|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Saturday January 01 05:09:36 2005 Re: check link from November |
| Brian R wrote:
> When I say, "Let's step back" > I mean, "Step back, > NOW." Intention when posted the link was to point out the over the top email. Suprised when saw that. Never seen one like that before, nor figure you have. Still doubt from regular-Known Posters here. Was kind of hoping for an "I didn't send that" - "of course, never figured you did" exchange. |
| Jay L |
| Saturday January 01 05:42:58 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| Brian R wrote:
> review any perceived issues with the > database rules, and I'll rule as necessary to clarify > them I'll go through sqwack list on this *later*. For isn't it a law in your country to watch Bowl Games today? ;) |
| Jay L |
| Saturday January 01 11:02:54 2005 Re: check link from November |
| Jay L wrote:
> Was kind of hoping for an "I didn't send that" > - "of course, never figured you did" exchange. > I think it's clear why I pointed to that day's posts ... but the thread's dead by decree, and I don't wish to play Dr. Frankenstein. I didn't sent any such messages ... you didn't ... Brian didn't. As I said before, you should ask him whom he was accusing if you're unsure. Makes sense, right? |
| Biff |
| Saturday January 01 11:10:15 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| Jay L wrote:
> Brian R wrote: > > > review any perceived issues with the > > database rules, and I'll rule as necessary to > clarify > > them > > I'll go through sqwack list on this *later*. > The only issues I can see are regarding voice talent gender ... and that's been resolved, I thought ... and the matter of anthroed furries. I asked earlier if Brian's comments about dealing only with humans meant all catgrrls, etc. had to exit, stage left ... no response yet. I'm assuming animated humanoid aliens are persona grata regardless. |
| Biff |
| Saturday January 01 11:23:27 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| Biff wrote:
> the matter of anthroed furries. I asked earlier if > Brian's comments about dealing only with humans meant all > catgrrls, etc. had to exit, stage left ... no response > yet. Because I'd have to do a bunch of research to figure out what you are talking about. Why not leave it the hell alone as long as no one is complaining about them? |
| Brian R |
| Saturday January 01 13:37:48 2005 Ref |
| Record number: 9748
Title: Snobs (2003) Medium: TV Series Actress: Ella Roberts Description: Episode: Unknown Pia (Roberts) recounts a story of how she and her 2 male friends were caught by a rival gang, and says "...and tied us up". The story is told in ´flashback style´ and we see her and her friends tied together in a circle by four winds of thick rope. Pia is bound hands in front, and gagged with a dark coloured cleave. Short scene |
| Jay L |
| Saturday January 01 13:43:47 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| Brian R wrote:
> Because I'd have to do a bunch of research to figure out > what you are talking about. Why not leave it the hell > alone as long as no one is complaining about them? > Happy New Year to you, too. I didn't raise the issue ... it came up at Discussion, if you recall. Jay later posted a link which quoted you here earlier saying that humans were the focus of the DB. That prompted my previous inquiry. I'm funny in that when someone asks for feedback on DB rules, I assume they'll welcome it ... because, y'know, that makes sense. To me, anyway. There are a number of entries whose subjects are animated furries ... mostly, if not wholly, anthroed felines. I don't recall any other humanized species offhand, but the question may arise in the future. I'm happy to enter scenes based on my best judgment in such instances ... if that's your ruling. I just don't want to see them flushed later on if that's not the case. |
| Biff |
| Saturday January 01 14:16:56 2005 Re: Biff |
| "I didn't sent any such messages" Doubt anyone figured you did "you should ask him whom he was accusing if you're unsure." Saw "character assasination" reply. More concerned with clearing that up. "Unsure" only in suprised with. Normal posters specific on what caused offence. Even the fella from Denmark, whom took offence to alot of things I posted, was good natured after issues sorted in email. Prefer continue explaining out to sort problems, rather than any acid posting |
| Jay L |
| Saturday January 01 14:29:12 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| Biff wrote:
> There are a number of entries whose subjects are animated > furries ... mostly, if not wholly, anthroed felines. No complaints about these aware of. |
| Jay L |
| Saturday January 01 14:39:18 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| Biff wrote:
> I just don't want to see them > flushed later on if that's not the case. Off-hand doubt will happen with your's. Normal first thing fellas take a run at when something deleted is Handgags and basic Hand-cuff arrests Other than that, problem with the Arab woman with scarf pulled tight around mouth and nose out, whilst Pamela Anderson and someone unbound, tape gagged allowed |
| Jay L |
| Saturday January 01 14:42:58 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| Jay L wrote:
> No complaints about these aware of. > This all began with the "acid" Discussion posts re Hadji's query about Zellweger's fishy voicing in A SHARK'S TALE. I don't know how to characterize them as other than "complaints" ... vociferous ones at that. |
| Biff |
| Saturday January 01 14:45:20 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| > problem with the Arab woman with scarf pulled tight
> around mouth and nose out, whilst Pamela Anderson and > someone unbound, tape gagged allowed "someone" is Angelle Brooks Here Record number: 6810 Title: V.I.P. aka VIP Medium: TV Series Actress: Angelle Brooks, Pamela Anderson aka Pamela Anderson Lee Description: Episode: "Miss Con-Jeannie-Ality" (4.18) Val (Pamela) and Maxine (Angelle) enter a beauty pageant, but a hitman captures them. They are tapegagged, but not bound, inside a closet. Maxine removes Val's tape gag and Val screams. Later they escape by climbing the wall. Occurs in the last 15 minutes. |
| Jay L |
| Saturday January 01 14:46:07 2005 Re: Biff |
| Jay L wrote:
> Prefer continue explaining out to sort problems, > rather than any acid posting > We're just going around in circles here. I'll reply to your Yahoo! add ... assuming it's still alive. If not, mail me with where I can reach you, okay? |
| Biff |
| Saturday January 01 15:00:46 2005 Re: Hadji Post |
| Biff wrote:
> This all began with the "acid" Discussion posts I see Meant the cat girls ones. Don't know off-hand which they are? As for Discussion Page. What read before Moderator started ejecting was snarking on the boy here. "Princess Leah (sp?) out, whilst fish allowed", roughly like that. Figure if serious complaint, they'd be over here, or email, on about it. |
| Jay L |
| Saturday January 01 15:10:01 2005 Re: Biff |
| Biff wrote:
> I'll reply to > your Yahoo! add ... assuming it's still alive. Put brian_r@hotmail.com in CC He's requested that all things concerning the site be related to him. Trying to keep him in the loop Thanx |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Saturday January 01 16:03:14 2005 Re: Hadji Post |
| Jay L wrote:
> Meant the cat girls ones. Don't know off-hand which they > are? > What ... complaints, or entries? I was referring to Brian's remark about humans. I can only think of the entries for Callie Briggs from SWAT CATS at present, but the animated world has several anthroed characters that have or may yet find themselves in a bind ... and I'd like to know how to handle those. If it's a matter of dealing with the issue when and if someone raises it, fine ... I'll take that as a nod to use my own judgment. |
| Biff |
| Saturday January 01 17:27:52 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| Biff wrote:
> I'm funny in that when someone asks for feedback on DB > rules, I assume they'll welcome it ... because, y'know, > that makes sense. To me, anyway. Last time someone forced me into making a quick ruling for no particular reason, it lead to a bunch of entries that weren't bothering anyone being rooted, it turns out in opposition to a previous ruling. Not this time. If someone has a problem with an entry, we'll deal with it. |
| Brian R |
| Saturday January 01 20:52:12 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| Brian R wrote:
> Last time someone forced me into making a quick ruling > for no particular reason, it lead to a bunch of entries > that weren't bothering anyone being rooted, it turns out > in opposition to a previous ruling. > I didn't know anyone could force you to do diddley ... but in any event I wasn't trying to, quickly or otherwise. In accessing the link Jay had provided on the subject, I saw your remark about humans ... so I asked for clarification. That's the long and the short of it. > Not this time. If someone has a problem with an entry, > we'll deal with it. > And since for whatever reason you seem incapable of taking my questions at face value, I'll just go about my DB business, interpreting the rules as best I can ... and avoid asking you about them. As you say, if a problem arises, we'll deal with it. |
| Biff |
| Saturday January 01 21:16:06 2005 Re: Draw the Line |
| Biff wrote:
> I asked earlier if > Brian's comments about dealing only with humans meant all > catgrrls, etc. had to exit, stage left ... no response > yet. > For what it's worth, if the above is what's got you bent out of shape, I simply meant that I hadn't heard back from you ... just stating a fact ... not that I had some sort of deadline for when that might be. You can believe it or not ... I certainly can't force you to. |
| Biff |
| Saturday January 01 23:16:42 2005 ? |
| Love is a many stupid thing |
| Jay |
|
|