|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Wednesday October 01 00:40:40 2008 Just released |
| Rest Stop 2-Don't look back |
 |
 |
 |
| Steve W |
| steve@knotsotight.com |
| http://www.knotsotight.com |
| Wednesday October 01 01:11:03 2008 Re: Without a trace |
| Great scene tonight! The damsel was gorgeous, her dress was sexy, and the red cleave gag looked smashing on her. (Pleasantly surprised they didn't also use a black tape gag to match her restraints.) |
| Wednesday October 01 03:08:38 2008 Re: Without a trace |
| Pat Powers wrote: > civil wrote: > > Pat Powers wrote: > > Minutes 5 through 58 > consist of a > > > black screen with nothing happening > > Don't listen to him. ***** Always good advice, just ask my wife. ***** Bah! What wife listens? Just bluff your way out by saying the wife was watching the "Criminal Minds" show It looked dead up until the final minutes and then the female UnSub tied somebody up I haven't ID'd anybody yet, the opportunity there bud. ;) |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday October 01 04:43:33 2008 Re: Without a trace |
| Nice start to the fall TV season: last week we got the back-to-back scenes on FOX with the Sarah Connor Chronicles and Prison Break; tonight CBS matches the back-to-back with The Mentalist and Without a Trace. Now if only NBC could trump those with a back-to-back-to-back with Yvonne whatshername on Chuck, Hayden Panettiere on Heroes, and Sarah Shahi on Life, or is that a bit too much to ask? |
| Dextor |
| Wednesday October 01 04:47:23 2008 Re: tonight's alerts |
| The House of Le Bastard wrote: > The Shield, in 15 minutes. There was a scene on tonight's episode of "The Shield", whose plot concerned the detectives trying to rescue the kidnapped daughter of a mobster. The girl is found naked, with her hands and feet bound to railings with white towels. |
| Hadji |
| Wednesday October 01 04:58:57 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| James Gagney wrote: > Look man ,i am not writing it off .Any other soap i > probably would but Hollyoaks has come through on a number > of occasions .The fact that the putz is gagged leads me > to believe there must still be something ,then of course > the fact that the pics in the Supposedly abandoned church > show all the damsels ungagged would go against that ,but > as has been said ,according to the storylines he kidnaps > the girls one by one ,so surely there must be some gags > for them at some point . > This scene is shaping up to be a potential classic i just > wanted to make people aware that it might not be as > supercool as we expect .Lessens the diappointment .Trust me i am fairly in the I hope to hell they all get the full treatment camp . Yeah fair point, one of the main problems we have as a community is that we tend to hype these "promised" scenes up before they even air, often based on the flimsiest of evidence. In that respect i suppose it's better to have modest expectations and to be pleasantly surprised than to automatically assume a scene will be a classic and come away dissapointed. |
| Moxx of Balhoom |
| Wednesday October 01 05:44:33 2008 Re: Without A Trace |
| I like the way Without A Trace showed the stupidity of hands tied in front and leaving the DiD locked in a room. Had to be one of the stupidest minions ever. Minion: "OK, I'm going to stick you in this room that locks from the inside with all the hacksaws and handgrenades and so forth, and featuring a large, easily shattered window. Don't do anything stupid." Damsel nods reassuringly and holds up bound hands. "What am I going to do like this?" she asks. Minion shuts door. Less than a minute later, the tape is off, the window is shattered and the damsel is out and running. Except for the minion's soliloquy, which I admit I have embroidered a bit, that's exactly how the scene went. Let this be a lesson to ALL evil minions. Especially the stupid ones. Who won't get it. |
| Pat Powers |
| Wednesday October 01 05:53:37 2008 Re: tonight's alerts |
| Hadji wrote: > There was a scene on tonight's episode of "The > Shield", whose plot concerned the detectives trying > to rescue the kidnapped daughter of a mobster. The girl > is found naked, with her hands and feet bound to > railings with white towels. This scene has commonalities with the scene in the movie "LA Confidential". In that movie, a gang of black criminals kidnaps a Latina, who is found bound on a bed. In the movie, however, the Latina is gagged. |
| Hadji |
| Wednesday October 01 08:26:29 2008 Re: Without a trace |
| Give me the number of season and the number of the episode please. I need more stuff to my vid accounts |
| Mandrakedaily |
| mandrakedaily@yahoo.es |
| Wednesday October 01 08:59:11 2008 Re: Without A Trace |
| Pat Powers wrote: > I like the way Without A Trace showed the stupidity of > hands tied in front and leaving the DiD locked in a room. I agree with you. The bondage in this episode was very lame. Hands taped in front and her ankles were never tied. Why didn't she pull her gag off in that trunk? Did you see how fast she got loose? This scene was as exciting as watching paint dry. It was a wasted opportunity. |
| Wednesday October 01 11:20:14 2008 Re: Without a trace |
| Mandrakedaily wrote: > Give me the number of season and the number of the > episode please. I need more stuff to my vid accounts "22 x 42" (7.2) |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday October 01 11:47:57 2008 Suspicion of forum foul play? |
| From video page:Mandrakedaily wrote: > JESUS CHRIST the two vids are deleted. Gestapo crowd its > really faster Or someone on here has it in for you and grasses you up? It isn't me. I love your choices. |
| Shocked and Disappointed |
| Wednesday October 01 12:15:01 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| Friggin' Candyass and stupid idiot director |
 |
 |
| http://www.afterelton.com/blog/snicks/attention%3Dhollyoaks-fans-weve-got-spoilers-and-you-wont-believe-the-insanity?&comment=55119 |
| Wednesday October 01 12:17:32 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| "Racing to the abandoned church, Myra is shocked to discover that Niall is her son, and all of her daughters are tied up and gagged!" ?????? |
| Wednesday October 01 12:42:47 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Friggin' Candyass and stupid idiot director > > http://www.afterelton.com/blog/snicks/attention%3Dhollyoak > s-fans-weve-got-spoilers-and-you-wont-believe-the-insanity?&comment=55119 Stupid jabroni of a director. Why can't the girls be gagged instead of that queer candyass. =( sucks. What a dissapointment. |
| Wednesday October 01 12:53:09 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| > What a dissapointment. Great news for fans of Jimmy Olsen and the famous putz Peyton Haas from Flipper |
| Wednesday October 01 14:02:53 2008 Re: Without a trace |
| Jay L wrote: thanks i work on it |
| Mandrakedaily |
| Wednesday October 01 14:03:31 2008 Re: Suspicion of forum foul play? |
| Shocked and Disappointed wrote: > Or someone on here has it in for you and grasses you up? > It isn't me. I love your choices. I dont think so |
| Mandrakedaily |
| Wednesday October 01 14:04:12 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| This kind of things makes me cry, seriously |
| Mandrakedaily |
| Wednesday October 01 14:28:36 2008 Re: Knotted Gags |
| Another nice one |
 |
| Wednesday October 01 14:34:39 2008 german soap |
| http://tinyurl.com/3m5jua |
 |
| noob |
| Wednesday October 01 14:38:22 2008 Re: Knotted Gags |
| Soaps are good for knots also |
 |
| Wednesday October 01 15:33:49 2008 Re: Clip Hassles |
| Until sort out this hassles, I'll try and answer questions here. {{I'll try and work something with majorjohns &/or Raffish parade for full clips}} (1st Question)- Re: Road Warriors. ;) "On the First Beat" soap is entered [#13692] I checked Sonija Kwok bio, and there are some Canadian schools on there. So as for "Canadians B&G in other countries?" Off-hand, US has a bunch. I'd say go with Pammy As for Hong Kong, there a few bounds but for B&G'd I recall Charlene Choi's bio has her as born here: ==== Record number: 10403 Title: Goo chak sam fong fong (2003) aka The Death Curse aka Gu zhai xin huang huang Medium: Movie Actress: Charlene Choi, Gillian Chung Description: First, Charlene is suspended arms over head with a length of rope to a pulley, and gagged with black tape. During a botched rescue, Charlene and Gillian become both tied hands in front to the length on rope. During chase with villian, both inadvertantly drag the other around, with Gillian ending up suspended over the side of a house. ============= One of our Miss Canada did a role in Hong Kong movies but I can't recall Title at moment. Hope this helps |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday October 01 15:35:41 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| "2405: Niall kidnaps Mercedes Airs on Friday, October 10 2008 at 18:30 BST on Channel 4 As Malachy insists it was the exact opposite, noting how much he cares for Mercedes, a confused Mercedes rejects this and strides off. Reeling from her confrontation with Malachy, Mercedes is unprepared when Niall leaps out and bundles her into an awaiting van. It is suddenly clear that the disappearances of the McQueen girls across the week haven’t been coincidental. Instead, it's something much more sinister…" |
 |
| Wednesday October 01 15:40:34 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| "Guess you don't need a gag, luv" |
 |
| Wednesday October 01 15:42:22 2008 Re: Clip Hassles - (Korean HG?) |
| (2nd Question) Okay, got the full credits and I've reworked that Korean handgag scene, but I still having the email hassles. Argghh Perhaps if you guys know a Y0utube Handgag site? I'll try and send. As I'm fairly confident Asian Wizards Blixen & Guest will ID it once see it. Sorry, until I learn Korean (don't hold your breath) it stays "HG'd Korean" ;) |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday October 01 15:42:57 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| "This could have been the DinD scene of the decade, ladies, but it's too bad I'm a yutz" |
 |
| Wednesday October 01 15:46:59 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| Some caption. Does the writer know what 'gagged' means? |
| http://www.bebo.com/PhotoAlbumBig.jsp?PageNbr=1&MemberId=7116325426&PhotoAlbumId=9011514720&PhotoId=9011529024 |
| Wednesday October 01 16:13:49 2008 Re: Clip Hassles (Re: Road Warriors) |
| Jay L wrote: > "Canadians B&G in other countries?" > One of our Miss Canada did a role in Hong Kong movies but I can't recall Title at moment. Here we go: Miss Montréal - Christy Chung ===== Record number: 4850 Title: Cold War (2000) Medium: Movie Actress: Christy Chung Description: (Hong Kong) Tied hands behind back, with rope attached to a bomb. Used as bait in an ambush. =========================================== Record number: 6000 Title: Asian Charlie's Angels (2001) Medium: TV Movie Actress: Christy Chung, Yu Ke Xin, Unknown Description: 1. First minute: Picture of a woman tape gagged, bound hand in front. 2. Second minute: A woman was handgagged by a killer on the bathroom. Later she was bound to a chair, cleave-gagged, threatened with a knife, but later killed. 3. Five minute: A girl bound (arm on her side), tape gagged, next to a ticking bomb. 4. Fifteen minutes: TV news with several tape gag pictures. 5. One hour: pictures of tape gagged women . 6. 1 hour 5 minutes: Christy Chung was handgagged and Chloroformed inside an elevator. 7. 1h 15 minutes: Yu Ke Xin was handgagged and chloroformed in her car. Later she was bound hands over head in a shower and tortured in front of a video camera. (no gag). 8. At the end of this TV movie: video tape of the torture. ========================= Hope that helps |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday October 01 17:07:47 2008 Re: Comic Bondage for Christmas! |
| Darkhawk wrote: > >Given the genres they cover, I would think > > there'd be a lot more scenes on comic book covers > than there are. > Clearly you've never seen this site. > http://bcotd.com/ Actually I have, and I'm not denying that there have been a lot of comic book covers with bondage on them over the last 70 years or however long comics have been going. But with what - maybe 400 comic books being published every month these days, many of them with more than one cover, and most of them in the adolescent adventure vein, I would think there would be more. Thasallimsayin. |
| Wednesday October 01 17:23:13 2008 Chuck |
| Looks like a 'meh' hands-in-front scene for Sarah on the next episode of Chuck. |
 |
| ss |
| Wednesday October 01 18:00:43 2008 Re: Comic Bondage for Christmas! |
> with what - maybe 400 comic books being published every > month these days, many of them with more than one cover, > and most of them in the adolescent adventure vein, I > would think there would be more. Thasallimsayin. There's not a lot of bondage covers, but recent comics like the Huntress mini-series, the Spider-man summer special, and NYX have had some good bondage and gag scenes. |
| Danny |
| Wednesday October 01 18:08:10 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > "Guess you don't need a gag, luv" > Aw! Did the nasty man get your hopes up? Let Uncle Dan fake it better! MMMwah! |
 |
 |
| Mad Dan |
| http://www.dansdidnts.com |
| Wednesday October 01 18:14:59 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| jajajaja thank you Mad |
| Mandrakedaily |
| Wednesday October 01 18:17:01 2008 Re: Comic Bondage for Christmas! |
| Danny wrote: > recent comics > like the Huntress mini-series, the Spider-man summer > special, and NYX have had some good bondage and gag scenes. Could you elaborate on what those bondage scenes are? Thanks! |
| win77ona |
| Wednesday October 01 18:23:17 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| > Let Uncle Dan fake it better! MMMwah! "Can you gag us, also???" |
 |
| Wednesday October 01 18:28:26 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| > "Can you gag us, also???" "And us, too"??? |
 |
| Wednesday October 01 18:29:52 2008 Re: Chuck |
| > Looks like a 'meh' hands-in-front scene for Sarah on the > next episode of Chuck. Putzes, they're everywhere |
| http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_RrObyQ3XzcY/SNYyshZvomI/AAAAAAAAeb0/SbUfJ6ohd5g/s1600-h/3t7252_012r6074.jpg |
| Wednesday October 01 18:32:27 2008 Re: Without a trace |
| Jay L wrote: > > Just bluff your way out by saying the wife was watching > the "Criminal Minds" show > It looked dead up until the final minutes and I assume this is tonight's episode for us U.S. folks. |
| civil |
| Wednesday October 01 18:33:09 2008 Re: Chuck |
| ss wrote: > Looks like a 'meh' hands-in-front scene for Sarah on the > next episode of Chuck. Try this link. |
| civil |
| http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_RrObyQ3XzcY/SNYyshZvomI/AAAAAAAAeb0/SbUfJ6ohd5g/s1600-h/3t7252_012r6074.jpg |
| Wednesday October 01 18:33:40 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > > Let Uncle Dan fake it better! MMMwah! > "Can you gag us, also???" > I've already done that one and posted it here, a few months ago. When I find it, I'll put it on my site, which is about due for an update. But not tonight, Josephine. Better not post a lot of fake requests here, as that's not the purpose of the forum. I just felt the pain of the community over the Hollyoaks fiasco and wanted to help. :-) Of course, there may actually be a gag or two, other than on the putz, as the story unfolds, but I shan't see that until the following Sunday, as Wales only gets the omnibus edition. |
| Mad Dan |
| Wednesday October 01 18:35:12 2008 Re: Chuck |
| civil wrote: Oops. Didn't refresh page to see someone post the hyperlink just a couple of minutes earlier. |
| civil |
| Wednesday October 01 18:43:44 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
Or alternately we could WATCH the episodes before writing them off. The photographic evidence may not be promising but neither is is conclusive. |
| moxx of balhoom |
| Wednesday October 01 18:46:21 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| > Better not post a lot of fake requests here, as that's > not the purpose of the forum. Just a couple of photos of multiple tied but ungagged damsels |
| Wednesday October 01 18:51:35 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| moxx of balhoom wrote: > Or alternately we could WATCH the episodes before writing > them off. The photographic evidence may not be promising > but neither is is conclusive. Good point. First WATCH the show before commenting on it. There is less panic for approaching hurricanes than for this. |
| Rams Fan |
| Wednesday October 01 19:02:44 2008 Re: Without a trace |
| civil wrote: > Jay L wrote: > > > Just bluff your way out by saying the wife was > watching > > the "Criminal Minds" show > > It looked dead up until the final minutes and ***** I assume this is tonight's episode for us U.S. folks. ***** The "UnSub" fancied an executed goof and she wants to continue his idiocy. See that, get ready If I wasn't backed up with this Asian stuff I'd give you a preview |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday October 01 19:24:07 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| Hope for the best |
| |
 |
| Wednesday October 01 19:57:56 2008 Hollyoaks theroy? |
| The ungagged photos are rehearsal shots? The putz is gagged because he want's to "be a laugh" during rehearsals? (Wishful thinking?Much?) Or it's an own goal! It ain't over till the end credits roll... |
| Shocked and Turned On |
| Wednesday October 01 19:59:02 2008 Re: german soap |
| noob wrote: > http://tinyurl.com/3m5jua Another example of an ugly vase ruining an otherwise acceptable scene (...okay, that and the Loosie bondage. Can anyone think of another example of tasteless ceramics spoiling a mainstream DiD-scene? ;-) |
| |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Wednesday October 01 20:57:17 2008 Knight Rider |
| Gal bound and gagged in last 10 minutes. The girl costar. |
| civil |
| Wednesday October 01 20:59:21 2008 Knightrider west coast alert |
| Deanna Russo I think thats her name gets hands taped in front & tape gagged. no good closeups Damn |
| Snowcat |
| Wednesday October 01 21:03:55 2008 Re: Possible Hollyoaks disappointment |
| moxx of balhoom wrote: > Or alternately we could WATCH the episodes before writing > them off. The photographic evidence may not be promising > but neither is is conclusive. The bit about her being thrown into that van and then it becomes clear where the others are still gives me hope here.I can understand from the photos ,them not screaming because the crazy villian is there and might hurt them ,but surely if he leaves them there ,while he goes to abduct the other girl they'd have to be silenced .Or indeed ,maybe they are in the van and thats how she finds out ? There are definite possibilities . The story then goes the mother goes to the church and discovers them ,and all the publicity stills seem to be from after the mother's arrival . Definitely a wait and see . |
| James Gagney |
| Wednesday October 01 21:06:37 2008 Pushing Daisies |
| Chuck (Friel's character) ends up being in distress between the 8:40 and 8:48 marks on ABC. She is setting in a chair with bees all over her. She is mumbling as she uses her feet to go to the window. Reason for her mumbling becomes apparent. She appeared to be restraint and gag, but only due to bees on her. Just for folks who don't care about the particular ways to restrain someone. |
| civil |
| Wednesday October 01 22:22:12 2008 Re: Pushing Daisies |
| civil wrote: > Reason for her mumbling becomes apparent. She appeared to be > restraint and gag, but only due to bees on her. > Just for folks who don't care about the particular ways > to restrain someone. Y'know, BigMT has been asking for the weirdest DiD scenes over on his blog (see homepage link). This just might qualify. |
| Pat Powers |
| http://bigmtdid.blogspot.com/2008/08/blog-post.html |
| Wednesday October 01 22:54:10 2008 Jessica Alba is shut up |
| Interesting ad from Jessica Alba: http://www.comcast.net/entertainment/eonline/slideshow/view/entertainment-eonline-20081001-b31924/ |
| John Grabowski |
|
|