|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Friday March 21 03:57:18 2003 Angel of destruction |
| Title: Angel of Destruction (1994) aka Furious Angel
Medium: Movie Actress: unknown (possibly Chandra or Maria Ford) The actresses are Chanda (spelled like that) and Jessica Mark. The description is OK, but there's another scene: Later, the lady in the red corset (Ms Mark) now wearing a red dress, is tied with thin rope in an upper spreadeagle, standing. We are in a dark room, not on stage, and she does not look too happy about it. |
| Per |
| Friday March 21 04:52:29 2003 Re: [#6580} Angel of destruction |
| > The actresses are Chanda (spelled like that) and Jessica
> Mark. > there's another scene: Got it, thanx for your assist here. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Friday March 21 05:38:17 2003 Re: [#6580} Angel of destruction |
| > Got it,
> thanx for your assist here. You're welcome. Minor correction needed on my Tarzan entry, see my post about it from yesterday |
| Per |
| Friday March 21 05:48:01 2003 Re: This gun for hire |
|
> As I recall, what's seen of this is a fade-in of the > baddie finishing knotting the gag at the beginning of the > scene. Ms. Lake's character is unconscious. You're propably right, she doesn't look too lively. Remember all I have are caps. |
| Per |
| Friday March 21 12:37:10 2003 Re: Per- Tarzan |
| > Minor correction needed on my Tarzan entry,
On list to sort out which of the two IMDB entries. Will get to it, thanx |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Friday March 21 14:42:58 2003 Re: This gun for hire |
|
> Per > > > As I recall, what's seen of this is a fade-in of the > > baddie finishing knotting the gag at the beginning of > the > > scene. Ms. Lake's character is unconscious. > > You're propably right, she doesn't look too lively. > Remember all I have are caps. > I didn't know what you were going by. I'm certain there's no complete gagging scene and that she's oblivious to the proceedings. |
| Biff |
| Friday March 21 16:30:08 2003 Re: This gun for hire |
| > she doesn't look too lively.
> > Remember all I have are caps. > > > I didn't know what you were going by. I'm certain > there's no complete gagging scene and that she's > oblivious to the proceedings. No? Well I wrote it in the entry. And, I DO have a cap where we see his hands tightening the knot of the white OTM gag in the back of her neck. So, I concluded on-screen-gagging. Let me know if you think that is wrong. |
| Per |
| Friday March 21 20:52:24 2003 Re: This gun for hire |
|
> So, I concluded on-screen-gagging. > Let me know if you think that is wrong. > See my amendments to the entry and give me your thoughts on them. |
| Biff |
|
|