|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Wednesday February 25 00:32:42 2009 Re: Censoring |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: Mandrake Reason: Please don't respond to trolls. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday February 25 10:28:09 2009 'Babysitter Wanted' |
| There's a new teaser at the movie's Facebook site that gives more than just a glimpse this time of Sarah Thompson's predicament; it's in the video section to the right, as well as below the new poster on the left. Hoping somebody can snag this soon, as it looks to be a real winner for us.... |
 |
 |
| DAK |
| http://www.facebook.com/pages/Babysitter-Wanted/39689182412 |
| Wednesday February 25 11:48:01 2009 Re: The FUNNY GAMES Fallout |
| > Sure, GAMES (in either incarnation) had some nice scenes > of interest to us, but overall the pretentious mess was > an insult to the fans of its genre. Naomi has no regrets about the movie |
 |
| http://www.vancouversun.com/entertainment/Watts+embraces+depravity+name/1327908/story.html |
| Wednesday February 25 11:55:53 2009 Re: GH |
| > Whats supposed to happen? Damsel bound and gagged with bomb ticking. Check the Video Page for promo |
| Wednesday February 25 12:13:55 2009 Re: GH |
| > bit. then people here will complain it was a loosy and > there was no gag. she's past her prime so no big deal really. There's a gag and she's only 33 |
 |
| Wednesday February 25 12:37:59 2009 Re: GH |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > > > there was no gag. she's past her prime so no big > deal really. > There's a gag and she's only 33 Nice to see Brown finally get a gag. I would have preferred Rebecca Budig in the first half of the promo, but no complaints with the recent dry spell in the soaps. |
| Wednesday February 25 14:02:59 2009 Re: GH |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > (> Nice to see Brown finally get a gag. I think the database is wrong on Brown's gag scene on VR Troopers. I saw the episode and never saw her gagged. Anyone see her gagged in that episode? |
| Wednesday February 25 15:12:00 2009 Get Smart |
| Was very disappointed with the brief scene,shown for Anne Hathaway.Not a true damsel in distress scenario.Althouh,her hands tied in front look good,and secured to the roof of the car,in which Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson is abducting her.Shame about no gag.Another letdown,in my opinion.I've just bought the TV series on dvd,maybe there'll be better luck watching that! |
| David |
| Wednesday February 25 15:13:19 2009 GH |
| Looks like any action Wednesday will be late. Spoiler says Sarah gets grabbed at gunpoint, so likely in the final minutes. She's walking around with Sony right now, but looking nice in her all-black outfit. And the black OTM will go perfectly. |
| Wednesday February 25 15:43:27 2009 Re: GH |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Looks like any action Wednesday will be late. Spoiler > says Sarah gets grabbed at gunpoint, so likely in the > final minutes. She's walking around with Sony right now, > but looking nice in her all-black outfit. And the black > OTM will go perfectly. Kelly Monaco just left a maid likely B&G in a bedroom stripped. But they didn't show her yet, just Kelly closing the door. She wasn't that good looking anyway, but it would have been nice to see it. |
| Wednesday February 25 15:46:06 2009 Pantyhose |
| Anyone think of other pantyhose stocking scenes that feature bound feet |
 |
| Greg |
| Wednesday February 25 15:56:40 2009 Re: GH |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > but looking nice in her all-black outfit. Wearing tight capri exercise pants as she just came back from a run. |
| Wednesday February 25 16:00:53 2009 Re: GH |
| > Wearing tight capri exercise pants as she just came back > from a run. Only held by gunpoint today. No B&G today |
| Wednesday February 25 16:03:36 2009 Re: GH |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > > Wearing tight capri exercise pants as she just came > back > > from a run. > Only held by gunpoint today. No B&G today They don't show previews anymore, but she'll likely be B&G Thursday unless they take the day off to set it up on Friday. Nothing shown with the maid who was stripped by Kelly Monaco, now walking around as a maid. |
| Wednesday February 25 17:35:52 2009 late alert : NCIS "Mind Games" |
| NCIS: "Mind Games" (Jessica Steen bound and gagged) is on right now on USA from 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM (eastern time). |
| Tapemaster |
| Wednesday February 25 17:56:49 2009 Re: Censoring |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Interesting; I don't believe this or Raffish's site is > voluntarily tagged as porn and even then I believe your > local library is in violation of the law if they receive > public taxpayer funds (unless it's Alaska, lol): This is > the equivalent of banning books *they* believe is 'in > poor taste'. That would be nice, but the reality is the opposite: under the terms of the "Children's Internet Protection Act" (which was snuck in as part of an omnibus spending bill in 2000 and upheld by the Supreme Court in 2003), libraries wishing to receive certain types of federal funding *must* filter Internet access for both minors and adults. |
| Raffish |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_Internet_Protection_Act |
| Wednesday February 25 18:13:21 2009 Re: Censoring |
| Raffish wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > > Interesting; I don't believe this or Raffish's site Folks--Keep in mind that public libraries are mostly staffed by nice old ladies. Do you really want to make keeping an eye on that dude whose staring, mouth agape, at a photo of a woman tied up, making sure his hand doesn't head into his pants, part of their job? Is staring at a site like this appropriate for a place that should be welcoming to kids? Free speech blah blah blah... Lets make public libraries family friendly areas, and get our dose of fantasy material in private. |
| ss |
| Wednesday February 25 19:00:59 2009 STARGÅTE UNIVERSE Babes! |
| The next series in the STARGÅTE franchise has started principal photography and is tentatively scheduled to premiere in October '09 on the SciFi Channel (in the US). For some reason the studio has been keeping a lid on who they's cast in female roles, but that just changed. The STARGÅTE UNIVERSE Babes will be... {drumroll}... ------- ALAINA HUFFMAN -- INFO from GateWorld: Vancouver native Alaina Huffman (also credited as Alaina Kalanj) will play Tamara Johansen on Stargate Universe, The Hollywood Reporter confirms. At age 28, the actress is perhaps most recognizable to genre fans as Black Canary / Dinah Lance on Smallville. She also played Maureen Bowers on the SCI FI Channel’s Painkiller Jane. Her list of guest appearances also includes NCIS, CSI: Miami, and CSI: NY. She is married with two children. ------- ELYSE LEVESQUE -- The 23-year-old actress has appeared in such series as Smallville, 2030 CE, Masters of Horror and Men In Trees. Her film career includes the recent TV movie Journey To the Center of the Earth. ------- MING NA -- The 45-year-old actress is best known for her stint on the venerable NBC hospital drama ER, where she played Dr. Jing-Mei Chen in some 118 episodes. She was born on an island near Hong Kong and raised in New York and Pittsburgh, according to the Internet Movie Database. She graduated with a theater degree from Carnegie Mellon University, and won a role on the soap As the World Turns. Her long list of credits also includes The Joy Luck Club, voiceover work in Spawn, Mulan II and The Batman, and television series from Private Practice to Two and a Half Men. (Ming's character *may* be recurring, rather than regular.) ------- Why is this on topic? Granted, STARGÅTE DiD-scenes are often pretty marginal, but they *have* come through with a few good ones (IMHO). :-) http://www.gateworld.net is a good to go for STARGÅTE UNIVERSE news. |
 |
 |
 |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Wednesday February 25 19:02:41 2009 Re: Censoring |
| ss wrote: > Folks--Keep in mind that public libraries are mostly > staffed by nice old ladies. Do you really want to make > keeping an eye on that dude whose staring, mouth agape, > at a photo of a woman tied up, making sure his hand > doesn't head into his pants, part of their job? I couldn't agree more -- but Congress clearly do want that, and the nice old ladies who challenged them in court lost. > Is > staring at a site like this appropriate for a place that > should be welcoming to kids? Free speech blah blah > blah... Lets make public libraries family friendly > areas, and get our dose of fantasy material in private. I haven't seen anyone suggesting otherwise since the original poster, but if we're headed into "Free speech blah blah blah" territory, I can't agree that new federal laws and mandatory filtering software are a legitimate way to achieve this goal. For one thing, even the best-maintained filters make "mistakes," and there has been any number of documented instances of library patrons being blocked from entirely non-prurient content. And then, of course, there are gray-area sites like mine. The law states that adult patrons should be blocked from viewing them if the site is "obscene," a term which the courts have long recognized is subjective based on community standards, but which is being used here as a federal barometer of which libraries get funded and which don't. Faced with a law that can't be objectively interpreted, libraries wishing to protect their E-Rate funding have a built-in incentive to "over-block." One hardly needs to support gawking at bondage scenes in public to recognize that there's something chilling about this. |
| Raffish |
| Wednesday February 25 19:47:49 2009 Re: Censoring |
| Raffish wrote: > ss wrote: > One hardly needs to support gawking at bondage scenes in public to recognize that there's something chilling about this. This falls in the category of "Flying Pig Management" --- coming up with a "solution" to a "problem" that sounds wonderful (and panders to some constituency) but, at the very least, opens a HUGE can of worms. Librarians (especially the sexy ones) have enough to do without being the National Thought Police. Can't write a law that makes sense? No problem. Let the librarians sort it out. |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Wednesday February 25 19:52:10 2009 Re: The FUNNY GAMES Fallout |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > > Sure, GAMES (in either incarnation) had some nice > scenes of interest to us, but overall the pretentious mess > was an insult to the fans of its genre. > Naomi has no regrets about the movie... ...And I have no regrets seeing Naomi Watts in this movie, or any other movies she's been in. Except for "King Kong", despite her brief scene I could've done without the rest of the film. I'm *almost* shocked at all the negative publicity directed at this otherwise mediocre film (especially here); I've seen far, far worse that have made more money. The only reasons I can see are two: Lack of a conventional, predictable plot and the fact the "good guys" didn't win in the end. Since the beginning of the industry it's been a given fact that no matter how bad things get for the 'innocents' there must be justice in the end, or at least, the "good guys" don't die. Many a good script has been tragically altered because of this standard in mainstream movie making. Take "The Abyss" for one: Originally the aliens destroyed the Earth in the end -- but we can't have a bad ending for people shelling out big bucks at the box office, can we? But, getting back to my point: This site is about the scenes, not the torture, so why keep complaining? Rarely a good bondage scene with a good actress is shot nowadays so take it where you can get it, especially since it's FICTION. “I think my taste will always remain the same,” she declares, which brings her back to the incendiary subject of Funny Games. “I’m not going to suddenly start doing kiddie-friendly films. My taste is my taste.” Thank you Naomi. More than I could say to or about a few formerly good filmmakers who shall remain nameless. |
| Captureher |
| Wednesday February 25 20:27:46 2009 Re: Drivers for Dialta CF2002 need |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: The Greyman Reason: Ok, thanks. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday February 25 20:30:36 2009 Re: Censoring |
Let's close this out. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday February 25 21:50:57 2009 Kidnapping |
| Kidnapping at http://www.Take180.com/ijustine The viewer can help determine what happens next! |
| TSR |
| Wednesday February 25 22:22:09 2009 Re: Pantyhose |
| Greg wrote: > Anyone think of other pantyhose stocking scenes that > feature bound feet Suggest you go request this from majorjohns.com or Raffi The "bunnyhop" is a pantyhose one you're looking for ======================= Record number: 11244 Title: Crime & Punishment aka Crime and Punishment Medium: TV Series Actress: Unknown Description: Episode: Unknown Korean TV series where a woman is kidnapped off a bus by a stalker. Chloroed, cuffed hands behind, gagged with green tape and has her ankles tied together with a tie all on screen. She awakes to find herself this way and does some major squirming around to escape. Struggling to her feet and bunnyhopping over to try and open a locked door to no avail. Ungagged and regagged a few times. She eventually spies a nail clipper on the floor, complains about the cuff marks on her wrists, suckering the stalker to remove the cuffs and tie her hands behind her back with another tie. Again onscreen. As soon as the stalker leaves, she immediately squirms over to the nail clipper and works at cutting herself free. Which she eventually does. The stalker's suspicious wife then discovers her. =============== |
| Jay L |
|
|