|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Tuesday January 15 00:06:12 2002 While We're Discussing Bugger Entries. |
| Record number: 5085 Title: Unknown (1994) Medium: TV Series Actress: Alba parietti Description: cleave-gagged after the match Italy - Norway. World cup '94 David: Had a bugger of a time finding anything in Alba Parietti's film bio for 1994, or any TV series. Closest by 2 or so years, a movie called, The Butcher There was mention of Alba being a stage actress. Figure Buddy may have meant an advertisement for a play, after the football match ended? |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Tuesday January 15 02:05:25 2002 Re: Foreign Names |
| > "I'm noticing that some of the titles and names with
> extended characters look funky now." > Mr. Yuck, (aka Mr Blues Fan?): ;) > Figure a French keyboard & re-entering would solve the > problem? Don't do anything until I look into it. I'll see what the extent of the problem is. Even if you don't a keyboard that supports the character, cut and paste will work. > "There are already half a meg's worth of new changes in > the change log." > Do you mean the TV Series editing? Probably. > Is this causing you a hassle here? Just means that I won't start over with the one here and roll the recent changes in. Too much work, there are probably easier ways. Most of the screwed up ones are German scenes, so I did a search for "german" in Description. That gives me some idea of the problem characters. I can then search titles and actresses for the broken characters. For instance, I now know there 19 with ÷ instead of ö by plugging the first character into Title, Actress and Description. I can work up a fairly complete list, then we can figure out how to attack it. It's not a terribly crucial deal, just something that will need to be done. |
| Brian R |
| Tuesday January 15 02:39:42 2002 Re: Kojak |
| > My references only have credits for two female
> characters: Rose Marie as Mrs. Tilden and Joyce Davis as > Valerie. The episode is "Two, Four, Six for Two-Hundred" > (no comma after "Six". The episode number should be > 2.22. Mornad: Got it, thanx for the assist here. David: Edited it to your post here. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Tuesday January 15 02:43:46 2002 Re: Kojak /Cross Your Heart and Hope to Die |
| > > Record number: 3788
> > > > Title: Kojak > > Medium: TV Series > > Actress: Andrea Marcovicci > > > > Description: Episode: either "Cross Your Heart and Hope > > > to Die" or "Once More From Birdland" > the > episode is definately "Cross Your Heart and Hope to > Die" David: Are you getting ep: # (2.12) for this one? Thanx |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Tuesday January 15 03:22:52 2002 Re: Foreign Scenes & One Favour? |
| As long as were on about foreign scenes: Here's one I've had trouble getting information for. ______________ Record number: 6509 Title: Over De Rooie Medium: TV Series Actress: unknowns Description: This was a daytime TV-show in Holland a few years ago. The host of this show asked ordinary people on the street if they would like to win 1000 dutch guilders (about $ 450). They had to "strange things" to win the 1000 Dutch guilders. One day they asked a guy if he would like to try to catch 10 different girls with a lasso and tie them up (like cowboys do tie-up a calf). He did asked the girls first of course if he could tie them up but he didn't mention most of the time he also needed to gag them with a red bandanna. He found 10 girls and about 6 were really pretty (3 even looked like models). The best thing about this show was when he gagged the girls. Most of the girls really did hesitate but this guy just wanted the 1000 Dutch guilders so he did gagged the girls while they were saying things like "oh no, don't put that in my mouth".The last shot they showed were 10 different girls lying on the ground, bound and gagged with red bandannas. FANTASTIC! _____________ Anyone have better luck with this one? (No luck in IMDB) Know if it's a Candid Camera style TV series, or variety show? Thanx |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Tuesday January 15 05:22:27 2002 #6515 |
| Record number: 6515
Title: SLICK CITY Medium: Movie Actress: Dita Von Teese, Unknowns Description: Model Dita Von Teese is chloroformed and wakes up on a bed dressed in tight pvc with her breasts out. She is chained up and is wearing restraints. She is cleave gagged with a white strip of cloth. Her companion is led in by her kidnapper, wearing a pvc french maid uniform and is ballgagged. Dita is later taken for display to be sold as a sex slave. She is ballgagged and has arms bound behind her back. There are several women ballgagged in this movie and only Dita gets a cleave gag and a chloroforming too. Great stuff in a rare movie role for the model Is this still a 'mainstream' film? |
| Anon |
| Tuesday January 15 06:53:01 2002 Re: Kojak /Cross Your Heart and Hope to Die |
| > > > Record number: 3788
> > > > > > Title: Kojak > > > Medium: TV Series > > > Actress: Andrea Marcovicci > > the > > episode is definately "Cross Your Heart and Hope to > > Die" > > David: > Are you getting ep: # (2.12) for this one? > Thanx Yepper! I've updated it. |
| Tuesday January 15 07:01:40 2002 Re: #6515 |
| > Record number: 6515
> > Title: SLICK CITY > Medium: Movie > Actress: Dita Von Teese, Unknowns > > Description: Model Dita Von Teese is chloroformed > and wakes up on a bed dressed in tight pvc with her > breasts out. She is chained up and is wearing restraints. > She is cleave gagged with a white strip of cloth. Her > companion is led in by her kidnapper, wearing a pvc > french maid uniform and is ballgagged. Dita is later > taken for display to be sold as a sex slave. She is > ballgagged and has arms bound behind her back. There are > several women ballgagged in this movie and only Dita gets > a cleave gag and a chloroforming too. Great stuff in a > rare movie role for the model > > > Is this still a 'mainstream' film? Hmm, doesn't look like it. It's not in the IMDb (and they've got plenty of non-mainstream bondage films in their database. I've tracked it down on to the website listed above (below? nearby?) |
| David |
| http://www.stockroom.com/b207.htm |
| Tuesday January 15 13:35:39 2002 Re: #6515 |
| > >
> > Is this still a 'mainstream' film? > > Hmm, doesn't look like it. It's not in the IMDb (and > they've got plenty of non-mainstream bondage films in > their database. I've tracked it down on to the website > listed above (below? nearby?) > That's JT's Stockroom, a "toy" store. From the description, it looks like a high-end fetish vid. If no compelling evidence to the contrary's offered, I'd flush it. |
| Biff |
| Tuesday January 15 22:34:39 2002 Re: No. 1876 |
| I taped Tarzan and the Slavegirl today and was surprised to discover that there are a LOT more scenes in it than in the original record, which cited only a single scene involving a gag. There were three closeups of women's feet chained at the ankle (knda made me wonder about the director) along with many medium length shots of the women walking while chained together, a handgag and a whipping that was offscreen but did have a brief shot of the scantily clad woman bound at the wrists, and a catfight and the women were generally attractive and scantily clad, and oh, yeah, a harem girl scene with skimpy harem outfits.
I'm not posting this just to rag on whoever entered the scene, as there probably wasn't a standard for how thoroughly movies should be described when entered (though you'd think all bondage scenes involving women should be mentioned). But I was thinking there might be a lot of other movies that were entered into the database early on that might turn out to be much better than their original entries indicate. I don't edit the database nearly as often as others do, so I don't know for sure, but the difference between what I saw in the Tarzan movie and what the database said, makes me think a "heads up" is appropriate. |
| Pat Powers |
| Tuesday January 15 23:11:18 2002 Re: No. 1876 |
| > I taped Tarzan and the Slavegirl today and was surprised
> to discover that there are a LOT more scenes in it than > in the original record, which cited only a single scene > involving a gag.... > > ....But I was thinking there might be a > lot of other movies that were entered into the database > early on that might turn out to be much better than their > original entries indicate.... > Pat, my guess would be that the original entry was: a) a description copied from another website, or... b) entered based on a description from the discussion page, or... c) information entered based on a set of DiDcaps. I've submitted hundreds of entries sight unseen based on second hand knowledge, trusting that others would update or correct the description as better information becomes available. I suspect others have done the same. IMHO incomplete information is better than no information. That's why there's the editor's page after all. |
| David |
| Tuesday January 15 23:20:39 2002 Re: No. 1876 |
|
> I taped Tarzan and the Slavegirl today and was surprised > to discover that there are a LOT more scenes in it than > in the original record, which cited only a single scene > involving a gag. There were three closeups of women's > feet chained at the ankle (knda made me wonder about the > director) along with many medium length shots of the > women walking while chained together, a handgag and a > whipping that was offscreen but did have a brief shot of > the scantily clad woman bound at the wrists, and a > catfight and the women were generally attractive and > scantily clad, and oh, yeah, a harem girl scene with > skimpy harem outfits. > > I'm not posting this just to rag on whoever entered the > scene, as there probably wasn't a standard for how > thoroughly movies should be described when entered > (though you'd think all bondage scenes involving women > should be mentioned). But I was thinking there might be a > lot of other movies that were entered into the database > early on that might turn out to be much better than their > original entries indicate. > I'd think folks enter what interests them, for the most part. I don't include every instance of anything associated with bondage. BTW, what do catfights and harem outfits have to do with bondage? |
| Biff |
|
|