|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Monday December 31 00:51:47 2012 Re: So Undercover |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Movie heading straight to DVD on Feb. 8. > Found this still on a fan page. Of course, I'm hoping she > was just ungagged. > It was released in the UK at the beginning of the month, but can't seem to find the movie on any streaming sites, nor any screencaps. Can anybody help with that? Or can anybody confirm a scene? Even just a handgag? |
| Monday December 31 02:11:37 2012 Re: So Undercover |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > > Movie heading straight to DVD on Feb. 8. > > Found this still on a fan page. Of course, I'm > hoping she > > was just ungagged. > > > It was released in the UK at the beginning of the month, > but can't seem to find the movie on any streaming sites, > nor any screencaps. > Can anybody help with that? Or can anybody confirm a > scene? Even just a handgag? Judging by the fact that there are only a handfull of reviews on IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes, I think that just about no one saw the movie. I guess we'll have to wait till February to find out. |
| Monday December 31 04:29:10 2012 Re: So Undercover |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > > (unsigned poster) wrote: > > > Movie heading straight to DVD on Feb. 8. > > > Found this still on a fan page. Of course, I'm > > hoping she > > > was just ungagged. > > > > > It was released in the UK at the beginning of the > month, > > but can't seem to find the movie on any streaming > sites, > > nor any screencaps. > > Can anybody help with that? Or can anybody confirm a > > > scene? Even just a handgag? > Judging by the fact that there are only a handfull of > reviews on IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes, I think that just > about no one saw the movie. I guess we'll have to wait > till February to find out. True, just thought there were some UK fans around these neck of the woods that might have caught it. I was hoping it'd leak online, but can't find anything yet. But that picture you or somebody, posted has me REALLY intrigued. Especially since the director stated Miley was supposed to face "real danger" at some point in the movie... |
| Monday December 31 05:24:41 2012 Re: So Undercover |
| > Movie heading straight to DVD on Feb. 8. > Found this still on a fan page. Of course, I'm hoping she > was just ungagged. Which site would that be? |
| Monday December 31 07:56:20 2012 Re: So Undercover |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Especially since the director stated Miley was > supposed to face "real danger" at some point in the movie... One review I saw emphasized there is nothing scary in this movie--I believe addressing the concerns of parents who are considering taking a 9 or 10 year old to see it. So I wouldn't hold my breath. |
| ss |
| Monday December 31 12:05:38 2012 Re: So Undercover |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > > Movie heading straight to DVD on Feb. 8. > > Found this still on a fan page. Of course, I'm > hoping she > > was just ungagged. > Which site would that be? Just a general Miley Cyrus fan site. If you google it, you'll get a bunch. The sites all have the same promo shots we've seen. I'd bet the photo was nothing, but you never know. Looks like a female in the car with her, so could be a good guy situation where she's grabbed to protect her. |
| Monday December 31 12:21:16 2012 Re: Zero Hour |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Any news? > A bit more detail for those ready to set the VCR/DVR: Zero Hour Premieres Thursday, February 14th at 8|7c on ABC. Saw a new extended trailer on ABC last week but can't find it online. |
| Monday December 31 15:04:02 2012 Re: Zero Hour |
| (unsigned poster) wrote:Saw a new extended trailer on ABC last week but can't find it online. See video page. |
| R. |
| Monday December 31 17:24:34 2012 Re: So Undercover |
| JP wrote: > I agree...but that doesn't mean there won't be a > possibility for some binding & gagging. I checked the 13 reviews and searched the usual suspect words these guys often use sarcastically when they hate a movie, but got nothing on tied, duct tape, and gagged. With 12 bad reviews out of 13, was hoping to read something like "this movie offers nothing unless you like seeing Miley Cyrus bound and gagged." |
| Monday December 31 17:29:33 2012 Re: Playing Hookey |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > In my case, the two most memorable examples were the > Karen Jensen kidnapping on "Bracken's World" > (ducked out of a good party for that one), and the Mary > Louise Weller kidnapping on "Super Train" You're very dedicated and to a certain extent lucky. I remember seeing both of those scenes on first run, but I didn't think that either one of them was ever re-run. Wasn't "superTrain one of the all-time pull-the-plug busts on TV? Sort of like "Dog and Cat" where we never got a second chance to see the famous adhesive tape episode, Another irritating thing was that in the summer shows might be re-run on different nights and/or at different times. If you didn't have a TV Guide subscription, it was really tough. And even if you did, the networks would sometime make last minute decisions to move stuff around or just cancel it. "Good old days"... yeah. |
| Monday December 31 19:01:30 2012 Re: Michelle Johnson, |
| The Moderator wrote: Any request for a clip or a video link > posted here will be deleted. OOP--Sorry Mr. Mod...I was hammered. |
| Introspector |
| Monday December 31 19:51:15 2012 Re: So Undercover |
| Well I found this : "It was revealed to us that her co-star Jeremy Piven is the bad guy in the film and that in scene we were shooting he kidnaps her and takes her back to the Sorority House and wants to kill her but her sorority sisters come in and save her life! As far as Jeremy Piven, I did not interact with him, he looked like a bum on the set (guess that was the idea!), but between takes he talked to no one." |
| http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2011/01/16/so-undercover-set-report-from-tulane-university/ |
| Monday December 31 21:42:35 2012 Re: So Undercover |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Well I found this : > "It was revealed to us that her co-star Jeremy Piven > is the bad guy in the film and that in scene we were > shooting he kidnaps her and takes her back to the > Sorority House This could be good news based on the photo still. Looks like a female in the car with Miley, so this is likely that scene. let's hope it's what it looks like, Miley being ungagged. |
| Monday December 31 21:44:26 2012 Re: So Undercover |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > This could be good news based on the photo still. Looks > like a female in the car with Miley. Read that wrong, thought it said Jenny. |
|
|