|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Wednesday March 05 00:41:28 2003 Re: Nightmare in Columbia County (1991) (TV) - Under Video Review |
| >
> Checked the link, couldn't find Seven? > > Other than that, > > Sound similar to what you all recall here? > "Seven" is a reference to Jeri Ryan, who played the character in STAR TREK: VOYAGER. > > From my delete notes, said Michele "Cleave-gagged". > > Now three fellas dispute this, so's if goes back in we'll > have to sort gag type. > Jay, I don't think you're sussing the situation. I suppose it might be possible to ascertain the gag from listening to her vocalizing, but we never *see* her ... that's the whole point. Re-read my earlier post ... the question is whether such a strictly audial scene should be in the DB. I'd say it does belong ... provided its nature is clearly described. There's also no danger of more than a handful of such items ever being added. |
| Biff |
| Wednesday March 05 01:36:59 2003 Re: Nightmare in Columbia County (1991) (TV) - Under Video Review |
| "Checked the link, couldn't find Seven?" ""Seven" is a reference to Jeri Ryan, who played the character in STAR TREK: VOYAGER." Got it now, thanx. Mark for reference, another actress with different credit names: IMDB Jeri Ryan "delete notes, said Michele "Cleave-gagged"" "Jay, I don't think you're sussing the situation." "Sussing"? Not familiar with the term. "I suppose it might be possible to ascertain the gag from listening to her vocalizing, but we never *see* her ... that's the whole point." Not following you here? To me, either the poster, or someone else who saw the cleave-gag has to post up and confirm it. Else I'm going by what others have related, that the cleave-gag was scene creep. "the question is whether such a strictly audial scene should be in the DB. I'd say it does belong ... provided its nature is clearly described." Sounds okay to me. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday March 05 01:49:01 2003 Re: Nightmare in Columbia County (1991) (TV) - Under Video Review |
| >
> "Sussing"? > > Not familiar with the term. > Bit of Anglophilia on my part ... it just means "figuring out" or "understanding". > > Not following you here? > > To me, either the poster, or someone else who saw the > cleave-gag has to post up and confirm it. > > Else I'm going by what others have related, > > that the cleave-gag was scene creep. > You spoke of "sort(ing) gag type" ... but that's impossible, as it's never seen. She *is* gagged ... we never see her or, obviously, it. Make sense? |
| Biff |
| Wednesday March 05 03:20:41 2003 Re: Nightmare in Columbia County (1991) (TV) - Under Video Review |
| "You spoke of "sort(ing) gag type" Mark my "we'll have to sort gag type.", as slang then. The gag seemed to be main point in dispute, so's needs to be sorted out. (Or worked out) "We'll" is incorrect yes, as you fellas have watched it and will be ones to decide. "sort(ing) gag type"... but that's impossible, as it's never seen." Agreed From Discussion Page for reference: Sunday March 02 21:35:23 2003 Re: Nightmare in Columbia County "The movie originally aired on one of the broadcast channels, I forget which. The scene was shown intact then. I've seen several repeats, all of which showed the scene as described above." Unless I misreading? Appears this only fella that doesn't feel it scene creep. Other than the poster. The others appear to agree with you, so's figure you can handle sorting the entry. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday March 05 05:47:04 2003 Double post |
| Sorry don't know how it happened (entries 8462 and 8463) |
| Per |
| Wednesday March 05 05:59:50 2003 Re: Per's Post |
| > BTW: In general, you've done a good job with those
> entries you've posted. Thanks a lot. I will remember to describe the clothing last. |
| Per |
| Wednesday March 05 11:16:21 2003 Re: Double post |
| > (entries 8462 and 8463)
Got it, thanx for your assist here. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday March 05 11:16:23 2003 Double post again |
| I really am sorry (entries 8464 and 8465)
After writing, and checking, the entry I click on "submit". Sometimes I get the message "connection to the website failed" or something like that. Then, of course, I try again, because I put a little effort into the entry. Resulting in a double post. Hmm-guess I must check if the entry has entered at first regardless of the message, thereby risking to lose the work- sometimes it disappears if I surf too much back and forth. Yeah well, sorry. |
| Per |
| Wednesday March 05 11:57:47 2003 Re: NIGHTMARE IN COLUMBIA COUNTY |
| > > Okay, the delete isn't final
The actress was gagged and mmmphed a lot. That's good enought for me. Keep it in. |
| Wednesday March 05 14:46:30 2003 Re: Double post again |
| >
> Resulting in a double post. Hmm-guess I must check if the > entry has entered at first regardless of the message, > thereby risking to lose the work- sometimes it disappears > if I surf too much back and forth. > > Yeah well, sorry. > Copy your work before checking if it's been entered. If it hasn't, you can paste it back and try again. You'll have to retype the title, actor, etc., but you'll have saved the description. On my MSN TV system, I hit cmd+a, which highlights the entire field, then cmd+c to copy ... cmd+v pastes it back into the field. |
| Biff |
| Wednesday March 05 15:08:47 2003 Re: Double post again |
| > Copy your work before checking if it's been entered. If
> it hasn't, you can paste it back and try again. You'll > have to retype the title, actor, etc., but you'll have > saved the description. > > On my MSN TV system, I hit cmd+a, which highlights the > entire field, then cmd+c to copy ... cmd+v pastes it back into the field. Good idea Biff, I will do that (save the description before checking) The MSN TV system I do not understand a word of. I just use an old Macintosh computer. |
| Per |
| Wednesday March 05 15:15:41 2003 Re: Double post again |
| I do not want to be inpolite, so (forgot before)
Thank you for the advice. |
| Per |
| Wednesday March 05 15:58:01 2003 Re: Double post again |
|
> Per > I do not want to be inpolite, so (forgot before) > > Thank you for the advice. > You're welcome ... but I think the initial post was plenty polite. No worries. And MSN TV is a world unto itself. <g> |
| Biff |
| Wednesday March 05 21:07:50 2003 Re: Double post again |
|
> Sometimes I get the message "connection to the website > failed" or something like that. Then, of course, I try > again, because I put a little effort into the entry. That message can happen at any point in the transaction, including after my server has sent the ack message. > Resulting in a double post. Hmm-guess I must check if the > entry has entered at first regardless of the message, > thereby risking to lose the work- sometimes it disappears > if I surf too much back and forth. Open a new window, use that to go and check the entry. |
| Brian R |
|
|