|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Thursday January 17 00:53:12 2002 David: Favours Question? (Nudity) |
| David:
I see that nudity has been brought up. That was another one of the favours the boy here had listed down in my notes. There were a few fellas that claimed nudity ruined the scene for them. (So wanted a 'Warning') And one fella that was interested in nude scenes. Was going to put that in a way for both 'warning' & 'alert'. But, If we're starting to cross up on each other, figure may be better to just to stop this particular favour. Going to go with what you think here, Thanx |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Thursday January 17 00:59:58 2002 Re: Correction to correction US (1.12)- Germany (1.6) |
| > I think we should use the episodes as they were aired in
> the country of origin. Since this is an American series, > we should use the American chronology. David: Got it, we'll leave it at (1.12). |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Thursday January 17 01:27:50 2002 Re: No. 1876 |
| > I'm not sure why you would've had that assumption, given
> the innumerable contributors and wide variety of > interests. Because in general it has been my experience that the database does record all the bondage scenes in a film, though it sometimes omits major stuff even then -- frex, last time I checked, the description of "The Collector" described the bondage scenes, but didn't mention the film's provenance. > And do you mean "*aren't* necessarily included"? Yep. > Handgags are restraint. The rest I don't have a problem > with ... unless they're the primary focus for the entry: yeah, there's no point in entering a movie with no scenes in the scene database. Which is why I never entered Desert Passion, which is a classic bondage fantasy that lacks any bondage. > Including such secondarily I don't mind. Yeah, that's the way I think it should be done. If there's bondage and a catfight, might as well throw in the catfight too if you think of it, some guys like 'em. |
| Pat Powers |
| Thursday January 17 02:29:34 2002 Re: No. 1876 |
| >
> > Including such secondarily I don't mind. > > Yeah, that's the way I think it should be done. If > there's bondage and a catfight, might as well throw in > the catfight too if you think of it, some guys like 'em. > I'm not sure you caught my drift from the example I gave: "There's a great catfight ... (goes on to describe it in detail). She's arrested and cuffed at the end." That would be an example of an entry I'd have a problem with, as the primary focus is on the catfight (sex scene, nudity, whatever) rather than the bondage scene. Something like: "Cameron Diaz is cuffed at the end of this film ... For those interested, there's a brawl between Ms. Diaz and Michelle Pfeiffer around the 47' mark." is more in keeping with the purpose of this DB ... the primary focus is on the cuffed scene, and the fight is mentioned in passing. |
| Biff |
| Thursday January 17 04:00:24 2002 Lucky Jo |
| I'd like to enter a few more details about the scene itself.
Title: Lucky Jo (1964) Medium: Movie Actress: Christiane Minazzoli (?) Description: Blonde Minazzoli, dressed in a short nightgown, gets tied up by Eddie Constantine himself. He gags her over the mouth with what is probably her nightie, ties her wrists in front with the belt of the gown, then takes the cord from the curtain and proceeds to bind her bare feet (all on-screen). He picks her up from the chair she sits on and throws her on the bed. After she's calmed down a little, he frees her. Lots of struggling and mmphhing from the damsel and you get to see a peek of her panties. The scene is about 3 mns in length. |
| James |
| Thursday January 17 07:20:00 2002 Re: Biff's Post |
| > >
> > Yes, but I wouldn't say to delete such references > > either. > > If it is a bonafide entry, and there are some > collateral > > references, that's not a big deal. > > > > If they relate to a bondage scene, I don't. If that's > not the case, it would depend on how they're presented. > > Again, I'm not actively searching for 'em. When I see > something of this nature, I make a judgment call. Make sense? Works for me. |
| David |
| Thursday January 17 07:24:32 2002 Re: David: Favours Question? (Nudity) |
| > David:
> I see that nudity has been brought up. > That was another one of the favours the boy here had > listed down in my notes. > > There were a few fellas that claimed nudity ruined the > scene for them. > (So wanted a 'Warning') > And one fella that was interested in nude scenes. > > Was going to put that in a way for both 'warning' & > 'alert'. > But, > If we're starting to cross up on each other, > figure may be better to just to stop this particular > favour. > Going to go with what you think here, Thanx If it occurs to me when I'm entering a scene, I include a description of the clothing, whether the DiD has bare feet, yada yada. I think whether or not a bondagette is nude is certainly relevant. |
| David |
| Thursday January 17 07:30:52 2002 Re: Lucky Jo |
| > I'd like to enter a few more details about the scene
> itself. > > > Title: Lucky Jo (1964) > Medium: Movie > Actress: Christiane Minazzoli (?) > > Description: > > Blonde Minazzoli, dressed in a short nightgown, gets tied > up by Eddie Constantine himself.... Got it. Thanks! |
| Thursday January 17 22:08:31 2002 9 1/2 Weeks listing scene creep |
| The current description in the scene database says that the European edition of 9 1/2 Weeks has a handcuff scene. I made inquiries on the discussion page, and no one appears to know of a handcuff scene. So unless anybody here knows different, I'm a gonna delete that reference.
|
| Pat Powers |
|
|