|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Monday March 10 00:50:47 2003 Re: Whilst Here Brian? |
|
> One poster has a solution, where rewrite the entry > describing it as an audio only gag scene. Ok, I don't want to get into a micromanagement situation. Use your best judgment here, I'd prefer to lay down more general guidelines rather than rule on each and every entry. If you think it belongs, fine, if it goes, I don't care. |
| Brian R |
| Monday March 10 03:05:11 2003 Re: |
| "Ok, I don't want to get into a micromanagement situation.
Use your best judgment here, I'd prefer to lay down more
general guidelines rather than rule on each and every
entry. If you think it belongs, fine, if it goes, I don't care." Okay, reposted as audio only |
| Monday March 10 03:15:34 2003 Re: |
| > reposted as audio only
That was me, for record now it's [#8511] |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Monday March 10 14:01:42 2003 The Accidental Bindee |
|
I'm assuming that silence indicates acquiesence to the notion that unintentional bindings are welcome in the DB. "Karen Dior"'s scene wouldn't qualify for other reasons, but sans gender bending, it would be a keeper, I take it? |
| Biff |
| Monday March 10 16:56:10 2003 Re: The Accidental Bindee |
| >
> I'm assuming that silence indicates acquiesence to the > notion that unintentional bindings are welcome in the DB. Dunno what silence means, Biff. I experienced it a few times. Kinda frustrating; then again, "database corrections" may not be the forum with the highest number of participants (or lurkers). Let us forget the fucking crossdresser. THEN I agree with you: Should a cute young WOMAN accidentally wrap herself up into something to the degree she needs help to get free again: MOST definately a scene in my book! |
| Per |
| Monday March 10 20:24:16 2003 Re: The Accidental Bindee |
| >
> I'm assuming that silence indicates acquiesence to the > notion that unintentional bindings are welcome in the DB. I don't know what that means. I specifically ruled against the wrapped in cloth one. I don't think that belongs, just like a woman wrapped around by a dog on a leash or something like that. |
| Brian R |
| Monday March 10 20:41:18 2003 Re: The Accidental Bindee |
|
> > > > I'm assuming that silence indicates acquiesence to the > > > notion that unintentional bindings are welcome in the > DB. > > I don't know what that means. I specifically ruled > against the wrapped in cloth one. I don't think that > belongs, just like a woman wrapped around by a dog on > a leash or something like that. > I asked the question earlier, and there was no response ... hence the comment. From your ruling, it was unclear whether you'd seen the scene, and thus understood the nature of it. That's why I asked, and put it in the larger context of unintentional restraint, such as a accidental cuffing in a sitcom, for instance. If you're saying items of this nature are persona non grata, that's your call. Is that your meaning? |
| Biff |
|
|