|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Saturday July 19 01:31:56 2008 Re: WWE possibility with Mickie James?? |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: Here is > the link: > http://www.wrestlingnewsworld.com/wnw-premium/backstage-ne > ws/new-raw-general-manager-kidnapping-angle-title-change.php How reliable is this site? Are they usually fairly accurate about their stuff or are they just full of crap? Maybe a subscriber could answer us... |
| ACC |
| accasino@hotmail.com |
| Saturday July 19 04:06:20 2008 Re: The Dark Knight |
| Sancho wrote: > and is a bummer to hear these 'heads up' ahead > of time ruining the mystery if one is happening or not . The Internet kinda ruined the surprise DID scene in movies and tv shows quite a while ago. You'd have to not see any previews[Youtube etc..], read any reviews, or visit any chat/message boards where they may be discussing the film to truly be surprised. |
| Saturday July 19 04:33:20 2008 Rotating spit |
| Damsels being tied up and ready to be burned in a rotating spit is one of my favourite DID scenes that i love to watch But the only scene i saw is the Addams family values one. Can anyone recommend to me other familiar scenes ? |
| Saturday July 19 05:38:48 2008 Anyone seen these movies? |
| Mostly, indie movies: Steel Trap http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0973790/ Dungeon Girl http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1173486/ Anything good in them? Thanks |
| SC Stevens |
| ddp456@yahoo.com |
| Saturday July 19 06:09:20 2008 Re: Anyone seen these movies? |
| SC Stevens wrote: > Mostly, indie movies: > Steel Trap > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0973790/ > Dungeon Girl > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1173486/ > Anything good in them? Thanks I have seen steel trap. One damsel gets a cleave gag, another gets a ball gag and another just gets her hands tied behind her back. All short scenes. |
| asmith |
| Saturday July 19 06:27:54 2008 Re: WWE possibility with Mickie James?? |
| ID4J wrote: > She had a scene when she was with TNA. It was under the > name Alexis Laree. She was tied and gagged with some > other guy whose name escapes me. Yes, this was the "famous" Alexis Laree scene (from back when she was in TNA & before it was aired on TV) that pops up here occassionally on Discussion. I was lucky enough to get the entire scene from a fellow trader. There are 2 scenes...the first one the evil James Mitchell has Alexis & a guy wrestler tied back to back in chairs & both cleave gagged. NO real good shots of her & no close ups. The next segment has both captives brought to the ring & tossed in while Mitchell calls out Raven (on of Alexis's cohorts). A fight ensues in the ring while Alexis & the guy are lying in the ring tied & gagged. No close ups at all. The guy manages to get free & joins the fray while Alex gets a kick to the stomach by one of the baddies as she lies there helplessly. Finally referres come out & free her. All are shown in medium shots, naturally the main focus of the action was on all the in-ring fighting & basically Alexis is just seen lying along the back of the ring. You can see she is cleave gagged, arms tied behind, and ankles crossed & tied. Personally I think the scene is so sought after mainly for its rareness & not it's quality. |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Saturday July 19 08:20:44 2008 Re: samrainbowrocker37 |
| The Moderator wrote: > This post was moved to The Video Page. > Poster: ST > Reason: Off-topic. I'm sorry, I thought since I was asking about a video, not posting one, that made it a dicsussion. the link was to her profile not a video. Could you explain this to me? ST |
| Saturday July 19 10:32:27 2008 Dungeon Girl |
| Dungeon Girl- nothing in it and I mean nothing. Extremely boring. |
| VM |
| mayhem50@stny.rr.com |
| http://www.videomayhem.com |
| Saturday July 19 10:40:39 2008 Re: samrainbowrocker37 |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > I'm sorry, I thought since I was asking about a video, > not posting one, that made it a dicsussion. You asked: "Did anyone save the video samrainbowrocker37" Presumably that wasn't idle curiosity, and that you wanted the video. That means it either belonged on Trade or on Video. |
| The Moderator |
| Saturday July 19 10:52:53 2008 Re: Dungeon Girl |
| VM wrote: > Dungeon Girl- nothing in it and I mean nothing. Extremely > boring. > http://www.videomayhem.com Y'know, I'm reviving the No-Bondage Zone (for movies that by every right SHOULD have bondage scenes, but for some inexplicable reason do not) on Bondgerotica and I'm thinking a movie entitled "Dungeon Girl" that has no scenes belongs there. |
| Pat Powers |
| Saturday July 19 11:11:41 2008 Re: WWE possibility with Mickie James?? |
| ACC wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > Here is > > the link: > > > http://www.wrestlingnewsworld.com/wnw-premium/backstage-ne > > > > ws/new-raw-general-manager-kidnapping-angle-title-change.p > hp > How reliable is this site? Are they usually fairly accurate about their stuff or are they just full of crap? Maybe a subscriber could answer us... Its actually a pretty reliable site. Im not a suscriber, but usually the free stuff is accurate. I also use pwmania.com and they are pretty accurate too. we need to get suscriber in here to tell us whats in this article though. |
| Saturday July 19 11:45:36 2008 Re: WWE possibility with Mickie James?? |
| > http://www.wrestlingnewsworld.com/wnw-premium/backstage-ne > > > > > > > > > ws/new-raw-general-manager-kidnapping-angle-title-change.p > > > hp > > How reliable is this site? Are they usually fairly > accurate about their stuff or are they just full of crap? > Maybe a subscriber could answer us... > Its actually a pretty reliable site. Im not a suscriber, > but usually the free stuff is accurate. I also use > pwmania.com and they are pretty accurate too. we need to get suscriber in here to tell us whats in this article though. i want to see this article so bad! i found a site with accounts on there. everybody should try loging in on wrestlingnewsworld.com with them. http://www.bugmenot.com/view/wrestlingnewsworld.com |
| Saturday July 19 13:46:06 2008 Re: new batman movie |
| Jorge-enlever wrote: > So, nothing for Maggie? There is a chair tie for Maggie, but it's dark with no visible bonds and no gag. |
| MC |
| Saturday July 19 14:09:25 2008 Re: new batman movie |
| MC wrote: > There is a chair tie for Maggie, but it's dark with no visible bonds and no gag. And lame. Exceedingly lame. |
| The House of Le Bastard |
| Saturday July 19 14:18:17 2008 Spolier protocol |
| I think I've mentioned spoilers before on this site (and if not here, certainly others). The Moderator, to whom I'll defer once this is posted, made his opinion pretty clear: don't want spoilers, don't read it. Fair enough. But: how about the posting community exercising a little bit of, er, restraint, on key plot points and the like. Or just using the generally accepted "SPOILER" warning when warranted. Case in point, this weekend's Big Event The Dark Knight. Now, I know all of us who frequent this board want to know whether Maggie G. gets The Treatment. Telling us whether or not she does isn't really a spoiler. It has nothing to do with a major plot point. The fact that +++SPOILER+++ she gets captured, yes. Major plot point. The fact she doesn't get full B & G action? Not so much. Besides, that's why we're here, to find that detail out. NOW, the other hostage situation, involving the clowns and hospital employees? Giving that away is a spoiler and should be marked as such. Noting some hostages are duct taped is fine, but noting how and why before seeing it kinda ruins the scene. Use common sense and courtesy. Just my opinion. As always, thanks for the site Brian. Your work, and that of the posting community, is always appreciated. |
| Rob |
| Saturday July 19 14:30:33 2008 re: Angry Looks |
| In Midnight Caller ("Evil is Live Spelled Backwards"), Wendy Kilborne's captor's gloating even included: "Oooh... hard eyes!" |
| Kinky-napper |
| Saturday July 19 15:28:40 2008 X-Files |
| Has anyone had an advanced screening of the New X-Files movie. Is there a possiblity that Gillian will get a record 7 Full Treatments scene. Hope so. |
| Saturday July 19 15:34:51 2008 Re: new batman movie |
| The House of Le Bastard wrote: > MC wrote: > > There is a chair tie for Maggie, but it's dark with > no visible bonds and no gag. > And lame. Exceedingly lame. I'll bet that after she shot "The Secretary", she's been making sure any new roles are pretty much "scene free". |
| MagickRat |
| magickrat@live.com |
| Saturday July 19 16:09:25 2008 Re: Spolier protocol |
| Thanx for putting this topic in proper context Rob . A bit of order goes a long way in benefiting the whole . The intent behind the 'scene' alert (used very loosely) was appreciated . . Just not the extracurriculars that went along with it . The movie by the way was phenomenal . |
| Sancho |
| Saturday July 19 17:16:28 2008 fantasy mission force |
| Just got this daft film on dvd,but Bridgette Lin certainly gets plenty of treatment here.Don't treat the film seriously though,but Bridgette certainly got tied up here,on more than one occasion! |
| David |
| Saturday July 19 18:45:35 2008 Re: new batman movie |
| MagickRat wrote: > The House of Le Bastard wrote: > > MC wrote: > > > There is a chair tie for Maggie, but it's dark with > > no visible bonds and no gag. > > And lame. Exceedingly lame. > > > I'll bet that after she shot "The Secretary", > she's been making sure any new roles are pretty much > "scene free". Uh... not to get snarky, but we should all be careful with amusing comments like this. There's always a certain number of people who take them *literally*. Six months from now, someone will refer to Maggie's "scene free" contract clause, someone else will post an "I knew the FemiNazi's were ruining our fun!" reply, and off we'll go down Bullsh*t Lane... AGAIN! Maggie was a guest on "The Daily Show" this week, and she was all excited about how much fun she had doing all the big-budget comic book action scenes. If anything, it's probably *MORE* likely we'll see her in more blockbuster movies from now on (with or *without* DiD-scenes). |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Saturday July 19 20:50:04 2008 Re: new batman movie |
| Van wrote: >If anything, it's probably *MORE* likely we'll see her in > more blockbuster movies from now on (with or *without* DiD-scenes). I'd respond to this, but it'd be either off-topic or revealing a spoiler. |
| The House of Le Bastard |
| Saturday July 19 22:21:14 2008 Re: new batman movie |
| MagickRat wrote: > I'll bet that after she shot "The Secretary", > she's been making sure any new roles are pretty much > "scene free". All the evidence indicates otherwise. In addition to the Dark Knight scene, however lame, there's that underwear company she took a gig modelling for that had a very nice pic of her tied to something or otherby the wrists while in her undies. If she had a problem with scenes, I really doubt that she would have taken that gig. |
| Pat Powers |
| Saturday July 19 23:20:32 2008 Re: new batman movie |
| > MagickRat wrote: > > I'll bet that after she shot "The > Secretary", > > she's been making sure any new roles are pretty much > > > "scene free". No offense to anyone, but isn't conspiracy stuff off-topic? I'm really sick of this shit. |
| SLJ |
| Saturday July 19 23:34:35 2008 Re: samrainbowrocker37 |
| The Moderator wrote: > Presumably that wasn't idle curiosity, and that > you wanted the video. That means it either belonged on Trade or on Video. OK |
| Saturday July 19 23:40:31 2008 Naomi Watts in King Kong Extended Edition |
| I just noticed this today and while its not my thing I figured that some of you might appreciate this: on the second disk of the director's cut dvd, Watts is chloroformed for the short film "The Present." Fairly lengthy as far as such things go. |
|
|