how they got somebody as name > recognizable as Naomi Watts to star in it. Seems like she respects the director or something. Weird. "It was interesting. I saw the original and it was intense, but Michael Haneke is a great filmmaker. I think his films will be remembered in 100 years to come. He's really trying to do something. We remade the film and what was interesting was that he wanted to do the exact same shots, so it was a great experience. He works from a very disciplined place. Everything's very worked-out, very structured, and that makes it a lot harder to be organic, because you've got so many notes in your head. Completely different style from the way David Cronenberg works." -- Naomi Watts I found that in about a minute via Google. There's presumably more out there. |
| Raffish |
| Saturday September 15 19:55:18 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> The little blonde with the broken arm was rather > fetching, as well, though I didn't care for the way she > got knocked around by the bad guy. Leo. Yeah, Pat Klous, who went on to be a regular on The Love Boat. Now, didn't she have on just about the TIGHTEST cleave gag you've ever seen??? It looked even tighter than the oft-mentioned Honor Blackman scene in THE AVENGERS. In fact, Pat's gag is so tight it almost looks painful. |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Saturday September 15 20:12:47 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake |
| Leo wrote:
> Well, the B&G in this thing will have to be > exemplary to get Leo to watch it. I absolutely HATE the > cynical original. I regard it as a faux-intellectual > piece of mastabatory fantasy from a singularly untalented > writer/director. Uh....yeah, I guess so.....but I'm thinking more of NAOMI WATTS tied & gagged! Yowza!!! Pat Powers wrote: > Nothing at all for those who don't like bondage. But for those of us that do......YEE HAW! Actually, it's very doubtful I'll even watch the movie...just rent it & skip to the good stuff & dub away, like I did with the original. I guess that's why I'm not too passionate in any feeling about the movie one way or the other...I've never SEEN it! :-) |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Saturday September 15 20:16:11 2007 Re: FUNNY GAMES Remake |
| Pat Powers wrote:
> Leo wrote: > > > Well, the B&G in this thing will have to be > exemplary Of course, we do not mind when entire cities and families get wiped out in summer trash like Commando, War of the Worlds, Independence day and so on. Why - because the bad guys lose at the end !! Sometimes you sit through a movie although it is deeply distrurbing- then the director has served his purpose because he/she forces you to confront something that is very real and very scary. I think that is one reason why established actresses like Naomi do these movies and take the tight bondage and gags. |
| zarchaic |
| Saturday September 15 21:22:18 2007 days kate gets it |
| Kate is on the phone to Roman, telling him that Andre is right outside, she saw him, and to get over there (the Pub) right away. She hangs up, Andre is right behind her, telling her good job. Roman comes in, and find Kate trussed up, and hanging from a beam, with duct tape tightly across her mouth. He cuts her down, asking if she is o.k. She nods, he pulls the tape off her mouth, she screams |
| rob |
| Saturday September 15 23:20:25 2007 Re: days kate gets it |
| It sounds decent enough but I gotta say that I'm kinda bummed. I was expecting one of the younger damsels like Chelsea or Stephanie (damn, she's uber-hot!). Let's hope they'll get the treatment soon enough. |
| ACC |
| accasino@hotmail.com |
| Saturday September 15 23:54:21 2007 Re: Naomi Watts |
| > > > Abu Zalaam wrote:
> > > > > > > Can anyone think of any other film that > would > > > benefit > > > > more from a shot-for-shot remake with > Damsel > > > Upgrade? Ok, I wanted to see what the BIG deal was with Naomi Watts. So I went to imdb & looked her up. I repeat: What's the BIG deal about Naomi Watts? She's borderline pretty, why is everybody going crazy for her? Also, what is the point of a shot-for-shot remake? That's is so totally stupid. Remake it & put a slight spin on the story. |
| Slim Shady |
|
|