|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Sunday October 19 09:08:34 2003 Where is Kung Fu Kids 5? |
| The movie exist. There is a web reference (1987)
Not mentioned on IMDB. |
| Sunday October 19 09:11:52 2003 Where is Kung Fu Kids 5? |
| On HKMDB They mention:
Young Dragons: Kung Fu Kids I Young Dragons: Kung Fu Kids II Young Dragons: Kung Fu Kids III Young Dragons: Kung Fu Kids IV Unfortunately no Kung Fu Kids V. |
| Sunday October 19 11:41:52 2003 Re: Where is Kung Fu Kids 5? |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> > The movie exist. There is a web reference (1987) I guess I'm confused about the question. Was the scene removed from the Database? > Not mentioned on IMDB. English grammar note: things go "on" a surface, they go "in" a container. |
| Brian R |
| Sunday October 19 11:50:54 2003 Does this belong? |
| Question came in to me via email:
You may have read reviews of Margaret Cho's one-woman show "The Notorious C.H.O." that she discusses her bondage experiences. Since Margaret Cho has said for years that she's into it and even worried at Stormy Leather, I watched the film and...Nothing. I wasn't expecting reenactments, but she mentions being in a bondage sling and about to be used by a Mistress in front of everybody...while wearing a leather hood. But she indicates that she wasn't actually bound. Her mouth was zipped, but apparently not really gagged . . . I considered creating a database entry for those who might be tempted to rent it expecting lascivious talk and instead get nearly nothing. But would you consider this a waste of space, since it would only have been an anecdote about bondage, at best? My feeling is probably not, what do you guys think? It seems like this falls more into that fetish but not really bondage category we talked about before. |
| Brian R |
| Sunday October 19 12:22:33 2003 Poison Ivy : The New Seduction (1997) |
| Present entry:
Record number: 2819 Title: Poison Ivy: New Seduction (1997) Medium: Movie Actress: unknown Description: A girl gets tied to a bed in a short and minor scene. Beware: the movie director was more into guys and leather-clad teen girls (Jaime Pressly). The Damsel is played by Shanna Moakler. I got that info from Movie Fan caps, but Shanna is listed in IMDB for the movie. Here's a suggestion for a description: (Based on screen captures and an internet site description): A young blond woman (Moakler) is asleep on her bed, wearing only a white bra and panties. Another blond cutie wearing a see-through black bra (and possibly more) sneaks into the bed. She handcuffs Moakler's character, hands in front, and lies down beside her. After a while our DiD wakes up. She kind of freaks out discovering she has been handcuffed, and that does not get better when out villainess tells her "your boyfriend will be here soon". Beware: the movie director was more into guys and leather-clad teen girls (Jaime Pressly). |
| Per |
| Sunday October 19 12:27:06 2003 Re: Poison Ivy : The New Seduction (1997) |
| May I add, based on the looks I am 99,99% sure that the "villainess" in the black bra is Jaime Pressly.
Whether that should be included I will leave to the editors to decide. |
| Per |
| Sunday October 19 12:43:13 2003 Re: Where is Kung Fu Kids 5? |
| "The movie exist. There is a web reference (1987)" Brian replied: "Was the scene removed from the Database?" Yes. Date wasn't provided in entry, and multiple films with same title. Closest on search/air-sched checks was a (1988) one. Poster entered Unknown "undercover character" Miss Wong. Film review had character name Peter Wong. No ladies listed in the credits. Now a date provided, might be a good idea if actress name provided. |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 19 12:58:37 2003 Re: Poison Ivy : The New Seduction (1997) |
| Per wrote:
> suggestion for a description: Got it, thanx for your assist here. |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 19 16:48:04 2003 Re: Does this belong? |
| Brian R wrote:
> My feeling is probably not, what do you guys think? Agreed. Been deleting the hoods, leash, fetish entries up till now. |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 19 16:59:41 2003 Re: Does this belong? |
| Jay L wrote:
> Brian R wrote: > > > My feeling is probably not, what do you guys think? > > Agreed. Been deleting the hoods, leash, fetish entries up > till now. Just my 2 cents. Jay maybe you misunderstand Brian, by agreeing to "propably not", if that means "it is propably not a waste of space to include it". (Read the question he answered to; but what do I know?) Anyway I agree in NOT entering hoods, latex dresses etc etc if there's no bondage involved. Then, I'm the guy who could do without handgag scenes too. And would like to have Damsels in small cages included. Ain't easy with the differing tastes. |
| Sunday October 19 17:00:48 2003 Re: Does this belong? |
| Ooops, was me, sorry. |
| Per |
| Sunday October 19 17:34:47 2003 Re: Does this belong? |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Just my 2 cents. Jay maybe you misunderstand Brian, by > agreeing to "propably not", if that means > "it is propably not a waste of space to include it". No, Jay understood me correctly. > (Read the question he answered to; but what do I know?) I think if you read my entire reply, it's clear: "My feeling is probably not, what do you guys think? It seems like this falls more into that fetish but not really bondage category we talked about before." Ergo, I'm saying it probably doesn't fit the criteria for database inclusion. |
| Brian R |
| Sunday October 19 17:38:05 2003 Re: Does this belong? |
| Brian R wrote:
> Ergo, I'm saying it probably doesn't fit the criteria > for > database inclusion. OK. Sorry that I misunderstood. |
| Per |
| Sunday October 19 17:41:28 2003 Re: Does this belong? |
| Brian R wrote:
But would you consider this a > waste of space, since it would only have been an anecdote > about bondage, at best? > My feeling is probably not Just to explain. I see the headline now, that must be what you answered to, not the question. |
| Per |
| Sunday October 19 17:41:49 2003 Re: Does this belong? |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Just my 2 cents. Jay maybe you misunderstand Brian, by > agreeing to "propably not", if that means > "it is propably not a waste of space to include > it". It's possible, Trimmed the quote to make sure it passed. Added this prehaps makes more sense: "It seems like this falls more into that fetish but not really bondage category we talked about before." Been deleting ones like that up to this point. |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 19 18:17:24 2003 Sient Witness DB nos. 9231 & 9232 |
| Seems like somebody entered some info re the Fatal Error episode at the same time as me tonight.
You may want to edit the two together etc - by the way, my entry 9232 is correct that there were TWO ladies bound and gagged. |
| Martin |
| Sunday October 19 18:42:00 2003 Re: Sient Witness DB nos. 9231 & 9232 |
| Martin wrote:
> entry 9232 is correct It needs some editing, but much better than 9231 |
| Sunday October 19 18:48:59 2003 Re: Sient Witness DB nos. 9231 & 9232 |
| Sorted now |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 19 23:39:15 2003 Does This Belong? |
| What about magician assistant who was put in stock inside
a box and cut in half by the magician? |
|
|