|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Saturday October 09 01:17:58 2004 Re: Renegadekid2003 |
| Jay L wrote:
> "That's not the policy. The policy is not to mention > (directly) ages." > Okay, > but have been encouraging fellas to post their opinions > here so you could be aware, opposed to e-mail. Are you suggesting a change in policy? Are we going to take out Don't Bother to Knock and Virtuosity? What about Ulee's Gold? Or Just Cause? Naturally, I don't want people emailing you regarding this, as you don't make policy, so I certainly can understand you refering them to page. Perhaps the best thing would be for them to contact me. Not everyone will be satisfied with every entry in the DB. Sometimes the answer to requests for changes or deletions has to be "no". |
| Brian R |
| Saturday October 09 02:02:00 2004 Re: Renegadekid2003 |
| "Are you suggesting a change in policy?" Are you asking me? I just reposted for Renegadekid2003, whom raised it on the page. Which prefer. Don't Bother to Knock Virtuosity? Ulee's Gold? Just Cause? Give me abit, I'll check the Sqwacklist, get back to the rest later. |
| Jay L |
| Saturday October 09 03:24:16 2004 Re: Renegadekid2003 |
| "Don't Bother to Knock and Virtuosity? What about Ulee's Gold? Or Just Cause?" Okay checked. Don't have mentioned in the Sqwacklist. But wait for it. "Naturally, I don't want people emailing you regarding this, as you don't make policy, so I certainly can understand you refering them to page." Renegadekid2003 hasn't emailed me about this. First I've heard from him. Others involving different entries did that. Recall wife of one of the Bure brothers were among wanted deleted "Perhaps the best thing would be for them to contact me." Okay "Not everyone will be satisfied with every entry in the DB. Sometimes the answer to requests for changes or deletions has to be "no"." Got it |
| Jay L |
| Saturday October 09 11:40:48 2004 ? |
| Record number: 10815
Title: The Forgotten (2004) Medium: Movie Actress: Julianne Moore Description: There's a nice handcuff scene involving Moore towards the beginning of this rather lame movie. She confronts a man about the disappearance of her son and after awhile he gets fed up with her and calls the police. They come to pick her up and she's led out to their car with her hands cuffed behind her back. There are a couple of shots of her wrists cuffed so we know she was actually wearing them during filming. This is one the first bondage scenes that Julianne Moore has done I believe. |
| Saturday October 09 11:54:45 2004 Re: ? |
| > Record number: 10815
> > Title: The Forgotten (2004) > Medium: Movie > Actress: Julianne Moore Here, this should line it up for the search: Record number: 10815 Title: Forgotten, The (2004) Medium: Movie Actress: Julianne Moore aka Julie Ann Moore |
| JayL |
| http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0356618/ |
| Saturday October 09 12:30:23 2004 Re: Renegadekid2003 |
| Jay L wrote:
> "Are you suggesting a change in policy?" > Are you asking me? I guess not :) > I just reposted for Renegadekid2003, whom raised it on > the page. Which prefer. Yes, obviously better that I be in the loop. I think you'd be within your rights to refuse any DB questions/ complaints by private contact. We have this forum so that no one needs to deal with editors directly. In fact I refer all routine contact on the DB here (although policy changes would be different). |
| Brian R |
| Saturday October 09 15:35:18 2004 Re: Renegadekid2003 |
| "Yes, obviously better that I be in the loop." Figure better "everyone" in loop, so going to answer this generally. Fellas get an idea of what other fellas thinking, then can adjust their posting. "I think you'd be within your rights to refuse any DB questions/complaints by private contact." Yes have been, here why "In General" as problem related to above. {Rough} "You edited my entry, WHY?? The movie did suck! No gag, so scene sucked!" "Redhead Jane Doe SHOULD have been B&G'd! It would have been okay if not as hot so&so was B&G'd by herself. It WAS obviously ruined by Political Correctly Catholic Feminazis! and related: {Rough} Brian allowed my opinions on Discussion Page. He's even allowed pictures of unbound actresses EVERYBODY knows, about shows with NO SCENES! So WHY are you acting like "Saddam"?? To answer, Forums allow fellas with differing opinions to make them aware to each other through replies. However, you can't reply to a Database entry. For me to be fair, do have to act like "Saddam" After awhile, realised e-mail wasn't as good as forums. It only allowed for Saddam here to hear one side. Which why prefer to gear it here. This why reposted Renegadekid2003 comment. Have some to relate on it, just have to figure how to do it carefully. |
| Jay L |
| Saturday October 09 17:31:57 2004 Sorry guys |
| I didn't mean to cause such a hoo ha with my posting it was a genuine concern and i thought the database forum was the place to post it .I have taken on board the moderator has said and it seems fair enough i guess ,i't up to us guys to police ourselves on these matters where age is a concern .Leave it there so i will . The Kid |
| Renegadekid2003 |
| Saturday October 09 18:06:31 2004 Re: Renegadekid2003 |
| "i curiously checked the database and saw an entry for it i was quite surprised ." "I don't think it appropriate that we have an entry for this scene on the database" Carefully wording this, ask as favour replies similar worded careful. Thanx Similar concerns expressed after 15 or so entries involving one of the Bure brother's wife, but by an admitted non-Collector. Reason mentioned, Collectors more likely to have had similar situations as have myself: Fella asks about getting ahold of such&such scenes (One recall involved Heartbeat & Medicopter series?). Plan to mail to him, then get that email signed different: "I don't know what you're talking about? Nobody here asked you for anything. Are you sure you typed correct? First instinct is to reply: "Hit "reply". Also got your address. Better go home and ask..." but then figure out what going on, and don't. Somebody already has some explaining to do at dinner huh? Being aware of things like this about posters here, makes perception quite different, or less serious, than say believe involving "fellas you'd rather not have anything to do with" |
| Jay L |
| Saturday October 09 18:57:21 2004 Re: Renegadekid2003 |
| Jay L wrote:
> Figure better "everyone" in loop, so going to answer this > generally. I agree. > So WHY are you acting like "Saddam"?? Why are you? You should be nice like me! Really though, stuff like that is definitely inappropriate. I have no problem with you CCing me a copy. I guarantee such people will think more fondly of you after I chime in. > It only allowed for Saddam here to hear one side. > Which why prefer to gear it here. Yes, here is best. > This why reposted Renegadekid2003 comment. So it's all his fault. I suspected as much. Off with his head. |
| Brian R |
|
|