|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Saturday October 21 02:33:36 2017 Re: Couples in distress (rescued from the error log) |
| Boundy22 wrote: > You mean the scene where they were tied back to back on > the bed and she was wearing I think a Cyan underwear and > there was another lady bound and gagged on the Floor ? Precisely!! DO you know which show it is? |
| Joe Callecita |
| Saturday October 21 02:34:51 2017 Re: Supernatural |
| Gagster wrote: > Coming in next week's episode: Clark Backo tied to a > chair by villain of the week. Hopefully more to the scene > than just this. Looks like an on screen tying to chair. If it's shown that would be great. |
| Florentina |
| Saturday October 21 08:12:40 2017 Re: Alice Nevers |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > A bit better when an handgag is over a gag Okay, I'll bite - in which episode does this image appear? |
| David B. |
| Saturday October 21 09:16:54 2017 Re: Alice Nevers |
| > Okay, I'll bite - in which episode does this image > appear? At Video Page |
| Saturday October 21 11:05:49 2017 Sky King |
| I have just seen a quick notice that DECADES - IMO the best TV channel for old, hard to find shows, is going to start showing Sky King episodes in the future. I have not seen any other details yet, but am looking forward to seeing how many will include some of the many Gloria Winders scenes. |
| Saturday October 21 16:10:38 2017 question about Raffish's alerts |
| hi. not sure if this is the best place to post this but I have a quick question. Raffish's alerts are wonderful (thanks raffish), but why are some of the entries in bold face & some (most) not? I at first thought it might mean "movies vs. television shows" but that wasn't right, then I thought maybe those with gags were in bold but many in bold don't have gags so that wasn't it either....can anyone tell me what the bold type means? Many thanks!!! |
| Saturday October 21 16:21:44 2017 Re: question about Raffish's alerts |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > hi. not sure if this is the best place to post this but > I have a quick question. Raffish's alerts are wonderful > (thanks raffish), but why are some of the entries in bold > face & some (most) not? I at first thought it might > mean "movies vs. television shows" but that > wasn't right, then I thought maybe those with gags were > in bold but many in bold don't have gags so that wasn't > it either....can anyone tell me what the bold type means? > Many thanks!!! Bold results are done by searching descriptions in the database, for the words "gagged" "gag" etc. It's not 100% accurate because the some descriptions will say "not gagged" or "no gags", but these are still returned in bold. As I say it's not perfect... |
| Saturday October 21 16:45:15 2017 Re: question about Raffish's alerts |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Bold results are done by searching descriptions in the > database, for the words "gagged" > "gag" etc. Right. There's a key at the bottom of the page that explains this, but it's easily missed, so I'm going to move it to the top from here on out: "Key: Bold titles denote scenes with gags. (This is done by scanning the DB entry for relevant phrases and is unlikely to be 100% accurate.)" For any code geeks out there, here's the regular expression that I'm currently using to try and filter out false positives: $description =~ s/ungag|sans gag|hand[ -]?gag|not? (also )?(been )?gag|engag|faux gag//gsi; After that expression runs, any entry that still has "gag" in it is presumed to be a gag scene. I've done a few spot checks and tweaked the expression accordingly. It's never going to be foolproof, but you guys are always welcome to email me when you see a false positive (or false negative). Then I can either tweak the expression further or maybe just modify the DB entry itself. |
| Raffish |
| raffish@outlook.com |
| Saturday October 21 16:52:34 2017 Re: question about Raffish's alerts |
| Oh, and in case it's not clear...that expression will catch the "not gagged" and "no gags" cases mentioned above, but of course there are less common phrases to indicate the lack of a gag that haven't been handled yet. |
| Raffish |
| Saturday October 21 17:03:06 2017 General Hospital possibility next week |
| There's a chance that there'll be a scene on General Hospital next week. Some foreign agents are trying to catch Jason - or his twin, or clone, or some damn stupid thing - and have decided to force him to come to them by kidnapping someone he cares about. They teased Friday it will be veteran DiD Sam, which would be fine, but since she's had other scenes I'm praying it will be Elizabeth. I'd pay real American money to see a great scene with her. Just hope they don't use one of the guy's young sons. Anyway, worth checking. |
| Saturday October 21 17:15:13 2017 GH followup |
| Sam is played by Kelly Monaco; Rebecca Herbst plays Elizabeth. |
| Saturday October 21 17:40:29 2017 Re: General Hospital possibility next week |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > There's a chance that there'll be a scene on General > Hospital next week. Some foreign agents are trying to > catch Jason - or his twin, or clone, or some damn stupid > thing - and have decided to force him to come to them by > kidnapping someone he cares about. They teased Friday it > will be veteran DiD Sam, which would be fine, but since > she's had other scenes I'm praying it will be Elizabeth. > I'd pay real American money to see a great scene with > her. Just hope they don't use one of the guy's young > sons. Anyway, worth checking. I doubt it will be Sam. The preview for Monday shows her in a scene in another situation. Unless, the scene at the end on Friday was a tease and no one is grabbed yet. But yeah, let's hope for Rebecca Herbst to get another full treatment. Her first one was good, but obscured in darkness of two types, the scene background and a blindfold for most of it. Herbst keeps looking better with aga, and right now she looks extraordinarily beautiful and shagging for a (binding and) gagging. |
| Old 88 |
| Saturday October 21 19:29:50 2017 Re: Leatherface 2017 |
| > Nothing at all in this film eh that's hugely > disappointing as every previous entry in the Texas > Chainsaw saga has had some form of restraint, Well, TheMovieSpoiler says Lizzy (Vanessa Grasse) "wakes up to find herself handcuffed to the back of Hal's car..." |
 |
 |
| http://www.themoviespoiler.com/2017Spoilers/Leatherface.html |
| Saturday October 21 19:46:01 2017 Re: Raven-Symonč |
> Whoopi doing a guest shot on that > Korean game show where the girls get Anybody know which episode was it? |
| Saturday October 21 23:52:47 2017 Re: American Horror Story: Cult |
| Another scene, a couple murdered by Lena Dunham's cult. Girl is tied up. Bad ending and putz. |
|
|