|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Tuesday May 17 01:27:34 2011 Pirates 4 |
| The mermaid in this played by Astrid Berges-Frisbey is bound hands behind her back and then arms over head on two separate occasions. Penelope Cruz is bound hands behind the back toward the end as well. |
| Tuesday May 17 08:11:15 2011 Re: Pirates 4 |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > The mermaid in this played by Astrid Berges-Frisbey is > bound hands behind her back and then arms over head on > two separate occasions. Penelope Cruz is bound hands > behind the back toward the end as well. I'm pretty sure I speak for everyone here with a sincere thanks for the confirmation, looks like I may need to go ahead and see if I can take a look at this now! |
| Brian K. |
| Tuesday May 17 11:39:57 2011 charlie's angels prreview vid |
| We got some DID action http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/05/charlies-angels-video-clip-pure-candy-angels-with-some-baggage.html May more of it come. Thursdays at 8 on ABC this fall |
| joe |
| Tuesday May 17 11:51:55 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| joe wrote: > We got some DID action > I think I saw that scene in "She Spies." I was hoping they wouldn't use the 100-bound babes beating up 300-pound guys nonsense as the storyline. Too bad it wasn't Minka Kelly bound and gagged on the bed. |
| Tuesday May 17 12:28:50 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| Too bad it wasn't Minka Kelly bound and gagged on the bed. I think the kidnap victim is played by Aubrey Peeples. |
| Tuesday May 17 12:38:24 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| > I think the kidnap victim is played by Aubrey Peeples. Most likely |
| http://www.facebook.com/AubreyPeeples |
| Tuesday May 17 13:40:52 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| joe wrote: > We got some DID action > http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/05/charlies-a > ngels-video-clip-pure-candy-angels-with-some-baggage.html > May more of it come. > Thursdays at 8 on ABC this fall Ridiculous. Just plain out ridiculous farce. More B rate eye candy "drama". 90lb pencil-armed waif knocks in a solid metal hotel room door with one kick? OFF IT'S HINGES NO LESS? C'mon. "We're not cops, we're angels." How cliche. I think I tasted a little vomit right there... |
| MagickRat |
| Tuesday May 17 14:00:08 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| magickrat- I think I tasted a little vomit right there...< I can taste your upchuck from here, Magick. This show looks even more reality challenged than the insanely stupid "She Spies". I'm glad Angel number two didn't need to karate chop her way through solid granite to get to the (poorly tied up) victim, because it would have been a piece of cake for her. |
| Tapemaster the Younger |
| Tuesday May 17 14:12:04 2011 Re: charlie's angels preview vid |
| joe wrote: > We got some DID action > http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/05/charlies-a > ngels-video-clip-pure-candy-angels-with-some-baggage.html > May more of it come. > Thursdays at 8 on ABC this fall Wow, thanks, that was an awesome scene, and the resolution of that clip at full screen is excellent. Love the thick gag and it looks like a blue bandana blindfold around her neck so clearly there is more to that scene. Plus, she is super cute and there is great close up. If this is the first preview I love it, it looks they are not afraid to go there and that's great. |
| Tuesday May 17 14:22:55 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| Tapemaster the Younger wrote: > magickrat- > I think I tasted a little vomit right there...< > I can taste your upchuck from here, Magick. This show > looks even more reality challenged than the insanely > stupid "She Spies". I'm glad Angel number two > didn't need to karate chop her way through solid granite > to get to the (poorly tied up) victim, because it would > have been a piece of cake for her. I'm willing to take a vacation from reality so that a wise-cracking bad actress can kick down a door, but when you gag the damsel with a bath towel for chrissakes, I tend to tune out. |
| kang |
| Tuesday May 17 14:45:11 2011 ncis |
| I hope something is going to happing tonight with ncis (to bad i can't watch it). But i got a feeling that nothing is going to happend. I think Barret is going to get killed and Ziva doens't get any treatment at all. I'm just hoping that i'm wrong but we'll see. |
| shootbinladen |
| Tuesday May 17 14:50:46 2011 Charlie's Angels preview vid |
| I know that Van's philosophy is (paraphrased) "It's all about the story", but I just can't help but be glad when there's a scene - even if the setup is overly cliched or goofy. 'Course, the shortcomings of the rest of the show (i.e. the non-damsel part) could doom the whole enterprise. Oops. Guess that's what Van meant.... |
 |
 |
 |
| Tuesday May 17 14:58:25 2011 Desperate Housewives |
| So did Eva Longoria get a handgag? Describe, if it's interesting. |
| Sam |
| Tuesday May 17 15:24:09 2011 Re: Charlie's Angels preview vid |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > I know that Van's philosophy is (paraphrased) "It's > all about the story", < Very cute girl. Mediocre scene. Terrible show. I think that's just about everything. |
| killbinladen |
| Tuesday May 17 15:34:54 2011 Re: Desperate Housewives |
| Sam wrote: > So did Eva Longoria get a handgag? Describe, if it's > interesting. She was handgagged from the front by her evil stepfather, who reminisced for a couple of seconds about how he used to handgag her when he abused her in days gone by "So," he said, "your mother wouldn't hear how much you were enjoying it." Then her husband or former husband - I don't really follow the show - came up behind him and smashed his skull in. Eva made a nice DiD face, but that was it. |
| Tuesday May 17 16:04:43 2011 Re: Desperate Housewives |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > She was handgagged from the front by her evil stepfather Any idea of the timing? It's apparently a 2-hour ep, so I don't want to sift through all that. |
| Sam |
| Tuesday May 17 16:13:29 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| kang wrote: > I'm willing to take a vacation from reality so that a > wise-cracking bad actress can kick down a door, but when > you gag the damsel with a bath towel for chrissakes, I tend to tune out. I'm not a real big fan of cleaves, but certainly prefer a thick one to a thin. And if it's in a hotel room, doesn't a towel make sense as a gag? Just not too likely that a network show is going to have the bad guys tear off her blouse, stuff it in her mouth, and then tie it in with her brassiere. I'm quite bemused at what a negative reaction this is getting. Were people expecting hard-edged, realistic drama from a remake of Charlie's Angels? We're getting a scene before the show premieres, and people are whining about it? Man, I dunno... you guys must just have tremendous scenes coming out of all your orifaces in order to sniff away a start like this. Well, good for you. For me, the show has my attention a lot more now than it did a few weeks ago. |
| Loup de loop |
| Tuesday May 17 16:15:15 2011 Re: Desperate Housewives |
| Sam wrote: > Any idea of the timing? It's apparently a 2-hour ep, so I > don't want to sift through all that. Last 15-20 minutes maybe? Definitely the last half hour. |
| Tuesday May 17 16:17:05 2011 Re: Desperate Housewives |
| Sam wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > > She was handgagged from the front by her evil > stepfather > Any idea of the timing? It's apparently a 2-hour ep, so I > don't want to sift through all that. It was in the last 10-15 minutes of the 2 hours, but there wasn't much more than was shown in the previews. |
| Gagster |
| Tuesday May 17 16:47:43 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| Loup de loop wrote: Were people expecting hard-edged, realistic drama from a remake of Charlie's Angels?< No, just like I don't expect fine dining from Burger King. But even though it might hit the spot now and then...it's still crap. |
| Pucker Henn |
| Tuesday May 17 16:50:29 2011 fast and fuiroius 5 |
| has anyone seen this movie? |
| Tuesday May 17 18:25:54 2011 Re: Strong independent heroines |
| > It's worth noting of course that it is possible to have a strong independant heroine who still gets tied up on a semi-regular basis though to the best of my knowledge it's a trick that's only been successfully pulled off twice - In The Avengers and Xena: Warrior Princess ~~~~ Perhaps one could add Stepfanie Kramer's Sgt. DeeDee McCall, aka "The Brass Cupcake" in "Hunter". The TV series maintained enough realism NOT to have McCall hauling off and overpowering much larger men in hand-to-hand combat. |
| J.T. |
| Tuesday May 17 18:45:03 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| Loup de loop wrote: > We're getting a scene before the show premieres, > and people are whining about it? A few people are never happy. Thick white cleaves are rare, so are super cute girls, dressed cute, hands behind and blindfolded previously but now just gagged, undoubtedly the scene is longer. It's a great start and a great indication if that's the clip they showed at the upfront. It seems the complaints, as few as they are, are more about the quality of the show or the realism, but for me, as long as there is a good scene, I'm in. I find it hard to complain about any scene with hands behind and a gag on a pretty girl. |
| Tuesday May 17 18:48:09 2011 Re: Strong independent heroines |
| J.T. wrote: > The TV series maintained enough realism NOT to have > McCall hauling off and overpowering much larger men in hand-to-hand combat. Thank goodness for that. |
 |
 |
 |
| Tuesday May 17 18:50:20 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| Loup de loop wrote: > kang wrote: > > I'm willing to take a vacation from reality so that > a > > wise-cracking bad actress can kick down a door, but > when > > you gag the damsel with a bath towel for chrissakes, > I tend to tune out. > I'm not a real big fan of cleaves, but certainly prefer a > thick one to a thin. And if it's in a hotel room, doesn't > a towel make sense as a gag? Just not too likely that a > network show is going to have the bad guys tear off her > blouse, stuff it in her mouth, and then tie it in with > her brassiere. I'm quite bemused at what a negative > reaction this is getting. Were people expecting > hard-edged, realistic drama from a remake of Charlie's > Angels? We're getting a scene before the show premieres, > and people are whining about it? Man, I dunno... you guys > must just have tremendous scenes coming out of all your > orifaces in order to sniff away a start like this. Well, > good for you. For me, the show has my attention a lot > more now than it did a few weeks ago. I think the difference here is I that don't NEED a scene that bad to have to submit myself to such horrible acting, writing, premise, etc. The heroines are outright ridiculous, the damsel is cute, the tie-up is mediocre at best, the gag is nothing short of a joke. Outright B rate fantasy schlock... I give this show five episodes total before ABC pulls the plug. Mark my words... |
| MagickRat |
| Tuesday May 17 19:32:16 2011 Re: Strong independent heroines |
| >>>>>J.T. wrote: > The TV series maintained enough realism NOT to have > McCall hauling off and overpowering much larger men in >>>hand-to-hand combat. One of my all time pet peeves. At least in the older days they had the girls giving the bad guys a karate chop to the back of the neck or some sort or judo flip. Now, they have these bony little 105 pound honeys going toe to toe with 200 pound thugs throwing right cross/left hook haymakers! That's just beyond ridiculous. On the actual subject of DiD's, I don't really care if she's normally strong, weak, or whatever, but once she's bound and gagged, I much prefer to see them irritated/pissed off rather than scared/crying/screaming. Especially when they emote and give off that "How dare you do this to me!" look. Just great. |
| The Greyman |
| Tuesday May 17 19:40:22 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| >>>MagickRat wrote: > 90lb pencil-armed waif knocks in a solid metal hotel room > door with one kick? OFF IT'S HINGES NO LESS? C'mon.<<< Last girl I saw do that had slayer strength. Silly? Maybe, but more plausible than what I just saw. Gimmie a break. I hate this show already. I really do. |
| The Greyman |
| Tuesday May 17 19:43:47 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| Tapemaster the Younger wrote: >>>This show looks even more reality challenged than the insanely stupid "She Spies".<<< She Spies, at least the first season, was played as tongue-in-cheek silliness. It was meant to be laughed at, as the girls were laughing as well. It was excellent. (1st season) |
| The Greyman |
| Tuesday May 17 19:53:56 2011 Re: ncis |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: (unsigned poster) Reason: People's handles are their own (and my) business. |
| The Moderator |
| Tuesday May 17 19:56:49 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| Oh my. Forget the complaints about it being cheesecakey. WHO DO I NEED TO SACRIFICE TO THE DID GODS TO GET A TAPE-GAG ON THAT CHICK WITH THE AFRO!? |
| Tuesday May 17 19:57:09 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| A reminder, again, that this is not a TV discussion forum. The merits of a program are not on-topic. Anything further will be removed. |
| The Moderator |
| Tuesday May 17 20:19:15 2011 Re: Cancelled TV Shows |
| More news on the TV renewal front: CW has renewed "Nikita" for another season. Season 1 was a dud in terms of DiD scenes, but perhaps Season 2 will be an improvement, though this might turn out to be another "Buffy" (yes, I know "BtVS" had some quality DiD moments, but all things considered, the show was something of a let-down in terms of full-treatment scenes -- Charisma Carpenter's scene from Season 1 of "Angel" put everything on "Buffy" to shame IMHO.) Speaking of "Buffy" (CW has likewise picked up Sarah Michelle Gellar's new crime drama "Ringer," a show which sounds like it has a good deal of potential (see the link). It might make up for the aforementioned "Buffy" dearth. |
| Dart |
| http://insidetv.ew.com/2011/05/17/sarah-michelle-gellar-cw/ |
| Tuesday May 17 20:26:43 2011 Re: Cancelled TV Shows |
| Dart wrote: > More news on the TV renewal front: CW has renewed > "Nikita" for another season. Season 1 was a > dud in terms of DiD scenes, ] Nikita's puppet had four scenes. One locked up in a cage, another when she and a coheart were captured as a test and was bound in a chair (maybe tied to it), and two with her strapped to a chair (once when she was drugged and the other last week when she was shocked to death and shot up with adrenaline). No gags but I still say they were DID scenes. |
| civil |
| Tuesday May 17 20:41:33 2011 NCIS |
| "Ziva" (Cote De Pablo) is bound and gagged but WE CAN'T SEE MUCH FROM THE CAMERA ANGLE. THIS IS NOW THE MOST FRUSTRATING BOUND AND GAGGED SCENE OF ALL TIME. |
| Kaman |
| Tuesday May 17 20:41:45 2011 The New TV Season |
| Fellow DiDiots, Now that the networks are rolling out their new schedules, I beg you (collectively)... (1) If you have some DiD-data to share (like the recent C.A. promo screencaps), by all means, share away! But... (2) Can we all agree NOT to trash or discuss what's probably going to go terribly wrong with any given show BEFORE WE'VE SEEN A SINGLE EPISODE?? Thank you. |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Tuesday May 17 20:44:35 2011 Re: NCIS |
| Kaman wrote: > "Ziva" (Cote De Pablo) is bound and gagged but > WE CAN'T SEE MUCH FROM THE CAMERA ANGLE. > THIS IS NOW THE MOST FRUSTRATING BOUND AND GAGGED SCENE > OF ALL TIME. Not the worst, but definitely in the top ten.... For those of you on the west coast, the glimpse of Cote comes at :40 minutes in.. The cliffhanger from last week with Sarah Jane Morris is resolved at :03, when she is found in the trunk of a car with clear plastic wrapped over her face, but no other visible bonds. As I write this, she has just been take captive again, so there is still a small chance of something worth watching. |
| Gagster |
| Tuesday May 17 20:45:43 2011 Re: NCIS |
| Kaman wrote: > "Ziva" (Cote De Pablo) is bound and gagged but > WE CAN'T SEE MUCH FROM THE CAMERA ANGLE. > THIS IS NOW THE MOST FRUSTRATING BOUND AND GAGGED SCENE > OF ALL TIME. Aaaaaaaaaaaargh!! Thud-thud-thud... <-(Sound of Van pounding head against wall.) Aaaaaaaaaaaaargh!! If anyone needs me, I'll be sobbing and mumbling incoherently in the corner. |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Tuesday May 17 20:52:38 2011 Re: NCIS |
| Gagster wrote: > Kaman wrote: > > "Ziva" (Cote De Pablo) is bound and gagged > but > > WE CAN'T SEE MUCH FROM THE CAMERA ANGLE. > > THIS IS NOW THE MOST FRUSTRATING BOUND AND GAGGED > SCENE > > OF ALL TIME. > Not the worst, but definitely in the top ten.... For > those of you on the west coast, the glimpse of Cote comes > at :40 minutes in.. > The cliffhanger from last week with Sarah Jane Morris is > resolved at :03, when she is found in the trunk of a car > with clear plastic wrapped over her face, but no other > visible bonds. > As I write this, she has just been take captive again, so > there is still a small chance of something worth watching. Well, so not exactly worth watching.... the last scene is resolved at :47, with Sarah and two guys standing, hands tied behind, and hooded while being hosed down. The hoods are removed, and Sarah looks like a drowned rat, and there are no good shots of her tied, just closeups on her face. Only 4 months until September premieres and we can start getting frustrated with this show all over again. |
| Gagster |
| Tuesday May 17 21:00:37 2011 NCIS Pyrimad |
| Not even 1.5 seconds, and it could have been her stand in for all we could tell. That was the lamest bound and gagged scene if not for the year maybe for all time, Couldn't see her face screen time was for half a second. Holy crap did they screw this up. How long has everyone waited for this BS |
| Tuesday May 17 21:07:39 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| The Moderator wrote: > A reminder, again, that this is not a TV discussion > forum. The merits of a program are not on-topic. Anything > further will be removed. Of course it will... |
| MagickRat |
| Tuesday May 17 21:14:07 2011 Re: ncis |
| The Moderator wrote: > This post was deleted. > Poster: (unsigned poster) > Reason: People's handles are their own (and my) > business. On the contrary... MY handle is none of YOUR business... |
| MagickRat |
| Tuesday May 17 21:15:37 2011 Re: charlie's angels prreview vid |
| Maybe they should add a fourth Angel... |
 |
| Tuesday May 17 21:16:54 2011 Re: NCIS Pyrimad |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Not even 1.5 seconds Even 1.5 seconds could have made a good scene if we could have gotten at least one good frame of film of her gagged face, but we did not even get that! |
| Kaman |
| Tuesday May 17 21:18:49 2011 Re: NCIS Pyrimad |
| Kaman wrote: > Even 1.5 seconds could have made a good scene if we could > have gotten at least one good frame of film of her gagged > face, but we did not even get that! Was she unconscious or awake during the split-second shot? |
| Tuesday May 17 21:40:11 2011 NCIS Pyrimad |
| The Gibbs team enters a barn with guns drawn, they she a toy monkey banging on some cymbols, your hear a distant mmmphhing sound hopes are raised, long side shot (not too focused) of a woman taped gagged a hand reaches in front of the face and pulls the tape off without really any true shot of Cote BS BS BS BS#@^%$ |
| Tuesday May 17 21:45:29 2011 NCIS Pyrimad |
| This is defenatly not a keeper, because what is there to keep. I suppose when put p[ut this to digital you may be able to get a close up of the two frames she is in. You might even see if it truly is Cote |
| Tuesday May 17 21:53:48 2011 Re: charlie's angels preview vid |
| The Moderator wrote: > A reminder, again, that this is not a TV discussion > forum. The merits of a program are not on-topic. Anything > further will be removed. Question: Are the merits of the scene and it's quality or why you liked it or disliked it also off topic? Thanks. |
| Tuesday May 17 21:57:51 2011 Frustration Hall of Fame |
| I can't compose a dBase entry for tonight's Zivapocalypse 'cause I'm a Leftcoaster and haven't actually seen it yet. However, until that happens, my all time greatest example of directorial DiD incompetence is: ------- Record number: 656 Title: Quantum Leap Medium: TV Series Actress: Claudia Christian Description: Episode: "Play it Again, Seymour - April 14, 1953"(1.9) This just missed being a classic (due to crappy camera work). She's been kidnapped, and is held B&G by the bad guy in a warehouse. There's a big shootout with Sam, and they keep showing shots of the crook. You can see Claudia behind him, however, she's far enough into background that the shots are always out of focus. You can just barely make out the white cleave gag. Not a single damn closeup, not even when he unties her. Action occurs in the last 10 minutes. ------- Imagine... You're the director. A *GORGEOUS* woman at least *pretending* to be bound & gagged is ALREADY IN THE SHOT, and all you have to do is tell the cameraman to do one of those push-in-then-pull-back things with the lens to capture the foreground *AND* the background... and you don't do it. Aaaaaaaagh! |
 |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Tuesday May 17 22:01:29 2011 Re: Frustration Hall of Fame |
| Lena Hedy in that one movie where she is tape-gagged. We finally get the strong-willed heroine of Terminator tied up, and the scene is ruined by the awful, nonsensical gag and the sobbing. Also, Marion Cotillard. |
| Tuesday May 17 22:22:18 2011 Re: Frustration Hall of Fame |
| Van wrote: > I can't compose a dBase entry for tonight's Zivapocalypse > 'cause I'm a Leftcoaster and haven't actually seen it > yet. However, until that happens, my all time greatest > example of directorial DiD incompetence is: > ------- > Record number: 656 > Title: Quantum Leap > Medium: TV Series > Actress: Claudia Christian > Description: Episode: "Play it Again, Seymour - > The litany of directorial incompetence is long and pathetic. In addition to this classic, you can add Teri Hatcher photographed from the back in the "Resurrection" episode of "Lois & Clark", Marilu Henner barely glimpsed in "Stark", Catherine Bach tied behind Boss Hogg in "Dukes of Hazzard", and my number one lost-opportunity irritant, "The Mean Season" with Mariel Hemingway. She is kidnapped by the killer, and after being rescued, talks about being left tied nearby in the woods.... but there is not one frame of film of her tied, not even out of focus. To this day, I still don't know if they filmed the scene and decided to cut it out of the film, or if in a suspense thriller they decided they didn't need to build any suspense by showing what was going on. To rub salt in the wound, in her entire career, she never did get a decent scene, just one half-assed no-gag tie-up in a comedy. |
| Gagster |
| Tuesday May 17 22:51:50 2011 Re: Frustration Hall of Fame |
| Gagster wrote: >...and my number one > lost-opportunity irritant, "The Mean Season" > with Mariel Hemingway. She is kidnapped by the killer, > and after being rescued, talks about being left tied > nearby in the woods.... As I recall (I saw "The Mean Season" years ago) after her kidnapping, Mariel had ropeburns on her wrists. It's like they were *toying* with us! Aaaaaaargh! |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Tuesday May 17 22:55:25 2011 Aurora Grand Finale |
| The promo for the grand finale of Aurora shows a blonde being pushed in a chair and having her hands tied behind her back. I don't know if she'll be gagged but it may be worth a look. Maybe they'll NCIS how its done. The scene is supposed to take place Friday May 20, 2011. |
| Jack Bauer |
| Tuesday May 17 23:26:41 2011 Re: Frustration Hall of Fame |
| > The litany of directorial incompetence is long and > pathetic. This will sound unnecessarily nitpicky and a tiny bit off-topic (I'll be brief), but sometimes it's not purely the director's fault. Directors often shoot closeups and shots from other angles that never make the final cut. They get edited out for lots of reasons, like trimming the show down for commercials (on TV), generally poor editing, etc. Let's remember that the director gave us a nice big closeup of Lois's first gag scene in Smallville, but the episode that aired gave us the tiniest split-second of the shot before the gag came out. The promo showed that there were better shots before the ungagging. That said, we've all mourned some "How could you!" scenes... Mia Sara in Caroline at Midnight, seen only from far away; the two lovely ladies in Children of the Corn, seen only in a wide shot before being ungagged; adorable Sybil Temchen in She Spies, whose back is to the camera when cleave-gagged (though we got a decent shot of Natasha Henstridge in the same situation)... But the one that really gets me (though it predates me) is the episode of Mod Squad where gorgeous Peggy Lipton is cleave-gagged for a good bit... but not only has a blindfold on the whole time, but a large triangle of it is obscuring her face all the while. Every decade has at least a couple of those "That doesn't count! Try it again!" scenes. |
| Miss Cleo |
| Tuesday May 17 23:27:49 2011 Clarification... |
| I meant Children of the Corn II in the previous post, not the first film. Accidentally left that off. |
| Miss Cleo |
| Tuesday May 17 23:40:58 2011 Re: Frustration Hall of Fame |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Lena Hedy in that one movie where she is tape-gagged. What movie was this? Found nothing like that in DB |
|
|