|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
Tuesday March 18 05:07:30 2003 Grim |
Current entry:
Record number: 2322 Title: Grim (1995) Medium: Movie Actress: Kadamba (aka Kadamba Simmons) Description: Terrible horror flick about a slimy monster, in which cute Kadamba manages to get herself bound and cleave-gagged in the last hour. It's a classic sacrifice scenario. She lies on the ground on top of a pentagram in a painted circle. Tied in a four-limb spreadeagle with rope to small poles hammered into the ground. Cleavegagged with white cloth. Nice struggling. She is saved. Wears an open jacket, white lowcut blouse and jeans. |
Per |
Tuesday March 18 07:10:18 2003 Re: Per's Posts- Anything Goes Page Posts |
> Went through the Anything Goes Page, just so's I could
> reference some Rated Adult Chinese porn that I decided > not to enter, and where different to Rated CAT-III. ........ > Didn't enter them into the DB as had to go into the Rated > Adult section to rent them. > > > > These films are more sexual than CAT-III films. With more > close-ups of nude individuals and their private parts and > performing sexual acts. > .......... Hope this a little more descriptive than my previous posts on this matter? Yes it was, and I think I am beginning to get it. Like "softcore porn" OK, "hardcore porn" not? Because as far as I understands the difference, it is exactly as you describe it, the hardcore porn has closeups of private parts, long sequences with sexual acts (and usually hardly any storyline). Thank you Jay. |
Per |
Tuesday March 18 07:20:10 2003 Re: Per's Posts- Anything Goes Page Posts |
-Just an afterthought:
I think the reason I seem so slow-witted on this subject, is because we do not have such an "adult rated" rating system here at all, and no special sections in the stores. Mainstream movies are rated before they are allowed to be shown in movie theaters, but that only results in a recommendation, like "not suited for children below the age of 8" for example. Soft- or hardcore porn films are not rated at all AFAIK. Or any films that only comes on video or DVD. |
Per |
Tuesday March 18 07:36:29 2003 Re: Per's Post |
> > Whether a film is placed in the category of 15 or 11 > depends on how realistically the violent scenes are > described. If the violent scenes are taking place in a > make-believe world the film might be placed in the > category of 11 years instead of 15" > ......... > It differentiates between Chinese general audience films, > > same as Danish Age 15 differentiates from Danish A ratings, or general audience. Oh I just saw now you even quoted some Danish rules. Sorry should have read your posts more carefully! As you can see the Danish raters focus more on violence, while nudity, or sex for that matter, is not considered as dangerous to see for children, as compared to the US. Dunno about China. |
Per |
Tuesday March 18 12:11:42 2003 Settle The Score |
Record number: 898
Title: Settle the Score (1989) Medium: TV Movie Actress: Monica Miller (with Jaclyn Smith) Description: Miller plays a teenager who in a flashback sequence towards the start of the film is accosted in a farm storeroom by a rapist who puts a *** LifetimeTV.com lists the title as "Settle the Score (aka Bloodknot)" |
Tuesday March 18 12:33:52 2003 Re: [#2322]- Grim |
> It's a classic sacrifice scenario. She lies on the ground
Substituted your description for previous one thanx for your assist here |
Jay L |
kdnpr@yahoo.com |
Tuesday March 18 13:02:39 2003 Re: [#898]- Reference |
"LifetimeTV.com lists the title as "Settle the Score (aka Bloodknot)" Okay, I'll have to check into it, as all I can find over there is this one: Lifetime.com Bloodknot Link Listed as this in IMDB: Bloodknot (1995/I) Just for my reference: Settle The Score (1989) Sister-in-Law, The (1995)aka Bloodknot Thanx for your assist here. |
Jay L |
kdnpr@yahoo.com |
Tuesday March 18 13:55:35 2003 Re: Per's Post |
Combined 2 of your posts in this reply Per, as you've hit on what I trying to relate. "Like "softcore porn" OK, "hardcore porn" not?" Correct. "Because as far as I understands the difference, it is exactly as you describe it, the hardcore porn has closeups of private parts, long sequences with sexual acts (and usually hardly any storyline)." Yes, and that would be rated Adult here. "you even quoted some Danish rules." Realised you'd mentioned Denmark in your e-mail, but only recalled once read post about the store shelves. Figure using Denmark's specific classifications as a guide would assist you better in understanding the Hong Kong classifications, in this case. BTW: High store shelf rule same here in Canada for Hard core porn vids & mags, unless in a separate area. So I understood what you meant there. "As you can see the Danish raters focus more on violence," Yes, which is pretty much what a Hong Kong Category III or CAT-III rating alerts to. Graphic violence. So in case of Chinese Torture Chamber You wouldn't consider it an as you say, "hard core porn" film, but the Danish classifiers would probably alert to the violence, same as the Chinese with the CAT-III rating. But the film would still be classified as Mainstream, and okay to enter into the Data-base. |
Jay L |
kdnpr@yahoo.com |
Tuesday March 18 14:37:45 2003 Re: Per's Post |
> but the Danish classifiers would probably alert to the
> violence, same as the Chinese with the CAT-III rating. > > But the film would still be classified as Mainstream, and okay to enter into the Data-base. Jay, I finally got it, and we agree 100 %. Thank you for your answer. |
Per |
Tuesday March 18 14:49:25 2003 Re: Per's Post |
One last (the very last, promise) remark relating to this:
Good. Because if softcore porn were not allowed in the DB you would have quite some work to do Jay. Removing the Abductors or Adventures of Justine entries, just to mention a few. Anyway thanks for your cooperative spirit. It is highly appreciated by me. |
Per |
|