|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Monday February 02 00:21:52 2009 Re: 13 --Fear is Real strikes again |
| The Moderator wrote: > Pat Powers wrote: > > I tend to look askance at posts from > > people who can't be bothered to back up their posts > with even a fake Internet name. **** Everyone has the right to post anonymously if they choose. I don't want other contributors harassing them **** It's a good suggestion though Brian. New guys may be missing the action going on off this board, like with say Wayne. Us sending him "Over the shoulders" clips and he alerting us to B&G'd. If he didn't make himself known, we'd have scrolled past his posts That goon Pat Powers should have added some sugar to the suggestion. ;) |
| Jay L |
| Monday February 02 01:02:13 2009 Taken |
| A couple of handgags, but nothing of interested. A missed opportunity. |
| Monday February 02 01:11:37 2009 Re: Final Verdict -- possible alert |
| Tapemaster wrote: > There was no bondage from what I saw in "Final > Verdict", although I missed the first 20 minutes. > I'll check that when it is replayed later. Lifetime movies have been in a major slump lately. |
| Monday February 02 03:14:21 2009 Re: 13 --Fear is Real strikes again |
| Jay L wrote: > The Moderator wrote: > **** Everyone has the right to post anonymously if they > choose. > It's a good suggestion though Brian. Well, fair enough. I was overly critical of the initial post. It's ok to mention that you don't consider or respond to anonymous messages, but I took exception to some of the wording like "bothered to back up their posts". |
| The Moderator |
| Monday February 02 03:53:49 2009 Re: Raffish DiDClips updated |
| Raffish wrote: > > http://www.bondageparade.com/ Great update Master Raffisth, i especially enjoy the Beyond Fear clip |
| Mandrake |
| Monday February 02 05:33:28 2009 Re: 13 --Fear is Real strikes again |
| Pat Powers wrote: > I was just riffing on Spiro Agnew's old claim to > represent "the silent majority" back in the > Nixon era. Obvously, if people aren't expressing their > opinion, you can't really claim to be representing their > opinion, because you don't know what their opinion is -- <<< That isn't true by any means. I don't need to question people to know a whole range of issues about their likes and dislikes. The public hasn't expressed to me their love of sex, but I will go out on a limb and predict that the majority of this country likes it. There are many ways a group can "express" something without coming out and directly saying it. Actions often speak louder than words, anyway. Getting back to the other point, I can't see what difference it makes whether someone posts nothing in the Name box or puts "Byron U. Blunderbrush" in there...practically EVERYONE on this forum posts anonymously. You don't reveal who you are by putting some gibberish in the Name box. If Jay wants to contact people by name, that is their choice to let themselves be contacted. If they read this forum, as is likely, they'll know if he wants to pass a message to them, anyway. |
| Byron U. Blunderbrush |
| Monday February 02 10:04:54 2009 Re: 13 --Fear is Real strikes again |
| The Moderator wrote: > Jay L wrote: > > It's a good suggestion though Brian. **** I took exception to some of the wording like "bothered to back up their posts". ***** Ahhh, I see. This a better response then: Unsigned wrote: ***** Has Brian's page turned into a site that only cares about gags? ***** No. Editors currently on ID'ing a dubbed Spanish series ep with an ungagged bride tied to a chair. You are more than welcome to the clip. Email me if interested? |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Monday February 02 10:36:59 2009 Re: 13 --Fear is Real strikes again |
| Gandhi wrote: >>>> I think there's a third group of people who wish everyone would get along and post pictures and vidclips without any argument. They're the majority.<<<<< Based on what I've seen, I seriously doubt that. Besides, that would make for one boring-ass board. Of course, you should be able to have lively debate on a subject without it turning into a heated argument. |
| The Greyman |
| Monday February 02 10:45:14 2009 "Well, fair enough. I was overly critical..." |
| >>>>The Moderator wrote: ... of the initial post. It's ok to mention that you don't consider or respond to anonymous messages,<<<<< Wow! Jay L, Pat, I am seriously impressed. In all my years here that's about as close to the Mod admitting he might have been wr... uh, wrrr... umm, slightly less than definitively correct that I've ever seen. |
| The Greyman |
| Monday February 02 12:44:08 2009 Re: 13 --Fear is Real strikes again |
| > Of course, you > should be able to have lively debate on a subject without > it turning into a heated argument. I think that the issue here is that there're a bunch of people here that are able to find videos of damsel in distress all around the world and offer or point out their locations to the community. Given the tone of most message they can be convinced that ONLY the clips with Gags are worth the effort to be offered to the community, while there're some people, a small minority maybe, that are interested also in clips without gag especially if they are long, dramatic (for example arresting clips), if the bondage is good, if the damsel is particulary pretty.. i don't know ... we cand find many reasons to appreciate a scene, not only the presence of a gag. That said the taste of everyone has to be respected and i don't have anything against the "gag snobs". I truly love gags myself. |
| George Annis |
| annis6395@gmail.com |
| Monday February 02 13:07:33 2009 Re: 13 --Fear is Real strikes again |
| George Annis wrote: > I think that the issue here is that there're a bunch of > people here that are able to find videos of damsel in > distress all around the world and offer or point out > their locations to the community. That´s the point. Im not speak english very well and i cannot contribute to the discussion. I visit this page especially in order to looking for new scenes of movies or tv series, thats the reason because its important to have a an as wide as possible description to the scene. For example if the scene not contain gags im not intesrested at all. But as you say all may due respect for any orientation. Gag snob forever |
| Mandrake |
| Monday February 02 13:21:13 2009 Last house On the Left Remake |
| I saw the trailer for this movie i wonder if the two girls in it get tied up like in the original |
| Dennis |
| bigden1962@yahoo.com |
| Monday February 02 17:36:19 2009 "Heroes", tonight, on NBC |
| Nobody's mentioned it, so I thought I would, in the interests of due diligence. Based on various promos, tonight's NEW episode of "Heroes" ("A Clear and Present Danger") will have at least *some* scenes with elaborate, prison-style bondage. A lot of it will be *heavily* putz-contaminated, but I've noticed what looks like an interrogation scene starring Ali Landry's character chained in a chair. "Heroes" fans will be watching, anyway... but I thought I'd mention it. ;-) |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Monday February 02 18:11:35 2009 Re: 13 --Fear is Real strikes again |
| The Moderator wrote: > but I took exception to > some of the wording like "bothered to back up their > posts". I could probably have worded it more carefully. |
| Pat Powers |
| Monday February 02 18:25:15 2009 Re: 13 --Fear is Real strikes again |
| Byron U. Blunderbrush wrote: > That isn't true by any means. I don't need to question > people to know a whole range of issues about their likes > and dislikes. The public hasn't expressed to me their > love of sex, but I will go out on a limb and predict that > the majority of this country likes it. Sorry, but you don't "know" whether or not people like sex. You're just making a guess -- very likely an accurate guess, but still just a guess. If someone did a survey they would have a basis for saying they know that people like sex. See: Kinsey Report. His survey revealed a lot of things that ran counter to what everyone "knew" about others' interests in sex. > There are many ways a group can "express" something without > coming out and directly saying it. Actions often speak > louder than words, anyway. On a message board, you're pretty much restricted to saying things. > Getting back to the other point, I can't see what > difference it makes whether someone posts nothing in the > Name box or puts "Byron U. Blunderbrush" in > there...practically EVERYONE on this forum posts > anonymously. You don't reveal who you are by putting > some gibberish in the Name box. If Jay wants to contact > people by name, that is their choice to let themselves be > contacted. If they read this forum, as is likely, > they'll know if he wants to pass a message to them, anyway. I agree with you that in terms of real world identity, there's no difference between gibberish in a message box and nothing, but in terms of conducting an online discussion, there is a huge difference. For starters, if the name box is blank, you can't tell if a response is from the same person who left the previous name box blank, or someone else who is leaving the name block blank, unless the poster makes some kind of indication in the text of his/her message. Also, as I said before, if someone posts under the same name consistently, readers are able to make an assessment of their post based on previous posts, that just isn't possible without a consistent identity. If JayL writes about a lakorn, I'll take it to the bank. If a blank name field writes about a lakorn, I will give them the benefit of the doubt, but will be prepared to revoke said benefit if it seems wise to do so. |
| Pat Powers |
| Monday February 02 19:56:05 2009 Probably off topic |
|
This post was moved to The Trading Forum. Poster: (unsigned poster) Reason: This would be more appropriate for Trade. |
| The Moderator |
| Monday February 02 21:15:56 2009 late alert -- NCIS: "See No Evil" |
| NCIS: "See No Evil" (Ely Pouget bound and gagged) is on ION right now. |
| Tapemaster |
| Monday February 02 21:51:30 2009 Re: "Heroes", tonight, on NBC |
| Van wrote: > Ali Landry's She was caught and had a her hands ziptied behind her in the first 10 or 12 minutes. Nothing until the last 10 minutes, and that would be the Con-Air scene you mentioned. |
| civil |
| Monday February 02 22:00:22 2009 Re: "Heroes", tonight, on NBC |
| civil wrote: > Van wrote: > > Ali Landry's > She was caught and had a her hands ziptied behind her in > the first 10 or 12 minutes. > Nothing until the last 10 minutes, and that would be the > Con-Air scene you mentioned. And when I say last 10 minutes, have those VCRs and DVDs reved up to speed since the action starts immediately around the 50' mark. |
| civil |
| Monday February 02 22:02:44 2009 Re: "Heroes", tonight, on NBC |
| civil wrote: > Van wrote: > > Ali Landry's > She was caught and had a her hands ziptied behind her in > the first 10 or 12 minutes. Previews show what appears to be the blond in an interrogation scene. |
| Pat Powers |
| Monday February 02 22:10:07 2009 Re: "Heroes", tonight, on NBC |
| Pat Powers wrote: > civil wrote: > > Van wrote: I forgot that was shown in the preview, but I didn't see it Ali in that ordeal. I was occasionally walking in and out of the room, so it may have happened without my noticing. |
| civil |
| Monday February 02 22:15:29 2009 Re: "Heroes", tonight, on NBC |
| civil wrote: > Pat Powers wrote: > > And I can't check my DVD since I watched the east feed and was going to record the west feed at midnight est tonight. Replay this Saturday at 8pm also. |
| civil |
|
|