|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Monday March 24 13:57:18 2003 magic christian |
| Record number: 8568
Title: Magic Christian, The (1969) Medium: Movie Actress: 60-70 unknowns 70 restrained actresses at the same time, beat that if you can Jay! Only it's a sixties comedy, not comey sorry typo. |
| Per |
| Monday March 24 14:26:04 2003 Re: [#8568]- Magic Christian |
| "70 restrained actresses at the same time, beat that if you can Jay!" Odd, with all those slave girls, only found Birthe Sector listed as one huh? Magic Christian, The (1969) Link Figure I'll have to work on this one abit. "Only it's a sixties comedy, not comey sorry typo." I'll get on that. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Monday March 24 15:02:09 2003 Re: [#8568]- Magic Christian |
|
> Odd, with all those slave girls, only found Birthe Sector > listed as one huh? > Just sent a mail to you, with the caps attached. See for yourself. It is all I have, and all I based the description on. |
| Monday March 24 15:37:12 2003 Re: [#8568]- Magic Christian |
| >
> Figure I'll have to work on this one abit. > Don't waste your time. The scene's a blip in the movie, which is a sardonic comedy about exposing greed, hypocrisy and other human foibles ... and quite a good one to my mind. It's set in the UK in the late '60s ... the galley's actually on a cruise ship, The Magic Christian. |
| Biff |
| Monday March 24 15:42:36 2003 Re: [#8568]- Magic Christian |
| > >
> > Figure I'll have to work on this one abit. > > > > Don't waste your time. The scene's a blip in the movie, So what? A scene is a scene is a scene Biff. Should I send the caps to you too? |
| Monday March 24 15:48:10 2003 Re: [#8568]- Magic Christian |
| Am I losing it?
Unsigned posts up to this point was from me, sorry. |
| Per |
| Monday March 24 16:00:02 2003 Re: [#8568]- Magic Christian |
| Hooh, now I was just about to write one of those angry posts that got me in trouble before.
But I restrained myself. I will only say, that is not encouraging, if I spend time and effort to make an entry, to see one editor say to the other "don't waste time on this one". Way to go Biff if you want people contribute to DB. Thank you. |
| Per |
| Monday March 24 16:08:32 2003 Re: [#8568]- Magic Christian |
| >
> Way to go Biff if you want people contribute to DB. > > Thank you. > Per, you have an annoying habit of misreading intent. You've done it with Jay in the past ... and now here. Jay was about to spend some of his valuable time trying to run down names of actors in this scene, when in all likelihood he would have come up empty ... as we're talking about dozens of extras. I was attempting to warn him of that prospect. You should really learn to ask questions before shooting. |
| Biff |
| Monday March 24 16:23:35 2003 Re: [#8568]- Magic Christian |
| > Odd, with all those slave girls, only found Birthe Sector > listed as one huh? "Just sent a mail to you, with the caps attached. See for yourself." Thanx, but I'm not the best at ID'ing through pictures. I'll probably have better luck ID'ing more on google searches. "It is all I have, and all I based the description on." Well, still a good description and entry. Understand not much you can do about ID'ing with only 1 listed so far. Thanx for your assist here. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Monday March 24 16:31:51 2003 Re: Biff-[#8568]- Magic Christian |
| > Don't waste your time. The scene's a blip in the movie,
Don't mind a few searches, there's fellas interested in anything with certain actresses. So's will run some just in case. Plus for the find possible "French-Canadian" title CBC channel might give it? <G> |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Monday March 24 16:36:27 2003 Re: [#8568]- Magic Christian |
| > Per, you have an annoying habit of misreading intent.
> You've done it with Jay in the past ... and now here. > > Jay was about to spend some of his valuable time trying > to run down names of actors in this scene Ohh, sorry, I apologize. I misunderstood. I never imagined Jay would ever try to find the names of 70 anonymous participants in a movie from 1969. Absolutely impossible project. Why not just write (as I did) 60-70 unknowns? When I read you wrote the scene was just a "blip in the movie" and Jay shouldn't waste his time, I thought you meant- yeah honestly that you thought it was I nuisance I made the post in the first place. Sorry. My bad. |
| Per |
| Monday March 24 16:43:31 2003 Re: Per's Post |
| > Hooh, now I was just about to write one of those angry
> posts Okay, go slow here. You did a good job with the entry, but ID'ing low ranked actresses always a bugger. Which believe Biff trying to relate? I doubt Biff meant it in acid way. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Monday March 24 17:44:55 2003 Re: Per's Post |
| > ID'ing low ranked actresses always a bugger.
> Which believe Biff trying to relate? > > I doubt Biff meant it in acid way. I know. I found out. You are absolutely right Jay. Thank you. |
| Per |
| Monday March 24 20:36:42 2003 Re: Biff-[#8568]- Magic Christian |
| >
> Don't mind a few searches, > there's fellas interested in anything with certain > actresses. > So's will run some just in case. > It's your choice, but I think we're looking at a situation similar to the VEGA$ scene ... with Brit Lind and the rest merely extras ... on a grand scale. > Plus for the find possible "French-Canadian" title CBC > channel might give it? <G> > I was only addressing identifying actors ... searching for other skinny may prove fruitful. |
| Biff |
| Monday March 24 20:44:36 2003 Re: [#8568]- Magic Christian |
| >
> Ohh, sorry, I apologize. I misunderstood. I never > imagined Jay would ever try to find the names of 70 > anonymous participants in a movie from 1969. > Absolutely impossible project. Why not just write (as I > did) 60-70 unknowns? > He's just trying to find as many as he can ... my sense is he's found the only galley slave credited in this scene. Actually, if memory serves, she might be a whip wielder rather than a rower. > When I read you wrote the scene was just a "blip in the > movie" and Jay shouldn't waste his time, I thought you > meant- yeah honestly that you thought it was I nuisance I > made the post in the first place. > Fair enough ... but ask for clarification before making assumptions. Most of us are guilty of it at times, sad to say. And know this about my view: I tend to err on the side of inclusion. Personally, I wouldn't have entered the scene, as one wrist chained doesn't count in my book. But as marginal as it is to me, it's not so far afield that I'd argue against it. <Sorry. My bad.> No worries. |
| Biff |
|
|