|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Saturday January 20 00:05:59 2007 Re: Alexis Laree TNA |
| doug wrote:
> Wow! you have a pic of > Alexis Laree aka Mikie James (TNA Wrestling) bound and > gagged at your site! I've been looking to see that for > years now. Only heard about it. Thought it was an urban > legend. Love the shot! Thanks. No, it exists allright. I have the entire scene on video (albiet a bit grainy...probably 2-3 generations down...got it in trade). Pretty nice scene, but no real good shots of Mickie (oops! I mean, Alexis!) in close-up. I'd make a YouTube video for all to see if I knew how! |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Saturday January 20 00:19:30 2007 Re: brittany daniel |
| Hadji wrote:
> It astonishes > me that the editorial staff of this series approved a > plot in which an entire cheerleading squad is bound and > gagged. I'm certainly not complaining! You want DiD, head to the YA books for girls. I read many such scenes growing up. |
 |
| Sylvie |
| Saturday January 20 01:58:02 2007 Gong Li - Hannibal RIsing |
| I'm pretty sure this is the scene where Gong Li gets bound. In the book there is also another scene where she is bound and gagged and carried over the shoulder. |
 |
| Saturday January 20 02:13:20 2007 Fancy Handgag photo |
| Found this up on NBC site.
Fancy getting handgag in bed. Coincidentally while we're talking 'bout cheerleaders she's apparently dreaming about being a cheerleader right before the handgag. Think the two will cross paths in the coming week? This will be her third tie up scene in the past few months. Is this chick liking the ropes lately or what? Give me an F Give me an A Give me an N Give me a C Give me a Y What's that spell? Fancy Fancy Yeah Fancy! |
 |
 |
| Big MT |
| http://bigmtdid.blogspot.com |
| Saturday January 20 02:16:36 2007 Re: Fancy Handgag photo |
| Big MT wrote:
> What's that spell? > Fancy Fancy Yeah Fancy! Can't wait for the latest chapter in officer Fancy's perils. Amazing run to be bound and gagged three times in a 3-month period. |
| Saturday January 20 02:20:44 2007 Photo on boundunderduress |
| Hello,
I just found this nice picture on a well-known web site. Title: «Hollywood files»? It's not in the database… |
 |
| Theo |
| Saturday January 20 02:34:24 2007 Re: Photo on boundunderduress |
| Theo wrote:
> Hello, > > I just found this nice picture on a well-known web site. > Title: «Hollywood files»? It's not in the > database… Yes, it is. Correct name of the movie is "Hollywood Flies." |
| Saturday January 20 05:46:45 2007 Re: brittany daniel |
| Kid Monster wrote:
> (unsigned poster) wrote: > I believe it's from the dustjacket of a Sweet Valley > High novel, not from the actual series. > > The title of the book is "R" FOR REVENGE (a > SWEET VALLEY HIGH "Super Thriller"). DAMN IT! That's EXACTLY what I wrote in my previous post! And who gets the props? Me? No! It's Kid Monster! And I get no credit. At all. I don't blame you for this, Kid Monster, because you may have missed / skipped my post. I just can't stand it when I spend five minutes of my life writing huge slabs of text for you guys to read, and no one pays attention to them... No offence. Besides, my post didn't include the picture of the gagged cheerleaders. Maybe that's why everyone ignored my post... |
| Abel |
| Saturday January 20 06:24:29 2007 Re: Sweet Valley Book Cover |
| David Knight wrote:
> Hadji wrote: > > What an unpredcedented achievement, kidnapping an > ENTIRE > > cheerleading squad, and having them all bound and > gagged > > in your basement! So many of us have fantasized > about > > this, but this deranged woman realized this fantasy! > I > > wonder whether the author of this book is secretly > one of us? > What surprised me the most I think about Sweet Valley's > book is not that it was written but that they took some > of the tv series stars and actually illustrated the cover > with a photo of them in bondage as they did. Most of > these kind of books just use a generic non-related to the > particular title kind of shot. I would guess, knowing > how many photos are generally taken to get a cover shot, > that there are at the very least dozens, possibly > hundreds of photos from that posing floating around out > there amongst a very few folk. I also wonder, from the > look of the photo, whether there might have actually have > been an episode shot, or at very least partially shot > that this photo was taken from that was, for whatever > reason,never aired. It seems like an awful lot to go > thru, staging wise and cost wise (those tv stars didn't > pose bound and gagged for free) for the cover of a kids book. I can aver that the book cover was not a still taken from an episode; the defunct series lasted only two seasons, and I would definitely know which episodes featured bound and gagged actresses. Furthermore, I don't think that the series was cancelled in mid-season; the second season completed its run, and the series was not renewed. I can also aver that at least two of the girls bound and gagged on the cover were actresses who starred in the series; the beautiful black girl seated to the right of Brittany Daniel became a series regular in the second season. She wasn't a cheerleader, however, but rather a famous teen model who had transferred to Sweet Valley High. This makes me almost positive that this picture was taken solely for the purpose of being a book cover. It is interesting to speculate how many photographs were taken of the actresses bound and gagged in cheerleading outfits. Considering how fussy and exacting photographers and book publishers are, the actresses must've had to pose for hours bound and gagged in cheerleading outfits. I'm sure they were generously compensated for their time, but I'm also sure that they were glad for the work, since none of them is a recognizable A-list actress. It is also interesting to speculate why actresses from the series, rather than professional models or struggling actresses desperate for work, were chosen to pose bound and gagged for the cover. Perhaps it was to encourage sales of the book, since watchers of the series would immediately recognize two of the girls bound and gagged on the cover as series regulars. Perhaps the image of these two beautiful series regulars bound and gagged might evoke interest, and increase the chances of the book being purchased. Perhaps a series watcher looking at the cover might think that there was a "tie-in" with the series(pun intended)! Hahahahahaha! The actresses appearing in the series may have had a cluase in their contracts that required them to participate in series promotions, including posing for book covers. They may have posed for many other covers in which they weren't bound and gagged. Finally, selecting actresses already appearing in the series may have saved the publisher time and money, as this obviated the need to pore through countless headshots to find a suitable model for the role. |
| Hadji |
| Saturday January 20 12:05:28 2007 Re: Youtube |
| Viking wrote:
> My apologies to the moderator if this isn't correct. (I'm > not sure about the policy for posting youtube) Youtube postings must follow the same rules as everything else, they must concern mainstream scenes. Youtube itself is not a mainstream medium. So amateur footage posted there is not topical. I don't have enough information from what you posted, but I suspect it's not. I'll give a bit of time to confirm or deny that, if I don't see something that indicates that it's topical I'll remove it next time I check in. |
| The Moderator |
| Saturday January 20 12:24:17 2007 Re: brittany daniel |
|
> DAMN IT! That's EXACTLY what I wrote in my previous post! > And who gets the props? Me? No! It's Kid Monster! And I > get no credit. At all. > > I don't blame you for this, Kid Monster, because you may > have missed / skipped my post. I just can't stand it when > I spend five minutes of my life writing huge slabs of > text for you guys to read, and no one pays attention to > them... Abel, your post was not on the page when I posted, so I can only assume that we both posted our information at more-or-less the same time. Great minds think alike, eh? |
| Kid Monster |
| Saturday January 20 12:43:50 2007 Re: Urinetown on YouTube |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> 'Snuff That Girl' - University of Southern Cal co-ed > B&G Thanks for the USC Urinetown clip. Just in case anyone lives close to Houston TX, Urinetown is playing at the Main Street Theater until Jan. 27. Hope Cladwell is played by a very attractive Allison Luff. http://www.theatreport.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=857 |
| J Par |
| Saturday January 20 13:24:00 2007 An American Crime |
| Just saw this docudrama about the Sylvia Likens tragedy at Sundance. Not much there for us, though that's possibly for the best. Brief scene with Ellen Page (as Likens) being tied to a basement beam with her hands at her sides, and also a brief handgag at one point. Good film, but obviously more than a little disturbing.
|
| Raffish |
| Saturday January 20 13:55:53 2007 Re: An American Crime |
| Raffish wrote:
> Just saw this docudrama about the Sylvia Likens tragedy > at Sundance. Not much there for us, though that's > possibly for the best. Yeah, what I'd REALLY like to see, and probably never will because it's in copyright hell and likely to remain there indefinitely, is a movie based on "Let's Go Play At The Addams'" which was also based on the Liken murder. Man, that was one creepy, disturbing, thoroughly sick little footnote in American history. But at least the "Addams" book was practically all bondage, practically all of it nude, too. |
| Pat Powers |
| Saturday January 20 14:29:47 2007 Do tell us, please, that we quest not in vain... |
| Sorry to go Shakespearean on everyone, but listening to an audiobook can do that to you.
We-my video-iPod-wielding acquaintance and I-followed up on a recent suggestion here upon finding that Linda Fairstein's "Entombed" was available from netLibrary as a digital download. I won't bore you-or risk the wrath of Alberto Gonzales and his minions-by relating the details of how the encrypted WMA-to-iPod compatible file conversion was accomplished, but we've got three weeks to listen to it (or six if we renew at the end of the checkout period), and if we chuck it afterwards, it's "no harm, no foul" at least as far as I'm concerned. But enough of that; I'm here to ask about the book itself. We're about five hours into it, and so far, the only first-person bondage account has been a rape victim's rather dry testimony before a grand jury. There's been much more second-person talk-particularly about the fate that befell a young woman whose skeleton was found bricked up inside the wall of an old building (the event from which the book gets its title), and who may not only have been alive, but bound and gagged when put there. Please tell us that there's going to be more than this! Please let us know that the artistry of voice actress Barbara Rosenblat won't be wasted, and that she'll give us Fairstein's protagonist as a latter-day Anne Beddingfeld, only better! Don't give away the ending, of course, but give us a reason to look forward to the remaining six hours. By the way, does Fairstein tie her heroine up in any of her other books? |
| Fettershackle |
| Saturday January 20 14:54:31 2007 Re: Do tell us, please, that we quest not in vain... |
| Fettershackle wrote:
> Please tell us that there's going to be more than this! If you go to the Amazon link below and search on "gag," you'll arrive at the main scene, which starts on page 257 of the hardcover edition. (And "box" will get you to that first page if the search results for "gag" don't let you navigate that far back.) |
| Raffish |
| http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0743482271 |
| Saturday January 20 15:35:51 2007 Re: Do tell us, please, that we quest not in vain... |
| Raffish wrote:
> If you go to the Amazon link below and search on > "gag," you'll arrive at the main scene, which > starts on page 257 of the hardcover edition. 'Nuff said, 'nuff said. Thanks, Raffish! And don't bother us for the next six breathtaking hours! |
| Fettershackle |
| Saturday January 20 16:12:01 2007 Fortier |
| Here's a short clip for download from the Canadian crime series 'Fortier' which hasn't been seen on the internet because it was never broadcast - preempted by a hockey game.
(I know zilch about sports, but if memory serves correct, I think it may have been the SL Blues vs the Lakers in the Superbowl or something like that - maybe the Manchester United) Regardless - a 'time-out' for this one |
 |
| Stephanie |
| http://www.majorjohns.com |
| Saturday January 20 16:12:13 2007 Brenda Starr |
| Best panel of her recent tie up is today. |
| ss |
| Saturday January 20 16:48:49 2007 Lordi video |
| Here the address of a music video by Lordi set in a haunted house
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfOGxMsFvN0 |
| paolo |
| Saturday January 20 17:28:32 2007 Re: brittany daniel |
| Kid Monster wrote:
> Abel, your post was not on the page when I posted, so I > can only assume that we both posted our information at > more-or-less the same time. Oh, yeah. I didn't think about that. Sorry. > Great minds think alike, eh? Yeah, I guess. :D |
| Abel |
| Saturday January 20 18:33:24 2007 Re: Do tell us, please, that we quest not in vain... |
| Fettershackle wrote:
> we've > got three weeks to listen to it (or six if we renew at > the end of the checkout period), and if we chuck it > afterwards, it's "no harm, no foul" at least as > far as I'm concerned. > Not to get too far afield here, but depending on your software, it's often possible to burn those files to CD as plain ol' CD-audio files, then rip those back to your computer as mp3 files, free of any Digital Rights Management. And while I tend to be a respecter of copyright, I doubt anyone's revenue stream would be affected by your making a permanent record of a couple of scenes here and there. |
| tbb78 |
| jebdel@yahoo.com |
| http://www.jebsadventurebound.net |
| Saturday January 20 18:35:21 2007 Re: Do tell us, please, that we quest not in vain... |
| tbb78 wrote:
Heh. Still in basketball message-board posting mode. But that's me. |
| Jeb |
| Saturday January 20 20:12:36 2007 Thoughts on "High Tension" |
| Looking at a tape I'd made of "High Tension" a very dull psychotic killer movie, but it did have one element that put its DID scene way ahead of any others.
And that element was the fact that the DiD was bound ... and gagged -- with chains. And the first chance her would-be rescuer has to rescue her, she is unable to, because she can't do a thing with the chains that secure the DiD. She has to leave as the serial killer returns, leaving her friend to his "mercies." That was extremely dramatic, and very nice, a neat bit in an otherwise unimaginative movie. (Plus, I hated its dark, grimy look and nasty theme.) I've often though it wold be a pretty cool scene to find a damsel tied with rope but gagged with a ballgag secured with a trainer harness with a lock in the hasp on the back, so that the harness can't be removed without a key. So the damsel is freed but has to spend some time moving around in a harness ballgag because they can't get it off. Make for some nice comedy, or pathos, depending on how it's used. Any remember any other scenes where a rescuer is forced to leave a damsel captive because she's bound too well (chained, tied extremely thorughly, whatever)? I'm not copunting "Indiana Jones" here because the problem isn't Marian's bonds, it's Indy's fear that her release would get the camp all alert and so forth. |
| Pat Powers |
| http://www.bondagerotica.com |
| Saturday January 20 20:15:02 2007 Re: Fortier |
| Stephanie wrote:
> Here's a short clip for download from the Canadian crime > series 'Fortier' which hasn't been seen on the internet > because it was never broadcast - preempted by a hockey > game. The drama of this scene has to be severely limited by the fact that only one of the damsel's wrists is actually in the cuff -- she is clearly hanging on for dear life to the cuff with the other hand. You have to wonder what they were thinking when they let that pass. |
| Pat Powers |
| Saturday January 20 20:27:54 2007 Re: brittany daniel |
| By the way Sylvie, where did you find that great book illustration of the girl all tied up? That's really nice!!
-Andre |
| Andre |
| toon.man@verizon.net |
| http://www.damseltheater.com/andre/index.html |
| Saturday January 20 20:30:46 2007 Mine eyes have seen the terror of the coming of the Mod... |
| ...and mine ears have heard the tramp of the jackboots with which he's shod-so rather than further risk riling him up, I'll cut off the discussion of how to (ahem, ahem) "borrow" public-library audiobooks via online download by telling everyone that the ones from netLibrary don't let you pull the burn-and-rip-back stunt. You have to resort to other means that frankly are neither on-topic nor technically legal to discuss here-so we won't.
There's another distributor called Overdrive whose catalog is available in some libraries; the weird thing about them is that they not only DO let you burn-and-rip some (but not all) of their offerings, but they publicly declare that you can keep the burned/ripped books forever afterward! The downside is that you have to download special software from Overdrive instead of just using Windows Media Player as with netLibrary (both are Windows-only, unfortunately), and if you DO happen to find a title of theirs that might be of interest, you'd better hope no one else beat you to it. Overdrive only allows one checkout per library per title as opposed to netLibrary's unlimited simultaneous downloads. Anyway, to steer back onto the straight and narrow highway of topicality, is anyone here whose local public library subscribes to Overdrive finding titles that would appeal to us? |
| Fettershackle |
| Saturday January 20 21:28:35 2007 Re: Alexis Laree TNA |
| PNEFC wrote:
> steve wrote: > > > How about Miki and Ashley > > http://www.boundunderduress.com > > How boutstacy keibler handgag or trish stratus tied up if > anyone has got them? i sensed your disappointment in not seeing the stacy handgag pics sooooo |
 |
 |
 |
| Slayer |
| Saturday January 20 21:33:15 2007 MORE wrestling divas in bondage |
| oh and here's Kristal handgagged by Finlay and Ivory tapegagged also...
bring on the love and praise!!!! :) |
 |
 |
| Slayer |
| Saturday January 20 22:18:38 2007 Re: Rescuer(s) unable to free a captive |
| > Any remember any other scenes where a rescuer is forced to leave a damsel captive because she's bound too well
(chained, tied extremely thorughly, whatever)? ---- Dracula's Castle (1969), where the heroine and her husband stumble upon the chained AOH women, but can't free them (and thus themselves become captives). This probably is most frequently depicted by Hollywood with handcuffs -- the famous final DiD scene in "Speed", where Keanu Reeves bests Dennis Hopper, but can't free Sandra Bullock from the runaway train because the mad bomber had the keys. Another "I don't have the keys" moment was Devon Miles to Mary Kate McGeehan in Knight Rider's "Knight of the Juggernaut". T.J. Hooker as a psychic moment: At the end of "The Obsession" episode, how was Stacy Sheridan freed so easily from her handcuffs? The gang leader (who presumably had the keys) fell off the building to his death. Or did Sgt. Hooker have psychic insight: "I better look up the serial# of the handcuffs that Stacy was issued, then have a duplicate key made ASAP. No doubt she's been locked up in her own handcuffs (again)." |
| Kinky-napper |
| Saturday January 20 22:22:47 2007 Re: MORE wrestling divas in bondage |
| Whoa! I didn't even know that Ivory was tapegagged! I knew about Kristal being handgagged by Finlay but I actually had never seen it.
Thanks, Slayer! |
| ACC |
| accasino@hotmail.com |
| Saturday January 20 23:42:47 2007 Gagged |
| Did ana claudia talancon ever get gagged in movie o tv? I hope she got one |
| Viksh |
|
|