|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Tuesday February 24 02:28:17 2009 Hello I am Trust YOU |
| Wow thanks! ;) |
| Celoe |
| vactonnp73@gmail.com |
| http://www.licencec.com/user/view.php?id=1346&course=1 |
| Tuesday February 24 07:22:38 2009 Kill Switch |
| I watched this latest Steven Seagal offering.There's only a couple of shots,about a female victim,with her hands taped overhead,on a bed.That was very disappointing.Thanks for the info on Babysitter Wanted,people! |
| David |
| Tuesday February 24 09:22:42 2009 Re: Gerber Comercial |
| civil wrote: > ..........They way she moved them resembled the > possibility they were tied, but her hands > unfortunately were not shown. > For completist only. On Video Page. Remember, hands were not shown and was only implied they were tied. No gag |
| civil |
| Tuesday February 24 09:39:38 2009 24 |
| "24!!!" (yelled at screen, shaking my fist, Stephen Colbert style). As this show jumps the shark (hell, the entire ocean--what is up with this show, did they think they were going to be cancelled about seven episodes into this season?), it just lurches from one missed opportunity to another. So Motobo's girlfriend goes on a dangerous mission for the government? No need for her to get tied up! So Chloe is racing against a mole at the FBI? Ditto! And last night the president's very hot adult daughter wanted to leave the White House despite the very dangerous situation in Washington, but she didn't (even though her mother pled with her not to go, classic set up for a scene dialogue). Next week, when the White House is attacked by terrorists (so what else is new?), probably something will fall and hit her on the head, and everyone will be all worried, but she won't get tied up (and let's not forget the FBI agent working with Jack, now engaged in the very suspenseful activity of standing around at the hospital). |
| ss |
| Tuesday February 24 12:00:39 2009 'Kidnap' |
| Looks interesting |
 |
| Tuesday February 24 12:17:56 2009 Test, just a test |
| Hello. And Bye. |
| AttassulaMeld |
| faggsarrafm44@gmail.com |
| Tuesday February 24 12:23:54 2009 Re: 24 |
| ss wrote: > "24!!!" (it just lurches from one > missed opportunity to another. I thought the black female would at least be tied up last night during the car ride. Of course, she wasn't, and then causes the accident that leads to the terror head's capture. Bad move on his part. The hot blonde dealing with the mole was whacked last night, so she's gone, and with the action shifting to the White House, Chloe and Garafolo look like they won't see any action either. |
| Tuesday February 24 13:51:34 2009 Re: 'Kidnap' |
| Yeah, right! |
| Zorak |
| Tuesday February 24 15:03:47 2009 Censoring |
| I know some had a laugh a month or so back when someone posted a message asking for help because his library was censoring this site as "porn." Well, I can now confirm firsthand that if a public library puts you on restricted access, you can lose the ability to get to this page. A couple of weeks ago a local librarian passed behind me while I was viewing something on Raffish's page and decided it was pornographic. The next time I went in, I got a message that I had restricted access. I couldn't get to this page or Raffish's or several other sites that generally at least have no nudity. This went on for a week while maybe they checked to see if I was a sex offender or whatever. Finally I regained the ability to generally go to any page. But if that particular librarian is on computer duty and sees me come in, I still end up with filtered (censored) ability only. And then libraries complain about the "bookburners..." |
| Cinch |
| Tuesday February 24 16:53:24 2009 Re: Censoring |
| I've found that the library in my bible-belt town has also blocked this site. They've also banned these two other sites I frequent...I get the "poor taste" message on my screen as well. Not that I care..I just use the lib computers to print out stuff ;) |
| Gagged Damsel Lover |
| Tuesday February 24 18:11:49 2009 A snap shot from Kidnap |
| The website has nothing (http://www.kidnapthefilm.com) but there are little things here and there. Actress is beautiful. |
| cc |
| http://www.theasiannews.co.uk/entertainment/film_and_tv/bollywood/s/1068279_sexy_minissha_lamba_on_kidnap |
| Tuesday February 24 18:18:53 2009 GH |
| Anything today on General Hospital? My satellite network does not get the local channels but DOES get SoapNet. |
| Tuesday February 24 18:28:32 2009 Re: GH |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Anything today on General Hospital? My satellite network > does not get the local channels but DOES get SoapNet. Nope, today was a storyline around the girl with the bad heart in the past. Alternate universe day on GH Try tomorrow. |
| civil |
| Tuesday February 24 18:31:30 2009 Re: 'Kidnap' |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Looks interesting > What kills me is the outcry over the re-release of the "Gor" novels (is that still happening btw?) and Detective Mags in the past but not these video covers; especially the "Babysitter Wanted" one. Interesting, outside of "Atame" I can't remember any other protests over a film featuring the 'classic' damsel in distress. |
| Captureher |
| Tuesday February 24 18:33:16 2009 Re: A snap shot from Kidnap |
| > The website has nothing (http://www.kidnapthefilm.com) but there > are little things here and there. Actress is beautiful. Not bad with both her and Ashley Scott (12 Rounds) playing duct-tape gagged damsels in distress in new movies |
 |
| Tuesday February 24 18:39:11 2009 Re: Censoring |
| Cinch wrote: > I know some had a laugh a month or so back when someone > posted a message asking for help because his library was > censoring this site as "porn." ... Finally I regained the ability to > generally go to any page. But if that particular > librarian is on computer duty and sees me come in, I > still end up with filtered (censored) ability only. ... Interesting; I don't believe this or Raffish's site is voluntarily tagged as porn and even then I believe your local library is in violation of the law if they receive public taxpayer funds (unless it's Alaska, lol): This is the equivalent of banning books *they* believe is 'in poor taste'. ...and I agree you shouldn't be visiting these type of sites at a library anyway. That's all I'm saying on the matter. |
| Tuesday February 24 19:59:29 2009 Re: Censoring |
> Yes, nothing screams wealth like buying a $300 computer > and dropping ten bucks a month for internet access... Get the money and buy a russian wife |
| Mandrake |
| Tuesday February 24 22:09:25 2009 GH |
| Whats supposed to happen? |
| A guy |
| Tuesday February 24 22:14:50 2009 Re: GH |
| A guy wrote: > Whats supposed to happen? sarah brown is going to be loosely tied up for a little bit. then people here will complain it was a loosy and there was no gag. she's past her prime so no big deal really. |
| noinversty |
| Tuesday February 24 22:52:19 2009 Kat Dennings in Big Momma's House 2 |
| Wow, I didn't know this, and i'm probably 3 years too late, but there's actually a scene featuring Kat Dennings (Norah from Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist) in this crap-fest of a movie. I caught it playing on FX (the network that has the bondage right?) and in the final 30 mins, she's tied up in a van with (putz alert) Martin Lawrence in drag. Kinda awesome. :) |
| Mike |
| Tuesday February 24 23:15:59 2009 Re: Legion of the Dead Alert |
| My alert for Legion of the Dead appears to be off by an hour. It started at 11, so the scene is 20 minutes off for those on the East Coast. |
| Pat Powers |
| Tuesday February 24 23:18:19 2009 Re: A snap shot from Kidnap |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > > The website has nothing (http://www.kidnapthefilm.com) but > there > > are little things here and there. Actress is > beautiful. This scene is somewhere on Youtube, I know I've seen it... |
| Tuesday February 24 23:39:11 2009 Re: Legion of the Dead Alert |
| Pat Powers wrote: > My alert for Legion of the Dead appears to be off by an > hour. It started at 11, so the scene is 20 minutes off > for those on the East Coast. 2001 or 2005 version |
| civil |
| Tuesday February 24 23:45:07 2009 Re: Legion of the Dead Alert |
| civil wrote: >> 2001 or 2005 version? I just checked....the version on Sci-Fi is the 2005 version. The one with the scene is in the 2002 version. So no-go tonite. Might as well watch Cabin by the Lake. |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Tuesday February 24 23:55:29 2009 Re: Oscar winners B&G |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > let's not forget the great Marisa Tomei in The Watcher. > One of my favorites I actually didn't love that scene. Her wrists almost looked like they were spread apart or something. Very odd. |
| psychlops |
|
|