|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Monday December 06 02:32:48 2004 Re: [11000] Battlestar Galactica (2003) |
| j wrote:
> Record number: 11000 > Title: Battlestar Galactica (2003) Why was this was posted here? |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Monday December 06 03:34:28 2004 Re: [11000] Battlestar Galactica (2003) |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> Why was this was posted here? I couldn't figure out why any of his were posted, so I deleted them all. |
| Brian R |
| Monday December 06 03:39:01 2004 Re: [11000] Battlestar Galactica (2003) |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> Why was this was posted here? Minor edit, *** Description: Episode: "Six Degrees of Separation" (1.07) *** (1.07) edited to standard (1.7) for foreign poster search ID assist. Recent posted part of coaching foreign poster on the search (Homepage link) Dec 1 @14:48:26 If you have any suggestions? Wouldn't mind a better way than this current. Thanx |
| Jay L |
| http://brianspage.com/showday.php?fname=dbcorrect%2Fhtml%2F335-2004 |
| Monday December 06 03:46:25 2004 Re: [11000] Battlestar Galactica (2003) |
| Brian R wrote:
> I couldn't figure out why any of his were posted Needed abit of editing different areas Turned out, last one minor. |
| Jay L |
| Monday December 06 03:53:13 2004 Re: [11000] Battlestar Galactica (2003) |
| Brian R wrote:
> I > deleted them all. Oh bugger, there possible added details? Have to get back on that |
| Jay L |
| Monday December 06 04:38:20 2004 Re: [11000] Battlestar Galactica (2003) |
| Brian R wrote:
> I couldn't figure out why any of his were posted, so I > deleted them all. Wasn't his ;) |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Monday December 06 04:43:59 2004 Re: [11000] Battlestar Galactica (2003) |
| d'oh. Thought you were reffering to the db entries, not posts in the thread.
If someone will throw something up "for review" or something could be added. I'm also assuming if a complete scene is repeated, it is ok. |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Monday December 06 10:12:45 2004 [31] As The World Turns |
| Correction to my OWN post!
Eventually pieced together all of these scenes and should read as follows: Hogtied on bed, she is gagged onscreen with a strip of black tape - short approximately 20sec scene. Remainder of description is as described. |
| Major John |
| Monday December 06 12:23:48 2004 Re: Deleted Posts |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> Thought you were reffering to the db entries, > I'm also assuming if a complete scene is repeated, it is > ok. The one you asked about only needed an episode number edit to line up for the search. It description match with previous entry okay, as poster alerted to that. a minor edit. The other one needed a date, and will likely get a red warning as poster alerting to not having viewed the film. Going to run by the fellas. The problem one almost got ejected due to for some reason? Poster put in age references when didn't even apply to lady in the scene? Some improvements made, it should be okay now. |
| Jay L |
| Monday December 06 12:28:42 2004 Re: [31] As The World Turns |
| Major John wrote:
> Correction Got it buddy thanx |
| Jay L |
| Monday December 06 20:41:25 2004 [7147] CSI: Crime Scene Investigation aka C.S.I. |
| Vogel was only gagged w/ duct tape and was not bound. |
| Monday December 06 21:42:54 2004 Re: [11000] Battlestar Galactica (2003) |
| Jay L wrote:
> Oh bugger, there possible added details? > Have to get back on that If someone is suggesting changes, then only changes should be posted. Not a complete rewrite for minor differences, because then the editor has to compare the two to pick out changes. My glance over didn't even see anything, so I was confusurated. I'll get them back if you want them. |
| Brian R |
| Monday December 06 22:58:39 2004 Re: "Goofing" - Editor Notes |
| Finally gathered basic tracking notes. After discussion with Biff, figured post some. Better explains what suggest Editors look for. Ref: From entry [7685] on. Original back-track gave rough idea to complaints about scant Descriptions, which had started becoming more common Here Link Here Link for ____________________________ Using same entry- post ref, these posts roughly the start of consistant entries with search failures Link Here Link Here ------------------------ Shortly after these two days, was alerted to a recent suspect Indonesian film. Entry ref at this point, 8500 on CD Foolishness Ref Link CD Foolishness Link 2 ___________________________________________ After this post of course, started searching on recent entries using ref [8525] on Link Here and again here Link Easily able to find entry source page and what copy pasted This day humourous, the predictable pattern pointed out in reply, a week or so after a post on topic. Still waiting for the Poster's explanation....... Humourous Day Link ============================= This covers predictable patterns noticed on Database Corrections. I also have notes on Discussion Page refs, but the 7600 on entries where the majority of the antics take place. |
| Jay L |
| Monday December 06 23:04:01 2004 Re: "Goofing" - Editor Notes |
| > basic tracking notes.
Biff: Realise you have trouble following me at times, but abit of reading and it'll become obvious whom "bait" intended for huh? Problem is others sucked in as well. Hope all clear now? |
| Jay L |
| Monday December 06 23:11:40 2004 Re: Brian - Ref Posts |
| Brian R wrote:
> If someone is suggesting changes, then only changes > should be posted. Not a complete rewrite Okay, threw up fast for fellas assist. Be more specific in future |
| Jay L |
|
|