|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Saturday September 21 12:23:50 2002 Re: What to do? |
|
> Decide what you'd figure best here. I posted in discussion, no replies, so now I entered them. Hope its OK with you. |
| Per |
| pka@mail1.stofanet.dk |
| Saturday September 21 12:41:55 2002 Candyman (1992) |
| Entry number 1441
Actress Virginia Madsen Current description: Three quarters of the way into the film, Candyman frames Helen Lyle (Madsen) for her friend's murder. She is thought to be looney so she is taken to a psycho ward. There she is strapped down with leather wrist and ankle restraints to a gurney. A lengthy shot, and she struggles nicely. My description (I have the scene on tape): Three quarters of the way into the film, Candyman frames Helen Lyle (Madsen) for her friend's murder. She is arrested by the police, and has her hands cuffed behind her back as she is led out. She is thought to be looney so she is taken to a psycho ward. In the ambulance, she lies on a stretcher,hands bound together in front with plastic cuffs ( cable binders). In the psycho ward she is strapped down with leather wrist and ankle restraints to a gurney. A lengthy shot, and she struggles nicely. Later, propably the next day, she is released from the gurney, only to be seated in a wheelchair and have her wrists tied with leather restraints again. Then she is driven down the hallway to her psychiatrist's office, and there has a lenghty conversation with him, including this remark (to which he doesnt answer) "are these restraints really nessessary?". |
| Per |
| pka@mail1.stofanet.dk |
| Saturday September 21 13:26:45 2002 Re: Candyman (1992) [#1441] |
| > My description (I have the scene on tape):
> Got it, thanx |
| Jay L |
| Saturday September 21 15:45:29 2002 Re: Candyman (1992) [#1441] Ceremony |
| Well OK seems you do not want assessments of the tie. I can live with that of course.
To me, the "reality quality" of the tie is more important than for example whether the Damsel is gagged or not. Yeah tastes, different fetishes....... What do we know Jay L ? |
| Per |
| pka@mail1.stofanet.dk |
| Saturday September 21 16:39:15 2002 Re: Candyman (1992) [#1441] Ceremony |
| "Well OK seems you do not want assessments of the tie." Copied word for word your Candyman description, so you must be talking about Ceremony. Anyway, Not a case of what I want: From Data-Base Additions Page Instructions: 3. Please try to be as accurate as possible. If you aren't sure of the exact title, or the actress name, try looking in the IMDB: IMDB 4. Try to be objective when you write the descriptions. Details of how, what, length, that sort of thing are much more important than your opinion of the scene. It's best to let people make up their own minds about it. If it appears to fit inside these guidelines, the entry will be left as is by me. "Yeah tastes, different fetishes......." What? You figure I'm picking on your's? "What do we know Jay L ?" Okay, I'll play. You'll have to take my word for it, but I've edited quite a few entries here. Even so much as adding and or specifying gag type or clothing worn by the ladies. If you search back on Discussion Page, you'll see the posts where fellas are requesting this. If a particular interest doesn't conflict with Brian's guidelines, and can be added in the bottom of the entry, I certainly won't prevent or edit it out. |
| Jay L |
| Saturday September 21 16:53:18 2002 Re: Candyman (1992) [#1441] |
| > To me, the "reality quality" of the tie is more important
> than for example whether the Damsel is gagged or not. > > Yeah tastes, different fetishes....... Well Per, I also couldn't care if there's a gag scene or not. Don't edit based on that. |
| Jay L |
| Saturday September 21 18:56:50 2002 Ceremony |
| Jay you are right, I was talking about "Ceremony" because a couple of sentencies describing the tie was let out.
No, I dont think you are picking on MY fetish. Why would I think that? Let me try to explain. It might be that subjective assessments of a scene does not belong in DB, but I think that is a hard criteria to hold up, because what isnt subjective? When I search DB I seek things that may interest me. OK judged by others, but I cant see how it could be different.. So, the "tie quality" means something to me if not others. (Frankly I dont give a damn if the Lady has a ballgag in her mouth, secured by thirteen rounds of silver duct tape wrapped around her head, supplied with a leather head harness, and she being barefoot, if its plain to see that she could free herself in app. two seconds because of the no-brains ropework supposed to tie her hands). So, here is a scene with rare decent ropework. Its nice to see IMO. I am not even sure if the actress could free herself if she wanted to. That makes this scene a hell of a lot different from all the sloppy-ropework scenes IMO, and that was what I wanted to tell in the DB entry. I did it the wrong way it seems. "There is a closeup of her bound hands" yes but what does that tell you? Nothing! Regards Per |
| Per |
| pka@mail1.stofanet.dk |
| Saturday September 21 18:57:14 2002 Ceremony |
| Jay you are right, I was talking about "Ceremony" because a couple of sentencies describing the tie was let out.
No, I dont think you are picking on MY fetish. Why would I think that? Let me try to explain. It might be that subjective assessments of a scene does not belong in DB, but I think that is a hard criteria to hold up, because what isnt subjective? When I search DB I seek things that may interest me. OK judged by others, but I cant see how it could be different.. So, the "tie quality" means something to me if not others. (Frankly I dont give a damn if the Lady has a ballgag in her mouth, secured by thirteen rounds of silver duct tape wrapped around her head, supplied with a leather head harness, and she being barefoot, if its plain to see that she could free herself in app. two seconds because of the no-brains ropework supposed to tie her hands). So, here is a scene with rare decent ropework. Its nice to see IMO. I am not even sure if the actress could free herself if she wanted to. That makes this scene a hell of a lot different from all the sloppy-ropework scenes IMO, and that was what I wanted to tell in the DB entry. I did it the wrong way it seems. "There is a closeup of her bound hands" yes but what does that tell you? Nothing! Regards Per |
| Per |
| pka@mail1.stofanet.dk |
| Saturday September 21 19:26:20 2002 Re: Ceremony |
| Double post sorry not intended my computer makes a fool of me. |
| Per |
| Saturday September 21 19:32:11 2002 Re: Ceremony |
| >
> I did it the wrong way it seems. "There is a closeup of > her bound hands" yes but what does that tell you? Nothing! > I'd think something along the lines of "her wrists are (realistically, tightly, effectively [pick one]) bound" would've gotten your intended point across and passed muster with no problem. |
| Biff |
| Saturday September 21 20:32:12 2002 Re: Ceremony [#7874] |
| "Jay you are right, I was talking about "Ceremony"" Okay, figured the one. "When I search DB I seek things that may interest me." "So, the "tie quality" means something to me" Okay, added this in bottom line of description: "There's a closeup of our heroines bound hands, with decent ropework that appears the actress couldn't free herself if she wanted to." "That makes this scene a hell of a lot different from all the sloppy-ropework scenes IMO, and that was what I wanted to tell in the DB entry." Figure the above addition will handle that, within the guidelines. Sloppy-ropework is a popular Discussion Page topic, if you want to bring this to other fella's attention. |
| Jay L |
| Saturday September 21 20:38:17 2002 Re: Ceremony |
| > I'd think something along the lines of "her wrists are
> (realistically, tightly, effectively [pick one]) bound" I pick "decent ropework", due to already adding it in Buddy. ;) |
| Jay L |
| Saturday September 21 21:31:09 2002 Re: Ceremony |
|
> > I'd think something along the lines of "her wrists are > > > (realistically, tightly, effectively [pick one]) bound" > > > I pick "decent ropework", due to already adding it in > Buddy. ;) > Lazy bugger. <g> |
| Biff |
| Saturday September 21 21:43:24 2002 Re: Ceremony |
| With your addition, making the point, I think it is OK.
Thanks a lot. (I wish I had your mail adress Jay L-then I could mail you with an attachment - the picture of the decent ropework, designed to hold the Damsel in place for some time...) |
| Per |
| pka@mail1.stofanet.dk |
|
|