|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Sunday October 17 01:59:04 2004 Re: Brian R Post |
| Jay L wrote:
> Brian R wrote: > > > Part of the problem is that I really don't understand > > too well what you mean. > > Well, see it different. Well, a lot of the time your notes and things are kind of Jay shorthand, and I'm not always sure if they're a note to yourself or something you want others to review. > Well, > kind of irritating that someone would waste your time > when this page is sitting right here. I could assist > quick huh? I agree about them not using the correct page. > Actually, irritating to point going to take 5, get back > to this post later As always, it's not my intention to jump down your throat. We need to establish procedures so that all editors can work together smoothly. I also need to be kept informed if there are people who need to be dealt with. I have tools at my disposal that no one else does. |
| Brian R |
| Sunday October 17 02:15:33 2004 Re: Brian R Post |
| "Are you refering to bogus entries
meant to cause trouble?" Correct, though I specifically used words to indicate how long figure some of these fellas been roaming the planet. Say intent more acid humour that causes trouble. It also meant for the individuals that carry on. They should realise someone whom doesn't contribute, nor involved with trading, can't yet. And handle it as such. Let the Editor play Mike Keenan. "If so, then I need to be kept in the loop so I can ban these people." Here where we differ. You banning just creates more work for you, correct? Mentioned above, this an Adult and Single Issue board. You can't be expected to do everything. Posters have to contribute to the group too? So we've had some problems with what common in South East Asia films, which uncommon in the United States and here. Leading to this recent Korean one. Heard all about it, which found to be true under review. Left a stern note about it here. Allowing for the poster to admit his error, if the case? but same time getting point across if it meant as humour. Figure handled without you having to put any effort into at all? "I thought we had decided to mark suspicious entries as "Under Review"." Figured had a "Sea of Red" developing, didn't appear to be getting poster's attention. Tried another way. "When I look at an entry like Line of Fire, there's no violation of policy that would justify its deletion." Entries aren't signed, tried to line up for the Search and coach accordingly. However, I've missed afew going through that came up the hard way. So yeah, like to get the attention of the poster whom did his own thing in the DB, and relate what heard about it. "What can I tell someone who complains? Been polite as can on this site. Figure no reason fellas can't come on this page and ask me. You agree? |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 17 05:09:31 2004 Re: Brian R Post |
| Brian R wrote:
> You're fixing problems that I don't > perceive as problems, so I must not be getting the > proper information Figure you're asking about the Search testing then? Problem being, get those non-English questions about say "cough-Check Database-cough", but still couldn't bring up entry. Figured solution to organise all in a standard. Coach to: Copy & Paste IMDB title and Episode title from Epguides, or TVTOME. Episode: "Epguides Title" Ones off, like that PSI Luv You show that got by me can cause problems. Doing ones' own thing in there causes problems as well. Still have a few fellas got to keep an eye on and assist with their trouble. One particular fella over there English good, but uses words not common used. Like to get them into the system. |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 17 12:49:39 2004 Re: Brian R Post |
| Jay L wrote:
> You banning just creates more work for you, correct? > Mentioned above, this an Adult and Single Issue board. > You can't be expected to do everything. Posters have to > contribute to the group too? The amount of work I have to do for that isn't an issue. I've got to be aware of what's going on. It doesn't make sense to keep me shielded from problems. If there are troublemakers, I not only want to be informed, I HAVE to be. This is my responsibility. > So we've had some problems with what common in South East > Asia films, which uncommon in the United States and here. > Leading to this recent Korean one. See, here you'd need to explain more about what the problem is. > "I thought we had decided to mark suspicious entries as > "Under Review"." > Figured had a "Sea of Red" developing, didn't appear to > be getting poster's attention. Tried another way. Ok. But is pulling them out, fixing them, putting them back any more effective? > "When I look at an entry like Line of Fire, there's no > violation of policy that would justify its deletion." > Entries aren't signed, > tried to line up for the Search and coach accordingly. I understand about the titles and all. If we're going to try to "coach" via deletions, then it's going have to be posted to Discussion. Most people don't read this forum, why should they? > "What can I tell someone who complains? > Been polite as can on this site. Figure no reason fellas > can't come on this page and ask me. That's true, and I do that. I just didn't realize you were taking out entries for incorrectly formatted titles. I think we need a better way. |
| Brian R |
| Sunday October 17 13:02:06 2004 Re: Brian R Post |
| Jay L wrote:
> Figure you're asking about the Search testing then? Well, I've known about the title thing for a while, that's why I developed the Title tool to list them out and stuff. What I'm not in the loop with is how it's being resolved. If it's a big problem, we need to figure out a better system. |
| Brian R |
| Sunday October 17 15:25:41 2004 Re: Brian R Post |
| Brian R wrote:
> Well, a lot of the time your notes and things are > kind of Jay shorthand Fair enough |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 17 20:07:29 2004 db search request |
| Quick question, is there a way you could add a "record number" to the search box in the db?
i.e. if I want record 9685, just type it in and hit go. Not really a big thing, but would be kind of nice. What would also be kind of cool is to have the actress field in the results page a hyperlink to a google search. Sadly there isn't really a central repositry of actor's pictures, but a google search usually comes close. http://www.google.com/search?q=%22FIRSTNAME+LASTNAME%22 |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Sunday October 17 20:32:26 2004 Re: Brian R Post |
| Brian R wrote:
> I'm open to suggestions on how to solve this problem. > I don't know how practical this would be ... but how 'bout if folks were informed that any entries entered that raise questions would be listed at DBC, and that they should check it for, say, a week after creating an entry to see if any flags are raised about it. If there are, and they don't respond to the concerns within a week of the entry being listed, it goes the way of civil discourse in this country ... i.e., dead and buried. They snooze, they lose. Make sense? And if so ... are the time frames workable? |
| Biff |
| Sunday October 17 20:46:36 2004 [2722] Lois |
| She gets grabbed about 35 minutes in, hands are tied behind her back, seated in a chair.
She gets tied to the chair off screen and at about 42 minutes, lex luther pays her a visit and taunts her. Clark finally rescues her at around 46", the closeups can been seen at this time. |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Sunday October 17 21:12:00 2004 [10625] Monk |
| scene @27" |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Sunday October 17 21:23:25 2004 [10625] Monk |
| She doesn't get freed either. The next scene cuts to her in an interrogation room at the police hq. |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Sunday October 17 21:32:18 2004 how should i proceed with this?? |
| "Bring 'Em Back Alive" (1982)
[TV-Series 1982-1983] Cindy Morgan I know that miss morgan had at least two scenes and proably more but I don't recall episodes... |
| Snowcat |
| Sunday October 17 23:07:40 2004 [9565] C.S.I.: Miami |
| At 11 minutes, she is captured, dragged into a van, hooded and presumably restrained. Van drives off while boyfriend looks stupid.
The hooded scene is quick, about 10 frames, so it is pretty easy to miss. At about 13" you see a video of her reading a "kidnappee waiver". |
| AsbestosFilter |
| AsbestosFilter@yahoo.com |
| Sunday October 17 23:13:28 2004 Re: how should i proceed with this?? |
| Snowcat wrote:
> "Bring 'Em Back Alive" (1982) > [TV-Series 1982-1983] > Cindy Morgan > I know that miss morgan had at least two scenes and > proably more but I don't recall episodes... I'd think you'd want to at least watch a clip of a scene so you could describe what happens a little better before throwing it in. That way, someone else who's seen it might be able to flesh it out a bit more, or perhaps even come up with an episode title. If you don't have a clip, well, someone reading this just might, so sit back with your fingers crossed along with the rest of us. That's my $.02, at least. The rest of you feel free to weigh in if you think otherwise. |
| An Old Friend |
| Sunday October 17 23:48:32 2004 Re: Brian R Post |
| Brian R wrote:
> How frequent are such entries? > Are these deliberate, Warned of afew, caught three now myself. Don't see how fella erred on gender?, so say acid humour attempt. > to do my job. > my responsibility. Disagree with this until you get paid, or something out of this. To me, group of fellas making use of opportunity to get ahold of and pass around scenes worldwide. Figure slowly happening. "All lines contributing, and all that" > Again, I think you should CC me, then they'll have a > much more realistic opinion Relating a perception problem concerning why I take things out. Say when Poster comments that "*Jane Doe* had the scene, but rather *Red-headed, freckled Sally*", then I hear from fella whom fancies Jane Doe. Fair solution to take out Sally, or add in "some fellas fancy Jane Doe"? "This piece of trash" with "some fellas liked it"? Ideally they'd let it go, but figured fairer if comments like that kept to place fellas could come to their fancy defence. Pointing this out, or relating foreign posters search trouble, normally fellas then understand. Basically not realising Discussion Page and Database different the problem. > It seems like you use "pulling" to get the > attention > of users, is that working to a sufficient degree? Yes |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 17 23:51:25 2004 Re: [9685] CSI: Crime Scene Investigation |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> Scenes occur at 28 minutes Got it thanx for assist |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 17 23:55:07 2004 Re: [9685] CSI: Crime Scene Investigation |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> Actress is Erinn Carter Got it, thanx for assist |
| Jay L |
| Sunday October 17 23:57:03 2004 Re: [2722] Lois |
| AsbestosFilter wrote:
> She gets grabbed Got it, thanx for assist |
| Jay L |
|
|