|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Wednesday March 19 06:46:01 2003 VERY small detail this time! |
|
Record number: 6467 Title: All Forgotten (2000) aka Lover's Prayer Medium: Movie Actress: Kirsten Dunst (?) Of course it is Kirsten Dunst. Just saw a video clip of that one. |
| Per |
| Wednesday March 19 11:39:12 2003 Re: [#6467] VERY small detail this time! |
| > Of course it is Kirsten Dunst.
Got it, thanx for your assist here. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday March 19 13:24:55 2003 Patience, or? |
| Man, this is quite a bigger task than I ever imagined!
As I told you, I am indexing my collection, and checking each scene that I have caps or clips from in the DB. So I find missing scenes. And enter them. Or I find lousy descriptions. And suggest improvements. You know how many suggestions I made. As for the missing scenes, all the entries with "Based on screen captures" are from me. As times go by it is quite a few. I have 31 CD's so far in the collection, and I am indexing number 13. So, Jay, provided I have the time and energy, expect this will continue for the next couple of months! As for the no-gag scenes not entered, I must agree. OK, I am not surprised an Italian 1964 flick like Lion of Thebes is missing. But Naomi Campbell movies with LONG bondage scenes? Or the first Lethal Weapon movie? Kinda thin. SIGH!!! (I need encouragement! Tell me to stop, or not!) |
| Per |
| Wednesday March 19 13:58:34 2003 Re: Patience, or? |
| > So, Jay, provided I have the time and energy, expect this
> will continue for the next couple of months! Great, Canada only has about a 3rd of the channels the US does, and we don't get alot of the shows that air down there. So, not able to contribute as much to assist poor David and the others as I'd like. When others offer assist like this it's greatly appreciated. Thanx |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday March 19 14:27:32 2003 Re: Per's Post- Preferences |
| > As for the no-gag scenes not entered, I must agree. OK, I
> am not surprised an Italian 1964 flick like Lion of > Thebes is missing. But Naomi Campbell movies with LONG > bondage scenes? Or the first Lethal Weapon movie? Understand what you mean, as this an ongoing thing. I see what Brian set up here as an information sharing site. So we can alert one another to scenes of interest. But have fellas that feel there shouldn't be any scenes in the DB that don't have gags. Also, have fellas don't like scenes where lady wearing pants, or where a fella is involved. Very passionate about it. Feel whilst the fellas are not obligated to enter a scene with a gagless lady tied to a "Putz", don't want them arguing with me that should be ejected from DB if in. Figure that fair all around. Don't get discouraged about this. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday March 19 15:37:23 2003 Re: Patience, or? |
| > When others offer assist like this it's greatly
> appreciated. Thanx Just what I needed. Thank you. I will carry on. |
| Per |
| Wednesday March 19 15:48:40 2003 Re: Per's Post- Preferences |
| > Feel whilst the fellas are not obligated to enter a scene
> with a gagless lady tied to a "Putz", don't want them > arguing with me that should be ejected from DB if in. Here in Denmark, if somebody has a job that is kind of hard, because someone will ALWAYS be dissatisfied and ungrateful, no matter WHAT he or she does, we call it (my translation, sorry) "The parking lot of beatings". I do not know if you have similar expressions. Seems you are situated on that lot too. Contributing to the community as best you can. Recieving complaints. But you just carrying on. OK. I will follow your example Jay. Prepare for lots of work from me in the future. Thank you again. |
| Wednesday March 19 17:30:21 2003 Re: Per's Post- Preferences - Describes Brian Here |
| > Feel whilst the fellas are not obligated to enter a scene > with a gagless lady tied to a "Putz", don't want them > arguing with me that should be ejected from DB if in. "Here in Denmark, if somebody has a job that is kind of hard, because someone will ALWAYS be dissatisfied and ungrateful, no matter WHAT he or she does, we call it (my translation, sorry) "The parking lot of beatings"." Understand what you mean, "Seems you are situated on that lot too. Contributing to the community as best you can. Recieving complaints." Say this describes poor Brian here more than myself. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday March 19 18:26:23 2003 Re: Per's Post- Preferences - Describes Brian Here |
| > "Seems you are situated on that lot too. Contributing to
> the community as best you can. Recieving complaints." > > Say this describes poor Brian here more than myself. Maybe so. But Brian strikes back. You are too kind a person to do that. At least as I have seen. Anyway I am pleased with your answers, so I will continue my work. Regards, Per |
| Per |
| Wednesday March 19 20:42:51 2003 SCARECROW "Saved by the Bells" |
|
As best I can remember, Amanda's taken from the townhouse unrestrained ... then comes the crate scene (BTW, it's a pink Georgetown University sweatshirt she's wearing). I don't think she's regagged after that. Can anyone corroborate? |
| Biff |
| Wednesday March 19 20:59:10 2003 Re: SCARECROW "Saved by the Bells" |
| > As best I can remember, Amanda's taken from the townhouse
> unrestrained ... then comes the crate scene (BTW, it's a > pink Georgetown University sweatshirt she's wearing). > > I don't think she's regagged after that. > > Can anyone corroborate? I am not sure about the Georgetown sweatshirt, but the rest of your description is in line with what I remember. She is definately not regagged. |
| mornad |
| mornad4@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday March 19 21:05:38 2003 Re: Per's Post- Preferences |
|
> Here in Denmark, if somebody has a job that is kind of > hard, because someone will ALWAYS be dissatisfied and > ungrateful As I've mentioned before, if any editor has problems with a "customer" feel free to refer him to the manager. I'll straighten it out in short order. I really don't think users should be emailing editors directly, but using this forum. |
| Brian R |
|
|