Home         Message Forums         E-Zine          Scene Database          FAQs          Friends Page          Contact


Database Correction Page

Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.

Post a Message


January
SMTWTFS
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
February
SMTWTFS
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28
          

Wednesday January 30 00:06:58 2002
Re: #6609 "The Play Is Under Review"
>
> The goal is list items that may reasonably be seen on TV
> or found in regular video outlets. Available only from
> certain mail-order sources doesn't cut it.
>
> My inclination right now is to take it out until the
> distribution questions are fully addressed.
>
> David, Jay, Biff, thoughts?
>

I'd say drop it for now. When and if it gets into mainstream distribution, it should be included.
Biff
Wednesday January 30 00:34:34 2002
Re: #6609 "The Play Is Under Review"
"Jay, I can think of several other series/movies that aren't in the IMDb, for example "The Mystery Of Edwin Drood"
"as well as Asians contributions."


David:
Was waiting for you to comment,
recall I was driving you nuts with the un-IMDB listed, Philippine Islander entries. :)

"The difference is -- you can catch "Edwin Drood" on the Disney Channel next week;"
"Asian's films can be seen on oriental TV stations."


See your point here.

"I don't see King of the Park Rangers having that sort of distribution, which makes me wonder it should be in the database."

See what you're saying Buddy.
Normally, I try to judge what is Mainstream in St. Louis, USA.

We have TV shows up here like SexTV,
The Sock Puppet Show
, (or Ed The Sock Puppet) whatever?,
Kink, etc
They've featured what Brian deems commercial models and scenes,
but are on mainstream CITY & ShowC channels.
(Poster Paige from here was featured on SexTV).

What I've kind of been doing,
is following Brian's Only discuss the bondage,
to alert the fellas here.
Haven't entered any into the DB yet, as mostly US posters here,
and I don't really feel they're Mainstream, as what is generally defined on this page as mainstream.

Sounds like you feel the same about this serial?

"What's Rin Tin Tin got to do with the price of eggs? Did whoever owns the copywrite to Rin Tin Tin grant the right to use the character name?"

This the same dog as starred in a Canadian young ladies type show called Katts & Dog?
DB has an alternative US title Rin Tin Tin K-9 Cop.
(In the Canadian series, the dog's name was Rudy, not Rin Tin Tin)
Is this what Todd meant by being Mainstream?
Jay L
kdnpr@yahoo.com
Wednesday January 30 00:45:06 2002
Re: Two easy pieces (for the editors to delete) 6616&6617
> Record number: 6616
>
> Title: Wonder Woman

> Record number: 6617
>
> Title: Wonder Woman

> Please repond if this actually too trivial to point out
> and the editors would have caught it anyway. I don't
> actually come over here much, so I'm not sure how it works.

Bobby:
Not too trivial my friend,
Appreciate being alerted to entries like this.
Thanx
Jay L
kdnpr@yahoo.com
Wednesday January 30 01:57:19 2002
Re: #6609 "The Play Is Under Review"
"This is running right on the edge. Merely making it into the IMDB doesn't necessarily make it eligible for our DB."

Brian:
That was me,
Refered to IMDB in the sense that the original post on Discussion was pretty acid.
Figured a spelling error in the actress name or title,
was what could be the problem?

"The goal is list items that may reasonably be seen on TV or found in regular video outlets. Available only from certain mail-order sources doesn't cut it."

Got it.

Question then?
How to judge some previous entries?
Similar, and the newscast entries?
I've been putting them in the Other category,
Figure you may want them reviewed as well?

"My inclination right now is to take it out until the distribution questions are fully addressed."

"David, Jay, Biff, thoughts?"


Whatever you want to go with is fine with me.

Figure Todd can alert the fellas to it on your Anything Goes Page, like we do with the Rated Adult movies.
Till you rule it mainstream.
Jay L
kdnpr@yahoo.com
Wednesday January 30 02:25:35 2002
Att: Todd 3-D, King Of The Park Rangers
Todd 3-D:

Deleted Entry #6609

However, decided to post it here for reference,
so you could simply copy/paste it back in when ruled OK.
Save you some typing later on.
_____________

Title: King of the Park Rangers
Medium: Movie Serial
Actress: Tracey Bates, Rosemary Gore
Description: A new 12 chapter serial that's a regular bondage fest, much like Manhunt of Mystery Island and Captain America. Scenes:
Chapter One into Two: Tracey Bates is knocked out by villain Marcus Danforth. She's sitting on the floor, hands behind back, legs crossed and tied at the ankles, and a tape gag.
Chapter Two into Three: First, her wrists are tied behind her back and she's walked through the woods. She breaks loose and gets away from the baddies until Danforth catches up to her and knocks her out on railroad tracks. She's tied wrists out in front and cleave gagged with a white cloth.
Chapter Four Into Five: Early in chapter four, she's kidnapped and being driven around wearing a blindfold. No visible bonds. Then she's bound hand and foot with duct tape and tape gagged.
Chapter Seven: Recap footage from the chapter one and two cliffhangers.
Chapter Eight Into Nine: Tied to a chair with a red bandana cleave gag.
Chapter Nine Into Ten: First, Rosemary Gore runs afoul of the bad guys. She's handgagged at first. Then we see her with her wrists taped behind her and her mouth taped shut. When the bad guys go off to deal with Tracey, Rosemary (still bound) runs off. Tracey's captured and has her wrists roped and her mouth taped. Note: this is an outdoor bondage scene. One thug grabs the still bound and gagged Rosemary and brings her back to the docks, but by then Tracey's slipped loose.
Chapter Ten Into Eleven: Tied with wrists out in front and with a rope going to her ankles, sitting in a chair, with a tape gag.
Chapter Eleven Into Twelve: Almost the same as above (different chair and setting though), only this time her upper body is roped to the chair as well.
Chapter Twelve: Hands taped behind her back and a tape gag during the film's finale.
Lotta scenes, though of varying quality. But, since it's a serial and not a commercial bondage video, what can one expect?
Jay L
kdnpr@yahoo.com
Wednesday January 30 22:26:20 2002
Am I missing something?
Record number: 6618

Title: Tartari, I (1961) aka Tartars, The
Medium: Movie
Actress: Unknown

Description: This is an Italian movie about the wars between the Vikings and the Tartars for control of the Russian steppe. Oleg the Viking king kills the brother of the emperor Burundi. Burundi swears revenge against Oleg and the Vikings. Later on the Tartars attacks and captures a Viking ship carrying Oleg's wife Helga and three other women. The Tartars kill all the men and take the women as prisoners. Helga and the other women are taken in front of Burundi sitting in his throne. Burundi orders the women to tell how many Viking ships have arrived from the north and how many Viking warriors are in their fort. When the women refused to talk, Burundi calls for Tartar torture. Two tall robed Tartar monks entered the room followed by a very short and husky old Tartar woman carrying a small wooden box. Burudi points to the younger of the women, a petite blonde probably no older than 18. The two monks grabbed her arms while the old woman goes down on her knees and removes the Viking girl's right shoe. She then takes out a bunch of bamboo slivers from her box. At a signal from Burundi she brings the bamboo slivers to the girl's naked foot. From her screams and violent movements the Viking girls appears to be in great pain. It is assumed that the old woman is inserting the bamboo slivers under her toenails. The scene ends with Burundi smiling and apparently enjoying the torture.

Is there a bondage element here that I'm missing?

David
Wednesday January 30 22:54:22 2002
Re: Am I missing something?

> Record number: 6618
>
> Title: Tartari, I (1961) aka Tartars, The
> Medium: Movie
> Actress: Unknown
>

Is there a bondage element here that I'm missing?
>

Nothing aside from the grabbing of her arms. Looks like torture's the focus of this entry.
Biff
Wednesday January 30 23:57:05 2002
Re: Am I missing something?
> Record number: 6618
>
> Title: Tartari, I (1961) aka Tartars, The
> Medium: Movie
> Actress: Unknown

David:
Deleted,
thanx
Jay L
kdnpr@yahoo.com

Post a Message

Home         Message Forums         E-Zine          Scene Database          FAQs          Friends Page          Contact