|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Tuesday January 04 00:48:38 2005 Re: Future Reference |
| Jay L wrote:
> Thought you wanted to be kept in the loop? I do, that's why I'm following up. I spent a lot of effort to install this system, I'm training you guys just as you should be training the users. |
| Brian R |
| Tuesday January 04 00:53:23 2005 Re: [11081] Family Guy |
| Jay L wrote:
> Way saw it, > hullohullohi did decent entries but missed "" > on ep title. Right, which he'll keep doing unless he's made aware. > Minor edit. > Far different from baiting Yanks entries, > whom I just wanted to settle down. > > Didn't want to treat them same I'm not suggesting you bash him, just advise him to follow the instruction page, another thing I spent a lot of time putting together. At any rate, I've sent a note to the user on the subject. |
| Brian R |
| Tuesday January 04 01:44:19 2005 Re: Future Reference |
| Brian R wrote:
> I spent a lot of > effort Figure I've backed you enough times on your effort and contributions here. If you don't think I appreciate it, let know why not? |
| Jay L |
| Tuesday January 04 01:48:43 2005 Re: hullohullohi |
| Brian R wrote:
> I'm not suggesting you bash him, just advise him to > follow the instruction page I see Will do that here on |
| Jay L |
| Tuesday January 04 01:49:08 2005 T.J. Hooker duplicate |
| Database entries No. 8 and No. 9059 are the same scene from the series listed twice. |
| Tuesday January 04 21:01:28 2005 Re: Future Reference |
| Jay L wrote:
> Figure I've backed you enough times on your effort and > contributions here. > > If you don't think I appreciate it, > let know why not? As a wise man says here sometimes, go slow ;) I got your back and you got mine. The new system is something that I think will ultimately make things better for all, both editors and users. Episode titles done incorrectly don't represent any huge amount of work on an individual basis, but why do them if not necessary? The important thing is to communicate with the users. I generally don't count on them reading this page. Why would they unless they've posted a correction? |
| Brian R |
| Tuesday January 04 21:03:35 2005 Re: T.J. Hooker duplicate |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:
> Database entries No. 8 and No. 9059 are the same scene > from the series listed twice. As posted on Discussion, this was deliberate. |
| Brian R |
|
|