|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Saturday March 08 08:44:17 2003 Central park west |
|
Record number: 2486 Title: Central Park West Medium: TV Series Actress: Madchen Amick Description: Unknown episode This is the episode "You Belong to Me!" (2.8). PS thanks for removing my multi-post etsterday I am still embarrassed. |
| Per |
| Saturday March 08 10:35:52 2003 Re: [#2486] Central park west |
| > This is the episode "You Belong to Me!" (2.8).
Got it, thanx for your assist here. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Saturday March 08 15:33:20 2003 GH Scene (Database #66) |
| Early this morning, I posted the description of the above scene which featured Holly Scorpio (Emma Samms) and Celia Quartermain (Sherilyn Wolter0 B&G'd. I also posted my recollections concerning this scene and several other scenes in the same storyline that do not appear to be in the database. Fuzz has now confirmed my recollection.
I intend to revise scne # 66 along the lines of my comments on discussion. I would also like to put in information about the other three scenes in the storyline. I believe that the two of these scenes that show bondage should be completely separate entries with referebces to scene # 66. As for the implied bondage scene, I am not sure if I should enter it at all, or if I do enter it, if I should merely include it with one of the other scene entries. Any thoughts on these subjects would be appreciated. Thanks again. |
| mornad |
| mornad4@yahoo.com |
| Saturday March 08 17:08:48 2003 Re: Xena |
| >
> So, I want to ask you: Are these scenes bondage scenes, > or should I not have entered them? > > Entry 8472 "Here she comes Miss Amphipolis"- during a > stage act, a cutie accidentally wraps some long cloth > strips around herself, body an arms. LOOKS like she's > tied up-loosely though-as she stands there laughing. > I know it's not bondage by any strict definition of the > word-only she looks so cute! > Works for me ... call it "unintentional self-bondage". > Entry 8473: The Debt 1- same thing can be said. A small > bamboo cage is not bondage; but I like the scene though I > know many won't-same as me with handgag scenes, they are > not bondage either IMO and I don't like them, but there > are plenty of those in DB. > Personally, I wouldn't enter it. I don't know that this passes logical muster, but to me handgags are ... gags. Certainly a scene of a woman gagged but not bound makes the grade, so why not these? But is a gag "bondage"? As I've said before, the term is amorphous ... a case could be made for cages. But to me, simply being placed in a confining space doesn't fill the bill. > Entry 8475:Animal attraction; Same question here, maybe > one could argue stronger for this one, Renee O'Connor IS > rather strictly restrained in her stock. > Stocks (unless merely a neck restraint) qualify to my mind. > If you want to see for yourself, you can see the caps > from all three here: > http://htfvidcaps.dyndns.org/masterframe.htm > Speaking of ... is that where you came across the CLEOPATRA 2525 caps? I've searched the site to no avail. |
| Biff |
| Saturday March 08 19:58:25 2003 Re: Xena |
| > Personally, I wouldn't enter it. I don't know that this
> passes logical muster, but to me handgags are ... >gags. > Certainly a scene of a woman gagged but not bound >makes > the grade, so why not these? > > But is a gag "bondage"? As I've said before, the term >is > amorphous ... a case could be made for cages. But >to me, > simply being placed in a confining space doesn't fill >the > bill. > Speaking of ... is that where you came across the > CLEOPATRA 2525 caps? I've searched the site to no >avail. Hi Biff, and thanks for your answer. It makes me glad to see you agree on the "unintended self-bondage" (if you went to HtF I believe you'll agree she is quite cute) and the Gabriella stock. As for the cage I was much in doubt myself-for example pics of women in ordinary prison cells doesn't do it for me either- only this cage was so small! And as said I kinda liked the scene. I have been becoming more and more aware that these discussions will never end, as there are as many different preferences and tastes as there are bondage lovers. OK a handgag is a gag for you. Not for me, really. Bondage without gags are restraining the body, right? What about a baddie holding a damsels upper arm tight, is that bondage? She IS restrained, right? Man, if we should include those, the DB would count not 8,000, but 18,000 entries! Whooah! Cleopatra, nah, I got caps from all over, even from you! The Cleo caps are Moviefan caps from Usenet. I would gladly mail the ones I have, and based my entries on, to you if you want. |
| Per |
| Saturday March 08 23:17:53 2003 Re: Xena |
| >
> Hi Biff, and thanks for your answer. It makes me glad to > see you agree on the "unintended self-bondage" (if you > went to HtF I believe you'll agree she is quite cute) > and the Gabriella stock. > Oh, I'm well acquainted with the ep. If you do a search on "Miss Amphipolis", you might find an interesting bit of trivia about Karen Dior ("Miss Artiphys", the hapless ribbon captive). > > I have been becoming more and more aware that these > discussions will never end, as there are as many > different preferences and tastes as there are bondage > lovers. > > OK a handgag is a gag for you. Not for me, really. > Bondage without gags are restraining the body, right? > What about a baddie holding a damsels upper arm tight, is > that bondage? She IS restrained, right? > Man, if we should include those, the DB would count not > 8,000, but 18,000 entries! > I've added entries for toon characters squeezed in bearhugs (or held in gigantic palms ... provided the arms are pinned inside the behemoth's grasp) ... but I'd eschew same for live action bindees. I couldn't give you a logical reason why. > > Cleopatra, nah, I got caps from all over, even from you! > The Cleo caps are Moviefan caps from Usenet. > I would gladly mail the ones I have, and based my entries on, to you if you want. > Much obliged. Please write to the add below, and I'll provide a destination to send 'em to. |
| Biff |
| biffbarksdale@yahoo.com |
|
|