|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Monday June 23 00:07:55 2003 Re: B&G on Cheap DVDs |
| > > Buying up cheap DVDs I've come across some great scenes
> > > with great quality ...and all for under 10 bucks. From > > > Alpha Video: The Sphinx- an ok scene but wotta cover! > [SNIP] > > The Monster Walks- ......etc > > Where did you find these DVD's? I've got all of these on > crummy 3rd generation VSH tapes! I got mine at Tower Records but I now see that they're cheaper at FYE. FYE and Alpha Video both have websites. http://www.fye.com/ oldies.com --- Alpha's site |
| Dr. Gag |
| Monday June 23 01:32:27 2003 CASE FILE added |
|
Catherine Correia and Eliana López from unknown eps of CARITA PINTADA |
| Biff |
| http://community.webtv.net/unlikelysource/TheCaseFilesofBiff |
| Monday June 23 02:23:21 2003 Re: Keira Knightley |
| > Forgive me if this has already been mentioned.
> It appears that Keira might get a little action in the > upcoming "Pirates Of the Carribean". There is a website > that features a pic of Keira with a chain draped over her > shoulder and chest. > http://www.evilchog.co.uk/keira_knightley/film.asp I think, in that particular shot, the chains are actually on Johnny Depp's wrists, and he's draping them over her from behind. There's still good news on this one, as at least one still shows her with her hands bound in front, which is great (if the scene doesn't get cut)-- but I've seen another pic of her walking the plank with her hands completely untied! Sloppy pirating, if you ask me. |
| Jeb |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.homestead.com/jebsadventurebound |
| Monday June 23 02:40:44 2003 Re: Keira Knightley |
|
> It appears that Keira might get a little action in the > upcoming "Pirates Of the Carribean". There is a >draped over her shoulder and chest. > http://www.evilchog.co.uk/keira_knightley/film.asp > >I think, in that particular shot, the chains are actually > on Johnny Depp's wrists, and he's draping them over her from behind. > There's still good news at least one > still shows her with her hands bound in front, which is > great (if the scene doesn't get cut)-- but I've seen > another pic of her walking the plank with her hands > completely untied! Sloppy pirating, if you ask me. Aww shucks! And the hands tied in front is loose besides! What's the use? I'll never understand hands tied in front in the practical sense - though it is easier to see camerawise. |
| Monday June 23 05:19:56 2003 Re: Interesting Item |
| > > at the link
> > Thanks for the link. Too bad they weren't tied as well as > gagged. Which one is Daphne and which one is Celeste? Who > are these girls? I've never heard of them. > > ah i remember those girls they are singers but i dont know if they still do since havent heard them for a long time |
| Monday June 23 05:38:37 2003 Re: CASE FILE added |
| >
> Catherine Correia and Eliana López from unknown eps of > CARITA PINTADA This is a great scene - any chance of getting an clip of this scene? |
| Graham |
| Monday June 23 06:20:06 2003 Lowball and Descendant |
| I just watched two movies tonight with excellent female bondage scenes. The first one was "Lowball", featuring Amber Smith. She is kidnapped by the villain early on in the plot. She is first shown with her hands secured with leather straps to the armrests of a chair and her mouth gagged with a black cleave gag. Later scenes show her being subject to psychological and physical degradation by a dominatrix; she even wears a leather mask of some sort in one scene.
The second movie was "Descendant", which was previously mentioned on this message board. Those who watch this movie will make a serendipitous discovery: there are three damsels in distress in this film, including the aforementioned Katherine Heigl. The first one has her hands tied to a bedpost before she is brutally murdered. The second one plays Katherine Heigl's best friend, and she is bound and gagged and mummified by the villain; her hands are tied over her head and she is gagged with duct tape, as the villain proceeds to wrap her with an Ace bandage. There are several close-up views of her bound hands and gagged mouth and of her mummification. Finally, Ms. Heigl is bound and gagged on a bed; her hands are tied to the headboard and she is gagged with duct tape. Her scenes are lengthy, featuring several close-up views of her tape-gagged mouth, and quite a bit of indignant "mmph"-ing as she is menaced by the villain. "Descendant" at least has some semblance of a plot; "Lowball" has an inane plot, and except for Amber Smith's bondage scenes, is forgettable. |
| Hadji |
| Monday June 23 07:43:30 2003 Re: Wonder Woman casting... |
| > Well, JP... Who decided? THE GUYS WHO ARE MAKING THE
> MOVIE!!! :-) As stated earlier, this makes sense from a > Hollywood perspective. They can make "WW-1" an "Origin > of..." movie, & by the time they get to "WW-5: WW & WGirl > on Gor," their star won't be in her 50's. (This is > sometimes referred to as "Harrison Ford Syndrome.") > Don't get me wrong; there are some seriously foxy > actresses in their fifties, but even Sigourney Weaver or > Susan Sarandon would look out of place in a standard WW costume. Yeah, but nobody's advocating actresses in their 40s and 50s for the role, it's when actresses in their late 20s and early 30s are rejected that it gets weird. And frankly, I have trouble with frail teenyboppers playing Wonder Woman. While it's true that it's best to have a young lead for the purposes of sequels, a lot of "franchises" have done just fine with several different guys (can't think of any female action hero franchises, though sadly, "Charlies' Angels" might soon fill that bill). They include Tarzan and James Bond, both of which have done well with a variety of guys playing the lead. YOu can even have an occasional dud (George Lazenby) and still come out all right. Heck, Star Wars and Star Trek have kept the franchise going with ENTIRELY NEW CASTS! So, I don't think it's necessary to case a teenybopper as Wonder Woman. Better to secure the future of the franchise with someone who can carry the role rather than settle on a lead who'd be much more convincing moping about boys in some WB nighttime soaper. |
| Pat Powers |
| Monday June 23 08:58:10 2003 Re: Wonder Woman casting... |
| > > I'm not sure who decided WW was
> supposed to be the age of one of the "Party of Five" > teeny-bopper set. Like some else said a day or so ago, > this is Wonder WOMAN, not Wonder GIRL. I know there are > some young'uns here, but I always thought of WW as a > fairly mature, 30-something butt-kicker. > show). > Wasn't Lynda Carter in her mid-30's when she played Wonder Woman? Actually Lynda Carter was in her early 20's when she played Wonder Woman. In the Comics,Wonder Woman was in her late teens,early 20's when she first appears. From a film-making standpoint, The producers are going to go for someone in their 20's for this movie as it needs to appeal to the same age groupas most WB TV shows. It's the way things are today. |
| Lenny S |
| Monday June 23 10:26:40 2003 Re: Lowball and Descendant |
| > Finally, Ms. Heigl is bound and gagged on a bed; her
> hands are tied to the headboard and she is gagged with > duct tape. And it's about time she got the full treatment! |
 |
| Canuck |
| Monday June 23 11:14:19 2003 Movie/Video alerts |
| I'm assuming that you're haveing some temporary problems with your message page, which is why the format has changed. You've combined favorite scenes with the above topic. You show the last posting being February, which I assume applies to favorite scenes as their were postings last week on the newly released video DECADENCE. Again I assume this is just temporary, but it is very useful to see something that tells you that something new has been posted to sites that don't see regular postings as DISCUSSIONS & VCR ALERTS do. |
| hallbird |
| Monday June 23 11:29:34 2003 Maxim Magazine |
| On page 152 in Maxim Magazine has a picture of a girl walking the plank with her hands tied behind her back. The photo shot is with the girls back to the camera, she is playfully doing this with a little smile on her face, she is tied with brown rope and you can barely see the rope on her hands but it's there.
|
| FFF |
| Monday June 23 11:45:53 2003 Re: Lowball and Descendant |
| > "Descendant" at least has some semblance of a plot;
Hi H, where did you get a DVD of Descendant, did you buy or rent? Fye doesn't have it and Amazon can't ship till July. Not in any of my video stores either. Thanks |
| Monday June 23 13:14:13 2003 Re: Gagged Photo |
| > Any Canucks that can get ahold of today's Tor Star
> newspaper. Two detective gagged ladies page A-22. In colour too. Sounds like a great picture, Jay! Any chance that's going to be submitted to the BIEL site? |
| Ed K. |
| expletive_deleteded@yahoo.com |
| Monday June 23 15:50:31 2003 Re: Lowball and Descendant |
| > Hi H, where did you get a DVD of Descendant, did you buy
> or rent? Fye doesn't have it and Amazon can't ship till > July. Not in any of my video stores either. Thanks I rented both DVDs at a Hollywood Video store, where both were available. |
| Hadji |
| Monday June 23 16:55:19 2003 Re: Ed K's Post- Gagged Photo |
| > Sounds like a great picture, Jay! Any chance that's going
> to be submitted to the BIEL site? Sorry, I'm not familiar with the BIEL site. If you want, ask the site owner if interested? And get an address from him I can mail it to. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Monday June 23 17:28:20 2003 Re: Lowball and Descendant |
| Ms Heigl has a pretty impressive DinD resume so far. More gags sure to come! |
| Chucky |
| Monday June 23 17:38:54 2003 Romantic? |
| And how! |
 |
| Monday June 23 19:06:40 2003 soaps? |
| Anything turn up on the soaps today (especially General Hospital??) |
| Monday June 23 20:18:12 2003 Re: Movie/Video alerts |
| > I'm assuming that you're haveing some temporary problems
> with your message page, which is why the format has > changed. No format change. The host had a crash, and some files were corrupted. > You've combined favorite scenes with the above > topic. No combination. > You show the last posting being February, which I > assume applies to favorite scenes as their were postings > last week on the newly released video DECADENCE. The "last message" file for Movie Alerts was wiped out. It won't show up until someone posts there. > Again I > assume this is just temporary, but it is very useful to > see something that tells you that something new has been > posted to sites that don't see regular postings as > DISCUSSIONS & VCR ALERTS do. There hasn't been anything new, at least since the crash. I didn't feel like manually changing it. |
| Brian R |
| Monday June 23 20:53:51 2003 I'm just curious... |
| ...as to whether anyone reading or posting to this site from a public library in the USA has had any problems with it being filtered. The reason I ask is that for those of you who haven't heard, the U. S. Supreme Court issued a ruling this morning which upheld the Children's Internet Protection Act, requiring libraries which get federal funds to install filtering software on their Internet connections, supposedly to protect kids from...well, this isn't the Anything Goes page, but you get the picture.
I've never run into a problem, but that may be because the library I hang out at most often gives the patron the choice of whether he or she wants to filter right on the login page. I imagine this won't be an option much longer. And while once again this isn't That Other Page, I can just see one of us going sheepishly up to a librarian and asking her (and there's another question: would it be even more embarrassing to have to ask a guy?) to kindly unblock this site, can't you? The ability to ask for an unblock was the court majority's principal rationale for its decision, but you've got to wonder if they really thought it through. Okay, Mr. Moderator, I'm off the soapbox. If I was on it too long to suit your taste, feel free to shove this over to you-know-where, and sorry for the inconvenience. Furthermore, if you want to similarly direct followups I'll understand. And while I'm here, I might as well weigh in on the who's-gonna-play-Wonder Woman question with a totally off-the-wall suggestion: She'd probably never do it, but how about Julia Roberts? |
| An Old Friend (who may not be able to come around as often now...) |
| Monday June 23 21:14:54 2003 Re: soaps? |
| > Anything turn up on the soaps today (especially General
> Hospital??) Nothing for Carly on GH today. But... Sonny and Jason now know that Rick is the one who kidnapped her. Near the end of today's episode Sonny told Jason that to get Carly back, he needed to have the most valuable thing Rick has, to which Jason answered "Liz". The dialogue I just paraphrased might not sound like much, but Sonny walked into the room just before this little exchange carrying a pair of black gloves, which he put on, and a large coil of rope!!! And in a classic bit of foreshadowing (hopefully!), the last time we saw Liz, Rick was telling her to go to her studio. He'd stop by to see her later. Could Rebecca Herbst finally be getting a b&g scene? |
| chubby |
| Monday June 23 21:33:21 2003 I am curious... but not yellow. :-) |
| No nudity, no dirty words, no sex... No porn here!
I confess I have unclean thoughts about Courteney Cox-Arquette. That does not make the FRIENDS section of nbc.com pornography. The mainstream media can bind & gag beautiful actresses, but we can't discuss it in a polite manner? Get a grip! :-) |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.lovetied.com/dug/ |
| Monday June 23 22:19:45 2003 Comic Book Bondage |
| The DC/Vertigo miniseries "Beware the Creeper" scored in its 3rd issue, with a beauty in her undies tied on her bed--arms overhead (wrists together) and legs spread very wide. The first scene is from behind (an interesting view) and the 2nd is of a painting (with a converntional front view). No gag, but still quite tasty.
A recent issue of Vampirella (I believe it was #20) had Vampi thoroughly strapped down on an operating table in her trademark skimpy outfit. The Connor/Palmiotti cover (with a poster version as the centerspread) was fantastic. |
| Rich McGill |
| Monday June 23 23:41:38 2003 Speaking of Wonder Woman |
| Tonights History Channel special on Superheroes had a brief shot of WW gagged on the cover of an old comic book.Itrepeats in about 2hrs.. |
| Md |
|
|