|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Sunday December 05 03:10:27 2004 Re: don't get baited |
| Biff wrote:
> you should know by now that I try > not to allow things to get to that point ... once a > discussion degenerates into baiting, I make my point and > take my leave. Anything more and you're giving the mook > what he's after, right? Key here, you realise a joker, I knew you aware. The problem we have is with fellas that don't realise it a joker, instead figure a warped individual interested in it. Reason for "In General" post. Meant for them. Humourous thing, went searching for bored kid *Unsigned Poster* antics from a year back. (Homepage link- starting with Brian @13:49:09) during search, came across from just afew days ago, a poor fella named Moxx posts over on Discussion Page. The boys were on him about a recent rough scene, he there apologising and trying to settle them down. Figure this ongoing huh? Btw: The what? *inspiration*? for Unsigned Poster antics came from a discussion a week earlier. (Nov 13 2003) Mark that, as noticed you posted a link to the Harmony Rules page. Considering fellas on Moxx post aren't the usual "concerned", imagine more comments on this to come for Editors. ;) Biff http://www.harmonyconcepts.com/www/rsite/statemnt.htm |
| Jay L |
| http://brianspage.com/showday.php?fname=dbcorrect%2Fhtml%2F331-2003 |
| Sunday December 05 14:20:13 2004 Re: don't get baited |
| Jay L wrote:
> Biff wrote: > > > you should know by now that I try > > not to allow things to get to that point ... once a > > > discussion degenerates into baiting, I make my point > and > > take my leave. Anything more and you're giving the > mook > > what he's after, right? > > Key here, you realise a joker, I knew you aware. > The problem we have is with fellas that don't realise it > a joker, instead figure a warped individual interested in > it. Reason for "In General" post. Meant for > them. > Jay, I'm sorry ... but I'm really not following you. I thought you were warning me about not getting baited ... but no one's tried that with me in some time. If they do in future, my comment above describes how I'd handle it. If you're talking about baiting in general, I have to say I haven't seen much of it. I don't recall anything here recently. Maybe more's occurring at Discussion than I realize ... I usually scroll past threads that might have devolved into dippiness. > Mark that, > as noticed you posted a link to the Harmony Rules page. > Are you saying *I* posted that link? My memory's not what it never was ... but I don't recall doing that. When was it posted ... I might have done so back in the dim and distant. |
| Biff |
| Sunday December 05 18:49:59 2004 Re: Harmony Rules page |
| "Are you saying *I* posted that link?" Yes "My memory's not what it never was ... but I don't recall doing that. When was it posted" Thursday November 13 14:38:22 2003 Re: [4728]- The Haunting of Morella Jay L wrote: "Fellas in US have this (video?) called Harmony: Love Bondage. It's basically against the rougher/torture scenes, and often mentioned when this topic comes up. Not being from US myself, nor ever having seen this video, was hard to follow what concerned about." Not a video ... a video production and (formerly) magazine publishing company for the last quarter-century or so. They were the publishers of BONDAGE LIFE. Their credo is at the link below. Biff http://www.harmonyconcepts.com/www/rsite/statemnt.htm |
| Jay L |
| Sunday December 05 19:02:36 2004 Re: don't get baited |
| Biff wrote:
> thought you were warning me about not getting baited No, not you. Why posted red "In General" comment. |
| Jay L |
| Sunday December 05 20:32:30 2004 Re: Harmony Rules page |
| Jay L wrote:
> "My memory's not what it never was ... but I don't recall > doing that. When was it posted" > Thursday November 13 14:38:22 2003 > The penny's dropped ... nearly thirteen months is ancient history to my synapses. |
| Biff |
| Sunday December 05 21:39:00 2004 Re: don't get baited |
| Biff wrote:
> If you're talking about baiting in general, I have to say > I haven't seen much of it. I don't recall anything here > recently. Maybe more's occurring at Discussion than I > realize ... I usually scroll past threads that might have > devolved into dippiness. Understand, as I used to scroll past certain posters too, until recent. If unaware, it due the old system of gearing complaints to email. Which likely you didn't get then? Why Brian stopping. Basically, appears "baiting" started by jokers intended for a colourful character whom used to post regular here. Some of his acid generalisations caused offence. Their way of say "matching hits" with? Problem being, others here with strong opinions about rough scenes & torture, etc believed these entries from serious collectors. Wanted them ejected. Poor Moxx on Discussion Page will likely hear from, huh? That when "pulling" started. For some reason? been ongoing since |
| Jay L |
|
|